UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
 
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨
Check the appropriate box:
xPreliminary Proxy Statement
oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
oDefinitive Proxy Statement
oDefinitive Additional Materials
oSoliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):
xNo fee required.required
oFee paid previously with preliminary materials
oFee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:
oFee paid previously with preliminary materials.
oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:
  












PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT—SUBJECT TO COMPLETION











lillylogorgbreda05a.jpg





Notice of 20222023
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and Proxy Statement

lly-20230224_g1.jpg











YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT


Please
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
Thank you for your continued support of, and investment in, Eli Lilly and Company. We are proud of Lilly’s achievements in 2022. We made several key regulatory and pipeline advancements with the potential to help people with diabetes, immune disorders, neurodegenerative conditions, and cancer. In particular, we introduced an important new type 2 diabetes treatment and added new indications to currently marketed products. And finally, we worked hard to deliver value to you, our shareholders. We delivered strong total shareholder returns through December 31, 2022, in terms of both total share price appreciation and dividends.
We also strengthened our initiatives in support of patients and communities, including collaborating to enhance sustainable access to affordable insulin in Africa, expanding our use of solar energy at global facilities, and partnering with UNICEF to help improve health outcomes for 10 million children and adolescents.
Our board continues to prioritize meaningful engagement with our shareholders and other key stakeholders. Since our 2022 annual meeting, we have spoken with a number of investors on an array of subjects, including: drug pricing transparency and global access to our products; product quality and safety; key enterprise risks and environmental, social and governance topics.
We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive feedback that we receive from our stakeholders. As a result of this input, and as in past years, the board is putting forward management proposals at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders (the Annual Meeting) to eliminate the classified board structure and supermajority voting requirements in our articles of incorporation.
lly-20230224_g2.jpg
We remain committed to serving you and making life better for millions of people around the world. We look forward to welcoming you to the Annual Meeting.
Sincerely,
lly-20230224_g3.jpg
lly-20230224_g4.jpg
lly-20230224_g5.jpg
lly-20230224_g6.jpg
David A. Ricks
Chair, President and CEO
Juan Luciano
Lead Independent Director




Table of Contents
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Proxy Statement Summary
Governance
Director Qualifications
Director Nominations
Item 1 - Election of Directors
Working Dynamics
Board Structure
Governance Practices
Board Alignment
Communication with the Board of Directors
Shareholder Engagement on Governance Issues
Ownership of Company Stock
Compensation
Item 2 - Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of the Compensation Paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers
Talent and Compensation Committee Matters
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Compensation
CEO Pay Ratio
Pay versus Performance
Item 3 - Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Named Executive Officer Compensation
Audit Matters
Item 4 - Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Auditor
Management Proposals
Item 5 - Proposal to Amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to Eliminate the Classified Board Structure
Item 6 - Proposal to Amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to Eliminate Supermajority Voting Provisions
Shareholder Proposals
Item 7 - Proposal to Publish an Annual Report Disclosing Lobbying Activities
Item 8 - Proposal to Eliminate Supermajority Voting Requirements
Item 9 - Proposal to Establish and Report on a Process by which the Impact of Extended Patent Exclusivities on Product Access Would be Considered in Deciding Whether to Apply for Secondary and Tertiary Patents
Item 10 - Proposal to Report on Risks of Supporting Abortion
Item 11 - Proposal to Disclose Lobbying Activities and Alignment with Public Policy Positions and Statements
Item 12 - Proposal to Report on Effectiveness of the Company’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts
Item 13 - Proposal to Adopt a Policy to Require Certain Third-Party Organizations to Annually Report Expenditures for Political Activities before Lilly Contributes to an Organization
Other Information
Meeting and Voting Logistics
Other Matters
Appendix A - Summary of Adjustments Related to the Annual Cash Bonus and Performance Award
A-1
Appendix B - Proposed Amendments to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation
B-1
Frequently Referenced Topics
Board Diversity
Board Skills Matrix
Board and Committee Oversight of:
ESG
Cybersecurity
Human Capital Management
Political Activities
Lead Independent Director Duties
Share Ownership and Retention Guidelines
Compensation Recovery Policy (Clawback)
Hedging and Pledging Restrictions
Transactions with Related Persons
This proxy statement contains forward-looking statements, including those regarding our emissions, diversity and inclusion and other sustainability commitments and goals; our strategies and financial performance; our development of new products and technologies, and other statements that are not historical fact, and actual results could differ materially. Risks that could cause actual results to differ are set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of, and elsewhere in, our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements are based on management estimates, projections, and assumptions as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update any such statements. Certain documents and information referenced in this proxy statement are available on our website. However, we are not including the information contained on our website, or any information that may be accessed by links on our website, as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this proxy statement.



Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Item 1Election of each of the four director nominees to serve three-year terms
Item 2Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the company’s named executive officers
Item 3Advisory vote on frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation
Item 4Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditor for 2023
Item 5Approval of amendments to the company’s articles of incorporation to eliminate the classified board structure
Item 6Approval of amendments to the company’s articles of incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting provisions
Item 7Shareholder proposal to publish an annual report disclosing lobbying activities
Item 8Shareholder proposal to eliminate supermajority voting requirements
Item 9Shareholder proposal to establish and report on a process by which the impact of extended patent exclusivities on product access would be considered in deciding whether to apply for secondary and tertiary patents
Item 10Shareholder proposal to report on risks of supporting abortion
Item 11Shareholder proposal to disclose lobbying activities and alignment with public policy positions and statements
Item 12Shareholder proposal to report on effectiveness of the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts
Item 13Shareholder proposal to adopt a policy to require certain third-party organizations to annually report expenditures for political activities before Lilly contributes to an organization
ADMISSION
lly-20230224_g7.gif
WHEN
8:30 a.m. EDT
Monday, May 1, 2023
The 2023 annual meeting of shareholders (the Annual Meeting) of Eli Lilly and Company will be held virtually via live webcast.
The webcast is designed to provide shareholders the opportunity to participate virtually to facilitate shareholder attendance and to provide a consistent experience to all shareholders, regardless of location. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting, vote, and submit questions virtually via live webcast by visiting virtualshareholdersmeeting.com/LLY2023. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting webcast, you must enter the 16-digit control number found on the proxy card, voting instruction form, or notice you received. For further information on Annual Meeting logistics, see the section titled “Other InformationMeeting and Voting Logistics.”
This proxy statement is dated March 17, 2023. We mailed a notice of internet availability of proxy materials on or about that date to our shareholders of record as of February 21, 2023 (other than those who previously requested electronic or paper delivery of our proxy materials and certain participants in The Lilly Employee 401(k) plan (401(k) Plan)).
lly-20230224_g8.gif
WHERE
Virtually at www.virtualshareholder
meeting.com/LLY2023
lly-20230224_g9.gif
RECORD DATE
February 21, 2023
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Every shareholder vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote promptly online, by telephone, or, if you received or requested paper copies of your proxy materials, by signing, dating, and returning your proxy card or voting instruction form by mail.mail, so that a quorum may be represented at the meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Anat Hakim
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
March 17, 2023
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the shareholder meeting to be held May 2, 2022:
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING
TO BE HELD MAY 1, 2023:
The annual report to shareholders and proxy statement are available at ProxyVote.com
as well as on our website at lilly.com/policies-reports/annual-report.

1



ricksround40a.jpglucianoround.jpgProxy Statement Summary


From
Powered by Purpose
Our Chair and Lead Independent Director

Dear fellow Lilly shareholders,
Thank youpurpose is to unite caring with discovery to create medicines that make life better for your continued support of, and investment in, Eli Lilly and Company. We are proud of Lilly's achievements in 2021. We delivered on important pipeline advancements that help people with diabetes, immune disorders, neurodegenerative disorders, and cancer, continued our efforts to fight COVID-19, and strengthened our initiatives in support of patients and communities. We also worked hard to deliver value to you, our shareholders. We generated strong total shareholder returns through December 31, 2021, in terms of both share price appreciation and dividends.
To supportaround the health and well-beingworld. This purpose fuels every aspect of our employees, boardbusiness, as we aspire to:
Discover first or best-in-class molecules from internal and external sources that address significant unmet needs by integrating disease understanding with innovative scientific capabilities;
Develop molecules faster than competitors by executing clinical plans that maximize the human and economic value of directors, shareholders, and other meeting participants, and to facilitate broad shareholder attendance and provide a consistent experience to all shareholders, regardless of location, the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting) will be held virtually via live webcast. We learned during the virtual annual meetings held in 2020 and 2021 that this format, in addition to being safer during the COVID-19 pandemic, actually enables more shareholders to attend, and gives our leadership team time to address more questions from those in attendance.medicines we launch;
As part of our mission to improve livesReachpeople around the world we are committedby creating volume-driven uptake and broad access to creating a safe supportive, ethical, and rewarding work environment. Lilly’s core valuesreliable supply of integrity, excellence, and respect for people, and our dedication to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are critical components of how we do business. We take a holistic approach because we’re a stronger company when we have a workforce of top talent from different backgrounds—people who are respected, valued, welcomed, and heard. To fulfill our purpose, we must look at challenges from multiple viewpoints and understand the diverse experiences of the patients who depend on us. In short, our differences make a difference—to patients and to our business.life-changing medicines;
Our board recognizes that one of its key responsibilities is to ensure that Lilly is governed in a manner that provides both independent oversight and efficient and effective decision-making. Our chief executive officer brings to the role of chair of our board substantial strategic and operational perspectives and a unique understanding of Lilly's opportunities and challenges. This familiarity withScale our business as well as extensive experienceby prioritizing investments into medicines that can deliver the greatest value for customers and leadershipcan drive long-term sustainable growth; and
Reinvest profits into our next wave of innovation and generate value for our investors.
Highlights of 2022 Performance
We continued to progress our strategy in our industry, positions our CEO to establish the agenda and drive strategy at the board level. Further, our lead independent director, currently CEO of a Fortune 100 company, elucidates an "outside in" analysis of company decisions and2022, focusing on four dimensions: operating performance, maintains frequent contact with our chair to ensure a productive partnership between our independent directors and management, and leads our independent directors in their important oversight function.
Our board continues to prioritize meaningful engagement with our shareholders and other key stakeholders. Since our 2021 annual meeting, we have spoken with a number of investors on an array of subjects, including: board leadership; environmental, social and governance topics; drug pricing transparencymatters, our innovation pipeline and global access toother business development, and shareholder return (both absolute and relative). See our products; product quality and safety; key enterprise risks; executive compensation; DEI; and human capital management.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, for more details.
We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive feedback that we receive from our stakeholders. As a result of this input, as in past years, the board is putting forward management proposals at the Annual Meeting to eliminate the classified board structure and supermajority voting requirements in our articles of incorporation. In addition, the board is putting forward a management proposal to amend our articles of incorporation to provide shareholders the ability to amend our bylaws.
We remain committed to serving you and the millions of patients around the world whose lives it is our mission to make better. We look forward to welcoming you at the Annual Meeting.
Sincerely,
drickssigrgba.jpglly-20230224_g10.gif
Operating Performance
$28.5
billion
in 2022 revenue
jlsigrgbv2a.jpg$6.90
earnings per share (EPS)
in 2022 on a reported basis, up from $6.12 in 2021
$7.94
EPS on a
non-GAAP basis
in 2022
David A. RicksJuan Luciano
Chair, President,
Reported results were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and CEO
Lead Independent Directorinclude all revenue and expenses recognized during the periods. A reconciliation of EPS on a reported basis to EPS on a non-GAAP basis is included in Appendix A.




Table of Contents
Management Proposals to Eliminate Classified Board, to Eliminate Supermajority Voting Provisionsand to Give Shareholders the Ability to Amend Bylaws
Ownership of Company Stock
Compensation
Audit Matters
Management Proposals
Item 6 - Proposal to Amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to Give Shareholders the Ability to Amend the Company’s Bylaws
Shareholder Proposals
Item7 - Proposal to Amend the Bylaws to Require an Independent Board Chair
Item8-Proposal to Publish an Annual Report Disclosing Lobbying Activities
Item 9 - Proposal to Disclose Lobbying Activities and Alignment with Public Policy Positions and Statements
Item 10 - Proposal to Report Oversight of Risks Related to Anticompetitive Pricing Strategies
Other Information
Appendix C - Proposed Amendments to the Company's Articles of Incorporation




Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
To the holders of common stock of Eli Lilly and Company:
The 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting) of Eli Lilly and Company (referred to as Lilly, we, us, or the company in this proxy statement) will be held at the time and location below:
TIME AND DATE
lly-20230224_g11.jpg
LOCATIONEnvironmental, Social, and GovernanceWHO CAN VOTE
11:00 a.m. EDT,
Monday, May
Innovative collaboration to deliver high-quality, affordable human and analogue insulinto at
lly-20230224_g12.jpg
New solar parking canopy in Fegersheim, France capable of producing approximately
4,200
megawatt-hours of electricity a year, progressing our 2030 goal to be carbon neutral in our own operations
Achieved an
A-
lly-20230224_g13.gif
least one million people living with type 1 and type 2 2022diabetes in low- to middle-income countries, most of which are in Africa
Virtuallyscore foreach of our climate and water 2022 CDP submissions, above the sector average
Racial Justice Pledge Progress From 2020 through 2022*
30,000+
volunteer hours
served by employees to
advance racial justice
initiatives since 2020
$214.7M
increase
in Black Business
Enterprises spend; 150%
increase over 2020
70+
apprentices
from underrepresented groups trained for family sustaining jobs at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2022Lilly without a four-year degree
Shareholders of record at the close of business on February 22, 2022
To support the health*For additional information on our Racial Justice Pledge and well-being of our employees, board of directors, shareholders, and other meeting participants, the Annual Meeting will be held virtually via live webcast.progress see “GovernanceHow We have designed the Annual Meeting live webcast to provide shareholders the opportunity to participate virtually to facilitate shareholder attendance and to provide a consistent experience to all shareholders, regardless of location.Operate an Effective BoardGovernance PracticesHuman Capital Management”.
This proxy statement is dated March 18, 2022. We mailed a notice of internet availability of proxy materials on or about that date toour shareholders of record as of February 22, 2022 (other than those who previously requested electronic or paper delivery of our proxy materials and certain participants in The Lilly Employee 401(k) plan (401(k) Plan)).
2


ITEMS OF BUSINESS
GovernanceBoard Voting RecommendationPage Reference
Item 1Election of each of the three director nominees to serve three-year terms
FOR
each of the director nominees
Compensation
Item
lly-20230224_g14.gif
Innovation Pipeline and Other Business Development
New Indications
U.S. approvalof Mounjaro (tirzepatide), the first and only GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes
Approval,
lly-20230224_g15.jpg
U.S. approval of Retevmo (selpercatinib), the first and only RET inhibitor for adults with advanced or metastatic solid tumors with a RET gene fusion, regardless of type
lly-20230224_g16.jpg
In collaboration with Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, U.S. approval of a new indication for Jardiance (empagliflozin) to treat adults with heart failure regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction
In collaboration with Incyte Corporation, U.S. approval of Olumiant (baricitinib) as a first-in-disease systemic treatment for adults with severe alopecia areata
lly-20230224_g17.jpg
lly-20230224_g18.jpg
Key Data Readouts
We announced several key data readouts in 2022, including:
Positive results from tirzepatide’s Phase III SURMOUNT-1 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide compared to placebo in adults with obesity. We received U.S. FDA Fast Track designation and initiated a rolling submission that will be based primarily on these results and those of SURMOUNT-2, which is expected to complete in the first half of 2023;
Positive results from two studies of lebrikizumab’s Phase III programs evaluating the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in people with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis through one year of treatment;
Positive results for Jardiance (empagliflozin) in the Phase III EMPA-KIDNEY study evaluating efficacy and safety compared to placebo for the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease; and
Updated data from the monarchE Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Verzenio (abemaciclib) in combination with standard endocrine therapy for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), node-positive, high- risk early breast cancer. We submitted an advisory basis,application to the FDA to expand the adjuvant indication based on these data.
Other Business Development Activities
Acquisition: acquired Akouos, Inc. to accelerate gene therapies that aim to restore, improve, and preserve hearing for patients living with disabling hearing loss worldwide.
15+
acquisitions, license agreements, and research collaborations in 2022
License: expanded our licensing and collaboration agreement with ProQR to leverage ProQR’s Axiomer RNA editing platform technology to include additional targets beyond the liver and the nervous system, which were the focus of the compensation paid to the company's named executive officers
FOR
Audit Matters
Item 3Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditor for 2022FOR
Management Proposals
Item 4Approval of amendments to the company’s Articles of Incorporation to eliminate the classified board structureFOR
Item 5Approval of amendments to the company’s Articles of Incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting provisionsFOR
Item 6Approval of amendments to the company's Articles of Incorporation to give shareholders the ability to amend the company's bylawsFOR
Shareholder Proposals
Item 7Shareholder proposal to amend the bylaws to require an independent board chair, if properly presented at the meetingAGAINST
Item 8Shareholder proposal to publish an annual report disclosing lobbying activities, if properly presented at the meetingAGAINST
Item 9Shareholder proposal to disclose lobbying activities and alignment with public policy positions and statements, if properly presented at the meetingAGAINST
Item 10Shareholder proposal to report oversight of risks related to anticompetitive pricing strategies, if properly presented at the meetingAGAINST
78original agreement from September 2021.
Admission Procedure for Attending the Annual Meeting
3
You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting, vote, and submit questions virtually via live webcast by visiting virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2022. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting webcast, you must enter the 16-digit control number found on the proxy card, voting instruction form, or notice you received. You may vote during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions available on virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2022 during the Annual Meeting.
For further information on how to attend the Annual Meeting, see the section titled "Other Information—Meeting and Voting Logistics."
1



Every shareholder vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote promptly online, by telephone, or, if you received or requested paper copies of your proxy materials, by signing, dating, and returning your proxy card or voting instructions by mail, so that a quorum may be represented at the meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Ms. Anat Hakim
lly-20230224_g19.gif
 Shareholder Return
34%
2022 Total Shareholder Return

Consistently Exceeded Compensation Peer Group and S&P 500
in Total Shareholder Return
in 2022 and the three- and five-year periods shown below
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
lly-20230224_g20.jpg
TSR takes into account both share price appreciation and Secretary
March 18, 2022
Indianapolis, Indianadividends. Any dividends paid by a given company are assumed to be reinvested in the company’s stock on a quarterly basis.
2


Proxy Statement Summary
New in This Year's Proxy Statement
In 2021 we focused on advancing our pipeline to help people with diabetes, immune disorders, neurodegenerative disorders, and cancer. In addition, we have continued to support patients, communities, and our employees affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
We have undertaken a detailed review of our sustainability efforts, how we communicate progress toward our Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) goals, and our broader ESG strategy. In 2021, we established new 2030 sustainability goals and held an ESG stakeholder day to share our strategy and progress. In 2021, we also issued Lilly’s first sustainability bond, which will help fund projects that will contribute to our ESG objectives.In this proxy statement, you will find additional information about our approach to ESG and sustainability. See "Governance—Highlights of the Company’s Corporate Governance—Environmental, Social and Governance."
In addition, we recently enhanced our disclosures related to our lobbying and political activities. For additional information, see “Governance—Highlights of the Company’s Corporate Governance—Political and Policy Participation.”
Our board has approved, and recommends that our shareholders approve, three important management proposals at the Annual Meeting. As in past years, the board recommends approval of amendments to the company’s articles of incorporation to eliminate the classified board structure (see Item 4 herein) and to eliminate supermajority voting provisions (see Item 5 herein). The board also recommends approval of amendments to the company’s articles of incorporation to give shareholders the ability to amend our bylaws (see Item 6 herein). The board believes these three proposals balance shareholder interests and demonstrate its accountability and willingness to take steps that address concerns expressed by shareholders.
Michael L. Eskew, who joined the board in 2008 and serves as the Chair of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, will retire from the board following the Annual Meeting.
Highlights of 2021 Performance
The following provides a brief overview of our 2021 performance in four dimensions: operating performance, progress in our innovation pipeline, business development, and shareholder return, both absolute and relative. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 for more details.
We continued to progress our company's purpose and strategy in 2021 as we remained focused on:
discovering, developing and acquiring first- or best-in-class medicines to address significant unmet needs in our core therapeutic areas—diabetes, immunology, neuroscience, and oncology;
reaching patients who can benefit from our innovative medicines around the world, directly and through partnership with healthcare systems and collaborators, providing broad access to safe, life-changing medicines;
focusing our time and resources on new medicines that patients value most, delivering volume-driven sustainable growth;
expanding our manufacturing footprint and bolstering our supply chain to support our growing portfolio; and
reinvesting in our business and our people to discover new medicines to address unmet medical needs, improve cost productivity, reduce environmental impact, and supply quality medicines, while returning capital to shareholders.
We believe our strategic choices, coupled with robust execution, delivered significant value for shareholders and patients in 2021. We reached over 47 million patients globally with our medicines, expanded our patient support programs, achieved significant pipeline advancements and key data readouts across our core therapeutic areas, leveraged external innovation to expand our pipeline, and delivered high total shareholder returns relative to our peers and the S&P 500 index. The discussion below expands on our considerable success in 2021.
Operating Performance
Performance highlights:
2021 revenue increased 15 percent to approximately $28.3 billion;
2021 earnings per share (EPS) on a reported basis were $6.12, compared to 2020 EPS on a reported basis of $6.79; and
on a non-GAAP basis, 2021 EPS increased 20 percent to $8.16.
Reported results were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and include all revenue and expenses recognized during the periods. A reconciliation of EPS on a reported basis to EPS on a non-GAAP basis is included in Appendix A.
3


2021 Innovation and Business Development Progress
We made significant pipeline advances in 2021, including:
U.S. approval of a new indication for Verzenio® (abemaciclib) for certain people with high-risk, early breast cancer;
in collaboration with Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, U.S. and European Union approval of a new indication for Jardiance® in adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with and without diabetes;
in collaboration with AbCellera Biologics Inc. and Junshi Biosciences Co., Ltd., the U.S. FDA granted Emergency Use Authorization for the administration of bamlanivimab and etesevimab together as a treatment for COVID-19 in patients at high risk for hospitalization; and
in collaboration with Incyte Corporation, approval in Japan for Olumiant® (baricitinib), in combination with remdesivir, as a treatment for COVID-19.
We announced several key data readouts in 2021, including:
positive topline results from four studies from tirzepatide’s Phase III type 2 diabetes program, SURPASS-2, 3, 4, and 5, and regulatory submission for tirzepatide for type 2 diabetes in the U.S. to which Lilly applied a priority review voucher, as well as submission in Europe and Japan;
positive topline results from donanemab’s TRAILBLAZER-ALZ, a Phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of donanemab compared to placebo in patients with early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease;
updated data for pirtobrutinib from the LOXO-305 BRUIN Phase I/II clinical trial in mantle cell lymphoma and other non-Hodgkin lymphomas, as well as in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma, at the 2021 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting;
positive topline results from mirikizumab’s Phase III LUCENT-1 and 2 studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab compared to placebo for the treatment of patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis;
positive topline results from three studies of lebrikizumab’s Phase III program evaluating the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in people with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis; and
in collaboration with Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, positive topline results from a Phase III study of Jardiance® (empagliflozin) in adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with and without diabetes, and submissions in the U.S., Europe, and Japan.
We also completed over fifteen acquisitions, license agreements, and research collaborations to complement our pipeline in 2021, including:
acquisition of Prevail Therapeutics Inc. to complement our existing expertise as we work to develop a gene therapy platform anchored by Prevail’s portfolio of clinical-stage and late pre-clinical stage gene therapies across a range of neurodegenerative disorders;
acquisition of Protomer Technologies Inc., a private biotechnology company whose proprietary peptide- and protein-engineering platform is used to identify and synthesize molecules that can sense glucose or other endogenous modulators of protein activity; and
entry into a global exclusive license agreement and strategic collaboration with Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to co-develop and commercialize Rigel’s R552, a receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) inhibitor for all indications, including autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.
4


Shareholder Returns
We generated strong total shareholder returns (TSR) through December 31, 2021. Our TSR takes into account both share price appreciation and dividends. Any dividends paid by a given company are assumed to be reinvested in that company’s stock on a quarterly basis. Our returns significantly exceeded our compensation peer group and the S&P 500 during the three- and five-year periods presented below:
totalshareholderreturn5a.jpg
Health, Safety and Welfare
In 2021, we continued to supply our therapies for COVID-19 and continued our research and development efforts and our partnership with regulators and governments to bring COVID-19 treatments to patients around the world. ThroughoutAs the COVID-19 pandemic has evolved, we have prioritized maintaining supply of and access to our medicines, particularly insulin, reducing the strainremained focused on the medical system, protecting the health, safety, and well-being of our employees,employees; supporting the medical system and supporting our workforce, affected communities,communities; and patients who needaffordability of and access to our medicines.
Maintaining Supplies of and Access to Lilly Medicines
Throughout 2021,2022, we continued our efforts to protect our manufacturing processes and remained in close communication with key suppliers regarding logistics, transportation, and supplies of raw materials. As a result,While we were ablehave faced challenges, and expect to largely maintain our normal operations and continue to provide medicines on which millionsface challenges, meeting strong demand for our incretin products, we expect significant additional manufacturing capacity will become operational starting in 2023 and continuing over the next several years as part of patients rely inour ongoing efforts to meet the face of global supply chain challenges. significant demand for our incretin medicines.
We also continued patient support programs to ensure patients maintained affordable access to their medications and adjusted how we operate to offer innovative solutions to our customers. We remain committed to working with stakeholders in healthcare systems to help patients get the medicines they need, including through our Insulin Value Program, which allows anyone with commercial insurance and those without insurance to fill their monthly prescription of Lilly insulin for $35, as well as our other access and affordability initiatives.
Working to Ensure Diversity in Clinical Trials
We continue to identify and address barriers to fair access and representation of communities in our clinical research to help develop innovative medicines. Diverse representation in clinical trials is critical to helping our researchers develop medicines that will be as effective as possible for patients who use them. We are working to ensure trial participants match the composition of the patient population that might use the trial’s medicine by selecting diverse investigators and collaborating with external groups to identify and implement solutions. We collaborate with patients, patient advocacy groups, regulatory agencies, health care professionals and community organizations to identify and implement solutions that will result in diverse representation, improve health equity and generate evidence to support better patient outcomes.
Keeping Our Employees Safe and Healthy
We remain focused on protecting the health and safety of our employees and strive to foster a healthy, vibrant work environment. For additional information on our employee health and safety initiatives, see "Governance—Highlights of the Company’s Corporate Governance—GovernanceHow We Operate and Effective BoardGovernance PracticesHuman Capital Management—Employee Health and Safety."Management.”
54



GovernanceBoard Leadership and Composition Highlights
Item 1: Election of Directors
For further information, see page 11

Director Nominee Snapshot
NameAgeDirector SinceOther Public BoardsPrincipal OccupationCommittee Membership
lly-20230224_g21.jpg
William G. Kaelin, Jr., M.D.
Independent Director
6520120Sidney Farber professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Professor, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute
lly-20230224_g22.jpgScience & Technology

lly-20230224_g22.jpgDirectors & Corporate Governance
lly-20230224_g23.jpg
David A. Ricks
Chair of the Board
5520171Chair, President and Chief Executive Officer, Eli Lilly and CompanyNone
lly-20230224_g24.jpg
Marschall S. Runge, M.D., Ph.D.
Independent Director
6820130CEO, Michigan Medicine, Executive Vice President for Medical Affairs and Dean, Medical School, University of Michigan
lly-20230224_g22.jpgEthics & Compliance

lly-20230224_g22.jpgScience & Technology
lly-20230224_g25.jpg
Karen Walker
Independent Director
6120181Operating Partner, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
lly-20230224_g26.jpgTalent and Compensation

lly-20230224_g26.jpgAudit
Name, age* and principal occupationPublic boardsManagement recommendationVote required to pass
alvarezrounda.jpg
Ralph Alvarez, 66

Operating Partner, Advent International Corporation

Director since 2009
Lowe's Companies, Inc.; Traeger, Inc.; First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.Vote FORMajority of votes cast
johnsonrounda.jpg
Kimberly H. Johnson, 49

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)

Director since 2021
Retirement
Vote FORMajority of votes cast
lucianoround.jpg
Juan R. Luciano, 60

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company

Director since 2016; Lead Independent Director since 2019
Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyVote FORMajority of votes cast
Jackson P. Tai, who joined the board in 2013 and serves on the Audit Committee and the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, will retire from the board following the Annual Meeting pursuant to our retirement policy.
*Age is as of the date of this proxy statement.
Our Corporate Governance Policies Reflect Best Practices
StrategyBoard Leadership and risk oversightStructure
üOur board approves and actively oversees our corporate strategy.
üOur board and board committee agendas are structured to engage our directors in informed reviews of strategic and forward-looking issues, as well as in constructive challenges to management initiatives and programs.
üOur board reviews the overall state of our compliance program at least annually and reviews our enterprise-level risks, including related to cybersecurity; our Audit Committee oversees the process by which we identify and create mitigation plans for enterprise-level risks.
üOur board and Audit Committee receive regular presentations on cybersecurity from our management as part of their oversight of enterprise-level risks; in addition to regular presentations, management updates our board regarding changes to the broader cybersecurity landscape, as well as significant threats or incidents as they arise.
üWe have a comprehensive code of business conduct, called The Red Book, which applies to our board and all employees worldwide. This code is reviewed and approved annually by the board, and in 2022 we revised The Red Book training to update our Global Conduct in the Workplace procedure to continue to help ensure that we maintain a respectful, safe, inclusive, and professional workplace.
üWe have a supplemental code of conduct for our CEO and all members of financial management, in recognition of their unique responsibilities to ensure proper accounting, financial reporting, internal controls, and financial stewardship.
üThe charters of our board committees clearly establish the committees’ respective roles and responsibilities.
üWe have an annual cap on director compensation.
6


Board skills and experience
üOur board membership is characterized by leadership, experience, and diversity.
üWe conduct comprehensive orientation and continuing education programs for directors.
üOur board conducts a robust annual assessment of board performance led by the lead independent director, including an annual assessment of each director.
üWe are committed to maintaining an active and insightful board and seek to balance continuity of experience with fresh perspectives. Currently, eight directors have served on the board for more than five years and five directors have served on the board for five years or less.
Focus on independence
üEach of our current board members other than the CEO is independent (12 of our 13 directors as of the date of this proxy statement).
üLead Independent Director:We have a strong lead independent director empowered with clearly defined responsibilities.
ü
Independent Committees: All standing board committees are composed solely of independent directors and led by independent committee chairs.
ü
Executive Sessions:Our board holds executive sessions of the independent directors that are presided over by the lead independent director at every regular board meeting.
ü
Access to Management & Advisors:Our independent directors actively engage in board meetings, have direct access to management, and, along with our board committees, have discretion to hire independent advisors at the company’s expense.
üOur independent directors lead the board’s process for selecting the CEO.
üOur Compensation Committee (and, in the case
Conflict of our CEO, in consultation with other independent directors and our external compensation consultant) establishes the compensation for our CEO and other executive officers.
üInterest Management:Our conflict of interest policy requires disclosures of potential conflicts to Lilly and clarifies when Lilly board service must be disclosed to others.
CEO Selection and Compensation: Our independent directors lead the board’s process for selecting the CEO. Our Talent and Compensation Committee (and, in the case of our CEO,
lly-20230224_g27.jpg
Information as of the date of this proxy statement.
Governance and accountability to shareholders
5


üin consultation with other independent directors and our external compensation consultant) establishes the compensation for our CEO and other executive officers.
Refreshment: We are committed to maintaining an active and insightful board and seek to balance continuity of experience with fresh perspectives.
Robust Annual Assessment: Our board values active shareholder engagement. In response to input from our shareholders, we have put forward for consideration atconducts a robust annual assessment of its performance led by the Annual Meeting management proposals to amend our articleslead independent director, including an annual assessment of incorporation to eliminate the classified board structure, to eliminate supermajority voting provisions in our articles of incorporation, and to give shareholders the ability to amend our bylaws.
üOur bylawseach director. These assessments help provide proxy access rights for shareholders holding at least three percent of our common stock for at least three years to nominate to the board the greater of two directors or 20 percent of our board seats.
üWe have a majority voting standardwith valuable perspectives to drive effectiveness and resignation policy for the election of directors in uncontested elections.
üWe do not have a shareholder rights plan ("poison pill").
üWe have meaningful stock ownership and retention guidelines for our directors and executive officers to foster alignment with shareholders.leadership.
Sustainability
üOur board has a longstanding commitment to corporate responsibility.
üWe have strong governance of corporate political spending and transparent policy engagement and recently enhanced our disclosures related to political and lobbying activities.
üOur board oversees and maintains ongoing engagement with our Compensation Committee, Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, and senior executives on key political, social, and governance matters, including sustainability and human capital management.
ü We enhanced our environmental, social, and governance sustainability reporting in 2021, including the adoption of additional prevalent reporting frameworks, and established new goals.
Strategy and Risk Oversight
CompensationStrategy: Our board approves and actively oversees our corporate long-term strategy. Our board and board committee agendas are structured to engage our directors in informed reviews of strategic and forward-looking issues, as well as in constructive challenges to management initiatives and programs.
Code of Conduct:Our code of business conduct reflects principles that are consistent with our company values of integrity, excellence, and respect for people, which are stated in The Red Book. This code applies to our board and all employees worldwide and is reviewed and approved annually by the board. In 2022 we revised The Red Book training to update our Global Conduct in the Workplace procedure to continue to help ensure that we maintain a respectful, safe, inclusive, and professional workplace. We have a supplemental code of conduct for our CEO and all members of financial management, in recognition of their unique responsibilities to ensure proper accounting, financial reporting, internal controls, and financial stewardship.
Corporate Governance: The charters of our board committees clearly establish the committees’ respective roles and responsibilities.
Compliance Program and Enterprise Risk Reviews:Our board reviews the overall state of our compliance program at least annually and regularly reviews our enterprise-level risks. Our Audit Committee oversees the process by which we identify and create mitigation plans for enterprise-level risks. See “Governance PracticesBoard Oversight” for additional information.
Board Oversight of Certain Key Areas
Item 2: Advisory Vote on Compensation Paid
to Named Executive Officers
Management recommendationVote required to pass
For furtherlly-20230224_g28.gif
lly-20230224_g29.gif
lly-20230224_g30.gif
lly-20230224_g31.gif
CybersecurityPolitical ActivityEnvironmentDEI
Our board and Audit Committee receive regular presentations on cybersecurity and information see page 37technology as part of their oversight of enterprise-level risks; in addition to regular presentations, management promptly updates our board regarding significant threats or incidents as they arise, as well as changes to the broader cybersecurity landscape.Vote FORMajorityOur board oversees our political expenditures and lobbying activities. Directors receive regular updates on public policy issues and on the company’s political corporate activity. The board also receives semi-annual updates on political engagement, including information on the contributions made by LillyPAC and the company, as well as trade association memberships.Our board, including its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, oversees and maintains ongoing engagement on key climate and sustainability matters.Our board exercises active oversight over the overall talent management process, including human capital management strategies, corporate culture, and DEI programs. The board also oversees the work of votes castits committees in connection with the board’s development of corporate policies and frameworks designed to attract, retain, engage, and develop a workforce that aligns with our values and mission.
76



Shareholder Access & Engagement
Engagement Response
In response to input from our shareholders and consistent with previous years, management is putting forth for consideration at the Annual Meeting proposals to amend our articles of incorporation to eliminate the classified board structure and to eliminate supermajority voting.
In response to input from our shareholders, at our 2022 annual meeting, management put forth, and shareholders approved, amendments to our articles of incorporation and bylaws to permit shareholders to amend the company’s bylaws.
Proxy Access
Our Executive bylaws provide proxy access rights for shareholders holding at least three percent of our common stock for at least three years to
nominate to the board the greater of two directors or 20 percent of our board seats.
Board Accountability
We have a majority voting standard and a resignation policy for the election of directors in uncontested elections.
Shareholders have the ability to amend our bylaws.
We do not have a shareholder rights plan (known as a “poison pill”).
We have meaningful stock ownership and retention guidelines for our directors and executive officers to foster alignment with shareholders.
We have an annual cap on director compensation.
Compensation
Compensation Programs Reflect Best Practices of Interest
Shareholders strongly support our compensation practices. For each of the last five years, greater than 94 percent of shares cast voted in favor of our executive compensation programs.
üShareholders strongly support our compensation practices: for the last five years, greater than 95 percent of shares cast voted in favor of our executive compensation programs.
üPay for Performance PhilosophyCompensation PoliciesWhat We Don’t Do
lly-20230224_g32.jpgOur compensation programs are designed to align executive pay with shareholder interests and link pay to performance through a blend of short- and long-term performance measures.
ü
lly-20230224_g32.jpgOur Talent and Compensation Committee annually reviews our compensation programs to help ensure they provide incentives to deliver long-term, sustainable business results while discouraging excessive risk-taking and other adverse behaviors.
ü
lly-20230224_g33.jpgWe have robust stock ownership and retention guidelines for executive officers.
lly-20230224_g33.jpgExecutive officers are prohibited from hedging or pledging their company stock.
lly-20230224_g33.jpgWe have a comprehensive compensation recovery or "clawback"“clawback” policy that applies to all executives and covers a wide range of misconduct. In 2021, we enhanced
lly-20230224_g33.jpgWe have a restrictive policy on perquisites.
lly-20230224_g33.jpgWe have double trigger change-in-control provisions in severance plans.
lly-20230224_g34.jpgWe don’t enter into employment agreements with any of our clawback policy toexecutive officers.
lly-20230224_g34.jpgWe don’t provide more robust disclosure around facts and circumstances triggering recoupment.
üOur executive officers are subject to robust stock ownership and retention guidelines and are prohibited from hedging or pledging their company stock. In 2021, we increased stock ownership and retention requirements for executive officers.
üWe do not have "top hat"“top hat” retirement plans. Supplemental plans are open to all employees and are limited to restoring benefits lost due to IRS limits on qualified plans.
ü
lly-20230224_g34.jpgWe do notdon’t provide tax gross-ups to executive officers (except for limited gross-ups related to international assignments).
üWe have a very restrictive policy on perquisites.
üOur severance plans related to change-in-control require a double trigger.
üWe do not have employment agreements with any of our executive officers.
Executive Compensation Summary for 20212022
At the timeend of 2022, the total target compensation was established at the end of 2020, the target compensation in aggregate for our named executive officers was comparable to the median of the company'scompany’s peer group. Incentive compensationBonus and equity payouts exceeded target, consistent with strong company performance over the bonus and equityrespective performance periods.
7


Pay for Performance
As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), we generally link our incentive pay programs to a mix of measures on three dimensions of company performance: operating performance; progress with our innovation pipeline; and shareholder return (both absolute and relative). The Talent and Compensation Committee adjusts reported EPS results to eliminate the distorting effect of certain unusual items on incentive compensation performance measures.
The summary below highlights how our incentive pay programs are intended to align with company performance. Please also see Appendix A for adjustments made to revenue and EPS for incentive compensation programs.
Bonus Plan Result: In 2022, the company exceeded its annual cash bonus target for revenue and nearly achieved its target for EPS. We also made significant pipeline advances. For purposes of the bonus, the Talent and Compensation Committee adjusted revenue and adjusted non-GAAP EPS to exclude estimated savings from certain discrete and unplanned performance items. See the CD&A for further discussion of the Eli Lilly and Company Bonus Plan (Bonus Plan).
1.20
Bonus Plan Multiple
2021-2023 Performance Award (PA) Result:We exceeded the two-year EPS growth target set for our PA program. The PA target is based on expected EPS growth of peer companies over a two-year period. As a result of exceeding the EPS growth target set for our PA program, the PA payout was above target. See the CD&A for further discussion on the PA program.
140%
2021-2023 PA Payout
2020-2022 Shareholder Value Award (SVA) Result:Our total stock price growth exceeded the target range in our SVA program, which is based on expected large-cap company returns over a three-year period. This performance resulted in a SVA payout above target. See the CD&A for further discussion on the SVA program.
175%
2020-2022 SVA Payout
2020-2022 Relative Value Award (RVA) Result: The RVA measures Lilly’s relative total shareholder return (TSR) against its peers. Lilly’s TSR performance exceeded the peer median TSR for the 2020-2022 performance period resulting in a payout above target. See the CD&A for further discussion on the RVA program.
175%
2020-2022 RVA Payout
In 2021, the company exceeded its annual cash bonus target for revenue and nearly achieved its target for EPS. We also made significant pipeline advances. For purposes of the bonus, the Compensation Committee adjusted revenue and non-GAAP EPS
Voting
How to exclude estimated savings from certain discrete and unplanned performance items from the bonus plan multiple. See the CD&A for further discussion of the Eli Lilly and Company Bonus Plan (Bonus Plan).
bonusplanmultiple2022a.jpg
8


2020-2022 Performance Award Multiple
We exceeded the EPS growth target set for our performance award program. The performance award target is based on expected EPS growth of peer companies over a two-year period. As a result of exceeding the EPS growth target set for our performance award program, the performance award payout was above target. See the CD&A for further discussion on the performance award program.

performanceawardmultiple20a.jpg
2019-2021 Shareholder Value Award (SVA) Multiple
Our stock price growth exceeded the target range (18.1 percent to 31.1 percent) under our shareholder value award program, which is based on expected large-cap company returns over a three-year period. This performance resulted in a shareholder value award payout above target.
For individuals who were executive officers when the award was granted, shareholder value award payouts were modified based on a three-year cumulative TSR relative to our peer companies. Lilly's relative TSR was 121.1 percentage points above the peer group median, resulting in a maximum award payout of 180 percent of target (SVA payout multiple of 150 percent multiplied by the 1.2 modifier = 180 percent final payout). See the CD&A for further discussion on the shareholder value award program and the TSR modifier.
shrvalueawardmultiple2022a.jpg
Audit MattersVote
Item 3: Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent AuditorManagement recommendationVote required to pass
For further information, see page 65
Vote FORMajority of votes cast
9


Management Proposals
Item 4: Proposal to Amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to Eliminate the Classified Board StructureManagement recommendationVote required to pass
For further information, see page 67
Vote FOR80% of outstanding shares

Item 5: Proposal to Amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to Eliminate Supermajority Voting ProvisionsManagement recommendationVote required to pass
For further information, see page 68
Vote FOR80% of outstanding shares

Item 6: Proposal to Amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to Provide Shareholders the Ability to Amend the Company’s Bylaws
Management recommendationVote required to pass
For further information, see page 69
Vote FORMajority of votes cast
Shareholder Proposals
Item 7: Proposal to Amend the Bylaws to Require an Independent Board ChairManagement recommendationVote required to pass
For further information, see page 70
Vote AGAINSTMajority of votes cast
Item 8: Proposal to Publish an Annual Report Disclosing Lobbying ActivitiesManagement recommendationVote required to pass
For further information, see page 73
Vote AGAINSTMajority of votes cast
Item 9: Proposal to Disclose Lobbying Activities and Alignment with Public Policy Positions and StatementsManagement recommendationVote required to pass
For further information, see page 75
Vote AGAINSTMajority of votes cast
Item 10: Proposal to Report Oversight of Risks Related to Anticompetitive Pricing StrategiesManagement recommendationVote required to pass
For further information, see page 78
Vote AGAINSTMajority of votes cast
10


Voting
How to Vote in Advance of the Meeting
Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote prior to the meeting using one of the methods described below.
laptopblue1a.jpglly-20230224_g35.gif
mobileblue76.jpglly-20230224_g36.gif
bymlblue76.jpglly-20230224_g37.gif
lly-20230224_g38.gif
ONLINEBY TELEPHONEBY MAILAT THE MEETING
Visit the website listed on your notice, proxy card, or voting instruction formCall 1-800-690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the instructions providedIf you received or requested paper copies of your proxy materials, sign, date, and return your proxy card or voting instruction form
Attend the Annual Meeting, online by live webcast at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2023 on Monday, May 1, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. EDT
Vote Early:Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote prior to the meeting, either online, by telephone or by mail.
Beneficial Shareholders:Shareholders who hold their shares beneficially through an institutional holder of record, such as a broker or bank (sometimes referred to as holding shares in street name), will receive voting instructions from that holder of record. If you do not provide voting instructions to the holder of record, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. See "Other Information—Other InformationMeeting and Voting Logistics—Voting Shares Held by a Broker"LogisticsHow to Vote for more information.
Further information on how to vote, including if you hold voting shares in the 401(k) Plan, is provided at the end of this proxy statement under "Other Information—Meeting and
8


Voting Logistics."
Deadlines:You may vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 1, 2022April 30, 2023, online or by telephone. If you are voting by mail, your marked, signed, and dated proxy card must be received by May 1, 2022.April 30, 2023. Shareholders who hold their shares in the 401(k) Plan must vote in advance of the Annual Meeting, by April 27, 2022,26, 2023, so the plan trustee can vote their shares accordingly. See "Other Information—Other InformationMeeting and Voting Logistics—Voting Shares HeldLogisticsHow to Vote” for more information.
More Information:Further information on how to vote, including if you hold voting shares in the Company 401(k) Plan" for more information.
Voting at Our 2022 Annual Meeting
You may also opt to vote by attending the Annual Meeting, which will be held online via live webcast at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2022 on Monday, May 2, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. EDT. See the section titled "Other Information—Plan, is provided under “Other InformationMeeting and Voting Logistics" for instructions.LogisticsHow to Vote.”
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
Voting MatterRequired VoteBoard Vote RecommendationSee Page
Item 1
Electionof four directors to serve three-year terms
Majority of votes cast (for each nominee)FOR EACH NOMINEE
Item 2
Advisory vote on compensation paid to named executive officers
Majority of votes castFOR
Item 3
Advisory vote on frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation
Majority of votes castFOR
Item 4
Ratification of the appointment of the independent auditor
Majority of votes castFOR
Item 5
Proposal to amend the company’s articles of incorporation to eliminate the classified board structure
80% of outstanding sharesFOR
Item 6
Proposal to amend the company’s articles of incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting provisions
80% of outstanding sharesFOR
Item 7
Shareholder proposal to publish an annualreport disclosing lobbying activities
Majority of votes castAGAINST
Item 8
Shareholder proposal to eliminatesupermajority voting requirements
Majority of votes castAGAINST
Item 9
Shareholder proposal to establish and report on a process by which the impact of extended patent exclusivities on product access would be considered in deciding whether to apply for secondary and tertiary patents
Majority of votes castAGAINST
Item 10
Shareholder proposal to report on risks of supporting abortion
Majority of votes castAGAINST
Item 11
Shareholder proposal to disclose lobbying activities and alignment with public policy positions and statements
Majority of votes castAGAINST
Item 12
Shareholder proposal to report on effectiveness of the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts
Majority of votes castAGAINST
Item 13
Shareholder proposal to adopt a policy to require certain third-party organizations to annually report expenditures for political activities before Lilly contributes to an organization
Majority of votes castAGAINST

9


Governance
How We Build an Effective Board
Our directors are elected by the company’s shareholders to oversee the actions and results of the company’s management. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, together with our lead independent director, regularly assesses the effectiveness of the board to ensure that directors reflect the skill sets, experiences, diverse viewpoints and characteristics necessary to lead our complex and evolving business. Execution of our robust assessment and refreshment process, guided by key governance guidelines, has resulted in a mix of directors that balance experienced institutional knowledge and fresh perspectives, and reflect a broad range of backgrounds and viewpoints.
lly-20230224_g39.jpg
Director Qualifications
Character: Our board members should possess the personal attributes necessary to be an effective director, including unquestioned integrity, sound judgment, a collaborative spirit, and commitment to our company, our shareholders, and other constituencies.
Independence: We believe there should always be a substantial majority (75 percent or more) of independent directors. The board annually determines the independence of directors based on a review and recommendation by the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee. No director is considered independent unless the board has affirmatively determined that he or she has no material relationship with the company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company. In assessing whether a director has no material relationship with Lilly, the board of directors also considers any persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. Material relationships can include commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, and familial relationships, among others. To evaluate the materiality of any such relationship, the board has adopted categorical independence standards consistent with the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards.
Lilly’s process for determining director independence is set forth in our Standards for Director Independence, which can be found on our website at lilly.com/leadership/governance, along with our corporate governance guidelines.
On the recommendation of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, the board determined that each current non-employee director is independent. The board also determined that the members of our Audit and Talent and Compensation Committees meet the heightened independence standards applicable to those committees. The board determined that none of the current non-employee directors has had during the last three years (i) any of the relationships identified in the company’s categorical independence standards or (ii) any other material relationship with the company that would compromise his or her independence.
lly-20230224_g40.jpg
In making its independence determinations, the board considered that Ms. Walker is affiliated with the Goldman Sachs Group, which the company may use for advisory, investment banking or similar services from time to time.
In addition, the board considered that some of the current non-employee directors are affiliated with companies or entities to which the company sold products or made payments, or from which the company purchased products or services during the year. Drs. Baicker, Kaelin, Hedley, and Runge are employed at medical or academic institutions with which the company engages in clinical research,

10


provides research grants, and/or engages in commercial transactions in the ordinary course of business. Mr. Luciano is employed by Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. The company engages in routine business transactions with these organizations. Aggregate payments to or from each such organization, in each of the last three fiscal years, did not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2 percent of that organization’s consolidated gross revenues in a single fiscal year. In reviewing these relationships, the board considered all relevant factors, including:
whether transactions were entered into at arm’s length in the normal course of business and, to the extent they were commercial relationships, had standard commercial terms; and
whether any director had any direct business relationships with the company or received any direct personal benefit from any of these transactions, relationships, or arrangements.
Diversity: The board strives to achieve diversity in the broadest sense, including persons diverse in geography, gender, ethnicity, age, and experience. Although the board does not establish specific diversity goals or have a standalone diversity policy, the board’s overall diversity is an important consideration in the director selection and nomination process. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of board diversity efforts in connection with the annual nomination process as well as in new director searches. The company’s current 13 directors range in age from 50 to 72 and include five women and six minority group members (MGM).
lly-20230224_g41.jpg
7.8 Years
Average Director Tenure
lly-20230224_g42.gif
Tenure:Our director composition reflects a mix of tenure on the board, which provides an effective balance of historical perspective and an understanding of the evolution of our business with fresh perspectives and insights. Mr. Tai, who joined the board in 2013, will retire from the board following the Annual Meeting.
Director Governance Spotlight
ü
Resignation Policy- In an uncontested election, directors are elected by a majority of votes cast. An incumbent nominee who fails to receive a greater number of votes “for” than “against” his or her election will tender his or her resignation from the board following the certification of the shareholder vote. The board, on recommendation of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, will decide whether to accept the resignation. The company will promptly disclose the board’s decision, including, if applicable, the reasons the board rejected the resignation.
ü
Director Retirement Policy- Non-employee directors must retire from the board no later than the date of the annual meeting that follows their seventy-second birthday, although the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee may recommend exceptions to this policy. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, with input from all board members, also considers the contributions of the individual directors annually, with a more robust assessment at least every three years when considering whether to nominate directors to new three-year terms. The company has not adopted term limits because the board believes that the company benefits from having a mix of longer- and shorter-tenured members of the board.
ü
Other Board ServicePolicy - To ensure proper engagement from our directors and effective functioning of our board, we have instituted certain limitations on service on the boards of other companies. In general, no director may serve on more than three other public company boards. No director that is an executive officer of a public company may serve on more than two public company boards (inclusive of Lilly). The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee may approve exceptions if it determines that the additional service will not impair the director’s effectiveness on the Lilly board. In addition, no director serving on the Audit Committee may serve simultaneously on the audit committee of more than two other public companies without the prior approval of the board.
ü
Confidentiality Policy - The board has adopted a Confidentiality Policy, applicable to all members of the board. The policy prohibits a director from sharing confidential information obtained in his or her role as a director with any third party except under limited circumstances where the director is seeking legal advice or is required by law to disclose information. The Confidentiality Policy can be viewed on the company’s website at: lilly.com/leadership/governance.

11


Director Skills:
Our directors are responsible for overseeing the company’s business consistent with their fiduciary duties. This significant responsibility requires highly skilled individuals with various qualities, attributes, and professional experiences. We believe the board is well-rounded, with a balance of relevant perspectives and experience, as illustrated in the following chart.
lly-20230224_g43.jpg
Director Experience:
Set forth below is information, as of February 21, 2023, regarding our directors and director nominees. We have provided the most relevant experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills that led to the conclusion that each director or director nominee should serve as a director in light of our business and operations.
No family relationship exists among any of our directors, director nominees, or executive officers. To the best of our knowledge, there are no pending material legal proceedings in which any of our directors or nominees for director, or any of their associates, is a party adverse to us or any of our affiliates, or has a material interest adverse to us or any of our affiliates. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no events under

12


any bankruptcy laws, no criminal proceedings and no judgments, sanctions, or injunctions during the past 10 years that are material to the evaluation of the ability or integrity of any of our directors or nominees for director. There is no arrangement or understanding between any director or director nominee and any other person pursuant to which he or she was or is to be selected as a director or director nominee.
Under our articles of incorporation, the board is divided into three classes with approximately one-third of the directors standing for election each year.
Class of 2023
KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g44.jpg
Dr. Kaelin is a world-renowned Nobel Laureate, scientist, academician, and physician who provides valuable leadership to the board’s oversight of Lilly’s discovery and development programs. His groundbreaking research and discovery talents provide an important resource to management, including in his role as the Chair of the board’s Science and Technology Committee.
With decades of preeminent medical research experience, particularly within oncology, Dr. Kaelin offers a valuable perspective to the board and management in pharmaceutical research and discovery in key therapeutic areas.
Dr. Kaelin has extensive experience as a professor and mentor to medical professionals who are key constituents for Lilly’s business and workforce.
As an investigator at Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Dr. Kaelin has a deep understanding of the challenges, perspectives, and opportunities for medical researchers.
Dr. Kaelin also brings commercialization experience to the board through his work with venture capital funds and biotech companies.
Dr. Kaelin’s passion for improving the lives of patients drives his ongoing research and is core to Lilly’s mission.
William G. Kaelin, Jr., M.D.
Age: 65
Director since: 2012
Board Committees:
Directors and Corporate Governance
Science and Technology (Chair)
Other Public Boards:
None
Recent Prior Public Boards:
None
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g45.giflly-20230224_g46.gif
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
Harvard Medical School
Sidney Farber Professor of Medicine (2018 - present)
Professor of Medicine (2002 - 2018)
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Professor (2002 - present)
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Investigator (2002 - present)
Assistant Investigator (1998 - 2002)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Recipient of numerous prizes and honors, including:
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award
Canada Gairdner International Award
Wiley Prize in Biomedical Sciences from the Rockefeller University
Paul Marks Prize for Cancer Research from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Member, National Academy of Medicine; National Academy of Sciences; American College of Physicians; Association of American Physicians; American Society of Clinical Investigation (ASCI); American Academy of Arts and Sciences

lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

13


KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g23.jpg
Mr. Ricks has 25 years of experience at Lilly, leading and shaping large-scale operations across the world. He has overseen some of the most transformative growth in the company’s history; since assuming the role as CEO, Lilly has (i) experienced revenue growth of approximately 34%, (ii) experienced a five-year total shareholder return of 377%, and (iii) taken important steps to increase the affordability and accessibility of our products around the globe.
Mr. Ricks embodies the “tone at the top” that strengthens the company’s culture, including through his commitment to compliance, talent development, and the expansion of our diverse workforce.
Mr. Ricks has combined his company-specific and industry knowledge to grow, articulate and implement Lilly’s strategic plan, as reflected by the growth in revenue, robust pipeline, and progressive approach on leveraging technology into the business.
As the primary face for Lilly, Mr. Ricks is able to draw on his extensive interactions with various stakeholders to apprise the board of significant developments in our business and industry, as well as to communicate feedback to the board and offer insights.
Mr. Ricks’ multi-faceted leadership approach is derived from his experience in marketing, sales, drug development, and international operations, as well as his significant experience in public policy.
David A. Ricks
Chair, President, and CEO
Age: 55
Director since: 2017
Board Committees: None
Other Public Boards:
Adobe Inc.
Recent Prior Public Boards:
Elanco Animal Health Inc.
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g47.giflly-20230224_g48.giflly-20230224_g49.giflly-20230224_g46.giflly-20230224_g29.giflly-20230224_g50.giflly-20230224_g51.giflly-20230224_g52.gif

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
Eli Lilly and Company
Chair, President, and Chief Executive Officer (2017 - present)
Senior Vice President and President, Lilly Bio-Medicines (2012 - 2016)
President, Lilly USA (2009 - 2012)
Served in various marketing, sales and international leadership roles (1996 - 2009), including:
As president and general manager of Lilly China
As general manager of Lilly Canada
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA), CEO Steering Committee
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), Board (Past Chair)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Council for Inclusive Innovation
Riley Children's Foundation
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership, Board









lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

14


KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g53.jpg
Dr. Runge’s extensive experience as a physician and scientist contributes a unique depth of understanding to the board’s risk oversight and advice on scientific matters involving Lilly’s discovery and development programs, including a strong understanding of healthcare facility systems, biomedical research and training, innovation, clinical trial design and patient safety.
As CEO of one of the largest hospitals in Michigan that is committed to high-quality care to under-resourced communities and is also a premier academic medical center, Dr. Runge brings to the board first-hand knowledge of healthcare services delivery, including hospital procurement and in-patient experiences with pharmaceuticals. Dr. Runge is committed to providing high-quality, low-cost healthcare for the underserved populations – locally and across the state.
With over three decades of academic experience across the United States, Dr. Runge provides a distinctive perspective on how future healthcare professionals are trained.
Dr. Runge’s service as a principal investigator and director of an institution that was part of a national consortium to improve the way biomedical research is conducted across the country, as well as his own research efforts, provide valuable insights into the medical research process.
Dr. Runge’s practical experience obtained at some of nation’s renowned medical institutions offers a valuable perspective on diabetes and obesity treatment.
Marschall S. Runge, M.D., Ph.D.
Age: 68
Director since: 2013
Board Committees:
Ethics and Compliance
Science and Technology
Other Public Boards:
None
Recent Prior Public Boards:
None
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g47.giflly-20230224_g46.giflly-20230224_g45.gif
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
University of Michigan
CEO, Michigan Medicine (2015 - present)
Executive Vice President for Medical Affairs (2015 - present)
Dean, Medical School (2015 - present)
University of North Carolina School of Medicine
Executive Dean (2010 - 2015)
Chair of the Department of Medicine (2000 - 2015)
Principal Investigator and Director of the North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (2010 - 2015)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Vice Chair, the University of Michigan Health Board
Chair, the Michigan Health Corp. Board (the governing board for business partnerships)
Member, American Association of Medical Colleges, American College of Cardiology, and American Medical Association
Cardiology Fellow and Faculty Member at Harvard’s Massachusetts General Hospital
Associate Professor of Medicine at Emory University
John Sealy Distinguished Centennial Chair in Internal Medicine and Director of the Division of Cardiology and the Sealy Center for Molecular Cardiology at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston




lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

15


KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g54.jpg
Ms. Walker brings to the board extensive experience in building and strengthening brands, cultivating opportunities in new and existing markets, scaling organizations, and demonstrating accountability for results. She has an acute understanding of technology’s importance in organizational success.
Ms. Walker has spent more than three decades in the information technology industry, building strong technology acumen and strategic insight through business and consumer leadership positions.
Ms. Walker has been a key leader in international organizations applying new strategies to achieve transformative change, including transforming the Intel brand, and an award-winning integrated marketing and communications approach using digital and social media to engage customers and partners on their purchase journey.
During her career at Cisco, Ms. Walker led a complete transformation of the company’s marketing function to become a leader in real-time marketing and communications while also spearheading transformation to a hybrid business model selling hardware, services, software as a service (SaaS) and software.
Karen Walker
Age: 61
Director since: 2018
Board Committees:
Audit
Talent and Compensation
Other Public Boards:
Sprout Social, Inc.
Recent Prior Public Boards:
None
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g49.giflly-20230224_g50.giflly-20230224_g51.giflly-20230224_g52.gif

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a leading global financial institution that delivers a broad range of financial services
Operating Partner (2023 – present)
Intel Corporation, a leader in the semiconductor industry
Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer (2019 - 2022)
Cisco Systems, Inc., a provider of communications technologies and services to commercial and governmental customers
Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer (2015 - 2019)
Senior Vice President, Marketing (2013 - 2015)
Senior Vice President of Segment, Services and Marketing Partner (2012 - 2013)
Hewlett-Packard Company, a manufacturer of software and computer services
Various marketing, strategy and operations roles in Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific (1984 - 2009)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Advisory Board, Salvation Army of Silicon Valley
Forbes Top 10 Most Influential CMOs in the World (2017 and 2019)









lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

16


Class of 2024
KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g55.jpg
Dr. Baicker’s experience in health economics research and policy at the highest levels, including as a former economic advisor to the White House and a current health advisor to the Congressional Budget Office, provides an invaluable perspective to the board. In addition to Dr. Baicker’s own high-impact research, her leadership of a preeminent research and educational institution gives her both insight into and influence over the future of health policy.
Through Dr. Baicker’s decades of research and policy engagement, including with respect to the effects of health system reforms of public and private insurance coverage and payment policy, she brings to the board insight and context as it oversees the company’s navigation of the complex environment of government regulation, insurance reimbursement, and access to affordable care.
Drawing on Dr. Baicker’s experience as an advisor to both the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. government, state governments, and numerous healthcare-related commissions and committees provides a keen understanding of government perspectives in our highly regulated industry.
Dr. Baicker, with extensive involvement with medical and health system research organizations, adds valuable input on the research and development landscape within the pharmaceutical industry.
Katherine Baicker, Ph.D.
Age: 51
Director since: 2011
Board Committees:
Ethics and Compliance (Chair)
Science and Technology
Other Public Boards:
None
Recent Prior Public Boards:
HMS Holdings Corp.
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g46.giflly-20230224_g45.giflly-20230224_g29.gif
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
University of Chicago
Provost (Effective March 2023)
Dean and the Emmett Dedmon Professor, Harris School of Public Policy (2017 - present)
Harvard University
C. Boyden Gray Professor of Health Economics (2014 - 2017)
Department of Health Policy and Management, Chair (2014 - 2016)
Adjunct Professor (2017 - present)
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (primary)
Harvard Kennedy School of Government (secondary)
National Bureau of Economic Research
Research Associate, Health Care and Public Economics Programs (2007 - present)
Faculty Research Fellow, Public Economics Program (2001 - 2005)
Council of Economic Advisers, Executive Office of the President
Member, confirmed by U.S. Senate (2005 - 2007)
Senior Economist (2001 - 2002)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Panel of Health Advisers to the Congressional Budget Office
Advisory Board of the National Institute for Health Care Management
Editorial Board of Health Affairs, JAMA Health Forum
Trustee of the Mayo Clinic
Member of the National Academy of Medicine, the National Academy of Social Insurance, and the Council on Foreign Relations, American Academy of Arts and Sciences

lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

17


KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g56.jpg
Mr. Fyrwald brings to the board a deep understanding of operational and strategic leadership and international business.
Mr. Fyrwald’s substantial experience in leading international companies provides valuable perspectives relating to international operations, manufacturing, logistics, and sustainability.
Mr. Fyrwald has a demonstrated focus on technology and a deep understanding of the challenges of developing and commercializing the results of innovation, as he has worked to align Syngenta to digital innovation and new agricultural technologies in the fight against climate change.
Mr. Fyrwald has also developed significant corporate governance experience through his current and prior service on the boards of directors of international companies and not-for-profit entities.
J. Erik Fyrwald
Age: 63
Director since: 2005
Board Committees:
Talent and Compensation
Science and Technology
Other Public Boards:
Bunge Limited
Recent Prior Public Boards:
None
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g47.giflly-20230224_g48.giflly-20230224_g49.giflly-20230224_g29.giflly-20230224_g52.gif
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
Syngenta Group, a global Swiss-based agriculture technology company that produces agrochemicals and seeds
President and Chief Executive Officer (2016 - present)
Member of the Board of Directors
Member of the Sustainability Committee
Univar, Inc., a leading distributor of chemicals and provider of related services
President and Chief Executive Officer (2012 - 2016)
Ecolab, Inc., a leading provider of cleaning, sanitation and water products and services
President (2011-2012)
Nalco Company, a leading provider of water treatment products and services
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2008 – 2011)
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, a global chemical company
Various management positions from 1980 to 2008 in production, sales, and marketing, including most recently Group vice president, agriculture and nutrition (2003 – 2008)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Not-for-profit boards of directors:
UN World Food Program Farm to Market Alliance
CropLife International (chair)
Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture








lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

18


KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g57.jpg
Mr. Jackson brings to the board significant global financial experience and a strong background in strategic planning.
Mr. Jackson’s global finance experience, including as chief financial officer at multiple Fortune 500 companies, provides extensive knowledge of international business operations and their associated financial complexities.
Mr. Jackson brings a valuable perspective on the management of complex financial risks and wide-ranging knowledge of finance and accounting matters to his role as Audit Committee Chair.
Mr. Jackson has also held roles in strategic planning and mergers and acquisitions, including responsibility for driving financial rigor, developing strategy and implementing change.
Jamere Jackson
Age: 54
Director since: 2016
Board Committees:
Audit (Chair)
Ethics and Compliance
Other Public Boards:
None
Recent Prior Public Boards:
Hibbett, Inc.
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g48.giflly-20230224_g49.giflly-20230224_g52.gif
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
AutoZone, Inc.,a leading retailer and distributor of automotive replacement parts and accessories in the United States, Mexico and Brazil
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Finance and Store Development (2020 - present)
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., a global vehicle rental, leasing and fleet management business
Chief Financial Officer (2018 - 2020)
Nielsen Holdings plc, a global measurement and data analytics company
Chief Financial Officer (2014 - 2018)
General Electric Corporation,an American multinational company and leader in the power renewable energy, aviation and healthcare industries
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, General Electric Oil and Gas, drilling and surface division (2013 - 2014)
Senior Executive, Finance, General Electric Aviation (2007 - 2013)
Finance Executive, General Electric Corporate (2004 - 2007)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Certified Public Accountant
Not-for-profit boards of directors:
Youth Villages
Future 5










lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

19



KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g58.jpg
Ms. Sulzberger brings over 30 years of experience advising public and privately held companies in consumer products, retail, financial services, and life sciences.
Ms. Sulzberger’s career in private equity has given her valuable experience in helping companies navigate disruption and transformation, engage with shareholders, and position businesses for growth and success.
Ms. Sulzberger provides global perspective as the Chair of Global ESG Advisory at Teneo, supporting Lilly and the Board’s commitment to continuous progress and improving our positive impact on people, the planet and society.
Ms. Sulzberger developed deep corporate governance experience through her work with corporate boards, both as a board member and as a governance committee chair.
Ms. Sulzberger also draws on experiences from her prior service as chief financial officer of several public and private companies and audit committee chair of several public companies, providing leadership as an Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Gabrielle Sulzberger
Age: 62
Director since: 2021
Board Committees:
Audit
Directors and Corporate Governance
Other Public Boards:
Mastercard Incorporated
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc.
Warby Parker Inc.
Recent Prior Public Boards:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g48.giflly-20230224_g49.giflly-20230224_g52.gif
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
Teneo,a global CEO advisory firm
Chair of Global ESG Advisory (2021 - present)
Two Sigma Impact, a private equity firm based in New York, New York
Senior Advisor (2021 - present)
Centerbridge Partners, a multidisciplinary investment firm
Senior Advisor (2021 - present)
Rustic Canyon/Fontis Partners L.P., a private equity firm based in California
General Partner (2005 - 2018)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Director or Trustee of the following not-for-profit organizations:
Metropolitan Museum of Art
Ford Foundation
Trinity Church Wall Street
Sesame Street Workshop
Former director, board chair and chair of Audit Committee, Whole Foods Market, Inc.









lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

20


KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g59.jpg
Mr. Tai is an accomplished international business executive who combines strong investment banking credentials, a depth of expertise about operating in Asia and broad experience as a non-executive board director across a wide range of sectors and geographies.
Mr. Tai’s distinguished career at DBS Group Holdings Ltd, one of the largest financial services groups in Asia, provides deep knowledge of the complex Asia-Pacific region.
Mr. Tai is an accomplished leader with international business, global capital markets, enterprise risk, and financial services experience, including developing emerging markets.
Mr. Tai brings a valuable combination of strategic and executive skills, along with a strong network of business and regulatory connections.
Mr. Tai also brings a wealth of corporate governance experience from his service on corporate and institutional investor boards in North America, Europe, and Asia, including NYSE Euronext, Bank of China, Singapore Airlines, and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board.
Jackson P. Tai*
Age: 72
Director since: 2013
Board Committees:
Audit
Directors and Corporate Governance
Other Public Boards:
Mastercard Incorporated
HSBC Holdings plc
Recent Prior Public Boards:
None
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g47.giflly-20230224_g48.giflly-20230224_g49.giflly-20230224_g52.gif
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
DBS Group Holdings Ltd and DBS Bank Ltd (formerly the Development Bank of Singapore),a financial services institution
Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2002 - 2007)
President and Chief Operating Officer (2001 - 2002)
Chief Financial Officer (1999 - 2001)
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, a leading global financial institution
Managing Director in the Investment Banking Division (1974 - 1999), including service as the senior officer for Japan Capital Markets and chairman of the Asia Pacific Management Committee
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Director, Metropolitan Opera
Trustee, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Member, Harvard Business School Asia Pacific Advisory Board
*Mr. Tai will retire from the board following the Annual Meeting.











lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

21


Class of 2025
KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g60.jpg
Mr. Alvarez brings to the board more than 40 years of experience in consumer marketing, global operations, international business, and strategic planning, as well as extensive executive leadership experience in managing some of the world’s best-known brands. Mr. Alvarez is a leader of people and brings to the Board a strong perspective on how to motivate and engage diverse talent.
As a senior executive of a leading global foodservice retailer and other global restaurant businesses, Mr. Alvarez developed in-depth knowledge of consumer marketing, brand management and strategic planning.
Mr. Alvarez also contributes an understanding of international markets and operations, including a special focus on Japan and emerging markets.
Mr. Alvarez has acquired wide-ranging corporate governance experience from his service on other public and private company boards.
Mr. Alvarez is an Audit Committee Financial Expert based on his public company experience, including his prior audit committee service on Lowe’s board of directors.
Ralph Alvarez
Age: 67
Director since: 2009
Board Committees:
Audit
Talent and Compensation (Chair)
Other Public Boards:
Lowe’s Companies, Inc.
Traeger, Inc.
First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (chair)
Recent Prior Public Boards:
Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc.
McDonald’s Corporation
KeyCorp
Skylark Co., Ltd.
Realogy Holdings Corp.
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g48.giflly-20230224_g49.giflly-20230224_g50.giflly-20230224_g52.gif
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
Advent International Corporation, a leading global private equity firm
Operating Partner (2017 - present)
Skylark Co., Ltd., a leading restaurant operator in Japan
Chairman of the Board (2013 - 2018)
McDonald’s Corporation, a leading food service retailer
President and Chief Operating Officer (2006 - 2009)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
University of Miami President’s Council







lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

22



KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g61.jpg
Dr. Hedley’s career has uniquely combined discovery, translational and clinical research and commercialization, bringing to the board extensive business leadership and scientific investigation experience in the biotechnology industry.
Having served as co-founder, CEO, president, chief scientific officer or chief operating officer of several biotechnology companies, Dr. Hedley has experience leading and overseeing the complex operations and risks of these businesses, including building C-suite teams, raising capital, and managing research and development, commercial development, manufacturing and supply chains, quality, regulatory affairs, and corporate strategy.
Dr. Hedley contributes a wide-ranging perspective on the life science business, acquired through her roles at multiple successful companies and her industry-spanning work advising CEOs, venture and life science companies in addition to academic scientists advancing therapeutic drug development while at the Broad Institute.
Dr. Hedley has substantial experience with developing and commercializing oncology therapeutics, one of Lilly’s core therapeutics areas.
Dr. Hedley’s service on the boards of directors and board committees of other public companies and not-for-profit entities, and, in particular, as chair or former chair of the nominating and corporate governance committees at each of Veeva Systems and Millendo Therapeutics and the audit committee of Centessa Pharmaceuticals, provides a multifaceted governance perspective.
Mary Lynne Hedley, Ph.D.
Age: 60
Director since: 2022
Board Committees:
Ethics and Compliance
Science and Technology
Other Public Boards:
VEEVA Systems Inc.
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc
Recent Prior Public Boards:
Millendo Therapeutics, Inc.
bluebird bio, Inc.
TESARO, Inc.
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g47.giflly-20230224_g48.giflly-20230224_g46.giflly-20230224_g45.giflly-20230224_g29.giflly-20230224_g52.gif
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT
Senior Scientific Fellow (2021 - present)
GlaxoSmithKline plc, a leading global pharmaceutical company
Member of executive research & development team; led integration efforts for TESARO acquisition (2019 - 2020)
TESARO, Inc., a company focused on the development and global commercialization of oncology therapeutics (acquired by GlaxoSmithKline plc in 2019)
President and Chief Operating Officer (2010 - 2019)
Abraxis BioScience, Inc., a biotechnology company (acquired by Celgene Corporation in 2010
Executive Vice President and Chief Science Officer (2009 - 2010)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Board of directors, Helsinn SA
Member, American Association of Immunologists;American Association for Advancement of Science; American Society of Clinical Oncology; American Association of Cancer Research
Advisory board, Boston Museum of Science






lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

23



KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g62.jpg
Ms. Johnson brings to the board considerable financial experience and a strong background in technology, governance, and strategy for global risk management.
Ms. Johnson’s wide-ranging operational experience at two complex financial institutions has included leadership over various departments focused on cybersecurity, technology, operations, account services, enterprise change, data, modeling, analytics, information security, resiliency, innovation, and corporate strategy.
Ms. Johnson also brings deep understanding of enterprise risk management, having served as chief risk officer of Fannie Mae and currently overseeing enterprise risk at T. Rowe Price.
Ms. Johnson also brings to the board knowledge of technology operations, having led Fannie Mae’s digital transformation, establishing a four-year enterprise modernization plan and an operational roadmap for redesigning business processes and reengineering core technology.
Kimberly Johnson
Age: 50
Director since: 2021
Board Committees:
Talent and Compensation
Ethics and Compliance
Other Public Boards:
None
Recent Prior Public Boards:
None
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g48.giflly-20230224_g49.giflly-20230224_g29.giflly-20230224_g51.giflly-20230224_g52.gif

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., a global leader in asset management
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (2022 - present)
Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), a provider of affordable mortgage financing in the United States
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (2018 - 2022)
Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer (2017 - 2018)
Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer (2015 - 2017)
Senior Vice President and Deputy Chief Risk Officer (2013 - 2015)
Credit Suisse AG, a global wealth manager, investment bank, and financial firm founded and based in Switzerland
Director, Interest Rate Derivative Products (2005 - 2006)
Vice President (2002 - 2004)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Director, Share Our Strength
Director, Planet Word
Former trustee, Princeton University











lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

24



KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
lly-20230224_g63.jpg
Mr. Luciano’s decades of experience, including as Chairman and CEO of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, in leading large organizations, international business, strategy, and operations bring to the board valuable insights into the complexities of operating in a rapidly changing global market. Mr. Luciano has strong leadership qualities that enable him to act as an independent leader for the Board.
As chairman and CEO of a major global enterprise, Mr. Luciano contributes extensive knowledge of international business and the development and execution of strategy, such as the increased use of innovative technologies to meet customer needs.
Mr. Luciano’s experience as a chief operating officer and line executive in several product areas also bring a thorough understanding of operations, especially in highly regulated sectors.
Mr. Luciano’s results-oriented perspective and his experience in leading a major multinational company are particularly valuable to the board and make him a strong lead independent director.
Mr. Luciano is a well-respected leader of the Board, with the willingness and ability to provide direct, candid feedback to the CEO while acting as a facilitator of discussion and progress.
Juan R. Luciano
Lead Independent Director (2019)
Age: 61
Director since: 2016
Board Committees:
Talent and Compensation
Directors and Corporate Governance (chair)
Other Public Boards:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Recent Prior Public Boards:
None
Key Skills:
lly-20230224_g47.giflly-20230224_g48.giflly-20230224_g49.giflly-20230224_g50.giflly-20230224_g52.gif
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, a global food processing and commodities-trading company
Chairman (2016 - present)
Chief Executive Officer and President (2015 - present)
President and Chief Operating Officer (2014 - 2015)
The Dow Chemical Company, a multinational chemical company
Executive Vice President and President, Performance Division (2010 - 2011)
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
Alternate Director, Wilmar International
Intersect Illinois, Board
Rush University Medical Center, Board of Trustees
The Business Roundtable
Civic Committee at the Commercial Club of Chicago, Member
Economic Club of Chicago, Member










lly-20230224_g47.gif
CEO Leadership
lly-20230224_g48.gif
Finance / Accounting
lly-20230224_g49.gif
International Business
lly-20230224_g46.gif
Healthcare Industry
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science / Academia
lly-20230224_g29.gif
Government Relations / Public Policy
lly-20230224_g50.gif
Sales / Marketing
lly-20230224_g51.gif
Technology / Digital
lly-20230224_g52.gif
Operations / Strategy

25


Director Nominations

Each year, the board proposes a slate of director nominees for election by shareholders at the Annual Meeting. The board has delegated the process of screening potential director candidates to the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, which receives input from other board members.
Incumbent Directors
lly-20230224_g64.gif
lly-20230224_g65.gif
Candidate
 Pool
lly-20230224_g66.gif
lly-20230224_g65.gif
In-Depth Review
lly-20230224_g67.gif
Recommend Selected Candidates for Election to the Board
lly-20230224_g68.gif
lly-20230224_g69.gif
Shareholders
lly-20230224_g64.gif
lly-20230224_g65.gif
Evaluate qualifications
Diverse backgrounds and experiences
Review independence
Assess skills
Meet with directors

Executive Search Firms
lly-20230224_g64.gif
lly-20230224_g65.gif
Management
lly-20230224_g64.gif
lly-20230224_g65.gif
Candidate Identification: Director candidates can be identified from several sources, including executive search firms retained by the committee, incumbent directors, management, and shareholders.
The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee employs the same process to evaluate all candidates, including those submitted by shareholders, in accordance with our bylaws and corporate governance guidelines.
1.Evaluate director qualifications. The committee initially evaluates a candidate based on publicly available information and any additional information supplied by the party recommending the candidate. If the candidate appears to satisfy the selection criteria and the committee’s initial evaluation is favorable, the committee, assisted by management or a search firm, gathers additional data on the candidate’s qualifications, availability, probable level of interest, and any potential conflicts of interest.
Incumbent Directors - For incumbent directors being considered for re-nomination, the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee has the additional benefit of (i) feedback from the annual board and committee evaluations and related individual discussions between each director and each of the chair and the lead independent director; (ii) knowledge of attendance and participation at, and preparation for, prior board and committee meetings; and (iii) shareholder feedback, if such nominee has been elected at a prior annual meeting.
2.Meetings with Select Directors. If the committee’s subsequent evaluation continues to be favorable, the candidate is contacted by the chair of the board and one or more of the independent directors, including the lead independent director, for direct discussions to determine the mutual level of interest in pursuing the candidacy.
3.Recommendation for Election. If these discussions are favorable, the committee recommends that the board nominate the candidate for election by the shareholders (or for the board to elect the candidate to fill a vacancy, as applicable).


26


Shareholder Director Candidates
lly-20230224_g32.jpgShareholder Recommendations of Director Candidates - A shareholder who wishes to recommend a director candidate for evaluation should forward the candidate’s name and information about the candidate’s qualifications by delivery and email to:
Chair of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee
c/o General Counsel and Secretary
Lilly Corporate Center
Indianapolis, IN 46285
Email: shareholderproposals@lilly.com
The candidate must meet the selection criteria described above under “Governance—How We Build an Effective Board—Director Qualifications” and must be willing and expressly interested in serving on the board.
lly-20230224_g32.jpgShareholder Nominations for Director Candidates for Inclusion in the Proxy Statement (“Proxy Access”) - If a shareholder or group of shareholders wishes to nominate one or more director candidates to be included in the proxy statement for the 2024 annual meeting pursuant to the “proxy access” provisions of the company’s bylaws (section 1.10), such shareholder or group of shareholders must deliver to the company’s Secretary, and the company’s Secretary must receive, written notice no later than November 18, 2023, and no earlier than October 19, 2023. However, if the date of the 2024 annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from May 1, 2024 (the date contemplated for the 2024 annual meeting as set forth in this proxy statement), a shareholder must give the company written notice no earlier than 150 days in advance of the date of the 2024 meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of 120 days in advance of the 2024 annual meeting or 10 days following the date we first publicly announce the date of 2024 annual meeting. Any such notice must also comply with the timing, disclosure, procedural, and other requirements as set forth in the bylaws.
lly-20230224_g32.jpgOther Shareholder Nominations for Director Candidates - In addition, under Section 1.9 of the company’s bylaws, any shareholder of record wishing to directly nominate a director candidate at the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders (i.e., to propose a candidate for election who is not otherwise nominated by the board through the recommendation process described above and not pursuant to the “proxy access” provisions described above) must deliver to the company’s Secretary, and the company’s Secretary must receive, written notice no later than the close of business on November 18, 2023, and no earlier than the close of business on September 19, 2023. However, if the date of the 2024 annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from May 1, 2024 (the date contemplated for the 2024 annual meeting as set forth in this proxy statement), a shareholder must give the company written notice no later than the close of business on the later of 120 days in advance of the 2024 annual meeting or 10 days following the date we first publicly announce the date of 2024 annual meeting. Any such notice must also comply with the timing, disclosure, procedural and other requirements as set forth in the bylaws. A copy of the bylaws is available online at lilly.com/leadership/governance.
lly-20230224_g32.jpgUniversal Proxy for Shareholder Nominations - In addition to satisfying the requirements under our bylaws, if a shareholder intends to comply with the SEC’s universal proxy rules and to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the company’s nominees, the shareholder must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, which notice must be postmarked or transmitted electronically to us at the address stated above for shareholder recommendations no later than 60 calendar days prior to the one-year anniversary date of the Annual Meeting (for the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders, no later than March 2, 2024). If the date of the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders is changed by more than 30 calendar days from such anniversary date, however, then the shareholder must provide notice by the later of 60 calendar days prior to the date of the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders and the 10th calendar day following the date on which public announcement of the date of the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders is first made by the company.

27


Item 1. Election of Directors
Under our articles of incorporation, the board is divided into three classes with approximately one-third of the directors standing for election each year. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended that each of the following four nominees be elected at the Annual Meeting. Each of the director nominees is currently serving as a director.
2023 Nominees
lly-20230224_g21.jpg
lly-20230224_g23.jpg
lly-20230224_g24.jpg
lly-20230224_g25.jpg
William G. Kaelin, Jr., M.D.
Independent Director
David A. Ricks
Chair of the Board
Marschall S. Runge, M.D., Ph.D.
Independent Director
Karen Walker
Independent Director
The term for directors to be elected this year will expire at the annual meeting of shareholders held in 2025.2026. Each of the director nominees listed belowabove has agreed to serve for that term. The following sections provide information about our director nominees, including their qualifications, the director nomination process, and director compensation.
Board Recommendation on Item 1
The board recommends that you vote FOR each of the following director nominees:
Ralph Alvarez
Kimberly H. Johnson
Juan R. Luciano
Board Operations and Governance
Board of Directors
Each of our directors isNominees are elected to serve until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. If a bona fide nominee set forth in this proxy statement is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, proxy holders may vote for another nominee
11


proposed by the board or, as an alternative, the board may reduce the number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting.
Director Biographies
Set forth below isFor more information as of February 22, 2022, regarding our directors and director nominees, which has been confirmed byabout each of them for inclusionthe nominees and the other directors serving on our board, please see “Director Experience in this proxy statement. We have provided the most significant experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills that led to the conclusion that each director or director nominee should serve as a director in light of our business and structure.
No family relationship exists among any of our directors, director nominees, or executive officers. To the best of our knowledge, there are no pending material legal proceedings in which any of our directors or nominees for director, or any of their associates, is a party adverse to us or any of our affiliates, or has a material interest adverse to us or any of our affiliates. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no events under any bankruptcy laws, no criminal proceedings and no judgments, sanctions, or injunctions during the past 10 years that are material to the evaluation of the ability or integrity of any of our directors or nominees for director. There is no arrangement or understanding between any director or director nominee and any other person pursuant to which he or she was or is to be selected as a director or director nominee.
Class of 2022
The three directors listed below will seek reelection at the Annual Meeting. See "Item 1. Election of Directors" above for more information.
alvarezround13a.jpg
Ralph Alvarez

Age: 66, Director since 2009, Board Committees: Audit; Compensation (chair)
PUBLIC BOARDSPRIOR PUBLIC BOARDSMEMBERSHIPS + OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
Lowe's Companies, Inc.; Traeger, Inc.; First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc.; McDonald's Corporation;
KeyCorp; Skylark Co., Ltd.; Realogy Holdings Corp.
University of Miami President's Council
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• Advent International Corporation, a leading global private equity firm
     - Operating Partner (2017 - present)
• Skylark Co., Ltd., a leading restaurant operator in Japan
     - Chairman of the Board (2013 - 2018)
• McDonald's Corporation, a leading global foodservice retailer
     - President and Chief Operating Officer (2006 - 2009)
QUALIFICATIONS
Through his positions at Skylark Co., Ltd. and McDonald’s Corporation, as well as with other global restaurant businesses, Mr. Alvarez has extensive experience in consumer marketing, global operations, international business, and strategic planning. Mr. Alvarez is an audit committee financial expert based on his public company experience, including his prior audit committee service on the Lowe’s board of directors. His international experience includes a special focus on Japan and emerging markets. He also has extensive corporate governance experience through his service on other public company boards as well as several private company boards.

12


johnsonrounda.jpg
Kimberly H. Johnson

Age: 49, Director since 2021, Board Committees: Compensation; Ethics and Compliance
NON-PROFIT BOARDS + OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
Princeton University, Trustee; Share Our Strength, Director; Planet Word, Director
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), provider of affordable mortgage financing in the United States
     - Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (2018-present)
     - Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer (2017-2018)
     - Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer (2015-2017)
     - Senior Vice President and Deputy Chief Risk Officer (2013-2015)
• Credit Suisse AG, a global wealth manager, investment bank, and financial services firm founded and based in Switzerland
     - Director, Interest Rate Derivative Products (2005-2006)
     - Vice President (2002-2004)
QUALIFICATIONS
Through her roles at Fannie Mae, where she also serves on the management committee, Ms. Johnson brings to the board significant financial expertise and a strong background in technology, governance, and strategy for global risk management.


lucianoround.jpg
Juan R. Luciano

Age: 60, Director since 2016, Lead Independent Director since 2019, Board Committees: Compensation; Directors and Corporate Governance
PUBLIC BOARDSNON-PROFIT BOARDSMEMBERSHIPS + OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Intersect Illinois; Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University; Rush University Medical Center Board of Trustees
Economic Club of Chicago; Commercial Club of Chicago; The Business Roundtable
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, a global food-processing and commodities-trading company
     - Chairman (2016 - present)
     - Chief Executive Officer and President (2015 - present)
     - President (2014 - 2015)
     - Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (2011 - 2014)
• The Dow Chemical Company, a multinational chemical company
     - Executive Vice President and President, Performance Division (2010 - 2011)
QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Luciano has chief executive officer and global business experience with Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, where he has established a reputation for strong results-oriented and strategic leadership, as well as many years of global leadership experience at The Dow Chemical Company. He brings to the board a strong technology and operations background, along with expertise in the highly regulated food and agriculture sectors.

13


Class of 2023
The following five directors are serving terms that will expire in May 2023.
eskew14a.jpg
Michael L. Eskew*

Age: 72, Director since 2008, Board Committees: Audit; Directors and Corporate Governance (chair)
PUBLIC BOARDSNON-PROFIT BOARDS
3M Corporation; IBM Corporation; The Allstate CorporationChairman of the board of trustees of The Annie E. Casey Foundation
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), a global shipping and logistics company
     - UPS Board of Directors (1998 - 2014)
     - Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2002 - 2007)
     - Vice Chairman (2000 - 2002)
QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Eskew has chief executive officer experience with UPS, where he established a record of success in managing complex worldwide operations, strategic planning, and building a strong consumer-brand focus. He is an audit committee financial expert based on his chief executive officer experience and his service on other U.S. public company audit committees. He has extensive corporate governance experience through his service on the boards of other companies.
*Mr. Eskew will retire from the board following the Annual Meeting.


kaelinround15a.jpg
William G. Kaelin, Jr., M.D.

Age: 64, Director since 2012, Board Committees: Directors and Corporate Governance; Science and Technology (chair)
INDUSTRY MEMBERSHIPSHONORS
National Academy of Medicine; National Academy of Sciences; American College of Physicians; Association of American Physicians; American Society of Clinical Investigation (ASCI); American Academy of Arts and SciencesNobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine; Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award; Wiley Prize in Biomedical Sciences from the Rockefeller University; Steven C. Beering Award from the Indiana University School of Medicine; ASCI's Stanley J. Korsmeyer Award; Paul Marks Prize for Cancer Research from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Prize from the American Association for Cancer Research; Scientific Grand Prix of the Foundation Lefoulon-Delalande; Canada Gairdner International Award; Doris Duke Distinguished Clinical Scientist Award; Helis Award from Baylor College of Medicine; Massry Prize from the Meira and Shaul G. Massry Foundation
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• Harvard Medical School
     - Sidney Farber Professor of Medicine (2018 - present)
     - Professor of Medicine (2002 - 2018)
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital
     - Professor (2002 - present)
• Howard Hughes Medical Institute
     - Investigator (2002 - present)
     - Assistant Investigator (1998 - 2002)
QUALIFICATIONS
Dr. Kaelin is a prominent medical researcher and academician. He has extensive experience at Harvard Medical School, a major medical institution, as well as special expertise in oncology—a key component of Lilly's business. He also has deep expertise in basic science, including mechanisms of drug action, and experience with pharmaceutical discovery research.

14


ricksround40a.jpg
David A. Ricks

Age: 54, Director since 2017, Board Committees: none
PUBLIC BOARDSNON-PROFIT BOARDSINDUSTRY MEMBERSHIPS
Adobe Inc.Board of Governors for Riley Children's Foundation;
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership
International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA) CEO Steering Committee; Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA); The Business Roundtable; National Council for Expanding American Innovation (NCEAI)
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• Eli Lilly and Company
     - Chair, President, and Chief Executive Officer (2017 - present)
     - Senior Vice President and President, Lilly Bio-Medicines (2012 - 2016)
QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Ricks was named President and Chief Executive Officer on January 1, 2017, and Chair on June 1, 2017. Mr. Ricks joined Lilly in 1996, and most recently served as president of Lilly Bio-Medicines.He has significant expertise across Lilly’s value chain and global operations, as well as in public policy.


rungeround16a.jpg
Marschall S. Runge, M.D., Ph.D.

Age: 67, Director since 2013, Board Committees: Ethics and Compliance; Science and Technology
NON-PROFIT BOARDSMEMBERSHIPS + OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
University of Michigan Health (vice chair); Michigan Health Corporation (chair)
American Association of Medical Colleges
American College of Cardiology
American Medical Association
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• University of Michigan
     - CEO, Michigan Medicine (2015 - present)
     - Executive Vice President for Medical Affairs (2015 - present)
     - Dean, Medical School (2015 - present)
• University of North Carolina School of Medicine
     - Executive Dean (2010 - 2015)
     - Chair of the Department of Medicine (2000 - 2015)
     - Principal Investigator and Director of the North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (2010 - 2015)
QUALIFICATIONS
Dr. Runge brings the unique perspective of a practicing physician who has a broad background in healthcare and academia. He has extensive experience as a practicing cardiologist, a strong understanding of healthcare facility systems, and deep expertise in biomedical research and clinical trial design.

15


walkerround16a.jpg
Karen Walker

Age: 60, Director since 2018, Board Committees: Audit;Compensation
PUBLIC BOARDSNON-PROFIT BOARDSMEMBERSHIPS + OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
Sprout Social, Inc.Salvation Army Advisory Board of Silicon ValleyAssociation of National Advertisers (board and executive committee)
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• Intel Corporation, a leader in the semiconductor industry
     - Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer (2019 - present)
• Cisco Systems, Inc., a provider of communications technologies and services to commercial and governmental customers
     - Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer (2015 - 2019)
     - Senior Vice President, Marketing (2013 - 2015)
     - Senior Vice President of Segment, Services and Partner Marketing (2012 - 2013)
QUALIFICATIONS
Ms. Walker brings extensive marketing and digital expertise. She has valuable business experience developed
through her business and consumer leadership positions in the information technology industry and is a recognized
industry authority on both technology and marketing. Her business expertise includes senior field and marketing roles
in Europe, North America, and the Asia-Pacific region.

Class of 2024
The following five directors are serving terms that will expire in May 2024.
baickerround17a.jpg
Katherine Baicker, Ph.D.

Age: 50, Director since 2011, Board Committees: Ethics and Compliance (chair); Science and Technology
PRIOR PUBLIC BOARDSMEMBERSHIPS + OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
lly-20230224_g70.jpg
RECOMMENDATION FOR
HMS Holdings Corp.Panel of Health Advisers to the Congressional Budget Office; Advisory Board of the National Institute for Health Care Management; Editorial Board of Health Affairs; Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research; Trustee of the Mayo Clinic, National Opinion Research Center, and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs; Member of the National Academy of Medicine, the National Academy of Social Insurance, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
Harris SchoolThe board recommends that you vote FOR the election of Public Policy, Universityeach of Chicagothe board’s nominees, William G. Kaelin, Jr., M.D., David A. Ricks, Marschall S. Runge, M.D., Ph.D., and Karen Walker, to serve as directors until our 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation, or removal.
     - Dean and the Emmett Dedmon Professor (2017 - present)
• Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management
     - C. Boyden Gray Professor (2014 -2017)
     - Acting Chair (2014 - 2016)
     - Professor of health economics (2007 - 2017)
• Council of Economic Advisers, Executive Office of the President
     - Member (2005 - 2007)
     - Senior Economist (2001 - 2002)
QUALIFICATIONS
Dr. Baicker is a leading researcher in the fields of health economics and public economics. As a valued adviser to numerous healthcare-related commissions and committees, her expertise in healthcare policy and healthcare delivery is recognized in both academia and government.

16


How We Operate an Effective Board
fyrwaldround17a.jpg
We believe that high board effectiveness promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders, strengthens the accountability of the board of directors and management, and improves our standing as a trusted member of the communities we serve. In addition to having the right mix of directors, there are many factors involved in operating an effective board.
J. Erik Fyrwald

Age: 62, Director since 2005, Board Committees: Compensation; Science and Technologylly-20230224_g71.gif
PUBLIC BOARDSPRIVATE BOARDSNON-PROFIT BOARDS
Bunge LimitedSyngenta Group
UN World Food Program Farm to Market Alliance;
Working Dynamics
CropLife International (chair); Swiss-American Chamber of Commerce;
Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• Syngenta Group, a global Swiss-based agriculture technology company that produces agrochemicals and seeds
     - President and Chief Executive Officer (2016 - present)
• Univar, Inc., a leading distributor of chemicals and provider of related services
     - President and Chief Executive Officer (2012 - 2016)
• Ecolab Inc., a leading provider of cleaning, sanitization, and water products and services
     - President (2012)
• Nalco Company, a leading provider of water treatment products and services
     - Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2008 - 2011)
• E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company, a global chemical company
     - Group Vice President, agriculture and nutrition (2003 - 2008)
QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Fyrwald has a strong record of operational and strategic leadership in complex worldwide businesses with a focus on technology and innovation. He is an engineer by training and has significant chief executive officer experience with Syngenta, Univar, and Nalco.


jacksonround18a.jpg
Jamere Jackson

Age: 53, Director since 2016, Board Committees: Audit (chair); Ethics and Compliance
PUBLIC BOARDS
Hibbett Sports, Inc.
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• Autozone, Inc., a leading retailer and distributor of automotive replacement parts and accessories in the United States, Mexico, and Brazil
     - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2020 - present)
• Hertz Global Holdings Inc., a global vehicle rental, leasing, and fleet management business
     - Chief Financial Officer (2018 - 2020)
• Nielsen Holdings plc, a global measurement and data analytics company
     - Chief Financial Officer (2014 - 2018)
• General Electric Company, an American multinational company and leader in the power, renewable energy, aviation and healthcare industries
     - Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, General Electric Oil & Gas, drilling and surface division (2013 - 2014)
     - Senior Executive, Finance, General Electric Aviation (2007 - 2013)
     - Finance Executive, General Electric Corporate (2004 - 2007)
QUALIFICATIONS
Through his senior financial roles at Autozone, Hertz, Nielsen, and General Electric, Mr. Jackson brings to the board significant global financial expertise and a strong background in strategic planning. He has spent his professional career in a broad range of financial and strategic planning roles. He is an audit committee financial expert, based on his chief financial officer experience and his training as a certified public accountant.

17


sulzbergerround18a.jpg
Gabrielle Sulzberger

Age: 61, Director since 2021, Board Committees: Audit; Ethics and Compliance
PUBLIC BOARDSPRIOR PUBLIC BOARDSNON-PROFIT BOARDS
Mastercard Incorporated;
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc.; Warby Parker Inc.


Whole Foods Markets, Inc.; Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited; Stage Stores, Inc.; IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.; Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc.; Brixmor Property Group Inc.Metropolitan Museum of Art; Ford Foundation; Trinity Wall Street; Sesame Street Workshop; TimesUp
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• Teneo, a global CEO advisory firm
     - Chair of Global ESG Advisory (2021 - present)
• TwoSigma Impact, a private equity fund based in New York, New York
     - Strategic Advisor (2021 - present)
• Rustic Canyon/Fontis Partners L.P., a private equity fund based in Pasadena, California
     - General Partner (2005 - 2018)
QUALIFICATIONS
Ms. Sulzberger brings 30 years of experience advising public and privately held companies in consumer products, retail, financial services, and life sciences, and deep corporate governance experience through her work with corporate boards. She is an audit committee financial expert based on her audit committee service at Cerevel and Whole Foods, her experience in private equity, and her prior service as chief financial officer of several public and private companies.


tairound19a.jpg
Jackson P. Tai

Age: 71, Director since 2013, Board Committees: Audit; Directors and Corporate Governance
PUBLIC BOARDSPRIOR PUBLIC BOARDSNON-PROFIT BOARDSMEMBERSHIPS + OTHER
ORGANIZATIONS
Mastercard Incorporated;
HSBC Holdings plc
Canada Pension Plan; Investment Board; Koninklijke Philips N.V.; The Bank of China Limited; Singapore Airlines Limited; NYSE Euronext; ING Groep N.V.; CapitaLand Limited (Singapore); DBS Group Holdings Ltd and DBS Bank LtdMetropolitan Opera;
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Harvard Business School
Asia-Pacific Advisory Board
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
• DBS Group Holdings Ltd and DBS Bank Ltd (formerly the Development Bank of Singapore), one of the largest financial services groups in Asia
     - Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2002 - 2007)
     - President and Chief Operating Officer (2001 - 2002)
     - Chief Financial Officer (1999 - 2001)
• J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, a leading global financial institution
     - Managing Director in the Investment Banking Division (1974 - 1999), including service as the senior officer for Japan Capital Markets and chairman of the Asia Pacific Management Committee
QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Tai is a former chief executive officer with extensive experience in international business and finance, and he is an audit committee financial expert based on his public company experience, including as an audit committee member of HSBC Holdings and Mastercard, and as chair of the risk committee of HSBC Holdings. He has deep expertise in the Asia-Pacific region, an important growth market for Lilly. He also has broad corporate governance experience from his service on public company boards in North America, Europe, and Asia.
18


Director Qualifications and Nomination Process
Director Qualifications
Experience:Our directors are responsible for overseeing the company's business consistent with their fiduciary duties. This significant responsibility requires highly skilled individuals with various qualities, attributes, and professional experience. We believe the board is well-rounded, with a balance of relevant perspectives and experience, as illustrated in the following chart. Categories referencing "expertise" indicate that the director is an expert in the field, while "experience" indicates direct experience, including management and oversight of significant operations:
CEO Experience:5
Financial Expertise:9
Relevant Scientific/Academic Expertise:3
Healthcare Experience:4
Operational/Strategic Expertise:9
International Experience:7
Marketing and Sales Expertise:5
Digital/Technology Expertise:3
Board Tenure: As the following chart demonstrates, our director composition reflects a mix of tenure on the board, which provides an effective balance of historical perspective and an understanding of the evolution of our business with fresh perspectives and insights. Mr. Eskew, who joined the board in 2008, will retire from the board following the Annual Meeting. The following graphic highlights the tenure of our current board members:
Less than 3 Years:2
3-5 Years:3
6-10 Years:4
More than 10 Years:4
Diversity:The board strives to achieve diversity in the broadest sense, including persons diverse in geography, gender, ethnicity, age, and experiences. Although the board does not establish specific diversity goals or have a standalone diversity policy, the board's overall diversity is an important consideration in the director selection and nomination process. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of board diversity efforts in connection with the annual nomination process as well as in new director searches. The company's current 13 directors range in age from 49 to 72 and include four women and six minority group members (MGM).
Character:Board members should possess the personal attributes necessary to be an effective director, including unquestioned integrity, sound judgment, a collaborative spirit, and commitment to the company, our shareholders, and other constituencies.
Director Refreshment
Together with our lead independent director, the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee performs periodic assessments of the overall composition and skills of the board to ensure that the board is actively engaged in succession planning for directors, and that our board reflects the viewpoints, diversity, and expertise necessary to support our complex and evolving business. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, with input from all board members, also considers the contributions of the individual directors.
The results of these assessments inform the board's recommendations on nominations for directors at the annual meeting of shareholders each year and help provide us with insight on the types of experiences, skills, perspectives, and other characteristics we should be seeking for future director candidates. Based on this assessment, the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended that each of the directors in the class of 2022 be elected at the Annual Meeting.
The board delegates the director screening process to the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, which receives input from other board members. Director candidates are identified from several sources, including executive search firms retained by the committee, incumbent directors, management, and shareholders. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee has retained Russell Reynolds Associates, an executive search and leadership consulting firm, to assist with identifying potential director candidates.
The Directors and Corporate Governance committee employs the same process to evaluate all candidates, including those submitted by shareholders. The committee initially evaluates a candidate based on publicly available information and any additional information supplied by the party recommending the candidate. If the candidate appears to satisfy the selection criteria and the committee’s initial evaluation is favorable, the committee, assisted by management or a search firm, gathers
19


additional data on the candidate’s qualifications, availability, probable level of interest, and any potential conflicts of interest. If the committee’s subsequent evaluation continues to be favorable, the candidate is contacted by the chair of the board and one or more of the independent directors, including the lead independent director, for direct discussions to determine the mutual level of interest in pursuing the candidacy. If these discussions are favorable, the committee recommends that the board nominate the candidate for election by the shareholders (or elects the candidate to fill a vacancy, as applicable).
Director Compensation
Directors who are employees receive no additional compensation for serving on the board. Non-employee director compensation is reviewed and approved by the board, on the recommendation of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee.
Cash Compensation
The following table shows the retainers and meeting fees in effect in 2021 for all non-employee directors:
Board and Committee Membership Retainers
(annual, paid in monthly installments)
Leadership Retainers
(annual, paid in monthly installments)
Annual board retainer$110,000Lead independent director$35,000
Audit Committee and Science and Technology Committee members (including the chairs)$6,000Audit Committee chair$18,000
Compensation Committee, Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, and Ethics and Compliance Committee members (including the chairs)$3,000Science and Technology Committee chair$15,000
All other committee chairs$12,000
Directors are reimbursed for customary and usual travel expenses in connection with their travel to and from board meetings and other company events. Non-employee directors may also receive additional cash compensation for serving on ad hoc committees that may be formed by the board from time to time.
Effective January 1, 2022, leadership retainers for committee chairs were increased to $22,000 for the Audit Committee chair, $18,000 for the Science and Technology Committee chair, and $17,000 for all other committee chairs. No increase was made to the lead independent director retainer.
Stock Compensation
A significant portion of non-employee director compensation is linked to the long-term performance of Lilly stock. In 2021, non-employee directors received an annual equity-based award valued at $175,000. The award was credited to each non-employee director’s deferred stock account established under the Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan as a number of units calculated by dividing $175,000 by the closing stock price on a pre-set annual date (approximately 677 units). The units track the economic value of shares of company stock with stock dividends being deemed "reinvested" in additional units based on the market price of the stock on the date dividends are paid. The units become converted into and issuable to the non-employee directors as shares of company stock commencing on the second January following a director's departure from board service (either in lump sum or installments as described below). When applicable, the annual equity-based award is prorated for time served.
Effective January 1, 2022, non-employee directors will receive an annual equity-based award valued at $180,000.
Share Ownership Guidelines
Directors are required to hold meaningful equity ownership positions in the company. Non-employee directors are required to hold Lilly stock, directly or through units representing the right to receive shares of Lilly stock under the Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan, valued at not less than five times their annual board retainer; new non-employee directors are allowed five years to reach this ownership level. All non-employee directors serving at least five years have satisfied these guidelines. All other non-employee directors are, or in the case of recently elected directors, are expected to begin, making progress toward these requirements.
Annual Compensation Cap for Directors
In 2018, the board approved an annual cap to the total annual compensation (cash and equity compensation) for non-employee directors of $800,000. The cap is intended to avoid excessive director compensation and is included in both the Lilly Directors' Deferral Plan and in the Amended and Restated 2002 Lilly Stock Plan approved by shareholders at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders.
Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan
In addition to the annual equity-based grants credited to each non-employee director’s deferred stock account as described above, the Lilly Directors' Deferral Plan allows non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or part of their cash
20


compensation until after their service on the board has ended. Each director can choose to invest any amounts deferred in one or both of the following two accounts:
Deferred Stock Account.This account allows the non-employee director, in effect, to invest his or her deferred cash compensation in company stock. Funds in this account are credited as units representing the right to receive shares of company stock based on the closing stock price on pre-set monthly dates. Hypothetical dividends are deemed "reinvested" in additional units based on the market price of the stock on the date dividends are paid. The units become converted into and issuable to the non-employee director as shares of company stock commencing on the second January following the director's departure from board service (either in a lump sum or installments as described below). The deferral stock account is the same account where the annual equity-based awards are credited with the same conversion timing and procedure applicable to the annual equity-based awards.
Deferred Compensation Account.Deferred cash compensation in this account earns interest each year at a rate of 120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate, compounded monthly, as established the preceding December by the U.S. Treasury Department under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Internal Revenue Code). The aggregate amount of interest that accrued in 2021 for the participating directors was $68,808, at a rate of 1.6 percent. The rate for 2022 is 2.3 percent.
Both accounts may be paid out in a lump sum or in annual installments for up to 10 years based on individual director annual elections. All payments begin the second January following the director’s departure from board service. Amounts in the deferred stock account are paid in shares of company stock.
2021 Compensation for Non-Employee Directors
NameFees Earned
or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($)1
All Other
Compensation
and Payments ($)
2
Total ($)3
Mr. Alvarez$131,000$175,000$0$306,000
Dr. Baicker$131,000$175,000$0$306,000
Mr. Eskew$131,000$175,000$10,000$316,000
Mr. Fyrwald$119,000$175,000$52,382$346,382
Mr. Jackson$137,000$175,000$0$312,000
Ms. Johnson$101,155$160,417$0$261,572
Dr. Kaelin$134,000$175,000$7,000$316,000
Mr. Luciano$151,000$175,000$0$326,000
Dr. Runge$119,000$175,000$0$294,000
Ms. Sulzberger$111,323$175,000$0$286,323
Mr. Tai$119,000$175,000$60,000$354,000
Ms. Walker$119,000$175,000$40,000$334,000
Former Directors:
Carolyn R. Bertozzi, Ph. D.$79,333$116,667$0$196,000
Kathi P. Seifert$39,602$72,917$46,500$159,019
1 Each non-employee director received an equity-based award of units valued at $175,000 (approximately 677 units) except Ms. Johnson, Dr. Bertozzi and Ms. Seifert, each of whom received a pro-rated award for a partial year of service. These units, and all prior awards of such units, are fully vested; however, the shares subject to such awards of units are not issued until the second January following the director's departure from board service when, as described above under "Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan," the units are converted into shares of company stock and distributed to the former director. The column shows the grant date fair value for each director’s equity-based award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, based on the closing stock price on the grant date. See Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, for additional detail regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards. Aggregate outstanding stock awards are shown in the "Common Stock Ownership by Directors and Executive Officers" table in the "Stock Units Not Distributable Within 60 Days" column.
2 This column consists of amounts donated by the Eli Lilly and Company Foundation, Inc. (the Foundation) under its matching gift program, which is generally available to U.S. employees as well as non-employee directors. Under this program, the Foundation matched 100 percent of charitable donations over $25 made to eligible charities, up to a maximum of $30,000 per year for each individual. The Foundation matched these donations via payments made directly to the recipient charity. The amounts for Mr. Fyrwald, Ms. Seifert, Mr. Tai and Ms. Walker include matching contributions for donations made at the end of 2020 (Mr. Fyrwald - $27,600; Ms. Seifert - $9,000; Mr. Tai - $30,000; Ms. Walker - $20,000) for which the matching contribution was not paid until 2021. The amount for Ms. Seifert also includes a $10,000 donation by the Foundation to a charity of Ms. Seifert's choosing in honor of her retirement from the board, consistent with the company's traditional practice for retiring directors.
3 Non-employee directors do not participate in a company pension plan or non-equity incentive plan.
2022 Director Compensation
The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee performs regular reviews of non-employee director compensation. In 2021 the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee performed an in depth review of non-employee director compensation, including a general industry peer group analysis and a pharmaceutical company peer group analysis
21


conducted with the assistance of an outside compensation consultant, discussions regarding the effectiveness of the non-employee directors in their various duties, and other considerations, including the desire to have non-employee director compensation positioned near the market median when compared against the general industry peer group. Following this review, and upon the recommendation of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, the board approved increases to the non-employee director committee leadership retainers effective January 1, 2022, and the annual non-employee director equity-award beginning in 2022, as further described above.
Director Independence
The board annually determines the independence of directors based on a review and recommendation by the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee. No director is considered independent unless the board has affirmatively determined that he or she has no material relationship with the company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company. In assessing whether a director has no material relationship with Lilly, the board of directors also considers any persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. Material relationships can include commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, and familial relationships, among others. To evaluate the materiality of any such relationship, the board has adopted categorical independence standards consistent with the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards.
The company's process for determining director independence is set forth in our Standards for Director Independence, which can be found on our website atlilly.com/leadership/governance, along with our corporate governance guidelines.
On the recommendation of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, the board determined that each current non-employee director is independent. The board also determined that the members of our Audit and Compensation Committees also meet the heightened independence standards applicable to those committees. Prior to their departures from our board in 2021, the board had reached the same conclusions about Dr. Bertozzi and Ms. Seifert. The board determined that none of the current non-employee directors has had during the last three years (i) any of the relationships identified in the company’s categorical independence standards or (ii) any other material relationship with the company that would compromise his or her independence.
In making its independence determinations, the board considered that some of the current non-employee directors are affiliated with companies or entities to which the company sold products or made payments, or from which the company purchased products or services during the year. Drs. Baicker, Kaelin, and Runge are employed at medical or academic institutions with which the company engages in clinical research, provides research grants, and/or engages in commercial transactions in the ordinary course of business. Mr. Luciano is employed by Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Mr. Fyrwald is employed by Syngenta Group. The company engages in routine business transactions with these organizations. Aggregate payments to or from each such organization, in each of the last three fiscal years, did not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2 percent of that organization's consolidated gross revenues in a single fiscal year. In reviewing these relationships, the board considers all relevant factors, including:
whether any transactions were entered into at arm's length in the normal course of business and, to the extent they are commercial relationships, have standard commercial terms; and
whether any director had any direct business relationships with the company or received any direct personal benefit from any of these transactions, relationships, or arrangements.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The duties and membership of our board-appointed committees are described below.
All committee members are independent as defined in the NYSE listing requirements and Lilly's independence standards. The members of the Audit and Compensation Committees each meet the additional independence requirements applicable to them as members of those committees.
The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, together with the lead independent director, identifies and recommends to the board candidates for membership on the board and board committees, and develops and recommends criteria and policies relating to service and tenure of directors. The board has no set policy for rotation of committee members or chairs but annually reviews committee memberships and chair positions, seeking the best blend of continuity and innovative perspectives on the committees.
The chair of each committee determines the frequency and agenda of committee meetings, subject to any minimums specified in the relevant committee charter, and the committees meet alone in executive session on a regular basis.
22


Membership and Meetings of the Board and Its Committees
In 2021, each director attended at least 75 percent of the total number of meetings of the board and the committees on which he or she served during his or her tenure as a board or committee member. In addition, all board members are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. All directors then serving on the board attended the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders with the exception of Ms. Seifert, who retired following the 2021 annual meeting. Current committee membership and the number of meetings of the board and each committee held in 2021 are shown in the table below.
NameBoardAuditCompensationDirectors and
Corporate Governance

Ethics and Compliance
Science and
Technology
Mr. AlvarezüüC
Dr. BaickerüCü
Mr. EskewüüC
Mr. Fyrwaldüüü
Mr. JacksonüCü
Ms. Johnsonüüü
Dr. KaelinüüC
Mr. LucianoLDüü
Mr. Ricksü
Dr. Rungeüüü
Ms. Sulzbergerüüü
Mr. Taiüüü
Ms. Walkerüüü
Number of 2021 Meetings799469
C    Committee Chair
LD    Lead Independent Director
All committee charters are available online at lilly.com/leadership/governance. Key responsibilities of each committee are set forth below.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by monitoring:
the integrity of financial information provided to our shareholders and others
management's systems of internal controls and disclosure controls
the performance of internal and independent audit functions
the qualifications and independence of the company’s independent auditor
the company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
processes and procedures related to identifying and mitigating enterprise-level risks.
The committee has sole authority to appoint or replace the independent auditor, subject to shareholder ratification.
The board has determined that Mr. Alvarez, Mr. Eskew, Mr. Jackson, Ms. Sulzberger, and Mr. Tai are audit committee financial experts, as defined in the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee:
establishes the compensation of our CEO, in consultation with other independent directors and our external compensation consultant, and other executive officers
oversees the company's global compensation philosophy and human management capital efforts, including DEI efforts
acts as the oversight committee with respect to the company’s deferred compensation plans, management stock plans, and other management incentive and benefit programs
reviews succession plans for the CEO and other key senior leadership positions, including a broad review of our succession management
23


advises our management and the board regarding other human capital management, DEI efforts, and employee compensation and benefits matters
reviews, monitors, and oversees stock ownership guidelines for executive officers
oversees the company’s executive compensation recovery policy
oversees the company’s engagement with shareholders regarding executive compensation matters, including reviewing and evaluating the results of advisory votes on executive compensation.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During the year ended December 31, 2021, Mr. Alvarez, Mr. Fyrwald, Ms. Johnson, Mr. Luciano, Ms. Seifert and Ms. Walker served on the Compensation Committee, with Ms. Seifert’s service on the Compensation Committee concluding in May 2021 upon her retirement from the board and Ms. Walker’s service on the Compensation Committee beginning January 1, 2021.
None of the Compensation Committee members:
has ever been an officer or employee of the company
is or has been a participant in a related person transaction with the company (see "Governance—Highlights of the Company's Corporate Governance—Conflicts of Interest and Transactions with Related Persons—Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons" for a description of our policy on related person transactions)
has any other interlocking relationships requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules.
Directors and Corporate Governance Committee
The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee:
reviews and recommends to the board the size and composition of the board and its committees
leads the process for director recruitment, together with the lead independent director
reviews recommendations for nominees for the board of directors
oversees matters of corporate governance, including board performance, non-employee director independence and compensation, corporate governance guidelines, and shareholder engagement on governance matters
identifies and brings to the attention of the board as appropriate current and emerging environmental, social political, and governance trends and public policy issues that may affect the business operations, performance or reputation of the company
annually assesses the performance of the board, board committees and board processes, and reviews such findings with the board.
Ethics and Compliance Committee
The Ethics and Compliance Committee:
reviews, identifies and, when appropriate, brings to the attention of the board legal and regulatory trends and issues, and compliance and quality matters that may have an impact on the business operations, financial performance, or reputation of the company
reviews, monitors, and makes recommendations to the board on corporate policies and practices related to compliance, including those related to employee health and safety.
Science and Technology Committee
The Science and Technology Committee:
reviews and advises the board regarding the company’s long-term strategic goals and objectives and the quality and direction of the company’s research and development programs
reviews and advises the board and management on the company’s major technology positions and strategies relative to emerging technologies, emerging concepts of therapy and health care, and changing market requirements
monitors and evaluates developments, technologies, and trends in pharmaceutical research and development
regularly reviews the company's product pipeline
assists the board with its oversight responsibility for enterprise risk management in areas affecting the company's research and development.
24


Board Oversight of Strategy, Compliance, and Risk Management
The board takes an active approach to its role in overseeing the development and execution of the company’s business strategies. On an annual basis, the board and executive management conduct an extended review and discussion of the company’s strategy, evaluating goals, the external environment, key questions, and key risks. Board meetings include discussions of company performance relative to the strategy. The board also reviews strategic focus areas for the company, such as innovation, information security, cybersecurity, and human capital management. See also "Governance—Highlights of the Company’s Corporate Governance—Human Capital Management."
The board, together with its committees, oversees the processes by which the company conducts its business to ensure the company operates in a manner that complies with laws and regulations and reflects the highest standards of integrity. The Ethics and Compliance Committee meets at least four times per year, including semi-annual private sessions to discuss compliance with the company’s chief ethics and compliance officer, the general auditor, and the senior vice president, global quality. On an annual basis, the full board reviews the company's overall state of compliance and the Ethics and Compliance Committee receives an update on compliance at each meeting.
The chief ethics and compliance officer and the senior vice president, global quality report directly to the CEO.
The company also has an enterprise risk management program directed by its chief ethics and compliance officer. Enterprise risks are identified and prioritized by management through both top-down and bottom-up processes. Key enterprise-level risks are overseen by the full board and our enterprise risk management process is overseen by the Audit Committee. Company management is charged with managing risk through robust internal processes and controls. The enterprise-level risks are reviewed annually at a full board meeting, and relevant enterprise risks are also addressed in periodic business function reviews and at the annual board and senior management strategy session.
Code of Ethics
The board approves the company's code of ethics, which is set out in:
The Red Book:A comprehensive code of ethical and legal business conduct applicable to all employees worldwide and to our board. The Red Book is reviewed and approved annually by the board. In 2022 we revised The Red Book training to update our Global Conduct in the Workplace procedure to continue to help ensure that we maintain a respectful, safe, inclusive, and professional workplace.
Code of Ethical Conduct for Lilly Financial Management: A supplemental code for our CEO and all members of financial management, in recognition of their unique responsibilities to ensure proper accounting, financial reporting, internal controls, and financial stewardship.
These documents are available online at lilly.com/operating-responsibly/ethics-compliance and lilly.com/operating-responsibly/ethics-compliance/financial-management-ethical-conduct. In the event of any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the code affecting the CEO, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions, we intend to post on the above website, within four business days after the event, a description of the amendment or waiver as required under applicable SEC rules, and we will maintain that information on our website for at least 12 months.
Highlights of the Company’s Corporate Governance
We are committed to good corporate governance, which promotes the long-term interests of shareholders and other company stakeholders, builds confidence in our leadership, and strengthens accountability by the board and management. The board has adopted corporate governance guidelines that set forth the company's basic principles of corporate governance. The section that follows outlines key elements of the guidelines and other important governance matters. Investors can learn more by reviewing the corporate governance guidelines, which are available online at lilly.com/leadership/governance.
Role of the Board
Directors are elected by the shareholders to oversee the actions and results of the company’s management. The board exercises oversight over a broad range of areas, but the board's key responsibilities include the following (certain of which are carried out through the board's committees):
providing general oversight of the business
approving corporate strategy
approving major management initiatives
overseeing capital allocation
selecting, compensating, evaluating, and, when necessary, replacing the CEO, and compensating other senior executives
ensuring that an effective succession plan is in place for all key senior leadership positions and reviewing our broader talent management process, including human capital management strategies, overall corporate culture, and DEI programs
25


overseeing the company’s ethics and compliance program and management of significant business risks
selecting, compensating, and evaluating directors
evaluating board processes and performance
overseeing the company's enterprise risk management program, including receiving regular briefings on cyber,
technology and information risks
overseeing the company’s approach to current and emerging environmental, social, political, and governance trends and public policy issues that may affect the business operations, performance or reputation of thecompany
overseeing the company’s political expenditures and lobbying activities.
The board takes an active role in its oversight of our corporate strategy. Each year, the board and executive management closely examine the company's strategy, including key risks and decisions facing the company. Decisions reached in this session are updated throughout the year, including as the board discusses the company's financial performance, the performance of our business units, and progress in our product pipeline.
Board Composition and Requirements
Mix of Independent Directors and Officer-Directors
We believe there should always be a substantial majority (75 percent or more) of independent directors. The CEO should be a member of the board.
Voting for Directors
In an uncontested election, directors are elected by a majority of votes cast. An incumbent nominee who fails to receive a greater number of votes "for" than "against" his or her election will tender his or her resignation from the board following the certification of the shareholder vote. The board, on recommendation of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, will decide whether to accept the resignation. The company will promptly disclose the board's decision, including, if applicable, the reasons the board rejected the resignation.
Director Tenure and Retirement Policy
Non-employee directors must retire from the board no later than the date of the annual meeting that follows their seventy-second birthday, although the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee may recommend exceptions to this policy. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, with input from all board members, also considers the contributions of the individual directors annually, with a more robust assessment at least every three years when considering whether to nominate directors to new three-year terms. The company has not adopted term limits because the board believes that the company benefits from having a mix of longer- and shorter-tenured members of the board.
Other Board Service
To ensure proper engagement from our directors and effective functioning of our board, we have instituted certain limitations on service on the boards of other companies. In general, no director may serve on more than three other public company boards. No director that is an executive officer of a public company may serve on more than two public company boards (inclusive of Lilly).The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee may approve exceptions if it determines that the additional service will not impair the director's effectiveness on the Lilly board. In addition, no director serving on the Audit Committee may serve simultaneously on the audit committee of more than two other public companies without the prior approval of the board.
Board Confidentiality Policy
The board has adopted a Confidentiality Policy, applicable to all current and future members of the board. The policy prohibits a director from sharing confidential information obtained in his or her role as a director with any third party except under limited circumstances where the director is seeking legal advice or is required by law to disclose information. The Confidentiality Policy can be viewed on the company's website: lilly.com/leadership/governance.
Leadership Structure; Oversight of Chair, CEO, and Senior Management
Leadership Structure
Our board believes that there is no "one-size-fits-all"“one-size-fits-all” approach to board leadership and recognizes that one of its key responsibilities is to evaluate its optimal leadership structure to ensure both independent oversight of management and an engaged board with complementary qualities, perspectives, and experiences. The board regularly reviews its leadership structure and developments in the area of corporate governance to ensure that our chosen leadership structure continues to strike the appropriate balance for the company and our stakeholders and enables us to promote the long-term interests of our shareholders. Throughout 2021,

28


In 2022, the board continued its proactive assessment of board succession and refreshment. After thoughtful consideration of our business, long-term strategy, and related risks, and the strong rolestrength of our lead independent director, the independent directors believe that combiningthe combination of the chair and CEO roles, coupled with a strong lead independent director position, continues to be in the best interest of the company and our shareholders. The board believes
26


that Mr. Ricks’ extensive knowledge of, and experience in, the pharmaceutical industry enables him to effectively set the long-term strategic direction of the company and provide diligent, long-term leadership and direction for management and our board.
Mr. Luciano serves as the current lead independent director. Mr. Luciano is a strong lead independent director who fulfilled each offulfills the duties below during the past year.below. As the CEO and president of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, he brings valuable and diverse experience and outside perspective to his lead independent director role, which permits him to serve as a trusted adviser to Mr. Ricks and ensure effective board management.management and risk oversight.
Lead Independent Director Responsibilities and Characteristics
lly-20230224_g72.jpglly-20230224_g73.jpg
In 2021,2022, the independent directors, led by Mr. Luciano, met at each regularly scheduled board meeting in executive session to discuss various matters related to the oversight of the company, the management of the board’s affairs, and the CEO’s performance. We believe Mr. Luciano fosters an open and constructive dialogue during these sessions as well as during individual discussions with the independent directors. Mr. Luciano advisesinforms Mr. Ricks onof the independent directors’ discussions, including providing performance feedback.
Board Independence
TheFostering Independent Oversight
In addition to a strong lead independent director role, the board has put in place a number of governance practices to ensure effective independent oversight, including:
Executive sessions of the independent directors:Held after every regular board meeting and presided over by the lead independent director.

29


Annual performance evaluation of the chair and CEO:Conducted by the independent directors, the results of which are reviewed with the CEO and considered by the Talent and Compensation Committee and independent directors in establishing the CEO’s compensation for the nextfollowing year.
A strong, independent, clearly defined lead independent director role: The lead independent director's responsibilities include:
leading the board’s processes for selecting the CEO
overseeing the independent directors’ annual performance evaluation of the chair and CEO
serving as a liaison between the chair and the independent directors
presiding at all meetings of the board at which the chair is not present
presiding at executive sessions of the independent directors
calling meetings of the independent directors, as appropriate
approving meeting agendas and schedules and reviewing information to be provided to the board
being available for consultation and direct communication with shareholders, as appropriate
together with the chair and the chair of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, conducting the annual board assessment process
together with the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, leading the director succession planning process
retaining advisors for the independent directors, as appropriate.
Lead independent director assessment:The lead independent director is elected by and from among the independent directors of the board, which conducts an assessment of his or her performance as part of the annual board assessment process. Currently, Mr. Luciano isprocess as well as an assessment of key characteristics for the lead independent director.director position.
Director access to independent advisors:The independent directors and all committees have the ability to retain their own independent advisors, at the company’s expense, whenever they deem it desirable to do so.
Director access to management: Independent directors have direct access to members of management whenever they deem it necessary, and certain of the company'scompany’s executive officers attend part of each regularly scheduled board meeting.
CEO Succession Planning
Board Structure
The board has established five standing committees: Audit, Talent and Compensation, Directors and Corporate Governance, Science and Technology, and Ethics and Compliance. Our independent directors are appointed to committees to take advantage of their diverse skill sets and enable deep focus on a specific scope of matters. The board annually reviews committee memberships and chair positions, seeking the best blend of continuity and innovative perspectives on the committees.
Each of our committees:
operates pursuant to a written charter (available on our website at lilly.com/leadership/governance),
evaluates its performance annually,
reviews its charter annually, and
is composed only of members that have been determined by the board to be independent as defined in the NYSE listing requirements and Lilly’s independence standards.
In addition, the members of the Audit and Talent and Compensation Committees each meet the additional independence requirements applicable to them as members of those committees. For more information on director independence, see “GovernanceHow We Build an Effective BoardDirector QualificationsIndependence.”
The chair of each committee determines the frequency and agenda of committee meetings, subject to any minimums specified in the relevant committee charter, and the committees meet alone in executive session on a regular basis.
Meetings of the Board and Its Committees
In 2022, our board met seven times, and each director attended at least 75 percent of the total number of meetings of the board and the committees on which he or she served during his or her tenure as a board or committee member. In addition, all board members are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. All directors then serving on the board attended the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders with the exception of Mr. Eskew, who retired following the 2022 annual meeting. Key responsibilities, current committee membership and the number of meetings of the board and each committee held in 2022 are shown in the table below.

30


Committees of the Board
lly-20230224_g74.gif
Audit Committee
Members:
Mr. Alvarez*
Mr. Jackson* (Chair)
Ms. Sulzberger*
Mr. Tai*
Ms. Walker
* Financial Experts
Meetings in 2022: 6

Key responsibilities and areas of risk oversight:
oversees integrity of financial information provided to our shareholders and others
oversees management’s systems of internal controls and disclosure controls
oversees performance of internal and independent audit functions
establishes qualifications and determines independence of the company’s independent auditor
has sole authority to appoint or replace the independent auditor
oversees compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
oversees processes and procedures related to identifying and mitigating enterprise-level risks
oversees the company’s programs, policies, procedures, and risk management activities related to information security and data protection    
together with the ethics and compliance committee, oversees the company’s compliance with the company’s code of ethics                                    
lly-20230224_g75.jpg
Talent and Compensation Committee
Members:
Mr. Alvarez (Chair)
Mr. Fyrwald
Ms. Johnson
Mr. Luciano
Ms. Walker
Meetings in 2022: 7

Key responsibilities and areas of risk oversight:
establishes the compensation of CEO (in consultation with independent directors and external compensation consultant) and other executive officers
oversees global compensation philosophy and human management capital efforts, including DEI efforts
has authority to appoint or replace the compensation consultant
acts as the oversight committee with respect to the company’s deferred compensation plans, management stock plans, and other management incentive and benefit programs
reviews succession plans for the CEO and other key senior leadership positions, including a broad review of our succession management
advises our management and the board regarding other human capital management, DEI efforts, and employee compensation and benefits matters
reviews, monitors, and oversees stock ownership guidelines for executive officers
oversees the company’s executive compensation recovery policy
oversees the company’s engagement with shareholders regarding executive compensation matters, including reviewing and evaluating the results of advisory votes on executive compensation

31


lly-20230224_g47.gif
Directors and Corporate Governance Committee
Members:
Dr. Kaelin
Mr. Luciano (Chair)
Ms. Sulzberger
Mr. Tai
Meetings in 2022: 7
Key responsibilities and areas of risk oversight:
reviews and recommends to the board the size and composition of the board and its committees
leads the process for director recruitment, together with the lead independent director
reviews recommendations for nominees for the board of directors
oversees matters of corporate governance, including board performance, non-employee director independence and compensation, corporate governance guidelines, and shareholder engagement on governance matters
identifies and brings to the attention of the board as appropriate current and emerging environmental, social, political, and governance trends and public policy issues that may affect the business operations, performance, or reputation of the company
annually assesses the performance of the board, board committees and board processes, and reviews such findings with the board
lly-20230224_g76.gif
Ethics and Compliance Committee
Members:
Dr. Baicker (Chair)
Dr. Hedley
Mr. Jackson
Ms. Johnson
Dr. Runge
Meetings in 2022: 4
Key responsibilities and areas of risk oversight:
reviews, identifies and, when appropriate, brings to the attention of the board legal and regulatory trends and issues, and compliance and quality matters that may have an impact on the business operations, financial performance, or reputation of the company
reviews, monitors, and makes recommendations to the board on corporate policies and practices related to compliance, including those related to employee health and safety
together with the audit committee, assists the board in its oversight of legal and regulatory compliance and oversees the company’s compliance with its code of ethics
lly-20230224_g45.gif
Science and Technology Committee
Members:
Dr. Baicker
Mr. Fyrwald
Dr. Hedley
Dr. Kaelin (Chair)
Dr. Runge
Meetings in 2022: 7
Key responsibilities and areas of risk oversight:
reviews and advises the board regarding the company’s long-term strategic goals and objectives and the quality and direction of the company’s research and development programs
reviews and advises the board and management on the company’s major technology positions and strategies relative to emerging technologies, emerging concepts of therapy and health care, and changing market requirements
monitors and evaluates developments, technologies, and trends in pharmaceutical research and development
regularly reviews the company’s product pipeline
assists the board with its oversight responsibility for enterprise risk management in areas affecting the company’s research and development

32



Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During the year ended December 31, 2022, Mr. Alvarez, Mr. Fyrwald, Ms. Johnson, Mr. Luciano, and Ms. Walker served on the Talent and Compensation Committee.
None of the Talent and Compensation Committee members:
has ever been an officer or employee of the company,
is or has been a participant in a related person transaction with the company (see “GovernanceHow We Operate an Effective BoardBoard AlignmentConflicts of Interest and Transactions with Related PersonsReview and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons” for a description of our policy on related person transactions), or
has any other interlocking relationships requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules.
Governance Practices
We are committed to good corporate governance, which promotes the long-term interests of shareholders and other company stakeholders, builds confidence in our leadership, and strengthens accountability by the board and management.
Board Oversight
The board exercises oversight over a broad range of areas, but the board’s key responsibilities include the following (certain of which are carried out through the board’s committees):
providing general oversight of the business
approving corporate strategy
approving major management initiatives
overseeing significant capital allocation
selecting, compensating, evaluating, and, when necessary, replacing the CEO, and compensating other senior executives
ensuring that an effective succession plan is in place for all key senior leadership positions and reviewing our broader talent management process, including human capital management strategies, overall corporate culture, and DEI programs
overseeing the company’s ethics and compliance program and management of significant business risks
selecting, compensating, and evaluating directors, and evaluating board processes and performance
overseeing the company’s enterprise risk management program, including receiving regular briefings on cybersecurity, technology, and information risks
overseeing the company’s approach to current and emerging environmental, social, political, and governance trends and public policy issues that may affect the business operations, performance or reputation of the company, and
overseeing the company’s political expenditures and lobbying activities.
Key Areas of Oversight by the Board and Its Committees
lly-20230224_g77.gif
Strategy
The board takes an active role in overseeing the development and execution of the company’s business strategy. Each year, the board and executive management conduct an extended review and discussion of the company’s strategy, goals, external environment, and key risks. Board meetings include discussions of company performance relative to its strategy. The board also reviews strategic focus areas for the company, such as innovation, information security, cybersecurity, and human capital management. Decisions reached in this session are reevaluated throughout the year, including as the board discusses the company’s financial performance, the performance of our business units, and progress in our product pipeline.


33


lly-20230224_g78.gif
Compliance
The board, together with its committees, oversees the processes by which the company conducts its business to ensure the company operates in a manner that complies with laws and regulations and reflects the highest standards of integrity. The Ethics and Compliance Committee meets at least four times per year, including semi-annual private sessions to discuss compliance with the company’s chief ethics and compliance officer, the general auditor, and the executive vice president, global quality. On an annual basis, the full board reviews the company’s overall state of compliance and the Ethics and Compliance Committee receives an update on compliance at each committee meeting. The chief ethics and compliance officer and the executive vice president, global quality report directly to the CEO.
lly-20230224_g79.gif
Risk Management
Our board, as a whole, is responsible for broad oversight of all existing and emerging enterprise risk (over the short-, mid- and long-term) and of management’s development and execution of mitigation strategies designed to address those risks. In this capacity, the board has designated committees to assist in its oversight of particular key risks as described in Board StructureCommittee Descriptions. Oversight of additional matters of potential risk not delegated remain the responsibility of the full board.
While the board and its committees oversee risk management, the company’s senior management is responsible for identifying, assessing and mitigating risk on a day-to-day basis. Each committee of our board meets regularly with key management personnel and, as desired by the applicable committee, outside advisors (including outside counsel, consultants and experts) to oversee risks associated with their respective principal areas of focus. In turn, each committee reports to the board regularly, fostering awareness and communication of significant matters among all directors, and promoting a coordinated and cohesive approach to enterprise risk oversight.
The company’s enterprise risk management program, which is overseen by the Audit Committee, is directed by its chief ethics and compliance officer. Enterprise risks are identified and prioritized by management through both top-down and bottom-up processes. Management uses robust internal processes and controls to manage risk. The enterprise-level risks are reviewed annually at a full board meeting, and relevant enterprise risks are also addressed in periodic business function reviews and at the annual board and senior management strategy session. Management frequently collaborates throughout the year to keep an open dialogue on emerging risks identified from a variety of internal and external sources.
lly-20230224_g80.gif
Governance
Corporate Governance Guidelines - The board has adopted corporate governance guidelines that set forth the company’s key principles of corporate governance and are available at lilly.com/leadership/governance.
Code of Ethics - The board approves the company’s code of ethics, which is set out in:
The Red Book: A code of ethical and legal business conduct applicable to all employees worldwide and to our board. The Red Book is reviewed and approved annually by the board. In 2022, we revised The Red Book training to update our Global Conduct in the Workplace procedure to continue to help ensure that we maintain a respectful, safe, inclusive, and professional workplace.
Code of Ethical Conduct for Lilly Financial Management: A supplemental code for our CEO and all members of financial management in recognition of their unique responsibilities to ensure proper accounting, financial reporting, internal controls, and financial stewardship.
These documents are available at lilly.com/operating-responsibly/ethics-compliance and lilly.com/operating-responsibly/ethics-compliance/financial-management-ethical-conduct. In the event of any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the code affecting the CEO, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions, we intend to post on the above website, within four business days after the event, a description of the amendment or waiver as required under applicable SEC rules. We will maintain that information on our website for at least 12 months.

34


lly-20230224_g81.gif
CEO Succession Planning
At least annually, the Talent and Compensation Committee, board, and CEO annually review the company'scompany’s succession plans for the CEO and other key senior leadership positions. The independent directors also meet without the CEO to discuss CEO succession planning.
During these reviews, the CEO and directors discuss:
future candidates for the CEO and other senior leadership positionspositions;
succession timingtiming; and
development plans for potential candidates.
27


The independent directors and the CEO maintain a confidential plan for the timely and efficient transfer of the CEO'sCEO’s responsibilities in the event of an emergency or his sudden departure, incapacitation, or death.
The company ensures that the directors have multiple opportunities to interact with the company'scompany’s top leadership talent in both formal and informal settings to allow them to most effectively assess the candidates'candidates’ qualifications and capabilities.
Environmental, Social, and Governance
Overview and Oversight
Our purpose is to unite caring with discovery to create medicines that make life better for people around the world. This purpose guides our ESG strategy, which includes five key pillars: Increase Access to Medicines, Improve Lives and Communities, Empower a Diverse Workforce, Minimize Our Environmental Impact and Operate Ethically and Responsibly.
We have undertaken a detailed review of our sustainability efforts, how we communicate our progress toward our ESG goals, and our broader ESG strategy. In 2021, we adopted additional prevalent reporting frameworks, established new 2030 sustainability goals, and held an ESG stakeholder day to share our strategy and progress. In 2021, we also issued Lilly’s first sustainability bond, which will help fund projects that will contribute to our ESG objectives.
We made progress toward our ESG goals in 2021 by, among other things:
Continuing our 30x30 global health effort, including an expansion of our partnership with Life for a Child to provide diabetes support to children in more than 60 countries over the next 10 years and the establishment of royalty-free licensing agreements with Indian pharmaceutical companies to accelerate manufacturing and distribution of our COVID-19 therapy baricitinib.
Making investments in our communities, including our investment in Sixty8 Capital, and a $5 million commitment to Direct Relief’s Fund for Health Equity.
Lilly employees completing 10,015 hours of 25,000 volunteer hours pledged over five years by Lilly as part of our Racial Justice Commitment.
Sharing our EEO-1 data for 2020 in an effort to enhance transparency about our workforce diversity and respond to stakeholder interest in this information.
Bringing on-line the largest solar field in Ireland at our facility in Kinsale, Ireland and completing solar installations at our facilities in Spain.
lly-20230224_g11.jpg
Environmental, Social, and Governance
Our approach to ESG governance includes board oversight, management accountability, corporate policies and management systems, and stated public policies and positions on key ESG topics. Our full board is engaged in strategic ESG oversight, receivingreceives regular updates on ESG matters, reviewing and approvingreviews our long-term environmental goals, and weighingweighs in on significant strategic investments, including those related to ESG. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for identifying and bringing to the attention of the board, as appropriate, current and emerging environmental, social, political, and governance trends and public policy issues that may affect our business operations, performance, or reputation. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for oversight of human capital management matters, including DEI.
In addition, we have formed an ESG Governance Committee that includes senior leaders across many of our business functions. The committee reports to our senior leadership Executive Committee. Throughout Lilly, leaders are
lly-20230224_g82.gif
Human Capital Management
The board exercises active oversight over our overall talent management process, including human capital management strategies, corporate culture, and DEI programs. The board also oversees the work of its committees in developing corporate policies and frameworks designed to attract, retain, engage, and develop a workforce that aligns with our values and mission. The Talent and Compensation Committee advises the board and management on and is responsible for embedding ESG goalsoversight of human capital management, DEI efforts, and employee compensation and benefits matters, and annually reviews our leadership development and succession planning practices.
The board also oversees human capital management by regularly engaging with management and facilitating a system of reporting that highlights the importance of DEI to Lilly. For example, as part of our commitment to DEI, our board considers the contributions related to DEI of our CEO and other executive committee members when determining their compensation. Our board also oversees the activities of our CEO and executive committee in their operationssetting expectations for inclusive leadership and areholding leaders accountable for progressbuilding diverse and achievementinclusive teams. Our CEO receives regular reports from Lilly’s executive vice president for human resources and diversity. In addition, our chief DEI officer is a senior vice president who also has responsibility for all aspects of those goals.talent management in the company, which enables full integration of DEI into our talent systems. The senior vice president of DEI and talent management reports to the executive vice president for human resources and diversity, who is a member of our executive committee. We believe this system of oversight and reporting by the board and our key executives is critical to our success in fostering an inclusive, supportive, and rewarding workplace.

35


lly-20230224_g28.gif
Cybersecurity
Our board and Audit Committee receive regular presentations on cybersecurity and information technology from our management as part of their oversight of enterprise-level risks. In addition to regular presentations, management promptly updates our board regarding significant threats or incidents as they arise, as well as changes to the broader cybersecurity landscape.
lly-20230224_g76.gif
Political Activities
Our board exercises governance oversight of our political expenditures and lobbying activities, ensuring our commitment to stewardship of corporate funds and risk minimization with respect to such activities. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying current and emerging environmental, social, political, and governance trends and public policy issues that may affect the business operations, performance, or reputation of the company. In addition, the board receives regular updates at board meetings from our executive vice president, corporate affairs, and communications, which include updates on public policy issues and the company’s political corporate activity, as needed. The board also receives semi-annual updates on political engagement, including information on the contributions made by our employee political action committee (LillyPAC) and the company, as well as trade association memberships.
Environmental, Social and Governance
Overview
Our purpose is to unite caring with discovery to create medicines that make life better for people around the world. This purpose guides our business and ESG strategy.
We have undertaken a detailed review of our sustainability efforts, how we communicate progress toward our ESG goals, and our broader ESG strategy. In 2021, we adopted the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board for Biotechnologyadditional prevalent reporting frameworks, established new 2030 sustainability goals, and Pharmaceuticalsheld an ESG stakeholder day to share our strategy and the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures frameworksprogress. In 2021, we also issued Lilly’s first sustainability bond, which will help fund projects intended to contribute to our ESG objectives.
Reporting Frameworks: We have adopted and communicate our progress toward our ESG objectives related with the respect to the:
1.Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) for Biotechnology and continue to report our progressPharmaceuticals,
2.Task Force on the Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, and
3.United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
Additional information on our ESG efforts is available in our ESG report on our website. The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this proxy statement or incorporated herein.
Highlights of 2022 Progress
We made progress toward our ESG goals in 2022 by, among other things:
Establishing a collaboration to deliver high-quality, affordable human and analogue insulin to at the ESG pageleast one million people living with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in low- to middle-income countries, most of which are in Africa.
Installing a new solar parking canopy at our facility in Fegersheim, France capable of producing approximately 4,200 megawatt-hours of electricity a year as part of our website.2030 goal to be carbon neutral in our own operations.
Publishing the first allocation report for our sustainability bond.

36


lly-20230224_g83.gif
Increase Access to Medicines
We work with global health systemsare deeply committed to equitable and organizations to improve equitableaffordable access to our medicines and addressso our breakthroughs can transform more lives. We are also committed to expanding our impact on society by addressing complex global health challenges, with a focus on communities with limited resources. Reaching across industry boundaries, we collaborate with partners to reach more people, and our collective work seeking to benefit individual patients and the global health system.
We offer a variety of affordability solutions through patient support programs and copay assistance across our major products, including medicines for diabetes, migraine, immunology diseases and cancer. For migraine and immunology, we have designed copay assistance programs to bring eligible patients’ monthly out-of-pocket costs to $25 or lower. For cancer treatment, we have created a Lilly Oncology Support Center that assists eligible patients in identifying affordability options related to our products in their treatment.
For millions of people with diabetes, insulin is a life-saving medicine. Over the last century, this medical miracle has improved and extended countless lives around the world. Lilly takes its role as a leading diabetes company seriously — and we believe that includes affordable access to treatments. Today, anyone in the United States is eligible to obtain their monthly prescription of Lilly insulin for $35 or less — regardless of the number of vials or pens — whether they are uninsured or use commercial insurance, Medicaid or a participating Medicare Part D plan.
As a global company, we are particularly aware of the social and economic circumstances in many developing countries that may make access to medicines difficult. In response, Lilly is researching and implementing alternative business models, recognizing particular access challenges in lower-income countries. We also support efforts to decrease the final price of medicines to patients, such as minimizing taxes and limiting markups applied in the COVID-19 pandemicsupply chain.
Through investments in people, medicines and the growing prevalence of diabetes. We have established a comprehensive goal—Lilly 30x30—health systems, we aim to improve access to quality health care for 30 million people living in communitiessettings with limited resources annually by 2030. We call this global effort Lilly 30x30. To achieve our goal, we are leveraging the company’s resources and working with leading health organizations to increase access to Lilly medicines and address complex global health challenges. Our Lilly 30x30 goal is intended to advance health equity across three areas of impact: our pipeline and external pipelines we help support, programs to increase access to Lilly medicines, and partnerships. In each of these areas, we are working to develop high-impact, scalable solutions.
lly-20230224_g84.gif
Improve Lives and Communities
Beyond our medicines, we invest our time, expertise, and resources to drive positive social impact with a focus on health. We focus on action and advocacy thatdesigned to build stronger communities where people and companies can prosper and thrive. We collaborate with organizations that have proven track records of social impact. We also encourage our employees to volunteer and give in meaningful ways.
28


lly-20230224_g85.gif
Empower a Diverse Workforce
Empower a Diverse Workforce
DEI is at the core of how we do business. Our long-standing values of integrity, excellence, and respect for people foster an environment where team members are encouraged to speak up, share ideas, and be fully engaged in our work, while bringing their full authentic selves to work every day. By doing so, we help innovate, accelerate, and deliver life-changing medicines that make a difference for people around the world. See below under “—Human Capital Management”Management for additional information regarding our DEI efforts and progress.
lly-20230224_g86.gif
Operate Ethically and Responsibly
We strive to earn and maintain the trust of people we serve by acting ethically and responsibly. We set high standards for our products, operations and performance, and we show caring and respect for those

37


touched by our work. Our actions are grounded in our company’s core values of integrity, excellence, and respect for people. See “Key Areas of Oversight by the Board and Its CommitteesGovernance” for additional information.
lly-20230224_g87.gif
Minimize our Environmental Impact
We believe that making life better means protecting and preserving the world in which we live. While making medicines requires the use of valuable resources, including energy, water, and raw materials, we remain committed to improving our environmental impact across our product life cycles and supply chain. We have set new 2030 sustainability goals to reduce our emissions and waste and to continue using water responsibly and efficiently.
Recognizing our responsibility to reduce our carbon footprint to help fight climate change, we have set new targets and have an established global energy-management program. Our 2030 climate goals include:
Sourcing 100% of our purchased electricity from renewable sources.
Becoming carbon neutral in our own operations.
Enhancing the tracking and reporting of emissions from our full value chain.
We are committed to minimizing waste and conserving energy, resources, and landfill space. We have enhanced our commitment to reduce landfill waste and have introduced new goals focused on addressing plastic waste from our operations and integrating sustainability into the designs of our products. Our 2030 waste goals include:
Zero waste to landfill from routine operations.
Repurposing 100% of plastic waste for beneficial use, with at least 90% recycled or reused.
Integrating sustainability-focused design principles into product and packaging design processes.
Water is essential to both our operations and the facilities where we discover and manufacture our medicines, and we are committed to using this critical resource more efficiently. We have set new water-related goals for 2030 that include establishing and implementing water management plans for all Lilly sites in water-stressed areas, as well as working to ensure our internal and external manufacturing operations do not adversely impact our waterways as a result of discharges of pharmaceuticals. These goals include:
Establishing and implementing water management plans for Lilly sites in water-stressed areas.
Ensuring 100% of Lilly sites meet predicted no-effect concentrations (PNEC) for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment.
Ensuring appropriate controls are in place by Lilly contract manufacturers to prevent discharge of pharmaceuticals in wastewater above applicable PNEC values.
Operate Ethically and Responsibly
We strive to earn and maintain the trust of people we serve by acting ethically and responsibly. We set high standards for our products, operations and performance, and we show caring and respect for those touched by our work. Our actions are grounded in our company’s core values of integrity, excellence and respect for people. See “Board Oversight of Strategy, Compliance, and Risk Management—Code of Ethics” for additional information.
Human Capital Management
Overview and Oversight
At Lilly, dedication to human capital management is a core component of our corporate governance and culture. Our comprehensive approach to human capital management is grounded in our core values of integrity, excellence, and respect for people, which reflect our commitment to creating a safe, supportive, ethical, and rewarding work environment.
The board exercises active oversight over our overall talent management process, including human capital management strategies, corporate culture, and DEI programs. The board also oversees the work of its committees in developing corporate policies and frameworks designed to attract, retain, engage, and develop a workforce that aligns with our values and mission. The Compensation Committee advises the board and management on and is responsible for oversight of human capital management, DEI efforts, and employee compensation and benefits matters, and annually reviews our leadership development and succession planning practices. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and bringing to the attention of the board, as appropriate, current and emerging environmental, social, political, and governance trends and public policy issues that may affect our business operations, performance, or reputation.
The board also oversees human capital management by regularly engaging with management and facilitating a system of reporting that highlights the importance of DEI to Lilly. For example, as part of our commitment to DEI, our board considers the contributions related to DEI of our CEO and other executive committee members when determining their compensation.
29


Our board also oversees the activities of our CEO and executive committee in setting expectations for inclusive leadership and holding leaders accountable for building diverse and inclusive teams. Our CEO receives regular reports from Lilly’s senior vice president for human resources and diversity. In addition, our chief DEI officer is a vice president who also has responsibility for all aspects of talent management in the company, which enables full integration of DEI into our talent systems. The vice president of DEI and talent managementreports to the senior vice president for human resources and diversity, who is a member of our executive committee. We believe this system of oversight and reporting by the board and our key executives is critical to our success in fostering an inclusive, supportive, and rewarding workplace.
Measuring Progress on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
We are committed to fairness and nondiscrimination in our employment practices, and we deeply value diverse backgrounds, skills, and global perspectives. To fulfill our purpose, we believe we must look at challenges from multiple viewpoints and understand the diverse experiences of the patients who depend on us. In short, our differences makewe believe that diverse representation at all levels makes Lilly a difference—to patientsstronger and to our business.more innovative company.
lly-20230224_g88.gif
Employee Journeys
We believe that fostering DEI begins with understanding, and we have approached DEI with the same rigor as our other business-critical priorities. Our Employee Journeys research has yielded important insights about the experiences of women, Black/African American, Latinx, Asian, and LGBTQ+ employees at Lilly. In response to insights from our Employee Journeys research, we developed, among others, an education and awareness program to help build cultural literacy and foster an understanding of employee expectations for feeling psychologically safe at work. More than 3,500 leaders and more than 13,000 employees have participated in required training to gain greater awareness of how unconscious bias and microaggressions can harm team cohesiveness and hurt employee engagement. Our Employee Journeys research has also resulted in growing energy around DEI, with a company-wide network of DEI champions, initiatives, and teams across business areas—and an expanding appreciation of the value of different perspectives. The results of this research are reviewed by our senior leadership, and we deploy actions and activities in response to these insights to improve our workplace and corporate culture.
lly-20230224_g89.gif
Racial Justice Commitment
In 2020, as part of our DEI and community initiatives, Lilly and the Lilly Foundation launched the Racial Justice Commitment, and pledged $25 million andwith Lilly pledging 25,000 volunteer hours over five years and the Lilly Foundation committing $25 million over five years to help decrease the burden of racial injustice and its effects on communities of color. The Racial Justice Commitment aims to drive change across five areas: internal people development, health equity, social impact, diversity partners, and family sustaining jobs, through the use of financial and people resources. In 2021,From 2020 through 2022, we have made progress in these efforts, including through the development of two apprenticeship programsnearly tripling our spend with Black-owned businesses, committing over $98 million to minority-led venture capital firms, serving over 30,000 volunteer hours to advance racial justice initiatives, and expanding our Skills First Program at Lilly for individuals without four-year college degrees.
workforcediversitya.jpg

38


lly-20230224_g90.gif
Workforce Diversity
Since 2017, we have committed to increasing the number of women, Black/African American, Latinx, and Asian populationsrepresentation in leadership roles, and we actively monitor our progress. From the end of 20172018 through the end of 2021,2022, we increased the percentage of women in management globally from 4142 percent to 4849 percent. For MGM in the U.S.United States, over the same period, we increased management representation from 1619 percent to 2425 percent. Across all levels of our workforce, from the end of 20172018 through the end of 2021,2022, we have seen increased representation for MGMs in the U.S.United States and women globally.
Our focus on DEI is also a critical component of our broader corporate governance. Five of fifteen current members (approximately 33 percent) of our executive committee (which includes our CEO) are women and two are MGM. In addition,
5356
WomenMGMsWomenMGMs
out of 15 current executive committee members
out of 15 current executive committee members
out of 13 current directors on our board
out of 13 current directors on our board
30


lly-20230224_g91.jpg
as of the date of this proxy statement, the company's 13 directors range in age from 49 to 72 and include four women and six members who are MGMs.
Spotlight on Level Up!
In 2022 Lilly hosted our biggest ever Global DEI conference, ‘Level Up’, with approximately 6,000 employees attending virtually and in person. The conference brought together employees and leaders across the company to embrace the rich dimensions of difference that exist across Team Lilly and to help become advocates for equity and inclusion through a variety of interactive workshops and external speakers.
Recognition
At Lilly we strive to be leaders in DEI and workplace benefits, and we are honored when we receive recognition for our efforts to improve the lives of our employees. Below are some of our accolades for 2021:2022:
a2021-awardsxrecognitionsxa.gif
DiversityInc:
Top 50 Companies for Diversity: No. 5
DiversityInc:
Top Companies for Board of Directors: No. 2
DiversityInc:
Top Companies for Supplier Diversity: No. 8
DiversityInc:
Top Companies for ESG: No. 15

39


Ethisphere:
World’s Most Ethical Companies
Forbes:
America’s Best Employers for Women
Zero Project:
Zero Project Award for Access Lilly

Disability:IN
Disability Equity Index Best Places to Work — Perfect Score
Human Rights Campaign Foundation:
Corporate Equality Index — Perfect Score
Fortune and IDEA Pharma:
Pharmaceutical Innovation Index: No. 19
Seramount:
Top Companies for Executive Women
Seramount:
Best Companies for Multicultural Women, Best Companies for Dads, 70% and Higher Inclusion Index
Employee Development
Hiring: We believe attracting and retaining the best, diverse talent begins with the hiring process. We therefore require hiring managers to consider a diverse pool of candidates, and we strive to provide a diverse panel of interviewers for open positions. We believe that hiring in this way helps ensure that people from all backgrounds have equal opportunity to advance their careers.
Onboarding: In early 2022, we launched Discover, a 12-month new employee onboarding program with multiple touchpoints designed to foster integration into the Lilly culture, to accelerate learning in their new roles and to create connections to further a sense of belonging at Lilly. Discover was shaped in part by external benchmarking, feedback from employees and learnings from onboarding remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Continuing Education: We offer training to enable our employees to perform their duties in our highly regulated industry. We also strive to cultivate a culture that promotes ongoing learning by encouraging employees to seek further education and growth experiences, helping them build rewarding careers. We have introduced online programming to facilitate access to our learning and development offerings.offerings in addition to our in-person programs. Many training courses are designed to improve accessibility for people with disabilities and other unique needs. Across Lilly, we are continuously working to design learning experiences to be more inclusive and effective. In addition, we have implemented development tools and resources andfor all employees, improved our talent programs and processes to provide broadbroader access to information, and increased transparency regarding career development and advancement at Lilly.
In early 2022 we launched Discover, a 12-month new employee onboarding program with multiple touchpoints designed to foster integration into the Lilly culture, to accelerate learning in their new roles and to create connections to further a sense of belonging at Lilly. Discover was shaped in part by external benchmarking, feedback from employees and learnings from onboarding remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Employee resource groupsResource Groups (ERGs): Our ERGs are another important component of developing talent at Lilly. We currently have 11 ERGs representing groups including women, MGMs, LGBTQ+ individuals, veterans, and people with disabilities. ERGs offer our diverse workforce opportunities to build relationships, engage with senior leaders, advance our caring community, and offer unique insights and perspectives to improve our business.
Make it Safe to Thrive:We have continued our efforts to create an inclusive workplace with the goal of ensuring that all employees feel safe to speak up and share their ideas at work.OurMake it Safe to Thriveeducation and awareness program is designed to help employees and leaders understand how individual psychological safety can be created and enhanced and includes live and online trainingtraining. In late 2022, we introduced a new version of Make it Safe to Thrive for leaders that continues to focus on psychological safety and a monthly video series.creating an inclusive environment, but it provides leaders with the opportunity to work through challenging conversations and situations currently being navigated in the workplace.
Cultural Foundation: Lilly is committed to fostering a culture of diversity and respect in the workplace—an environment free of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation of any kind. In 2022, as part of our annual review of The Red Book and related policies and procedures, we revised the Global Conduct in the Workplace procedure to continue to help ensure that we maintain a respectful, safe, inclusive, and professional workplace.
Compensation, Benefits, and Pay Equity
While our rewards programs vary around the world, we take a holistic approach to employee benefits. These may include flexible work arrangements, on-site conveniences, such as cafes, fitness centers and child development centers, competitive time-off programs, retirement benefits, and health and disability programs that are available to eligible employees when they need support. We are committed to rewarding, supporting, and developing our employees who make it possible to fulfill our mission to unite caring with discovery to create medicines that make life better for people around the world.
We are also committed to ensuring pay is administered equitably across our workforce. For more than 20 years, we have regularly conducted pay equity studies of our workforce in the U.S. and have more recently started conducting studies of our workforce outside of the U.S. While infrequent, we have made pay adjustments as warranted based on these analyses. We believe that pay equity is critical to our success in supporting a global, diverse, and inclusive workforce.

3140



We are also committed to ensuring pay is administered equitably across our workforce. For more than 20 years, we have regularly conducted pay equity studies of our workforce in the United States and have more recently started conducting studies of our workforce outside of the United States. While minimal, we have made pay adjustments as warranted based on these analyses. We believe that pay equity is critical to our success in supporting a global, diverse, and inclusive workforce.20
Years
of pay equity studies in the U.S.
Employee Health and Safety
We strive to foster a healthy, vibrant work environment, which includes keeping our employees safe. We seek to create a companywide culture where best-in-class safety practices are consistently followed. To do this, we assess and continuously attempt to improve our companywide safety performance to promote the well-being of employees and to help safeguard communities where we operate. As the COVID-19 pandemic has evolved, we have takencontinued to take various measures (as necessary) to protect and support the health and safety of our employees globally, including instituting travel restrictions and work-from-home arrangements, offering onsite testing and vaccination options where possible, and instituting safety precautions such as masking, social distancing, and enhanced cleaning practices. To support employee well-being in the U.S., we also enhanced local benefits related to health care, childcare, and time off.globally. We believe thisa holistic approach and dedication to safety helps us be our best as we deliver on our company purpose to improve lives around the world.
Political and Policy Participation
As a biopharmaceutical company that develops treatmenttreatments for serious diseases, we believe it is important for our company to be a responsible participant in global political and public policy debates. Our engagement in the political arena helps ensure that patients have access to needed medications. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all our locations globally to offer Lilly’s perspective on the political environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines and a way to engage on issues specific to local business environments.
TheAs discussed in “GovernanceHow We Operate an Effective BoardGovernance PracticesBoard Oversight”, the board exercises governance oversight of our political expenditures and lobbying activities, ensuring our commitment to stewardship of corporate funds and risk minimization with respect to such activities. The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying current and emerging environmental, social, political and governance trends and public policy issues that may affect the business operations, performance, or reputation of the company. In addition, the board receives regular updates at board meetings from our senior vice president, corporate affairs, and communications, which include updates on public policy issues and the company’s political corporate activity, as needed. The board also receives semi-annual updates on political engagement, including information on the contributions made by our employee political action committee (LillyPAC) and the company, as well as trade association memberships.
In particular, our board is deeply engaged in oversight over Lilly’s approach to drug pricing and access. Guided by this active oversight, Lilly has taken numerous steps to address drug pricing and access concerns. For example, Lilly introduced two additional lower-priced versions of Humalog in January 2020 and added the Lilly Insulin Value Program to Lilly’s comprehensive suite of insulin affordability solutions in September 2020, which now enables customers with commercial insurance or no insurance to purchase their monthly prescription of all Lilly insulins for $35. In addition, in September 2021, the company announced that it lowered the list price of all Lilly’s non-branded insulins, including Insulin Lispro Injection, by an additional 40% in the U.S. effective January 1, 2022, effectively reducing its list price to 2008 levels. These examples, among others, demonstrate Lilly’s commitment to providing effective oversight over drug pricing and access.
We provide information on our website related to direct company contributions and LillyPAC contributions to support candidates for political office, political parties, officials, or committees in the U.S.,United States, as well as information regarding our trade association memberships and the company'scompany’s oversight of these activities. In response to input from our stakeholders, we have reviewed and enhanced the information available on our corporate website and plan to continue to engage with stakeholders on this topic.
Board Education and Annual Performance AssessmentAlignment
The company provides a comprehensive orientation process for incoming directors. Directors also attend regular continuing education sessions on areas of relevance or importance to our company, and we hold periodic mandatory training sessions for the Audit Committee.
Every year, the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, together with the chair and the lead independent director, conducts a robust assessment of the performance of the board and board committees, and of all board processes, based on input from all directors. We also conduct an annual assessment of each director's performance, and every three years we conduct a detailed review of individual director performance when considering whether to nominate the director to a new three-year term.
Conflicts of Interest and Transactions with Related Persons
Conflicts of Interest
Occasionally, a director'sdirector’s business or personal relationships may give rise to an interest that conflicts, or appears to conflict, with the interests of the company. As outlined in the company'scompany’s corporate governance guidelines, directors must disclose to the company all relationships that could create a conflict or an appearance of a conflict. The board, after consultation with counsel, takes appropriate steps to identify actual or apparent conflicts and ensure that all directors voting on an issue are disinterested with respect to that issue. A director may be excused from board discussions and decisions on an issue related to an actual or apparent conflict, as appropriate.
In addition, a director’s relationship with Lilly may give rise to an interest that conflicts, or appears to conflict, with the interests of another company, institution, or other stakeholder. A director must disclose his or her relationship with Lilly in connection with any scientific publication, using the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) conflict of interest form for this purpose when possible. Each director must disclose his or her service on the board to his or her employer and any other organization with which the director has a relationship of trust and where the relationship with the
32


companyLilly is relevant. In addition, directors must follow the internal conflict of interest policies and procedures of each such organization.
Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons
The board has adopted a written policy and procedures for review, approval, and monitoring of transactions involving the company and related persons (including current executive officers, directors, or director nominees and persons who served in those roles at any time since the beginning of our last fiscal year, greater than five percent shareholders of the company, immediate family members of such persons, and related entities of such persons, including entities in which any of such persons is employed, is a general partner or principal or in which

41


such person has a 10 percent or greater beneficial ownership interest). The policy covers any related person transaction that meets the minimum threshold for disclosure in this proxy statement under relevant SEC rules (generally, transactions involving amounts exceeding $120,000 in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest).
Policy:
Related person transactions must be preapproved by the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee of the board or another independent body of the board, who will approve the transaction only if the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee or such independent body determines it to be consistent with the interests of the company and its shareholders. In considering the transaction, the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee or such independent body will consider all relevant factors, including:
the company’s business rationale for entering into the transaction;
the purpose of, and potential benefits to the company of, the transaction;
the alternatives to entering into a related person transaction;
whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those available to third parties, or in the case of employment relationships, to employees generally;
the potential for the transaction to lead to an actual or apparent conflict of interest and any safeguards imposed to prevent such actual or apparent conflicts;
the overall fairness of the transaction to the company;
the approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the transaction, particularly as it relates to the related person;
the related person’s interest in the transaction; and
any other information regarding the transaction or the related person that would be material to the company’s shareholders in light of the circumstances of the particular transaction.
Procedures:
Prior to entering into a transaction that may be a related person transaction, the related person (or the appropriate executive officer or director, in the case of immediate family members) is required to bring the matter to the attention of the chair of the board or the lead independent director, or alternatively, the Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.
The chair of the board and the lead independent director jointly determine (or, if either is involved in the transaction, the other determines in consultation with the chair of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee) whether the matter should be considered by the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee or another independent body of the board.
If a director is involved in the transaction, he or she will be recused from all discussions and decisions relating to the transaction.
The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee or such other independent body may approve the related person transaction only if the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee or such other independent body determines in good faith that, under all of the circumstances, the transaction is consistent with the interests of the company and its shareholders.
The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee or such other independent body may impose such conditions as it deems appropriate on the company or the related person in connection with the approval of the related person transaction.
If the transaction is recurring and is approved, the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee or such other independent body will review the related person transaction annually to determine whether it continues to be consistent with the interests of the company and its shareholders.
The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee or another independent body of the board retains the right to review and ratify related person transactions. In addition, the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee or such other
33
42



or such other independent body may take or cause to be taken additional actions including, but not limited to, immediate discontinuation or rescission of the transaction, or modification of the transaction.
On August 23, 2021,In 2022, there were no related party transactions required to be reported pursuant to relevant SEC rules in this proxy statement.
Board and Director Assessment
Reexamine Evaluation Process
lly-20230224_g67.gif
Questionnaire
lly-20230224_g65.gif
One-On-One Discussions
lly-20230224_g65.gif
Evaluation Summary
lly-20230224_g92.gif
Closed Session Discussions
lly-20230224_g92.gif
Follow Through
Our lead independent director and Directors and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed the evaluation process.
Directors provided written feedback on an unattributed basis.
Each director had one-on-one discussions with the lead independent director and with the board chair.A summary of board and committee evaluations results was provided to the board and its committees.
Closed session evaluation discussions of the board and committees were led by our lead independent director and independent committee chairs.Incorporated feedback into nomination process and the 2023 board and committee planning process, as applicable.
Every year, the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, together with the chair and the lead independent director, conducts a robust assessment of the performance of the board and board committees, and of all board processes, based on input from all directors. We also conduct an annual assessment of each director’s performance, and every three years we conduct a detailed review of individual director performance when considering whether to nominate the director to a new three-year term.
The results of these assessments inform the board’s recommendations on nominations for directors at the annual meeting of shareholders each year and help provide us with insight on the types of experiences, skills, perspectives, and other characteristics we should be seeking for future director candidates. Together with our lead independent director, the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee performs periodic assessments of the overall composition and skills of the board to ensure that the board is actively engaged in succession planning for directors, and that our board reflects the diversity of viewpoints and expertise necessary to support our complex and evolving business.
Board Education
Periodic briefing sessions are provided to members of the board and committees on subjects that would assist them in discharging their duties. Directors also attend regular continuing education sessions on areas of relevance or importance to our company, entered intoand we hold periodic mandatory training sessions for the Audit Committee.
Beyond the Boardroom
Director Orientation
Each new director participates in an orientation program upon joining the board. The program includes presentations by senior management to familiarize new directors with, among other things, Lilly’s ethics, compliance and governance programs, business units, financial position, strategic plans, and human capital management programs.
Business Deep Dive
Periodically, directors will be invited or may request “deep dive” educational sessions with respect to a multi-year research collaboration and licensing agreement with Lycia Therapeutics, Inc. (Lycia). Dr. Bertozzi, a former memberparticular business unit or other aspect of our business.
Site Visits
Periodically, directors will be invited or may request to visit the company’s manufacturing or other operating sites, and management will prepare educational sessions for the directors relevant to the location’s business and culture.

43


Diversity and Inclusion Events
Directors have the opportunity to participate in a variety of Lilly diversity and inclusion events, both as presenters and as participants. This offers a chance for directors to connect with Lilly employees, show their support for these activities and see our diversity and inclusion strategies in action.
Shareholder Engagement
The board receives periodic updates on shareholder engagement led by management, and is directly involved in responding to and participating in communications where appropriate. From time to time, directors participate in direct engagement with shareholders to discuss specific matters of mutual importance.
Director Compensation
Directors who are employees receive no additional compensation for serving on the board. Non-employee director compensation is reviewed and approved by the board, on the recommendation of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee.
62%
Board Service Compensation linked to the long-term performance of Lilly stock
5x
Annual Board Retainer share ownership requirement for non-employee directors
CAP
on total annual compensation for non-employee directors

Director Compensation Governance
The Directors and Corporate Governance Committee performs an annual in-depth review of non-employee director compensation, including considerations such as:
ü    general industry and pharmaceutical company peer group analysis conducted with the assistance of an outside compensation consultant,
ü    the desire to have non-employee director compensation positioned near the market median when compared against the general industry peer group,
ü    the desire to avoid excess compensation, and
ü    a focus to link a significant portion of compensation to the long-term performance of Lilly stock.
If the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee determine adjustments to non-employee director compensation are warranted, it will make recommendations to the full board for consideration.
Compensation Elements
The following table shows the compensation elements in effect for all non-employee directors:
Compensation ElementPayment or Value
Changes for 20232
Board Service1
Annual board retainer$110,000$110,000
Annual equity grant3
$180,000 in deferred stock units
$200,000 in deferred stock units
Lead independent director$35,000$40,000
Committee Service1
Annual Committee Retainer2
ChairMemberChairMember
Audit Committee$22,000$6,000$26,000$6,000
Science and Technology Committee$18,000$6,000$18,000$6,000
Talent and Compensation Committee$17,000$3,000$17,000$3,000
Ethics and Compliance Committee$17,000$3,000$17,000$3,000
Directors and Corporate Governance Committee$17,000$3,000$17,000$3,000
Total Compensation Value Cap of $800,0004

44


1Expenses and Ad Hoc Committees. Directors are reimbursed for customary and usual travel expenses in connection with their travel to and from board meetings and other company events. Non-employee directors may also receive additional cash compensation for serving on ad hoc committees that may be formed by the board from time to time. Committee chair retainers are in addition to member retainers.
2Changes for 2023. Following the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee’s in-depth review of non-employee director compensation (as further described above) related to 2023 non-employee director compensation, the board approved increases to the annual equity grant, lead independent director retainer and audit committee chair retainer, effective January 1, 2023.
3Stock Compensation. Non-employee directors received an annual equity-based award that was credited to each non-employee director’s deferred stock account established under the Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan as a number of units calculated by dividing $180,000 by the closing stock price on a pre-set annual date (approximately 498 units). When applicable, the annual equity-based award is prorated for time served. See “Lilly Directors’ Deferral PlanDeferred Stock Account”.
4 Annual Compensation Cap for Directors. In 2018, the board approved an annual cap to the total annual compensation (cash and equity compensation) for non-employee directors of $800,000. The cap is intended to avoid excessive director compensation and is included in both the Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan and in the Amended and Restated 2002 Lilly Stock Plan approved by shareholders at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders.
Share Ownership Guidelines
Non-employee directors are required to hold Lilly stock, directly or through units representing the right to receive shares of Lilly stock under the Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan, valued at not less than five times their annual board retainer. New non-employee directors are allowed five years to reach the required ownership level. All non-employee directors serving at least five years have satisfied these guidelines. All other non-employee directors are, or in the case of recently elected directors, are expected to begin, making progress toward these requirements.
Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan
In addition to the annual equity-based grants credited to each non-employee director’s deferred stock account as described above, the Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan allows non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or part of their cash compensation until after their service on the board has ended. Each director can choose to invest any amounts deferred in one or both of the following two accounts:
Deferred Stock Account.This account allows the non-employee director, in effect, to invest his or her deferred cash compensation in company stock. Funds in this account are credited as units representing the right to receive shares of company stock based on the closing stock price on pre-set monthly dates. Hypothetical dividends are deemed “reinvested” in additional units based on the market price of the stock on the date dividends are paid. The units become issuable to the non-employee director as shares of company stock commencing on the second January following the director’s departure from board service (either in a lump sum or installments as described below). The deferral stock account is the academic foundersame account where the annual equity awards for board service are credited using the same conversion timing and procedure.
Deferred Compensation Account.Deferred cash compensation in this account earns interest each year at a rate of Lycia120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate, compounded monthly, as established the preceding December by the U.S. Treasury Department under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Internal Revenue Code). The aggregate amount of interest that accrued in 2022 for the participating directors was $91,920, at a rate of 2.3 percent. The rate for 2023 is 5.1 percent.
Both accounts may be paid out in a lump sum or in annual installments for up to 10 years based on individual director annual elections. All payments begin the second January following the director’s departure from board service. Amounts in the deferred stock account are paid in shares of company stock.

45


2022 Compensation for Non-Employee Directors
NameFees Earned
or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($)1
All Other
Compensation
and Payments ($)
2
Total ($)3
Mr. Alvarez$136,000$180,000$0$316,000
Dr. Baicker$136,000$180,000$0$316,000
Mr. Fyrwald$119,000$180,000$24,882$323,882
Dr. Hedley$74,855$120,000$0$194,855
Mr. Jackson$141,000$180,000$0$321,000
Ms. Johnson$116,000$180,000$0$296,000
Dr. Kaelin$137,000$180,000$9,500$326,500
Mr. Luciano$162,288$180,000$0$342,288
Dr. Runge$119,000$180,000$0$299,000
Ms. Sulzberger$119,000$180,000$0$299,000
Mr. Tai$119,000$180,000$30,000$329,000
Ms. Walker$119,000$180,000$20,000$319,000
Former Director:
Mr. Eskew4
$46,065$75,000$27,500$148,565
1 Each non-employee director received an equity-based award of units valued at $180,000 (approximately 498 units) except Dr. Hedley, and held an approximate 10.1 percent ownership interest thereinMr. Eskew who both received a pro-rated award for a partial year of service. These units, and all prior awards of such units, are fully vested; however, the shares subject to such awards of units are not issued until the second January following the director’s departure from board service when, as described above under “Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan,” the units are converted into shares of August 23, 2021.company stock and distributed to the former director. The transaction was approvedcolumn shows the grant date fair value for each director’s equity-based award computed in accordance with Lilly’s related persons transactions policy and Dr. Bertozzi did not participateFASB ASC Topic 718, based on the closing stock price on the grant date. See Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements in any discussions or votes relating to the transaction. Immediately upon the company’s entry intoAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the collaboration and licensing agreement, Dr. Bertozzi resigned from our board. Lycia received an upfront payment of $35 million during thefiscal year ended December 31, 20212022, for additional detail regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards. Aggregate outstanding stock awards are shown in the “Common Stock Ownership by Directors and Executive Officers” table in the “Stock Units Not Distributable Within 60 Days” column.
2 The amount for Mr. Eskew includes a $10,000 donation by the Foundation to a charity of Mr. Eskew's choosing in honor of his retirement from the board, consistent with the company’s traditional practice for retiring directors. This column includes amounts donated by the Eli Lilly and Company Foundation, Inc. (the Foundation) under its matching gift program, which is eligiblegenerally available to receive over $1.6 billion in potential milestone payments based on the achievement of prespecified preclinical, development and commercial milestones,U.S. employees as well as tiered royalties from mid-singlenon-employee directors. Under this program, the Foundation matched 100 percent of charitable donations over $25 made to low double-digits on sales resulting fromeligible charities, up to a maximum of $30,000 per year for each individual. The Foundation matched these donations via payments made directly to the agreement.recipient charity. The expected payments in 2023 related to matching contributions for donations made by non-employee directors at the end of 2022 include for Mr. Fyrwald - $25,884; Mr. Tai - $30,000; Ms. Sulzberger - $16,500 and Ms. Walker - $20,000.
3 Non-employee directors do not participate in a company pension plan or non-equity incentive plan.
4 Mr. Eskew retired following the 2022 annual meeting.
Communication with the Board of Directors
You may send written communications to members of the board, including independent directors, addressed to:
Board of Directors
Eli Lilly and Company
c/o General Counsel and Secretary
Lilly Corporate Center
Indianapolis, IN 46285
Shareholder Engagement on Governance Issues
To ensure that a variety of perspectives are thoughtfully considered on several issues, each year the company engages large shareholders and other key constituents to discuss areas of interest or concern related to corporate governance, as well as any specific issues for the coming proxy season. Since our 20212022 annual meeting of shareholders, we have spoken with a number of investors on an array of subjects, including board leadership; environmental, social and governance topics;matters; drug pricing transparency and global access to our products; product quality and safety; key enterprise risks; executive compensation; DEI; and human capital management. We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive feedback that we receive from our stakeholders. While a few shareholders communicated differing views on some of our governance practices, the investors with whom we spoke were generally supportive of our performance and overall compensation and governance policies. This feedback has been discussed with our chair and CEO, the lead independent director, our Talent and

46


Compensation Committee, and our Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, and it was a key input into board discussions on corporate governance topics. As a result of these discussions and its own deliberations, the board decided to recommend in favor of the threetwo management proposals described below. We are committed to continuing to engage with our investors to ensure that their diverse perspectives on corporate governance and other issues are thoughtfully considered.
Management Proposals to Eliminate Classified Board and Supermajority Voting Requirements and to GiveShareholders the Ability to Amend the Company's Bylaws
Each year between 2007 and 2012, and again from 20192018 through 2021,2022, our management put forward proposals to eliminate the company'scompany’s classified board structure. The proposals did not pass because they failed to receive a "supermajority vote"“supermajority vote” of 80 percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock, as required in the company'scompany’s articles of incorporation. In addition, each year from 20102011 through 2012,2013, and again from 20182019 through 2021, 2023, we submitted management proposals to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements. Those proposals also did not receive the required 80 percent vote.   
Prior to 2012, these proposals received support ranging from 72 to 77 percent of our outstanding shares. In 2012, the vote in support of these proposals was approximately 63 percent of our outstanding shares, driven in part by a 2012 NYSE rule revision prohibiting brokers from voting their clients'clients’ shares on corporate governance matters absent specific instructions from such clients. In 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2021,2022, the vote in support was approximately 62, 66, 69, 70 and 70 percent of our outstanding shares, respectively.
After considering the interests of the company and our shareholders, we have resubmitted for consideration at the Annual Meeting management proposals to eliminate the classified board structure and supermajority voting requirements (see(see Items 45 and 5)6).
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws currently do not allow shareholders to amend the bylaws. This position reflects the default under Indiana law, which reserves the exclusive authority to amend the bylaws to the board of directors. After considering feedback from our shareholders, we are submitting a management proposal to amend our articles of incorporation to give shareholders the ability to amend our bylaws (see Item 6).
We will continue to engage with our shareholders on these and other topics to ensure that we continue to demonstrate strong corporate governance and accountability to shareholders.
34


Shareholder Proposals
Shareholder Proposals under Rule 14a-8
Shareholders interested in submitting a proposal considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 20232024 annual meeting must follow the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Proposals should be addressed to the General Counsel and Secretary and mailed to Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285. For convenience, emailed copies may also be sent toshareholderproposals@lilly.com. In general, to be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 20232024 annual meeting, shareholder proposals must be received no later than November 18, 2022.2023.
Other Shareholder Proposals
In addition, under section 1.8 of the company’s bylaws, any shareholder of record wishing to propose any other business (i.e., not(other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8)14a-8 or related to the nomination of directors) at the 20232024 annual meeting of shareholders, must give the company written notice no later than the close of business on November 18, 2022,2023, and no earlier than the close of business on September 19, 2022.2023. However, if the date of the 20232024 annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from May 1, 20232024 (the date contemplated for the 20232024 annual meeting as set forth in this proxy statement), a shareholder must give the company written notice no later than the close of business on the later of 120 days in advance of the 20232024 annual meeting or 10 days following the date we first publicly announce the date of 2023the 2024 annual meeting. Any such notice must also comply with the timing, disclosure, procedural and other requirements as set forth in the bylaws. A copy of the bylaws is available online at lilly.com/leadership/governance.
Shareholder Recommendations and Nominations for Director Candidates
Shareholder Recommendations of Director Candidates
A shareholder who wishes to recommend a director candidate for evaluation should forward the candidate's name and information about the candidate's qualifications to:
Chair of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee
c/o General Counsel and Secretary
Lilly Corporate Center
Indianapolis, IN 46285
The candidate must meet the selection criteria described above under "Governance—Director Qualifications and Nomination Process—Director Qualifications" and must be willing and expressly interested in serving on the board.
Shareholder Nominations for Director Candidates for Inclusion in the Proxy Statement (“Proxy Access”)
If a shareholder or group of shareholders wishes to nominate one or more director candidates to be included in the proxy statement for the 2023 annual meeting pursuant to the “proxy access” provisions of the company’s bylaws (section 1.10), such shareholder or group of shareholders must give the company written notice no later than the close of business on November 18, 2022 and no earlier than the close of business on October 19, 2022. However, if the date of the 2023 annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from May 1, 2023 (the date contemplated for the 2023 annual meeting as set forth in this proxy statement), a shareholder must give the company written notice no earlier than 150 days in advance of the date of the 2023 meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of 120 days in advance of the 2023 annual meeting or 10 days following the date we first publicly announce the date of 2023 annual meeting. Any such notice must also comply with the timing, disclosure, procedural and other requirements as set forth in the bylaws.
Other Shareholder Nominations for Director Candidates
In addition, under Section 1.9 of the company’s bylaws, any shareholder of record wishing to directly nominate a director candidate at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders (i.e., to propose a candidate for election who is not otherwise nominated by the board through the recommendation process described above and not pursuant to the “proxy access” provisions described above) must give the company written notice no later than the close of business on November 18, 2022 and no earlier than the close of business on September 19, 2022. However, if the date of the 2023 annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from May 1, 2023 (the date contemplated for the 2023 annual meeting as set forth in this proxy statement), a shareholder must give the company written notice no later than the close of business on the later of 120 days in advance of the 2023 annual meeting or 10 days following the date we first publicly announce the date of 2023 annual meeting. Any such notice must also comply with the timing, disclosure, procedural and other requirements as set forth in the bylaws. A copy of the bylaws is available online at lilly.com/leadership/governance.
We know of no other matters to be submitted to shareholders at the Annual Meeting other than the proposals referred to in this proxy statement.
35
47



Ownership of Company Stock
Common Stock Ownership by Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the number of shares of company common stock beneficially owned by the directors, the named executive officers, and all directors and executive officers as a group, as of February 22, 2022.21, 2023. On February 22, 2022,21, 2023, there were 952,347,126950,296,153 shares of the company’s common stock outstanding. None of the stock or stock units owned by any of the listed individuals has been pledged as collateral for a loan or other obligation.
Beneficial Owners
Common Stock1
Common Stock1
Beneficial OwnersBeneficial Owners
Shares Owned2
Stock Units Distributable Within 60 Days3
Percent of Class
Stock Units Not Distributable Within 60 Days4
Beneficial Owners
Shares Owned2
Stock Units Distributable Within 60 Days3
Percent of Class
Stock Units Not Distributable Within 60 Days4
— *51,142 Ralph Alvarez— *52,772 
Anat AshkenaziAnat Ashkenazi31,603 *11,499 Anat Ashkenazi38,305 *11,499 
Katherine Baicker, Ph.D.Katherine Baicker, Ph.D.— *21,381 Katherine Baicker, Ph.D.— *22,154 
Michael L. Eskew— *45,237 
J. Erik FyrwaldJ. Erik Fyrwald100 *68,742 J. Erik Fyrwald100 *70,539 
Anat HakimAnat Hakim22,189 *4,442 
Mary Lynne HedleyMary Lynne Hedley— *623 
Jamere JacksonJamere Jackson— *7,793 Jamere Jackson— *8,392 
Kimberly H. JohnsonKimberly H. Johnson— *1,093 Kimberly H. Johnson— *2,010 
Patrik JonssonPatrik Jonsson43,417 *4,124 
William G. Kaelin, Jr., M.D.William G. Kaelin, Jr., M.D.— *19,772 William G. Kaelin, Jr., M.D.— *20,525 
Juan R. LucianoJuan R. Luciano— *13,537 Juan R. Luciano— *14,783 
Diogo Rau— *20,160 
David A. RicksDavid A. Ricks561,433 5*47,786 David A. Ricks644,144 *29,611 
Marschall S. Runge, M.D., Ph.D.Marschall S. Runge, M.D., Ph.D.— *15,234 Marschall S. Runge, M.D., Ph.D.202 *15,928 
Daniel Skovronsky, M.D., Ph.D.Daniel Skovronsky, M.D., Ph.D.148,559 *15,675 Daniel Skovronsky, M.D., Ph.D.175,587 *9,941 
Joshua L. Smiley75,865 6*— 
Gabrielle SulzbergerGabrielle Sulzberger— *720 Gabrielle Sulzberger— *1,614 
Jackson P. TaiJackson P. Tai46,936 *15,159 Jackson P. Tai47,592 *15,864 
Jacob Van Naarden12,309 *6,403 
Karen WalkerKaren Walker— *4,967 Karen Walker— *5,529 
All directors and current executive officers as a group
(27 people):
All directors and current executive officers as a group
(27 people):
1,171,778 7,929*424,724 All directors and current executive officers as a group (27 people):1,212,249 5,271*341,071 
* Less than 1.0 percent of the outstanding common stock of the company.
1 The sum of the "Shares Owned"“Shares Owned” and "Stock“Stock Units Distributable Within 60 Days"Days” columns represents the shares considered "beneficially owned"“beneficially owned” for purposes of disclosure in this proxy statement. Unless otherwise indicated in a footnote, each person listed in the table possesses sole voting and sole investment power with respect to their shares.
2 This column includes the number of shares of common stock held directly or indirectly, including the number of 401(k) Plan shares held by the beneficial owners indirectly through the 401(k) Plan.
3 This column sets forth restricted stock units that vest within 60 days of February 22, 2022.21, 2023.
4 For the executive officers, this column reflects restricted stock units that will not vest within 60 days of February 22, 2022.21, 2023. For the non-employee directors, this column reflects the number of units representing the right to receive shares of company stock credited to the directors'directors’ accounts in the Lilly Directors'Directors’ Deferral Plan.
5 The shares shown for Mr. Ricks include 23,03055,497 shares that are owned by a family foundation for which he is a director. Mr. Ricks has shared voting power and shared investment power with respect to the shares held by the foundation.
6 Mr. Smiley resigned from his officer position on February 9, 2021. His share information is as of December 31, 2021, and his shares are excluded in the total for all directors and current executive officers as a group.
36


Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Holders
The following table sets forth the number of shares of company common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2021,2022, unless otherwise indicated, by each person known to the company to beneficially own more than 5 percent of the outstanding shares of the company’s common stock:
Name and AddressNumber of Shares
Beneficially Owned
Percent of Class*
Lilly Endowment Inc. (the Endowment)
2801 North Meridian Street
Indianapolis, IN 46208
1107,463,81011.3%
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
269,261,7547.3%
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
363,877,0236.7%
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
300 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
451,888,4555.4%

48


Name and AddressNumber of Shares
Beneficially Owned
Percent of Class*
Lilly Endowment Inc. (the Endowment)
2801 North Meridian Street
Indianapolis, IN 46208
1102,948,81010.8%
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
273,429,8637.7%
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
365,467,7936.9%
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
300 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
451,829,8735.5%
*Percent of class is calculated based on the shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 22, 2022.21, 2023.
1 Based on information provided to Lilly by the Endowment as of January 11, 20226, 2023, and a Schedule 13G/A filed by the Endowment with the SEC on January 27, 2022,25, 2023, the Endowment has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to all of its shares. The board of directors of the Endowment is composed of N. Clay Robbins, chairman & chief executive officer; Mary K. Lisher; William G. Enright; Daniel P. Carmichael; Charles E. Golden; Eli Lilly II; David N. Shane; Craig Dykstra; Jennett M. Hill, president; John C. Lechleiter; and Clarence Crain.
2 Based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 20222023, by The Vanguard Group, it beneficially owns 69,261,75473,429,863 shares altogether. It does not have sole voting power with respect to any of its shares and it has shared voting power with respect to 1,357,2921,190,462 of its shares. It has sole dispositive power with respect to 65,918,83770,058,275 of its shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 3,342,9173,371,588 of its shares.
3 Based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 8, 20221, 2023, by BlackRock, Inc., it has sole voting power with respect to 55,682,05458,947,344 of its shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 63,877,02365,467,793 of its shares.
4 Based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 202210, 2023, by The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.; PNC Bancorp, Inc.; PNC Bank, National Association (PNC Bank); PNC Delaware Trust Company; and PNC Investments LLC (collectively, PNC), PNC beneficially owns 51,888,45551,829,873 shares altogether. PNC has sole voting power with respect to 1,848,7641,795,248 of its shares and shared voting power with respect to 50,005,19950,007,832 of its shares. PNC has sole dispositive power with respect to 1,515,5801,472,029 of its shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 50,333,64150,311,228 of its shares. Of the total shares of common stock reported for PNC above, 50,000,000 shares are held in the Eli Lilly and Company Compensation Trust account for which PNC Bank serves as directed trustee. As directed trustee, PNC Bank is deemed to share both voting power and investment discretion with respect to those 50,000,000 shares.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership of, and transactions in, our equity securities with the SEC. Based on a review of the copies of these reports, and on written representations from our reporting persons, we believe that all such reports were timely filed, except that, due to administrative error, Marschall Runge was four days late in reporting an open market purchase of common stock.

Compensation
Item 2. Advisory Vote on Compensation Paid to Named Executive Officers
Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides the company'scompany’s shareholders with the opportunity to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the company'scompany’s named executive officers as disclosed in thethis proxy statement. Our compensation philosophy is designed to attract, engage, and retain highly talented individuals from a variety of backgrounds and motivate them to create long-term shareholder value by achieving top-tier corporate performance while embracing the company’s core values of integrity, excellence, and respect for people.
The Talent and Compensation Committee and the board believe that our executive compensation aligns well with our philosophy and with corporate performance. Executive compensation is an important matter for our shareholders. We routinely review our compensation practices and engage in ongoing dialogue with our shareholders to ensure our practices are aligned with stakeholder interests and reflect best practices.
We request shareholder approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the company.

49


However, the Talent and Compensation Committee values input from shareholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future executive compensation decisions. At our 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, our shareholders expressed a preference that advisory votes on executive compensation occur every year, as recommended by our board. Consistent with this preference, the board determined that the company would hold advisory votes on executive compensation on an annual basis until the next advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation, which will occur no later than our 2023 annual meeting of shareholders.
Board Recommendation on Item 2
The board recommends that you vote FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the CD&A, the compensation tables, and
37


related narratives provided below in this proxy statement.
lly-20230224_g70.jpg
RECOMMENDATION FOR
The board recommends that you vote FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the CD&A, the compensation tables, and related narratives provided below in this proxy statement.
Talent and Compensation Committee Matters
Background
Role of the Independent Consultant in Assessing Executive Compensation
The Talent and Compensation Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (FW Cook) as its independent compensation consultant. FW Cook reports directly to the Talent and Compensation Committee, and it is not permitted to have any business or personal relationship with management or members of the Talent and Compensation Committee. FW Cook’s responsibilities are to:
review the company’s total compensation philosophy, peer group, and target competitive positioning for reasonableness and appropriateness;
review the company’s executive compensation program and advise the Talent and Compensation Committee of evolving best practices;
provide independent analyses and recommendations to the Talent and Compensation Committee on the CEO’s pay;
review the draft CD&A and related tables for the proxy statement;
proactively advise the Talent and Compensation Committee on best practices for board governance of executive compensation; and
undertake special projects at the request of the Talent and Compensation Committee or its chair.
FW Cook interacts directly with members of company management only on matters under the Talent and Compensation Committee’s oversight and with the knowledge and permission of the Talent and Compensation Committee chair.
Role of Executive Officers and Management in Assessing Executive Compensation
With the oversight of the CEO and the seniorexecutive vice president of human resources and diversity, the company’s global compensation group formulates recommendations on compensation philosophy, plan design, and compensation for executive officers (other than the CEO, as noted below). The CEO provides the Talent and Compensation Committee with a performance assessment and compensation recommendation for each of the other executive officers. The Talent and Compensation Committee considers those recommendations with the assistance of its compensation consultant.consultant FW Cook. The CEO and the seniorexecutive vice president of human resources and diversity attend Talent and Compensation Committee meetings; however, they are not present for executive sessions or any discussion of their own compensation. Only non-employee directors and the Talent and Compensation Committee’s consultant attend executive sessions.
The CEO does not participate in the formulation or discussion of his pay recommendations. He has no prior knowledge of the recommendations that FW Cook makes to the Talent and Compensation Committee.
Risk Assessment Process
As part of the company'scompany’s overall enterprise risk management program, in 20212022 (consistent with prior years), the Talent and Compensation Committee reviewed the company’s compensation policies and practices and concluded that the programs and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. The Talent and Compensation Committee noted numerous policy and design features of the company’s compensation programs and governance structure that reduce the likelihood of inappropriate or excessive risk-taking, including, but not limited to:
Only independent directors serve on the Talent and Compensation CommitteeCommittee.

50


The Talent and Compensation Committee engages its own independent compensation consultantconsultant.
The Talent and Compensation Committee has downward discretion to lower compensation plan payoutspayouts.
The Talent and Compensation Committee approves all adjustments to financial results that affect compensation calculationscalculations.
Different measures and metrics are used across multiple incentive plans that appropriately balance cash/stock, fixed/variable pay, and short-term/long-term incentivesincentives.
Incentive plans have predetermined maximum payoutspayouts.
Performance objectives are challenging but achievableachievable.
Programs with operational metrics have a continuum of payout multiples based upon achievement of performance milestones, rather than "cliffs"“cliffs” that might encourage suboptimal or improper behaviorbehavior.
A compensation recovery policy is in place for all members of senior management; negative compensation consequences can result in cases involving serious compliance violationsviolations.
Meaningful share ownership and retention requirements are in place for all members of senior management and the board.
38


Talent and Compensation Committee Report
The Talent and Compensation Committee evaluates and establishes compensation for executive officers and oversees the deferred compensation plan, management stock plans, and other management incentive and benefit programs. Management has the primary responsibility for the company’s financial statements and reporting process, including the disclosure of executive compensation in the CD&A. With this in mind, the Talent and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A with management. Based on this discussion, the Talent and Compensation Committee recommended to the board that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and the company'scompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021,2022, for filing with the SEC.
Talent and Compensation Committee
Ralph Alvarez, Chair
J. Erik Fyrwald
Kimberly H. Johnson
Juan R. Luciano
Karen Walker

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This CD&A describes our executive compensation philosophy, the Talent and Compensation Committee’s process for setting executive compensation, the elements of our compensation program, the factors the Talent and Compensation Committee considered when setting executive compensation for 2021,2022, and how the company’s results affected incentive payouts. This CD&A provides compensation information for our chief executive officer, David Ricks, our chief financial officer, Anat Ashkenazi, and our next three most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers on December 31, 2021,2022, Daniel Skovronsky, Jacob Van NaardenAnat Hakim, and Diogo Rau. The CD&A also includes our former chief financial officer, Joshua Smiley, who resigned from his officer position on February 9, 2021.Patrik Jonsson.

51


Name and principal occupation
lly-20230224_g93.jpg
David A. Ricks
Chair, President, and CEO
lly-20230224_g94.jpg
Anat Ashkenazi
SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
skovronskyround40a.jpglly-20230224_g95.jpg
Daniel Skovronsky, M.D., Ph.D.
SeniorExecutive Vice President, Chief Scientific and Medical Officer and President, Lilly Research Laboratories
vannaardenround40a.jpglly-20230224_g96.jpg
Jacob Van NaardenAnat Hakim
SeniorExecutive Vice President, CEO Loxo Oncology at LillyGeneral Counsel and Secretary
lly-20230224_g97.jpg
Patrik Jonsson
Executive Vice President and President, Lilly Oncology
rauround40a.jpg
Diogo Rau
Senior Vice PresidentImmunology, Lilly USA and Chief Information and DigitalCustomer Officer
Four of our named executive officers, Ms. Ashkenazi, Mr. Van Naarden, Mr. Rau and Mr. Smiley, served in their respective roles for a portion of 2021. Ms. Ashkenazi succeeded Mr. Smiley as senior vice president and CFO on February 9, 2021. Prior to becoming CFO, Ms. Ashkenazi served as senior vice president, controller and chief financial officer, Lilly Research Laboratories.
Mr. Van Naarden became senior vice president, CEO of Loxo Oncology at Lilly and President of Lilly Oncology on September 5, 2021. He previously served as CEO of Loxo Oncology at Lilly. Mr. Rau joined Lilly as senior vice president and chief
39


information and digital officer on May 17, 2021. Prior to joining Lilly, Mr. Rau served as senior director, information systems and technology for retail and online stores at Apple, Inc.
Our Philosophy on Compensation
At Lilly, our purpose is to unite caring with discovery to create medicines that make life better for people around the world. To do this, we must attract, engage, and retain highly talented individuals from a variety of backgrounds and motivate them to create long-term shareholder value by achieving top-tier corporate performance while embracing the company'scompany’s core values of integrity, excellence, and respect for people. Our compensation programs are designed to help us achieve these goals while balancing the long-term interests of our shareholders and customers.
Objectives
Our compensation and benefits programs are based on the following objectives:
Reflect individual and company performance:We reinforce a high-performance culture by linking pay with individual and company performance. As employees assume greater responsibilities, the proportion of total compensation based on absolute company performance, relative company performance and shareholder returns increases. We perform annual reviews to ensure our programs provide an incentive to deliver long-term, sustainable business results while discouraging excessive risk-taking or other adverse behaviors.
Attract and retain talented employees:Compensation opportunity is market competitive and reflects the level of job impact and responsibilities. Retention of talent is an important factor in the design of our compensation and benefit programs.
Implement broad-based programs:While the amount of compensation paid to employees varies, the overall structure of our compensation and benefit programs is broadly similar across the organization to encourage and reward all employees who contribute to our success.
Consider shareholder input:Management and the Talent and Compensation Committee consider the results of our annual say-on-pay vote and other sources of shareholder feedback when designing executive compensation and benefit programs.

52


Say-on-Pay Results
At our 20212022 annual meeting of shareholders, greater than 9594 percent of the sharesvotes cast votedwere in favor of the company'scompany’s say-on-pay proposal on executive compensation. Management and the Talent and Compensation Committee view this vote as supportive of the company'scompany’s overall approach toward executive compensation.
Talent and Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s Processes and Analyses
Setting Compensation
The Talent and Compensation Committee considers individual performance assessments, compensation recommendations from the CEO (with respect to each of the other executive officers), company performance, peer group data, input from its compensation consultant, feedback from shareholders, and its own judgment when determining compensation for the company'scompany’s executive officers.
Individual performance:
CEO:Generally, the independent directors, under the direction of the lead independent director, meet with the CEO at the beginning of each year to establish the CEO'sCEO’s performance objectives. At the end of the year, the independent directors meet to assess the CEO'sCEO’s achievement of those objectives along with other factors, including contribution to the company’s performance, diversity,environmental, social (DEI) and governance matters, ethics, and integrity. This evaluation is used in setting the CEO'sCEO’s compensation opportunity for the next year.
Other Executives: The Talent and Compensation Committee receives individual performance assessments and target compensation recommendations from the CEO for each of the remaining executive officers. Each executive officer’s performance assessment is based on the achievement of objectives established at the start of the year, as well as other factors, including contribution to the company'scompany’s performance, diversity,environmental, social (DEI) and governance matters, ethics, and integrity. The Talent and Compensation Committee considers these inputs, its knowledge of and interactions with each executive officer, and its judgment to develop a final individual performance assessment. For new executive officers, target compensation is set by the Talent and Compensation Committee at the time of promotion or offer.appointment.
Company performance:Lilly performance is considered in multiple ways:
Overall prior year performance is a factor in setting target compensation for the comingupcoming year.
At the beginning of each calendar year, annual performance goals are established and approved by the compensation committee.Talent and Compensation Committee. Performance against these annual goals is used to determine the short-term cash incentive payout.
Prior to the annual equity grant, multi-year performance goals are established and approved by the compensation committee.Talent and Compensation Committee. Performance against these multi-year objectives is used to determine the long-term incentive equity payout.
40


Peer group analysis: The Talent and Compensation Committee uses data from the peer group described below as a market check for compensation decisions but does not use thisthese data as the sole basis for its compensation targets and does not target a specific position within that range of market data.
Input from independent compensation consultant:The Talent and Compensation Committee considers the advice of its independent compensation consultant, FW Cook, when setting executive officer compensation.
Competitive Pay Assessment
Lilly’s peer group is composed of companies that directly compete with Lilly, use a similar business model, and employ people with the unique skills required to operate an established biopharmaceutical company. The Talent and Compensation Committee selects a peer group whose median market cap and revenue are broadly like Lilly's.Lilly’s. The Talent and Compensation Committee reviews and approves the peer group at least every three years.years, and the Chair and independent compensation consultant review the peer group annually. The Talent and Compensation Committee established the following peer group in May 20182021 for purposes of assessing competitive pay:

53


AbbVieBristol-Myers SquibbMerckSanofiRoche
Allergan*AmgenCelgene*GileadNovartisShire*Sanofi
AmgenAstraZenecaGileadGlaxoSmithKlineNovo NordiskTakeda
AstraZenecaBiogenGlaxoSmithKlinePfizer
BiogenJohnson & JohnsonRochePfizer
*Market data unavailable for assessing competitive 2021 pay due to business mergers.
At the time of the review in May 2018,2021, all peer companies were no greater than two times our revenue or market cap except Johnson & Johnson Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. The Talent and Compensation Committee included these fourtwo companies despite their size because they compete directly with Lilly, have similar business models, and seek to hire from the same pool of management and scientific talent.
When determining pay levels for target compensation, the Talent and Compensation Committee considers an analysis of market competitive pay for each executive officer position (except CEO), along with internal factors such as the performance and experience of each executive officer. The independent compensation consultant for the Talent and Compensation Committee provides a similar analysis when recommending pay levels for the CEO. The CEO analysis includes a comparison of our CEOCEO’s actual total direct compensation in the prior year to company performance on an absolute and relative basis. The analysis also includes a comparison of current target total direct compensation for our CEO to the most recently available data on CEO target total direct compensation for our peer group with an emphasis on peers that are headquartered in the U.S.United States. On average, the named executive officers'officers’ target total direct compensation for 20212022 was comparable to the median of the peer group.
Components of Our Compensation
Our 20212022 executive compensation was primarily composed of three components:
base salarysalary;
annual cash bonus, which is generally based on company performance relative to internal targets for revenue, EPS, and the progress of our pipelinepipeline; and
three different forms of equity incentives:
performance award, which is a performance-based equity award that vests over three years. Payout is based on the company'scompany’s two-year growth in EPS relative to the median external analyst anticipated peer group EPS growth. The earnedAfter the two-year performance period, the performance-adjusted shares are then subject to a 13-month service-vesting period
shareholder value award, which is a performance-based equity award that pays out based on absolute company stock price growth measured over a three-year period, followed by a one-year holding period
relative value award, which is a performance-based equity award that pays out based on company TSR results relative to peers measured over a three-year period, followed by a one-year holding period.
Executives also receive a company benefits package, described below under "OtherOther Compensation Practices and Information—Employee Benefits."Benefits.”
Adjustments to Reported Financial Results
The Talent and Compensation Committee has the authority to adjust the company'scompany’s reported revenue and EPS upon which incentive compensation payouts are determined to eliminate the distorting effect of unusual income or expense items. The adjustments are intended to:
align award payments with the underlying performance of the core businessbusiness;
avoid volatile, artificial inflation or deflation of awards due to unusual items in any year induring the performance periodperiod;
41


eliminate certain counterproductive short-term incentives—for example, incentives to refrain from acquiring new technologies, to defer disposing of underutilized assets, or to defer settling legacy legal proceedings to protect current bonus paymentspayments; and
facilitate comparisons with peer companies.
The Talent and Compensation Committee considers the adjustments approved by the Audit Committee for reporting non-GAAP EPS and other adjustments, based on guidelines approved by the Talent and Compensation Committee prior to the performance period.Committee. The Talent and Compensation Committee reviews and approves adjustments on a quarterly basis and may adjust payouts for items, including but not limited to, the impact of significant acquisitions or divestitures, the impact of share repurchases that differ significantly from business plan, and large swings in foreign exchange rates. Further details on the adjustments for 20212022 and the rationale for making these adjustments are set forth in

54


Appendix A, "SummarySummary of Adjustments Related to the Annual Cash Bonus and Performance Award."Award.” For ease of reference, throughout the CD&A and the other compensation disclosures, we refer simply to "revenue"“revenue”, “EPS”, and "EPS,"“adjusted non-GAAP EPS,” but we encourage you to review the information in Appendix A toto understand the adjustments from reported revenue and EPS that were approved.
The Talent and Compensation Committee also has general authority to apply downward discretion to bonus, performance award, shareholder value award, and relative value award payouts for individual or all executive officers.
1.Base Salary
In setting salaries, Lilly seeks to retain, motivate, and reward successful performers while maintaining affordability within the company'scompany’s business plan. Base salaries are reviewed and established annually and may be adjusted upon promotion, following a change in job responsibilities, or to maintain market competitiveness. Salaries are compared annually with peer group data and are based on each person'sperson’s level of contribution, responsibility, expertise, and competitiveness and are compared annually with peer group data.
Base salary increases for 2021 were based on competitiveness. Generally, executive base salaries are positioned against market salaries, considering experience, and performance over time. time, and competitiveness.
If an executive'sexecutive officer’s salary is deemed competitive given their experience and performance, no salary increase is provided.
2.Annual Cash Bonus (Bonus Plan)
The Bonus Plan is designed to reward the achievement of the company’s annual financial and innovation objectives. All the named executive officers participated in the Bonus Plan during 2021. Mr. Van Naarden's participation in the Bonus Plan commenced at the time of his promotion on September 5, 2021. For the portion of the 2021 performance year prior to his promotion, Mr. Van Naarden participated in The Loxo Oncology, Inc. Bonus Plan (Loxo Bonus Plan), and in lieu of the payments he would have been eligible to receive thereunder, the Company paid Mr. Van Naarden a one-time payment, as further described below in the Summary Compensation Table.
Bonus Plan2022.
The Talent and Compensation Committee sets Bonus Plan performance goals and individual bonus targets for the Bonus Plan at the beginning of each year. The bonus is based on three areas of company performance measured relative to internal targets: revenue, EPS, and pipeline progress. The annual cash bonus payout is calculated as follows:
bonusplanpayouta.jpg
base salary earnings
lly-20230224_g98.gif
individual bonus target
lly-20230224_g98.gif
bonus multiple
Actual payouts can range from 0 to 200 percent of an individual'sindividual’s bonus target. The Talent and Compensation Committee references the annual operating plan and pipeline objectives to establish performance targets and to assess the relative weighting for each objective. In 2021,2022, the performance measures and weightings remainremained unchanged from the prior year:
Lilly GoalsWeighting
Revenue performance25%
EPS performance50%
Pipeline progress25%

Based on this weighting, the company bonus multiple is calculated as follows:
bonusmultipleequation43a.jpg
25% x revenue multiple
lly-20230224_g99.gif
50% x EPS multiple
lly-20230224_g99.gif
25% x pipeline multiple
lly-20230224_g100.gif
bonus multiple
Loxo Bonus Plan
Performance goals for the Loxo Bonus Plan are determined by a committee consisting of senior company leadership (the Loxo Oncology Steering Committee) and mirror the goals under the Bonus Plan; provided, however, that eligible employees have an additional bonus opportunity that may be awarded for the attainment of other goals specific to oncology research and development (Additional Cash Award). These other goals can vary annually, but typically include preclinical, clinical, regulatory actions, external innovation and scientific publication milestones. These additional goals associated with molecule advancement and proof of concept milestones typically carry more weight in the Additional Cash Award results.
42


The annual Loxo Bonus Plan payout is calculated by multiplying a participant's base earnings, the individual bonus target and the sum of the Bonus Plan and Additional Cash Award payout multiples.
Base Earnings x Individual Bonus Target x (Bonus Plan Multiple + Additional Cash Award Multiple)
Actual payouts for the Loxo Bonus Plan can range from 0 to 400 percent of an individual's bonus target (0 to 200 percent for the Bonus Plan performance and 0 to 200 percent for the Additional Cash Award). Goal attainment is determined by the Loxo Oncology Steering Committee.
3.Equity Incentives
The company grants three types of equity incentives to executives and certain other employees: performance awards that are designed to focus leaders on multi‑year operational performance relative to peer companies, shareholder value awards that are intended to align earned compensation with long-term growth in shareholder value, and relative value awards which encourage TSR outperformance compared to our peer group. These awards, when considered together, align with shareholder interests by incenting long-term operational excellence, shareholder return and peer company outperformance without encouraging excessive risk-taking behaviors. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to adjust payout from an equity award granted to an executive officer downward from the amount yielded by the applicable formula.
Performance Awards
Performance awards vest overafter three years. Payouts are based on achieving EPS growth targets over a two-year performance period, followed by an additional 13-month service-vesting period for executive officers. During the service-vesting period, the award is held in the form of restricted stock units. The growth-rate targets are set relative to the median external analyst anticipated EPS growth for our peer group over the same performance period. These awards do not accumulate dividends during the two-year performance period, but they do

55


accumulate dividend equivalent units during the service-vesting period.
The Talent and Compensation Committee believes EPS growth is an effective measure of operational performance because it is closely linked to shareholder value, is broadly communicated to the public, is understood by Lilly employees, and allows for objective comparisons to the performance of Lilly'sLilly’s peer group. Consistent with the objectives established by the Talent and Compensation Committee, Lilly company performance exceeding the expected peer group median results in above‑target payouts, while Lilly company performance lagging the expected peer group median results in below‑target payouts. Possible payouts range from 0 percent to 175 percent of the target number of shares, depending on Lilly EPS growth over the performance period.
The measure of EPS used in the performance award program differs from the measure used in the Bonus Plan in two ways. First, the EPS goal in the Bonus Plan is set with reference to internal goals that align to our annual operating plan, while the EPS goal in the performance award program is set based on the external analyst anticipated EPS growth rates of our peer group. Second, the Bonus Plan measures EPS over a one-year period, while the performance award program measures EPS over a two-year period. In any given year, the Bonus Plan may pay above target while the performance award pays below target (or vice versa).
Shareholder Value Awards
Shareholder value awards are earned based on Lilly'sLilly’s share price performance. Shareholder value awards pay above target if Lilly'sLilly’s stock outperforms an expected rate of return and below target if Lilly's stock underperforms that expected rate of return. The expected rate of return is based on the three-year TSR that a reasonable investor would consider appropriate when investing in a basket of large-cap U.S. companies, as determined by the Talent and Compensation Committee. The minimum price to achieve target is calculated by multiplying the starting share price of Lilly'sLilly’s stock by the three-year compounded expected rate of return less Lilly'sLilly’s dividend yield. Shareholder value awards have a three-year performance period, and any shares paid are subject to a one-year holding requirement. No dividends are accrued during the performance period. Possible payouts are based on share price growth and range from 0 to 175 percent of the target number of shares. Executive officers receive no payout if Lilly'sLilly’s TSR for the three-year period is zero or negative.
Relative Value Awards
Relative value awards are earned based on Lilly'sLilly’s TSR performance relative to our peer group. The minimum performance to achieve target is a TSR that is equal to the median TSR performance for the peer group. Relative value awards have a three-year performance period, and any shares paid are subject to a one-year holding requirement. No dividends are accrued during the performance period. Executive officers receive no payout if Lilly'sLilly’s TSR for the three-year period is 30 or more percentage points below the median TSR performance for the peer group over the same time period. Possible payouts range from 0 to 175 percent of the target number of shares.
Pay for Performance
The mix of compensation for our named executive officers reflects Lilly’s desire to link executive compensation with individual and company performance. As reflected in the charts below, a substantial portion of the target pay for executive officers is performance-based. The annual cash bonus and equity payouts are contingent upon company performance, with the bonus factoring in performance over a one-year period, and equity compensation factoring in performance over multi-year periods. The charts below depict the annualized mix of target compensation for Lilly’s CEO and the annualized average for theMs. Ashkenazi, Dr. Skovronsky, Ms. Hakim and Mr. Jonsson.
43
56



other named executive officers annualized for Ms. Ashkenazi, Mr. Van Naarden and Mr. Rau. The Other Named Executive Officers chart below excludes Mr. Smiley.lly-20230224_g101.gif
trgtcompensationmix45a.jpg
Target Total Compensation
Performance Review Process
In setting 20212022 target compensation for the named executive officers, the Talent and Compensation Committee considered individual contributions, Lilly'sLilly’s performance during 2020,2021, internal relativity, peer group data, and input from the CEO for named executive officers other than himself.
Evaluation of Individual Named Executive Officer Performance
A summary of the Talent and Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s review of individual named executive officer performance in 20202021 that influenced decisions on 20212022 target compensation for these executives is provided below:
David Ricks, Chair, President, and CEO:
In accordance with the company’s corporate governance guidelines, the independent directors conducted an assessment of Mr. Ricks’ performance led by the lead independent director. The independent directors believe the company largely met or exceeded its combined financial and strategic goals for 20202021 under Mr. Ricks’ leadership. In 2020,2021, Mr. Ricks and his team:
Launched several innovative medicines to patients globally. Additionally, 2518 new indications for already marketed medicines were launched to patients around the world including Verzenio in certain people with high-risk early breast cancer and Jardiance in heart failure which reduced ejection fraction.
Progressed 1712 and 10 potential new medicines into Phase I and Phase II clinical development respectively from both internal research and external sourcessources.

57


Initiated actionsAdvanced tirzepatide and donanemab, two promising pipeline assets, both having significant data releases and initiating the regulatory review process.
Contributed towards the fight against the global COVID-19 pandemic, including (1) implementing diagnostic testing in our community, (2) discovering and developing SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies leading to the Emergency Use Authorization for bamlanivimab, and (3) striving to protect the health and safety of Lilly employees while continuingwho continued to provide life savinglifesaving medicines to people around the world.
44


Completed numerous pre-clinical and new modality business development transactions to complement and expand internal research efforts.
Completed the acquisition of Dermira, expanded Lilly's strategic collaboration with Innovent for Tyvyt globally and completed seven preclinical asset transactions
Continued to drive a cross-company productivity agenda resulting in savings that funded increased investment in research and development and commercialization of key medicines.
ImplementedContinued execution of a comprehensive strategy that improved diversity, equity and inclusionDEI across the company, increased the representation of women and minorities in management and conducted pay equity studies to promote equality in pay. The company was ranked #3 on the DiversityInc. top 50 companies list and received Women Business Collaborative CEO recognition for excellence in gender diversity
Ledlist. Additionally, led the development of Lilly'scompany’s comprehensive Racial Justice Commitment to help improve equity within Lilly and the communities in which it operatesoperates.
Achieved certain 2020Established new 2030 environmental performance goals to be carbon neutral in our own operations, purchase 100% renewable electricity, have zero waste to landfill from routine operations and continue our water stewardship. Held the company’s first established in 2013, such as greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency, waste efficiencyESG investor meeting and wastewaterpublished Lilly’s comprehensive ESG report.
Established new long-term goals for environmental, safety and governance goals for 2030
In addition, the company was named one of the world’s most ethical companies by the Ethisphere Institute.Institute.
Anat Ashkenazi, SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
Ms. Ashkenazi became Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) on February 9, 2021. Priorcontributed to becoming CFO,the strong financial performance of the company in her first year as chief financial officer. Ms. Ashkenazi served as senior vice president and controller, and led corporate strategy at Lilly Research Laboratories. As controller, Ms. Ashkenazi:Ashkenazi’s 2021 accomplishments included:
Played a key role in the company achieving its financial targets in 2020 and in2021.
Drove the company’s efforts to reallocate financial resources in2022 strategic planning and business planning process.
Championed the fight against COVID-19company’s productivity agenda throughout 2021 and during the company’s strategic and operational planning processes.
Led the company’s broad productivity agendacapital allocation process allowing for investment in several years, having beenin-licensing deals and increased funding for the advancement of new medicines through clinical development.
Continued to build excellent rapport and represent the company with the investment community.
Was a keystrong partner towith the operating units across the value cyclebusiness unit presidents, chief scientific and played a key role in all business development activitiesmedical officer, and president of manufacturing operations.
Led the company’s 2021 strategic plan and 2021 operating plan
Sponsors Lilly’s Veteran Network, an employee resource group focused on recruiting and advancing people who served in the country’s militarymilitary.
Daniel Skovronsky, M.D., Ph.D., SeniorExecutive Vice President, Chief Scientific and Medical Officer and President, Lilly Research Laboratories:
Dr. Skovronsky advanced innovation for patients as the company'scompany’s chief scientific and medical officer. His contributions in 2020 include:2021 included:
Advanced innovative medicines through the product pipeline leading to numerous first approvals, including bamlanivimab (under Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA) in partnership with AbCellera. Additionally, 2518 new indications for already-marketed medicines that were launched to patients globally, including Verzenio in certain people with high-risk early breast cancer and Jardiance in heart failure which reduced ejection fraction in the United States and other key markets.
Achieved industry leading speed across preclinical and clinical development, clinical success rates above the industry peer average, and sellside consensus as the highest valued pipeline in the industry.

58


Delivered several significant positive data readouts including for Verzenio (Phase III in the adjuvant setting), LOXO-305 (advanced b-cell malignancies), Jardiance (cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction),tirzepatide, donanemab, mirikizumab, (psoriasis head-to-head versus secukinumab) and tirzepatide (type 2 diabetes)pirtobrutinib.
Co-led the acquisition of Dermira, expanded Lilly's strategic collaboration with Innovent for Tyvyt globally,Led numerous pre-clinical and completed seven preclinical assetnew modality business development transactions to complement and expand internal research efforts.
Sped research resulting in 1712 and 10 potential new medicines advancing tointo Phase I and Phase II clinical development includingrespectively from both internally discovered moleculesinternal research and molecules sourced externallyexternal sources via business developmentdevelopment.
Led the company’s efforts in the fight against SARS-CoV-2 including (1) implementing diagnostic testing at our headquarters in Indianapolis, Indiana and (2) discovering and developing SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies leading to the Emergency Use Authorization for bamlanivimabantibodies.
Enhanced strategies to further reduce drug discovery and development timelines, leading to earlier product launch
Led DEI strategies in research and development to improve innovation and productivity.productivity and sponsored Lilly’s Chinese Culture Network.
Jacob Van Naarden, Senior
Anat Hakim, Executive Vice President, CEO Loxo Oncology at LillyGeneral Counsel and President, Lilly Oncology:Secretary:
Mr. Van Naarden servedMs. Hakim was effective and influential in her second year as chief operating officergeneral counsel in 2021, and she was a productive partner with the executive team. In 2021, she:
Continued to build even stronger credibility with the company’s board as Corporate Secretary.
Defended several key patents, including patents for Alimta and Taltz.
Developed and implemented legal strategies in the areas of Loxo Oncology at Lilly whenM&A, intellectual property protection, product liability, regulatory reform and pharmaceutical pricing. Drove a transformation effort to increase the company acquired Loxo Oncology, Inc. in 2019 and was later named CEOcapability of Loxo Oncology at Lilly in January 2021. Mr. Van Naarden played an integral role with numerous oncology assets including the approval of Retevmo. As CEO of Loxo Oncology at Lilly, Mr. Van Naarden has built a science-first drug discovery and development organization. He has ledcompany’s law division.
Provided sound legal counsel through numerous business development transactions and contributed toactivities.
Influenced the company’s scientific efforts in other therapeutic areas.ethics and compliance programs globally to ensure the company realizes its long-standing value of integrity.
Diogo Rau, Senior Vice PresidentLed a company initiative to increase protection of Lilly’s intellectual property assets and Chief Information and Digital Officer:
Mr. Rau joined Lilly as senior vice president andpartnered with the chief information and digital officer in May 2021. Prior to joining Lilly, Mr. Rauimprove cybersecurity.
Led and served as senior directoran executive sponsor of information systemsthe company’s Women Leading in Lilly, an employee resource group focused on supporting and technologyadvancing women within Lilly.
Patrik Jonsson, Executive Vice President, President, Lilly Immunology and Lilly USA, and Chief Customer Officer:
Mr. Jonsson demonstrated strong leadership of Lilly Immunology, Lilly USA and across the company. In 2021, he:
Drove volume growth within the immunology business unit and delivered financial results.
Championed the development of potential new medicines with significant data readouts for retailmirikizumab and online stores and most recently served as the top executive of information technology for retail and online stores at Apple, Inc. (Apple). During his 10 years at Apple, heOlumiant.
Successfully led the development and implementationcompany’s commercial business in the United States, which is the company’s largest market.
As the company’s chief customer officer, led the continued transformation of the technology supporting the Apple Online Storecompany’s go-to-market strategies in preparation for potential launches of tirzepatide, donanemab, mirikizumab and Apple retail stores,pirtobrutinib.
45


including e-commerce platform, mobile pointServed as executive sponsor of sale, the Apple Store App, and systems used by store team members. Prior to joining Apple, Mr. Rau was a partner with McKinsey & Company.
In connection with Mr. Smiley’s resignation as an officer on February 9, 2021, the Compensation Committee took action to reduce his 2020 Bonus Plan payout to zero, reduce his 2018-2020 shareholder value award and cancel all his other outstanding equity incentive awards granted in 2019 and 2020. The foregoing terms were agreed to by Mr. Smiley pursuant to his release agreement effective as of February 9, 2021. The material terms of the agreement were previously disclosed inOLA, the company’s 2021 proxy statement.employee resource group focused on supporting and advancing the development of Latin and Hispanic employees across the company.
Target Compensation
The information below reflects total compensation at target for named executive officers for 2021.2022. The actual compensation received is summarized below in "Compensation Results."Compensation Results.”

59


Rationale for Changes to Named Executive Officer Target Compensation
The Talent and Compensation Committee established the 20212022 target total compensation for each named executive officer except Ms. Ashkenazi, Mr. Van Naarden and Mr. Rau, based on the named executive officer's 2020officer’s 2021 performance, internal relativity, and peer group data. The Compensation Committee approved target total compensation for Ms. Ashkenazi, Mr. Van Naarden and Mr. Rau upon their promotion or hire, as applicable, based on job scope, market data, experience, and internal relativity.
Base Salary
The following table shows the approved annualized salary for each named executive officer. Mr. Ricks and Dr. Skovronsky did not receive an adjustment toa base pay adjustment in 2021,2022; however, other named executive officer base pay amounts were adjusted to align pay with their level of experience, internal relativity, peer group market data and the remaining executive officers' 2021 annualized salaries were effective on the day they assumed their new responsibilities.individual performance. Each named executive officer'sofficer’s actual base salary earned during 20212022 is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the "Executive Compensation"“Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement.
Name2
2020 Annual Base Salary Effective March 1, 20202021 Annual Base Salary Effective March 7, 2021Increase
NameName2021 Annual Base Salary Effective March 7, 20212022 Annual Base Salary
Effective March 6, 2022
Increase
Mr. RicksMr. Ricks$1,500,000$1,500,000%Mr. Ricks$1,500,000$1,500,000%
Ms. AshkenaziMs. AshkenaziN/A1$900,000N/AMs. Ashkenazi$900,000$950,0005.6 %
Dr. SkovronskyDr. Skovronsky$1,000,000$1,000,000%Dr. Skovronsky$1,000,000$1,250,00025.0 %
Mr. Van NaardenN/A1$675,000N/A
Mr. RauN/A1$670,000N/A
Ms. HakimMs. Hakim$775,000$900,00016.1 %
Mr. JonssonMr. JonssonN/A1$750,000N/A1
1 Ms. Ashkenazi, Mr. Van Naarden and Mr. Rau wereJonsson was not a named executive officersofficer in 2020.2021.
2 For the period beginning on January 1, 2021 through February 8, 2021, Mr. Smiley's annual base salary was $1,000,000, and for the transition period beginning on February 9, 2021 through July 31, 2021, Mr. Smiley earned a biweekly base salary of $9,000.
Annual Cash Bonus Targets
Based on a review of internal relativity, peer group market data, and individual performance, the Talent and Compensation Committee retained the same percent-of-salary bonus targettargets as in 20202021 for Mr. Ricks, increased theMs. Ashkenazi, Dr. Skovronsky and Ms. Hakim. Mr. Jonsson’s bonus target for Dr. Skovronsky to 100 percent,was set Ms. Ashkenazi's bonus target at 100 percent and set Mr. Van Naarden's and Mr. Rau's bonus targets at 80 percent.for the 2022 performance year. 2022 Bonus targets are shown in the table below aswere:
Name2021 Bonus Target2022 Bonus Target
Mr. Ricks150 %150 %
Ms. Ashkenazi100 %100 %
Dr. Skovronsky100 %100 %
Ms. Hakim100 %100 %
Mr. JonssonN/A1100 %
1 Mr. Jonsson was not a percentage of each named executive officer’s earnings from base salaryofficer in 2021:2021.
Name3
2020 Bonus Target2021 Bonus Target
Mr. Ricks150 %150 %
Ms. AshkenaziN/A1100 %
Dr. Skovronsky95 %100 %
Mr. Van NaardenN/A180 %2
Mr. RauN/A180 %2
1 Ms. Ashkenazi, Mr. Van Naarden and Mr. Rau were not named executive officers in 2020.
2 Mr. Van Naarden's Bonus Plan participation was initiated upon his promotion on September 5, 2021. Prior to his promotion, Mr. Van Naarden participated in the Loxo Bonus Plan, which entitled him to a target bonus equal to 60% of base salary.
3 Pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement with the company, Mr. Smiley was not entitled to an annual bonus for the 2020 and 2021 calendar years. See "Agreement with Former Chief Financial Officer" for additional information.
46


Equity Incentives - Target Grant Values
For 20212022 equity grants, the Talent and Compensation Committee set the total target values for named executive officers based on internal relativity, peer group market data and individual performance, and internal relativity.performance. Named executive officers have 35 percent of their equity target allocated to shareholder value awards and relative value awards, respectively, and 30 percent to performance awards. Total target values for the 20202021 and 20212022 equity grants to the named executive officers were as follows:
Name5
2020 Annual Equity Grant2021 Annual Equity Grant
NameName2021 Annual Equity Grant2022 Annual Equity Grant
Mr. RicksMr. Ricks$12,500,000$14,000,000Mr. Ricks$14,000,000$16,250,000
Ms. AshkenaziMs. AshkenaziN/A1$2,200,0002Ms. Ashkenazi$2,200,000$3,000,000
Dr. SkovronskyDr. Skovronsky$4,100,000$4,700,000Dr. Skovronsky$4,700,000$5,500,000
Mr. Van NaardenN/A1$1,300,0003
Mr. RauN/A1N/A4
Ms. HakimMs. Hakim$2,100,000$3,000,000
Mr. JonssonMr. JonssonN/A1$2,100,000
1 Ms. Ashkenazi, Mr. Van Naarden and Mr. Rau wereJonsson was not a named executive officersofficer in 2020.2021.
2 Ms. Ashkenazi’s 2021 award was granted prior to her transition into the Chief Financial Officer role. As such, her 2021 annual equity grant aligns with the terms and conditions associated with her prior position.
3 Mr. Van Naarden was not an executive officer at the time of the 2021 annual equity grant. As such, his 2021 annual equity grant aligns with the terms and conditions associated with his prior position. Mr. Van Naarden also received equity awards of restricted stock units valued at (i) $1,650,000 in February 2021 representing transition equity following Lilly’s acquisition of Loxo Oncology, Inc. and (ii) $1,000,000 in December 2021 associated with Mr. Van Naarden's promotion.

4 Mr. Rau started with Lilly in May 2021, after annual grants were issued; however, he received an equity grant of restricted stock units valued at $4,000,000 upon hire to replace a portion of the outstanding equity he forfeited after leaving Apple and the missed opportunity for a 2021 annual equity award from Lilly.60
5 Pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement with the company, Mr. Smiley was not entitled to an annual equity grant in 2021. See "Agreement with Former Chief Financial Officer" for additional information.


Performance Goals for Incentive Programs
Annual Cash Bonus Goals
The Talent and Compensation Committee established the company performance targets using the company's 2021company’s 2022 annual operating plan, which was approved by the board in 2020.2021. These targets are described below under "Compensation“Compensation Results."
Performance Award
In February 2021,2022, the Talent and Compensation Committee established a compounded two-year EPS growth target of 8.86.3 percent per year based on investment analysts’ EPS growth estimates for our peer group companies at that time. To translateShortly after the 8.8approval of the EPS growth target, following guidance from the SEC, Lilly’s presentation of Non-GAAP EPS began including acquired in-process research and development (acquired IPR&D) and development milestone charges. In May 2022, the Talent and Compensation Committee reconvened to approve an updated 2021 EPS baseline that excluded all acquired IPR&D and development milestone charges. As a result, the updated 2021 EPS baseline changed from $8.16 to $8.25. The Talent and Compensation Committee reapplied the previously approved 6.3 percent per year growth goal into a two-year cumulative EPSrate to establish the 2022-2024 performance target the Compensation Committee applied the target growth to the 2020 adjusted non-GAAP EPS of $6.78 to obtain target 2021 results of $7.38 and then applied the goal growth again to the target 2021 results to obtain target 2022 results of $8.02. The target 2021 and 2022 results were added together to yield a two-year cumulative EPS target of $15.40. as calculated below:
Target 2022 EPSTarget 2023 EPSTwo-Year Cumulative Target EPS
$8.25*1.063
lly-20230224_g99.gif
$8.25 * 1.063 * 1.063
lly-20230224_g100.gif
$18.09
Payouts for the 2021-20232022-2024 performance award can range from 0 to 175 percent of the target number of shares, as shown below:
performanceaward48a.jpg
2022-2024 Performance Award
Target
0%50%51% -99%100% - 174%175%
EPS GrowthPayout threshold-1.7%6.3%18.3%
Cumulative 2-Year EPS$8.25$16.08$18.09$21.31+
47


Shareholder Value Award
For purposes of establishing the stock price target for the shareholder value awards, the starting price was $152.16$260.57 per share, the average closing stock price for all trading days in November and December 2020.2021. The target share price was established using the expected annual rate of return for large-cap companies (8 percent), as determined by the Talent and Compensation Committee, less an assumed Lilly dividend yield (2.23(1.50 percent). To determine payout, the ending price will be the average closing price of company stock for all trading days in November and December 2023.2024. The award is designed to deliver no payout to executive officers if the shareholder return (including projected dividends) is zero or negative. Possible payouts based on share price ranges are illustrated in the grid below.
shareholdervalueaward48a.jpg
2022-2024 Shareholder Value Award
Target
% of Target0%50%75%100%125%150%175%
Stock Price<$246.99$246.99- $280.85$280.86 - $314.71$314.72 - $348.58$348.59 - $382.45$382.46 - $416.32>$416.32
Compound Annual Stock Price Growth<-1.8% -1.8%-2.5%2.5% - 6.5%6.5% - 10.2%10.2% - 13.6%13.6% - 16.9%>16.9%

61


Relative Value Award
The relative value award is based on the three-year Lilly TSR performance compared to our peer group. To determine payout, the TSR performance is calculated for Lilly and its peers. This calculation compares the average closing price of each company’s stock for all trading days in November and December 20202021 to the average closing price of each company’s stock for all trading days in November and December 2023,2024, assuming reinvestment of dividends, to obtain the TSR for each company. The median TSR for the peer companies is then subtracted from Lilly’s TSR to determine what payout has been earned. For example, if Lilly’s TSR was 55 percent over the three-year performance period and the median peer company performance was 41 percent, Lilly would have outperformed by 14 percentage points (55 percent - 41 percent). This outperformance would have resulted in a 130 percent payout based on the payout ranges depicted below.
relativevalueaward49a.jpglly-20230224_g102.gif
Compensation Results
The information in this section reflects the amounts paid to named executive officers under the Bonus Plan and for equity awards granted in prior years for which the relevant performance period ended in 2021.2022.
Lilly Performance
In 2021, we2022, the company exceeded our revenue target and nearly achieved our EPS target. We also made significant pipeline advances. Key pipeline progression highlights includeinclude:
U.S. approval of Mounjaro (tirzepatide), the first and only GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes
Positive results from tirzepatide’s Phase III SURMOUNT-1 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide compared to placebo in adults with obesity, or overweight with at least one comorbidity who do not have diabetes
In collaboration with Incyte Corporation, U.S. approval of Olumiant (baricitinib) as a first-in-disease systemic treatment for adults with severe alopecia areata
In collaboration with Boehringer Ingelheim, U.S. approval of a new indication for Verzenio® for certain peopleJardiance (empagliflozin) to treat adults with high-risk, early breast cancer; theheart failure regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction
U.S. Emergency Use Authorization of bebtelovimab for the administration of bamlanivimab and etesevimab together for the treatment
48


ofcertain non-hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in patients at high risk of progression to severe disease
U.S. approval of Retevmo (selpercatinib), the first and only RET inhibitor for hospitalization; the regulatory submission for tirzepatide foradults with advanced or metastatic solid tumors with a RET gene fusion, regardless of type 2 diabetes in the U.S. to which Lilly applied a priority review voucher, as well as submission in Europe and Japan; positive topline
Positive results from donanemab’s TRAILBLAZER-ALZ, a Phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of donanemab compared to placebo in patients with early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease; updated data for pirtobrutinib, from the LOXO-305 BRUIN Phase I/II clinical trial in mantle cell lymphoma and other non-Hodgkin lymphomas, as well as in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma, at the 2021 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting; positive topline results from mirikizumab’s Phase III LUCENT-1 and 2 studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab compared to placebo for the treatment of patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis; and positive topline results from threetwo studies of lebrikizumab’s Phase III program evaluating the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in people with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. See "Proxydermatitis through one year of treatment

62


Updated data for Verzenio (abemaciclib) from the monarchE Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Verzenio in combination with standard endocrine therapy for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), node-positive, high risk early breast cancer.
For additional highlights, see “Proxy Statement Summary—Highlights of 2021 Performance."2022 Performance.”
By the end of 2021,2022, Lilly exceeded its two-year EPS growth target for the performance award, and our three-year stock price growth target for the shareholder value award. The company began grantingaward and the median total shareholder return of our peer companies for the relative value awards in 2020; therefore, no relative value awards were granted or earned for the 2019-2021 performance period.award. The discussion below details the measures used in each program, what the performance goal was to obtain target performance, how performance outcomes were assessed and what the Talent and Compensation Committee approved as the final payout multiple.
Bonus Plan
The company utilized revenue, EPS, and pipeline progress to incent the achievement of 20212022 company objectives. Each measure contributes to the final payout multiple on a weighted basis: revenue (25 percent), EPS (50 percent), and pipeline progress (25 percent). Each performance measure is assessed a payout multiple of 0 to 200 percent.
For purposes of the bonus, the Compensation Committee adjusted revenue and non-GAAP EPS to exclude estimated savings from certain discrete and unplanned performance items from the bonus plan multiple. The Science and Technology Committee'sCommittee’s assessment of the company'scompany’s product pipeline achievements is detailed below:
ActivityActivityObjectiveAchievementActivityObjectiveAchievement
ApprovalsApprovals2 new drug first approvals
14-15 other approvals
0 new drug first approvals
18 other approvals
Approvals1 new drug first approval
>18 other approvals
1 new drug first approval
30 other approvals
Potential new drug Phase III startsPotential new drug Phase III starts32Potential new drug Phase III starts3
Potential new drug Phase I startsPotential new drug Phase I starts16-1712Potential new drug Phase I starts16-179
Potential new indication or line extension Phase III startsPotential new indication or line extension Phase III starts59Potential new indication or line extension Phase III starts58
Plan BoldlyPlan BoldlyMeet industry benchmark for speed of developmentExceeded industry benchmark for speed of developmentPlan BoldlyMeet industry benchmark for speed of developmentExceeded industry benchmark for speed of development
Deliver to LaunchDeliver to LaunchMeet planned project timelinesMet planned project timelinesDeliver to LaunchMeet planned project timelinesMet planned project timelines
Qualitative AssessmentQualitative AssessmentAssessment of the chief scientific and medical officer's evaluation of performance against strategic objectivesQualitative AssessmentAssessment of the chief scientific and medical officer’s evaluation of performance against strategic objectives
Game Changer Event1
Game Changer Event1
Assessment by the Science and Technology Committee of the Board regarding significant scientific events
1 The Game Changer Event was added starting with the 2022 performance year. A Game Changer Event is a significant scientific advancement that the Science and Technology Committee of the board deems could capture significant value for patients and for the company.

The Science and Technology Committee may also recommend that the Talent and Compensation Committee use downward discretion on the pipeline metric result if clinical development for a potential major asset is unsuccessful. The Science and Technology Committee did not recommend that the Talent and Compensation Committee exercise this discretion related to the 2022 pipeline multiple.
Based on the recommendation of the Science and Technology Committee, the Talent and Compensation Committee approved a pipeline multiple of 1.06.1.68.
49
63



The company'scompany’s performance compared to targets as well as the resulting bonus multiple is illustrated below:
bonusplanmultiple50a.jpglly-20230224_g103.jpg
For additional information on financial results, see Appendix A, "SummarySummary of Adjustments Related to the Annual Cash Bonus and Performance Award."Award.”
When combined, the revenue, EPS, and pipeline multiples yielded a bonus multiple of 1.10.1.20.
bonusmultipleequationfillea.jpg
RevenueEPSPipelinePayout
25% x 1.33
lly-20230224_g99.gif
50% x 0.90
lly-20230224_g99.gif
25% x 1.68
lly-20230224_g100.gif
1.20 bonus multiple
Loxo Bonus
The Loxo Bonus Plan Committee assessed the level of oncology research and development goal achievement compared to the preclinical, clinical, regulatory actions, external innovation and scientific disclosure milestones established at the beginning of the year. On a payout continuum between 0 – 200 percent, the Loxo Bonus Plan Committee determined the Additional Cash Award portion of the Loxo Bonus would pay at 200 percent. To determine the final Loxo Bonus payout multiple, the Loxo Bonus Plan Committee added the Bonus Plan multiple to the Additional Cash Award multiple to yield a total payout of 310 percent.
Bonus Payments
The 20212022 bonuses paid to the applicable named executive officers under the Bonus Plan were as follows:
Name2022 Bonus ($)
Name3
Mr. Ricks
2021 Bonus ($)$2,700,000
Mr. RicksMs. Ashkenazi$2,475,0001,128,462
Ms. AshkenaziDr. Skovronsky$907,8161,442,308
Dr. SkovronskyMs. Hakim$1,100,0001,051,154
Mr. Van Naarden1
Jonsson
$1,029,507
Mr. Rau2
$362,831888,462
1 A portion of the 2021 bonus payable to Mr. Van Naarden was attributable to achievement of the performance goals under the Loxo Bonus Plan. The 2021 Loxo Bonus Plan achievement was 310%. The amount of the 2021 bonus paid to Mr. Van Naarden in the table above reflects his achievement under both the Loxo Bonus Plan and the Bonus Plan, in each case, pro-rated to reflect the period in 2021 during which he was a participant in the respective plan. Mr. Van Naarden also received a one-time cash payment of $218,715 in lieu of compensation and benefits he was no longer eligible to receive following his transition to his new role, including compensation for the difference between the bonus he would have earned under the Loxo Bonus Plan and the Lilly Bonus Plan, and changes in his expected out-of-pocket costs for healthcare expenses.
2 Mr. Rau joined Lilly in May 2021, and the table reflects the pro-rated bonus paid for the portion of the year for which he was employed.
3 Pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement with the company, Mr. Smiley was not entitled to an annual bonus for calendar year 2021. See "Agreement with Former Chief Financial Officer" for additional Information.
50


2020-20222021-2023 Performance Awards
The target cumulative EPS for the 2020-20222021-2023 performance award was originally set in the first quarter of 2020,2021, reflecting expected peer group EPS growth of 5.78.8 percent each year and a total cumulative target EPS of $13.13$15.40 over the two-year performance period. In December 2020,May 2022, following the aforementioned change to its presentation of non-GAAP measures, the Talent and Compensation Committee updated the award to align with Lilly's decisionthe new SEC guidance to adjust EPS results to remove the impact of gainsexclude adjustments for acquired IPR&D and losses on investments in equity securitiesdevelopment milestone charges from its non-GAAP measures and compensation program outcomes.results. The updated award retained the Talent and Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s decision to establish a compounded two-year EPS growth target of 5.78.8 percent per year, but the growth was applied to an adjusted 20192020 non-GAAP EPS of $5.73$6.89 that excluded gainsacquired IPR&D and losses on investments in equity securities.development milestone charges. Using this methodology, the adjustedupdated cumulative EPS target became $12.46$15.65 for the two-year performance period of 2020-2021.2021-2022. The company'scompany’s actual adjusted non-GAAP EPS over the performance period was $14.94$17.09 representing a growth rate of 19.015.2 percent and a final payout percentage of 140 percent.
performanceawardmultiple51a.jpg

64


lly-20230224_g104.jpg
For Mr.Messrs. Ricks, Jonsson, Ms. Hakim and Dr. Skovronsky, shares earned for the 2020-20212021-2022 performance period are subject to an additional 13-month service-vesting period and are shown in the table below as restricted stock units. Because she was not an executive officer when the award was granted, Ms. Ashkenazi's 2020-2021Ashkenazi’s 2021-2022 performance award was paid in shares of Lilly common stock and not subject to the additional service-vesting period. Mr. Van Naarden was an employee of Loxo Oncology, Inc. and did not receive a performance award grant in 2020. Mr. Rau joined Lilly in May 2021, so he did not receive a performance award grant in 2020.
Name3
Target SharesShares EarnedRSUs
NameNameTarget SharesShares EarnedRSUs
Mr. Ricks Mr. Ricks27,306 N/A47,786Mr. Ricks21,151 N/A29,611
Ms. Ashkenazi Ms. Ashkenazi2,7314,779 N/AMs. Ashkenazi5,5407,756 N/A
Dr. Skovronsky Dr. Skovronsky8,957 N/A15,675Dr. Skovronsky7,101 N/A9,941
Mr. Van Naarden1
N/A N/A
Mr. Rau2
N/A N/A
Ms. HakimMs. Hakim3,173 N/A4,442
Mr. JonssonMr. Jonsson2,946 N/A4,124
1 Mr. Van Naarden was an employee of Loxo Oncology, Inc. and did not receive a performance award grant in 2020.
2 Mr. Rau joined Lilly in May 2021, so he did not receive a performance award grant in 2020.
3 Pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement with the company, Mr. Smiley forfeited his entire 2020-2022 performance award. See "Agreement with Former Chief Financial Officer" for additional information.
2019-2021 Shareholder Value Award
The target stock price range of $132.73$140.74 to $147.37 (18.1$156.21 (17.5 percent to 31.130.1 percent total stock price growth) for the 2019-20212020-2022 shareholder value award was set in 20192020 based on a beginning stock price of $112.38,$119.76, which was the average closing price for Lilly stock for all trading days in November and December 2018.2019. The ending stock price of $260.57$363.15, which was the average closing price for Lilly stock for all trading days in November and December 2022, represents annualized stock price growth of 131.944.7 percent over the relevant three-year period resulting in a payout multiplepercentage of 1.50.175 percent.
The relative TSR modifier applies to those individuals who were executive officers when the award was granted. The cumulative TSR median for the company’s peer group was 24.6 percent, and Lilly’s TSR over the same period was 145.7 percent. Given this positive relative performance, Lilly's relative TSR was 121.1 percentage points above the peer group
51


median resulting in a maximum award payout of 180 percent of target (SVA payout multiple of 150 percent multiplied by the 1.2 modifier = 180 percent final payout).
shareholdervalueawardmultia.jpg
2020-2022 Shareholder Value Award Payout
TargetFinal Result:
Avg. Stock Price: $363.15
Annualized Stock Price Growth: 44.7%
% of Target0%50%75%100%125%150%175%
Stock Price<$109.78$109.78- $125.25$125.26 - $140.73$140.74 - $156.21$156.22 - $171.69$171.70 - $187.17>$187.17
Compound Annual Stock Price Growth<-2.9% -2.9%-1.5%1.5% - 5.5%5.5% - 9.3%9.3% - 12.8%12.8% - 16.0%>16.0%
The number of shares paid to each of our named executive officers for the 2019-20212020-2022 shareholder value award performance period were as follows:
Name3
Target SharesShares Paid Out
NameNameTarget SharesShares Paid Out
Mr. Ricks Mr. Ricks68,382123,088Mr. Ricks33,75059,063
Ms. Ashkenazi1
Ms. Ashkenazi1
3,6335,450
Ms. Ashkenazi1
1,3172,305
Dr. Skovronsky Dr. Skovronsky22,79441,029Dr. Skovronsky11,07019,373
Mr. Van Naarden2
N/A
Mr. Rau2
N/A
Ms. HakimMs. Hakim5,4009,450
Mr. JonssonMr. Jonsson4,7258,269
1 The TSR modifier did not apply to Ms. Ashkenazi’s 2019-20212020-2022 shareholder value award payouts since she was notgranted prior to becoming an executive officer at the time of grant.officer.
2 Mr. Van Naarden was an employee of Loxo Oncology, Inc. in 2019 and so he did not receive a shareholder

65


2020-2022 Relative Value Award
The relative value award grantis based on the three-year Lilly TSR performance compared to our peer group. To determine relative performance, the calculation compares the average closing price of each company’s stock for all trading days in 2019. Mr. Rau joined LillyNovember and December 2019 to the average closing price of each company’s stock for all trading days in May 2021, so he did not receiveNovember and December 2022, assuming reinvestment of dividends, to obtain the TSR for each company. The median TSR for the peer companies is then subtracted from Lilly’s TSR to determine what payout has been earned.
Lilly’s average closing price adjusted for dividend reinvestment for November and December 2019 was $113.96, and Lilly’s average closing price adjusted for dividend reinvestment for November and December 2022 was $362.94. Therefore, Lilly’s TSR over the performance period was 218.5 percent. The median TSR for the peer companies was 37.4 percent thereby making Lilly’s peer outperformance 181.1 percentage points (218.5 percent minus 37.4 percent). This level of outperformance yields a shareholder175 percent payout as depicted in the chart below.
lly-20230224_g105.gif
The number of shares paid to each named executive officer for the 2020-2022 relative value award grant in 2019.performance period were as follows:
3 Pursuant
NameTarget SharesShares Paid Out
Mr. Ricks24,31942,558
Ms. Ashkenazi1
1,0421,824
Dr. Skovronsky7,97713,960
Ms. Hakim3,8916,809
Mr. Jonsson3,4055,959
1 Ms. Ashkenazi’s 2020-2022 relative value award was granted prior to the terms of his separation agreement with the company, Mr. Smiley forfeited his entire 2019-2021 shareholder value award. See "Agreement with Former Chief Financial Officer" for additional information.becoming an executive officer.

Other Compensation Practices and Information
Employee Benefits
The company offers core employee benefits coverage to:
provide our workforce with a reasonable level of financial support in the event of illness or injury,
provide post-retirement income, and
enhance productivity and job satisfaction through benefit programs that focus on overall well-being.
The benefit programs available to executive officers are offered to all eligible U.S. employees and include benefits such as medical and dental coverage, disability insurance, and life insurance. In addition, the 401(k) Plan and The Lilly Retirement Plan (the Retirement Plan) are intended to provide U.S. employees a reasonable level of retirement income reflecting employees’ careers with the company. To the extent that any employee’s calculated retirement benefit exceeds Internal Revenue Service (IRS) limits for amounts that can be paid through a qualified plan, the company also offers a nonqualified pension plan and a nonqualified savings plan. These plans provide

66


only the difference between the calculated benefits and the applicable IRS limits, and the formula is the same for all participating employees. The cost of employee benefits is partially borne by the employee, including each executive officer.
Perquisites
Perquisites
The company provides limited perquisites to executive officers. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the company considered various actions to promote the health and safety of its employees, including its named executive officers, recognizing that the company’s important objectives during this critical time would be significantly disadvantaged without
52


the full services of its employees. As part of this process, the company has encouraged Mr. Ricks’Ricks was granted personal use of the corporate aircraft (upup to a maximum incremental cost of $60,000)established by the Talent and Compensation Committee as a means to (i) increase his time available for company business;business and (ii) protect his health and safety. The incremental cost of personal use of the corporate aircraft is included as a perquisite in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading "AllAll Other Compensation."
The Lilly Deferred Compensation Plan
Members of senior management may defer receipt of part or all of their cash compensation under The Lilly Deferred Compensation Plan (Deferred Compensation Plan), which allows executives to save for retirement in a tax-effective way at minimal cost to the company. Under this unfunded plan, amounts deferred by the executive are credited at an interest rate of 120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate, as described in more detail following the "NonqualifiedNonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2021"2022 table.
Severance Benefits
Except in the case of certain terminations following a change in control of the company, the company is generally not obligated to pay severance to executive officers upon termination of their employment; any such payments are at the discretion of the Talent and Compensation Committee.
The company has adopted change-in-control severance pay plans for nearly all employees, including executive officers. The plans are intended to preserve employee morale and productivity and encourage retention in the face of the disruptive impact of an actual or rumored change in control. In addition, the plans are intended to align executive and shareholder interests by enabling executives to evaluate corporate transactions that may be in the best interests of the shareholders and other constituents of the company without undue concern over whether the transactions may jeopardize the executives’ own employment.
Highlights of Our Change-in-Control Severance Plans
all regular employees are covered
double trigger required
no tax gross-ups
up to two-year pay protection
18-month benefit continuation
Although benefit levels may differ depending on the employee’s job level and seniority, the basic elements of the plans are comparable for all eligible employees:
Double trigger:Unlike "single trigger"“single trigger” plans that pay out immediately upon a change in control, our plans require a "double trigger"“double trigger”—a change in control followed by an involuntary loss of employment within two years. This is consistent with the plans'plans’ intent to provide employees with financial protection upon loss of employment. With respect to unvested equity, performance to the date of the change in control will be used to determine the number of shares earned under an award, but vesting does not accelerate immediately upon a change in control. Rather, the performance-adjusted awards will convert to time-based restricted stock units that continue to vest with the new company. Shares will pay out upon the earlier of the completion of the original award period; upon a covered termination; or if the successor entity does not assume, substitute, or otherwise replace the awards.
Covered terminations: Employees are eligible for payments if, within two years of the change in control, their employment is terminated (i) without cause by the company or (ii) for good reason by the employee, each as defined in the plans. See "Compensation—Compensation—Executive Compensation—Payments upon Termination or Change in Control"Control for a more detailed discussion, including a discussion of what constitutes a change in control.

67


Employees who suffer a covered termination receive up to two years of pay and 18 months of benefits protection:These provisions ensure employees a reasonable period of protection of their income and core employee benefits.
Severance payment. Eligible terminated employees would receive a severance payment ranging from six months'months’ to two years’ base salary. Executives are all eligible for two years’ base salary plus two times the then-current year’s target bonus.
Benefit continuation. Basic employee benefits such as health, dental, life insurance and long-term disability would continue for 18 months following termination of employment, unless the individual becomes eligible for coverage with a new employer. All employees would receive an additional two years of both age and years-of-service credit for purposes of determining eligibility for retiree medical and dental benefits.
Accelerated vesting of equity awards:Any unvested equity awards would vest at the time of a covered termination.
Excise tax:In some circumstances, the payments or other benefits received by the employee in connection with a change in control could exceed limits established under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. The employee would then be subject to an excise tax on top of normal federal income tax. The company does not reimburse employees for these taxes. However, the amount of any change-in-control-related benefit will be reduced to the 280G limit if the effect would be to deliver a greater after-tax benefit than the employee would receive with an unreduced benefit.
53


Share Ownership and Retention Guidelines
Share ownership and retention guidelines help create direct alignment of interests between senior management and shareholders over the longer term. Lilly has established a formal share ownership policy under which the CEO and other senior executives are required to acquire and hold Lilly shares in an amount representing a multiple of base salary. During 2021, the Compensation Committee approved an increase toThe share ownership requirementsrequirement for the CEO is 12 times his annual base salary and the share ownership requirement for the other named executive officers as follows:
Previous Share Ownership RequirementCurrent Share Ownership Requirement
CEO6X Base Salary12X Base Salary
Other NEOs4X Base Salary6X Base Salary
is 6 times their annual base salary.
Until ownership of the required number of shares is reached, an executive officer must hold 50 percent of all shares, net of tax, from all equity payouts. Executive officers are also required to hold all shares received from equity program payouts, net of taxes, for at least one year, even once share ownership requirements have been met. For performance awards granted to executive officers, this holding requirement is met by the 13-month service-vesting period after the end of the performance period.
All of the named executive officers are compliant with the share ownership guidelines. The following graphic shows each respective named executive officer'sofficer’s guideline and each named executive officer'sofficer’s holdings as of December 31, 2021, other than Mr. Smiley, who resigned effective as of February 9, 2021.2022.
shareownership55a.jpg
Share Ownership and Retention Guidelines
12x Base Salary Ownership Requirement
Mr. Ricks123x
6x Base Salary Ownership Requirement
Ms. Ashkenazi12x
Dr. Skovronsky43x
Ms. Hakim*4x
Mr. Jonsson16x
*Ms. Hakim joined Lilly in February 2020 and has held at least 50 percent of her net share payouts in compliance with share ownership and retention guidelines.

68


Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging Shares
Non-employee directors and employees, including executive officers, are not permitted to hedge their economic exposures to company stock through short sales or derivative transactions. Non-employee directors and employees, including executive officers, are prohibited from pledging any company stock (i.e., using company stock as collateral for a loan or trading shares on margin).
Executive Compensation Recovery Policy
Pursuant to the provisions of our incentive award agreements and our robust executive compensation recovery policy (the Executive Compensation Recovery Policy), allLilly may seek recoupment of incentive awards are subjectcompensation (cash or equity) and/or non-qualified benefits previously granted or paid to forfeiture upon termination of employment prior toexecutives in the end of the performanceevent of: (a) certain financial restatements resulting from misconduct or vesting period or for disciplinary reasons. In addition, the Compensation Committee adopted updates to the Executive Compensation Recovery Policy to be effective January 1, 2022 (the Executive Compensation Recovery Policy, as updated and effective January 1, 2022, the Updated Executive Compensation Recovery Policy) which provides the Compensation Committee broad discretion to claw back non-qualified retirement benefits accrued beginning January 1, 2022 from any member of senior management whose(b) other misconduct resultsresulting in a material violationviolations of law or company policy that causes significant harm to the company or who fails in his or her supervisory responsibilitycompany. Furthermore, all outstanding incentive awards are subject to prevent such misconduct by others.forfeiture upon termination of employment.
54


Pursuant to the Executive Compensation Recovery Policy,Specifically, the company couldmay recover all or a portion of any incentive compensation and, effective as of January 1, 2022 pursuantpaid to an executive officer during the Updated Executive Compensation Recovery Policy,prior three years and the company could also recover non-qualified retirement benefits accrued beginning January 1, 2022, from an executive officer in the case of materially inaccurate financial statements or material errors in the performance calculation,calculation. Compensation recovery may occur whether suchfinancial statement inaccuracies or errors result in a restatement and whether or not the executive officer has engaged in wrongful conduct.
The Executive Compensation Recovery Policy covers any incentive compensation awarded or paid to a member of senior management during the last three years and, effective as of January 1, 2022 pursuant to the Updated Executive Compensation Recovery Policy, covers non-qualified retirement benefits accrued beginning January 1, 2022. Subsequent changes in status, including retirement or termination of employment, do not affect the company’s rights to recover compensation under the policy.
The Executive Compensation Recovery Policy is administered by the Talent and Compensation Committee. The company will disclose decisions to take action pursuant to the Updated Executive Compensation Recovery Policy in its proxy materials when required by, and in compliance with, SEC rules and regulations and other applicable laws. In addition, when legally permissible to do so, the company will disclose a decision to take actionact under this policy when the facts and circumstances of the matter that triggered application of the policy have been publicly disclosed in the company’s filings with the SEC and where disclosure can be made without prejudicing the company and its shareholders.
The principlescompany will further comply with any recoupment requirements imposed by applicable laws, rules or regulations, including in connection with the final rule issued by the SEC implementing the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act relating to recoupment of incentive-based compensation. We will monitor the listing standards adopted by the NYSE and amend our robust Updated Executive Compensation Recovery Policy are also incorporated intoduring the terms of our incentive plans and award agreements, which,required timeframe in the event of misconduct meeting the standards described above, allow the Compensation Committee to reduce or cancel awards or payouts that would otherwise have been earned based on company performance. Action by the Compensation Committee to reduce or cancel awards or payouts can occur during or following the relevant performance period.compliance with those standards.

69


Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock Awards
($)
1
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
2
Change in
Pension Value
($)
3
All Other Compensation
($)
4
Total Compensation
($)
David A. Ricks2021$1,500,000 $0$14,966,000 $2,475,000 $2,442,235$126,750$21,509,985 
Chair, President, and
Chief Executive Officer
2020$1,483,333 $0$13,587,500 $2,625,500 $5,883,924$128,372$23,708,629 
2019$1,400,000 $0$12,222,000 $2,919,000 $4,658,242$84,000$21,283,242 
Anat Ashkenazi2021$850,432 $0$2,453,000 7$907,816 $395,335$51,026$4,657,609 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer2020N/AN/AN/A7N/AN/AN/AN/A
2019N/AN/AN/A7N/AN/AN/AN/A
Daniel M. Skovronsky, M.D., Ph.D.2021$1,000,000 $0$5,024,300 $1,100,000 $342,792$60,000$7,527,092 
Senior Vice President,
Chief Scientific and Medical Officer and President, Lilly Research Laboratories
2020$983,333 $0$4,456,700 $1,102,317 $751,223$58,539$7,352,112 
2019$900,000 $0$4,074,000 $1,188,450 $446,521$54,000$6,662,971 
Jacob Van Naarden2021$745,649 5$218,715 6$4,099,500 $1,029,507 $16,909$12,462 $6,122,742 
Senior Vice President, CEO Loxo Oncology at Lilly and President, Lilly Oncology2020N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
2019N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Diogo Rau7
2021$412,308 $250,0008$4,000,000$362,831 $44,519$31,670$5,101,328 
Senior Vice President and Chief Information and Digital Officer2020N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
2019N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Joshua L. Smiley2021$230,831 $0$010$09$0$13,850 $244,681 
Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer2020$983,333 $0$3,587,100 10$09$2,685,276$58,539 $7,314,248 
2019$895,833 $0$3,142,800 10$1,182,948 $2,073,070$53,750 $7,348,401 
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock Awards
($)
1
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
2
Change in
Pension Value
($)
3
All Other Compensation
($)
4
Total Compensation
($)
David A. Ricks2022$1,500,000 $0 $16,981,250 $2,700,000 $0$216,885$21,398,135 
Chair, President, and Chief Executive Officer2021$1,500,000 $0 $14,966,000 $2,475,000 $2,442,235$126,750$21,509,985 
2020$1,483,333 $0 $13,587,500$2,625,500 $5,883,924$128,372$23,708,629 
Anat Ashkenazi5
2022$940,385 $0 $3,135,000$1,128,462 $0$56,423$5,260,270 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer2021$850,432 $0 $2,453,000$906,894 $395,335$51,026$4,656,687 
2020N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/A
Daniel M. Skovronsky, M.D., Ph.D.2022$1,201,923$0 $5,747,500$1,442,308 $0 $72,115$8,463,846 
Executive Vice President,
Chief Scientific and Medical Officer and President, Lilly Research Laboratories
2021$1,000,000$0 $5,024,300$1,100,000 $342,792 $60,000$7,527,092 
2020$983,333$0 $4,456,700$1,102,317 $751,223 $58,539$7,352,112 
Anat Hakim2022$875,962$0 $3,135,000$1,051,154 $317,189 $52,558$5,431,863 
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary2021$775,000$0 $2,244,900$852,500 $98,953 $46,500$4,017,853 
2020$710,417$150,000 $4,174,043$670,633 $87,848 $124,958$5,917,899 
Patrik Jonsson5
2022$740,385$0 $2,194,500$888,462 $55,495 $44,423$3,923,265 
Executive Vice President and President, Lilly Immunology, Lilly USA and Chief Customer Officer2021N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/A
2020N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/A
1 This column shows the grant date fair value of performance awards, shareholder value awards and relative value awards for all named executive officers and additional restricted stock unit awards for Mr. Van Naarden and Mr. Rau computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20212022 for additional detail regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards. All values in the "Stock Awards"“Stock Awards” column were based upon the probable outcome of performance conditions as of the grant date, which vary year to year.
55


For purposes of comparison, the supplemental table below shows the total target grant values of stock awards approved by the Compensation Committee:
Name2019 Total Equity2020 Total Equity2021 Total Equity
Mr. Ricks$10,500,000$12,500,000$14,000,000
Ms. AshkenaziN/A*N/A*$2,200,000
Dr. Skovronsky$3,500,000$4,100,000$4,700,000
Mr. Van NaardenN/A*N/A*$4,099,500**
Mr. RauN/A*N/A*$4,000,000***
Mr. Smiley$2,700,000****$3,300,000****$0****
*Ms. Ashkenazi, Mr. Van Naarden and Mr. Rau were not executive officers in 2019 and 2020.
**Mr. Van Naarden's total equity includes $1,300,000 non-executive officer annual equity grant when he held his former role with Loxo Oncology, Inc. and $2,650,000 of restricted stock units ($1,650,000 granted in February 2021 representing transition equity following Lilly’s acquisition of Loxo Oncology, Inc.and $1,000,000 granted in December 2021 associated with Mr. Van Naarden's promotion).
***Mr. Rau received a sign-on restricted stock unit to replace a portion of the outstanding equity he forfeited after leaving Apple and the missed opportunity for a 2021 annual equity award from Lilly.
****As a result of Mr. Smiley's resignation as an officer on February 9, 2021, his 2019 and 2020 equity awards were cancelled and he did not receive an equity grant in 2021.
The table below shows the minimum, target and maximum payouts (valuing the number of shares that would vest at each payout level using the grant date fair value of a share of Lilly common stock on the date of grant)value) for the 2021-20232022-2024 performance award, the 2022-2024 shareholder value award, and the 2022-2024 relative value award, each of which are included in the Summary Compensation Table which willabove. All awards below pay out in February 2024.2025 and have a minimum payout of $0.
NameMinimum PayoutTarget PayoutMaximum Payout
Mr. Ricks$0$4,200,000$7,350,000
Ms. Ashkenazi$0$1,100,000$1,925,000
Dr. Skovronsky$0$1,410,000$2,467,500
Mr. Van Naarden$0$650,000$1,137,500
Mr. Rau*N/AN/AN/A
Mr. Smiley**N/AN/AN/A
*Mr. Rau joined Lilly in May 2021 and did not receive a 2021-2023 performance award grant.
**As a result of Mr. Smiley's resignation as an officer on February 9, 2021, Mr. Smiley did not receive a 2021-2023 performance award grant.

The table below shows the minimum, target, and maximum payouts (valuing the number of shares that would vest at each payout level using the grant date fair value of a share of Lilly common stock on the date of grant) for the 2021-2023 shareholder value award included in the Summary Compensation Table, which will pay out in February 2024.
2022-2024 PA2022-2024 SVA2022-2024 RVA
NameTargetMaximumTargetMaximumTargetMaximum
Mr. Ricks$4,875,000 $8,531,250 $5,687,500 $9,953,125 $5,687,500 $9,953,125 
Ms. Ashkenazi$900,000 $1,575,000 $1,050,000 $1,837,500 $1,050,000 $1,837,500 
Dr. Skovronsky$1,650,000 $2,887,500 $1,925,000 $3,368,750 $1,925,000 $3,368,750 
Ms. Hakim$900,000 $1,575,000 $1,050,000 $1,837,500 $1,050,000 $1,837,500 
Mr. Jonsson$630,000 $1,102,500 $735,000 $1,286,250 $735,000 $1,286,250 
NameMinimum PayoutTarget PayoutMaximum Payout
Mr. Ricks$0$4,900,000$8,575,000
Ms. Ashkenazi$0$550,000$962,500
Dr. Skovronsky$0$1,645,000$2,878,750
Mr. Van Naarden$0$325,000$568,750
Mr. Rau*N/AN/AN/A
Mr. Smiley**N/AN/AN/A
*Mr. Rau joined Lilly in May 2021 and did not receive a 2021-2023 shareholder value award grant.
**As a result of Mr. Smiley's resignation as an officer on February 9, 2021, Mr. Smiley did not receive a 2021-2023 shareholder value award grant.
56


The table below shows the minimum, target, and maximum payouts (valuing the number of shares that would vest at each payout level using the grant date fair value of a share of Lilly common stock on the date of grant) for the 2021-2023 relative value award included in the Summary Compensation Table, which will pay out in February 2024.
NameMinimum PayoutTarget PayoutMaximum Payout
Mr. Ricks$0$4,900,000$8,575,000
Ms. Ashkenazi$0$550,000$962,500
Dr. Skovronsky$0$1,645,000$2,878,750
Mr. Van Naarden$0$325,000$568,750
Mr. Rau*N/AN/AN/A
Mr. Smiley**N/AN/AN/A
*Mr. Rau joined Lilly in May 2021 and did not receive a 2021-2023 relative value award grant.
** As a result of Mr. Smiley's resignation as an officer on February 9, 2021, Mr. Smiley did not receive a 2021-2023 relative value award grant.
2 Payments under the Bonus Plan for performance in the years represented. For Mr. Van Naarden, the amount in this column reflects payments under the Bonus Plan and the Loxo Bonus Plan for 2021.
3 The amounts in this column reflect the change in pension value for each individual, calculated by an actuary. The changes in pension values in 20212022 were driven by changes in actuarial assumptions offset by pay changes and an additional year of credited service, offset by changes in actuarial assumptions.service. The design of the pension benefit plan did not change. See the Pension Benefits in 20212022 table below for information about the standard actuarial assumptions used. No named executive officer received preferential or above-market earnings on deferred compensation.

70


4 The amounts in this column are company matching contributions into each individual'sindividual’s 401(k) and nonqualified savings plan contributions. For Mr. Ricks, the amount in this column reflects $90,000 of company matching contributions and nonqualified savings plan contributions and $36,750$126,885 of aggregate incremental cost for his personal use of the corporate aircraft. The aggregate incremental costs for personal use of our aircraft are calculated based on our variable operating costs, which include crew travel expenses, on-board catering, landing fees, trip-related hangar/parking costs, fuel, trip-related maintenance, and other smaller variable costs. Because the vast majority of the use of the corporate aircraft is for business purposes, fixed costs such as aircraft purchase costs, maintenance not related to personal trips, and flight crew salaries are not included. For Mr. Rau, the amount in this column reflects $18,914 of company matching contributions and nonqualified savings plan contributions and $12,756 of moving expense reimbursements. The company does not reimburse executives for taxes outside of the limited circumstance of taxes related to a domestic employee relocation or a prior international assignment.
5 For Ms. Ashkenazi was not a named executive officer in 2020. Mr. Van Naarden, this column reflects $668,399Jonsson was not a named executive officer in salary payments and $77,250 of unused vacation pay from Loxo Oncology, Inc.
6 This column includes the amount which represents a one-time cash payment of $218,715 in lieu of compensation and benefits Mr. Van Naarden was no longer eligible to receive following his transition to his new role, including compensation for the difference between the bonus he would have earned under the Loxo Bonus Plan and the Lilly Bonus Plan, and changes in his expected out-of-pocket costs for healthcare expenses.
7 Mr. Rau joined Lilly in May 2021, and the amount in this column reflects the pro-rated annual incentive paid for the portion of the year for which he was employed.
8 Mr. Rau received a cash sign-on award of $250,000 to replace a portion of the outstanding equity with near-term vesting provisions that he forfeited after leaving Apple and to cover other incidental expenses associated with his transition to the role with Lilly.
9 As a result of Mr. Smiley’s resignation as an officer on February 9, 2021, he did not receive a bonus payout for 2020 or 2021.
10 As a result of Mr. Smiley’s resignation as an officer on February 9, 2021, his 2019 and 2020 equity awards were cancelled and he did not receive a 2021 equity grant. Mr. Smiley realized $0 from these awards.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During 20212022
The compensation plans under which the grants in the following table were made are described in the CD&A above and consist of the Bonus Plan (a non-equity incentive plan) and the Amended and Restated 2002 Lilly Stock Plan which provides for performance awards, shareholder value awards, relative value awards, and restricted stock units, among others.
To receive a payout under thea performance award, thea shareholder value award and thea relative value award issued annually to executive officers, the participant must remain employed with the company through the end of the relevant awardperformance period, retire after December 31 of the year in which the award was issuedgranted or be subject to termination events outside of the control of the employee (death, disability, plant closing or reduction in workforce). Annual awards issuedgranted to executive officers are also generally subject to a one-year non-compete post company exit, other than the award of restricted stock units granted to Mr. Van Naarden on December 28, 2021, which does not include a non-compete covenant.exit. The annual awards issuedgranted to executive officers (other than Mr. Van Naarden's award of restricted stock units granted on December 28, 2021) provide that if the former executive officer works for a direct competitor within the one-year restriction period, all annual cycle awards issuedgranted during the 20212022 annual cycle or later would be forfeited. Awards issued to employees who were not executive officers at the time of grant generally dodid not include the non-compete or vesting into retirement provisions.
57


No dividends accrue on either performance awards, shareholder value awards, or relative value awards during the performance period. During the performance award 13-month service-vesting period and restricted stock unit award restriction period, non-preferential dividends accrue and are paid upon vesting.
NameAward
Grant Date2
Compensation Committee Action Date
Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
1
Estimated Possible and Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
All Other
Stock or Option Awards:
Number of
Shares of Stock,
Options, or Units
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(# shares)
Target
(# shares)
Maximum
(# shares)
Mr. Ricks____$562,500$2,250,000$4,500,000
2021-2023 PA32/8/202112/11/202010,576 21,151 37,014 $5,166,000 
2021-2023 SVA42/8/202112/11/202011,271 22,541 39,447 $4,900,000 
2021-2023 RVA52/8/202112/11/20208,545 17,090 29,908 $4,900,000 
Ms. Ashkenazi____$206,322$825,287$1,650,575
2021-2023 PA32/8/202112/11/20202,770 5,540 9,695 $1,353,000 
2021-2023 SVA42/8/202112/11/20201,176 2,351 4,114 $550,000 
2021-2023 RVA52/8/202112/11/2020959 1,918 3,357 $550,000 
Dr. Skovronsky____$250,000$1,000,000$2,000,000
2021-2023 PA32/8/202112/11/20203,551 7,101 12,427 $1,734,300 
2021-2023 SVA42/8/202112/11/20203,784 7,567 13,242 $1,645,000 
2021-2023 RVA52/8/202112/11/20202,869 5,738 10,042 $1,645,000 
Mr. Van Naarden____$111,164$444,655$1,429,696
2021-2023 PA32/8/202112/11/20201,637 3,273 5,728 $799,500 
2021-2023 SVA42/8/202112/11/2020695 1,389 2,431 $325,000 
2021-2023 RVA52/8/202112/11/2020567 1,134 1,985 $325,000 
RSU62/8/202110/15/20205,461 $1,100,000 
RSU62/8/202110/15/20202,785 $550,000 
RSU612/28/202112/21/20213,618 $1,000,000 
Mr. Rau____$82,462$329,846$659,692
RSU76/1/20213/10/202120,160 $4,000,000 

71


NameAward
Grant Date2
Compensation Committee Action Date
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
1
Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and Option Awards
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(# shares)
Target
(# shares)
Maximum
(# shares)
Mr. Ricks____$562,500$2,250,000$4,500,000
2022-2024 PA32/9/202212/13/202110,376 20,751 36,314 $5,606,250 
2022-2024 SVA42/9/202212/13/202116,186 32,372 56,651 $5,687,500 
2022-2024 RVA52/9/202212/13/202112,364 24,728 43,274 $5,687,500 
Ms. Ashkenazi____$235,096$940,385$1,880,769
2022-2024 PA32/9/202212/13/20211,916 3,831 6,704 $1,035,000 
2022-2024 SVA42/9/202212/13/20212,988 5,976 10,458 $1,050,000 
2022-2024 RVA52/9/202212/13/20212,283 4,565 7,989 $1,050,000 
Dr. Skovronsky____$300,481$1,201,923$2,403,846
2022-2024 PA32/9/202212/13/20213,512 7,023 12,290 $1,897,500 
2022-2024 SVA42/9/202212/13/20215,479 10,957 19,175 $1,925,000 
2022-2024 RVA52/9/202212/13/20214,185 8,370 14,648 $1,925,000 
Ms. Hakim____$218,990$875,962$1,751,923
2022-2024 PA32/9/202212/13/20211,916 3,831 6,704 $1,035,000 
2022-2024 SVA42/9/202212/13/20212,988 5,976 10,458 $1,050,000 
2022-2024 RVA52/9/202212/13/20212,283 4,565 7,989 $1,050,000 
Mr. Jonsson____$185,096$740,385$1,480,769
2022-2024 PA32/9/202212/13/20211,341 1,277 1,277 $724,500 
2022-2024 SVA42/9/202212/13/20212,092 1,992 1,992 $735,000 
2022-2024 RVA52/9/202212/13/20211,598 1,522 1,522 $735,000 
1 These columns show the threshold, target and maximum payouts for performance under the Bonus Plan. For Mr. Van Naarden, the columns show the threshold, target and maximum payouts for performance under both the Bonus Plan and the Loxo Bonus, pro-rated for the portion of the year he was participating in each plan. The Bonus Plan payouts range from 0 to 200 percent of target and the Loxo Bonus payouts range from 0 to 400 percent of target. The Bonus Plan and Loxo Bonus paymentspayout for 20212022 performance were 110was 120 percent of target and 310 percent of target, respectively.target. Actual payouts are shown in the Summary Compensation Table in the column titled "Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation."
2 To assure grant timing is not manipulated for employee gain, the annual grant date is established in advance by the Talent and Compensation Committee.
3 This row shows the possible payouts for the 2021-20232022-2024 performance awards ranging from 0 to 175 percent of target. This performance award will pay out in February 2024. Ms. Ashkenazi and Mr. Van Naarden were not executive officers at the time of grant and, therefore, their performance awards will not be subject to the 13-month service vesting period and will payout in February 2023.2025.
4 This row shows the range of payouts for the 2021-20232022-2024 shareholder value awards. This shareholder value award will pay out in February 2024,2025, with payouts ranging from 0 to 175 percent of target. We measure the fair value of the shareholder value award on the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model.
5 This row shows the range of payouts for the 2021-20232022-2024 relative value awards. This relative value award will pay out in February 2024,2025, with payouts ranging from 0 to 175 percent of target. We measure the fair value of the relative value award on the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model.
6 These grants were made outside of the normal annual cycle in 2021, and 5,461 units will vest on February 16, 2022, 2,785 units will vest on February 16, 2023, and 3,618 units will vest on February 1, 2024.
7 This grant was made outside of the normal annual cycle in 2021, and 7,560 units will vest on July 1, 2022, 6,300 units will vest on July 1, 2023 and 6,300 units will vest on July 1, 2024.
58
72



Outstanding Equity Awards on December 31, 20212022
The 20212022 closing stock price used to calculate the values in the table below was $276.22.$365.84.
Stock AwardsStock Awards
NameNameAwardNumber of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)NameAwardNumber of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Mr. RicksMr. Ricks2021-2023 SVA39,4471$10,896,050Mr. Ricks2022-2024 SVA56,6511$20,725,202
2020-2022 SVA59,0632$16,314,3822021-2023 SVA39,4472$14,431,290
2021-2023 RVA17,0903$4,720,6002022-2024 RVA43,2743$15,831,360
2020-2022 RVA24,3194$6,717,3942021-2023 RVA29,9084$10,941,543
2021-2023 PA37,0145$10,224,0072022-2024 PA36,3145$13,285,114
2020-2022 PA47,7866$13,199,449

2021-2023 PA29,6116$10,832,888

2019-2021 PA56,2057$15,524,945

2020-2022 PA47,7867$17,482,030

Ms. AshkenaziMs. Ashkenazi2121-2023 SVA4,1141$1,136,369Ms. Ashkenazi2022-2024 SVA10,4581$3,825,955
2020-2022 SVA2,3052$636,6872021-2023 SVA4,1142$1,505,066
2021-2023 RVA1,9183$529,7902022-2024 RVA7,9893$2,922,696
2020-2022 RVA1,0424$287,8212021-2023 RVA3,3574$1,228,125
2021-2023 PA9,6955$2,677,9532022-2024 PA6,7045$2,452,591
RSU11,4998$3,176,254RSU11,4998$4,206,794
Dr. SkovronskyDr. Skovronsky2021-2023 SVA13,2421$3,657,705Dr. Skovronsky2022-2024 SVA19,1751$7,014,982
2020-2022 SVA19,3732$5,351,2102021-2023 SVA13,2422$4,844,453
2021-2023 RVA5,7383$3,657,7052022-2024 RVA14,6483$7,014,982
2020-2022 RVA7,9774$2,203,4072021-2023 RVA10,0424$3,673,765
2021-2023 PA12,4275$3,432,5862022-2024 PA12,2905$4,496,174
2020-2022 PA15,6756$4,329,7492021-2023 PA9,9416$3,636,815
2019-2021 PA18,7357$5,174,9822020-2022 PA15,6757$5,734,542
Mr. Van Naarden2021-2023 SVA2,4311$671,491
Ms. HakimMs. Hakim2022-2024 SVA10,4581$3,825,955
2021-2023 RVA1,1343$671,4912021-2023 SVA5,9172$2,164,675
2021-2023 PA5,7285$1,582,1882022-2024 RVA7,9893$3,825,955
RSU11,8649$3,277,0742021-2023 RVA4,4874$1,641,524
Mr. RauRSU20,16010$5,568,595
Mr. Smiley0$00$0
2022-2024 PA6,7045$2,452,591
2021-2023 PA4,4426$1,625,061
2020-2022 PA7,6467$2,797,213
Mr. JonssonMr. Jonsson2022-2024 SVA7,3221$2,678,680
2021-2023 SVA5,4952$2,010,291
2022-2024 RVA5,5933$2,678,680
2021-2023 RVA4,1654$1,523,724
2022-2024 PA4,6945$1,717,253
2021-2023 PA4,1246$1,508,724
2020-2022 PA6,6907$2,447,470
1 Shareholder value awards granted for the 2022-2024 performance period will vest on December 31, 2024. The number of shares reported reflects the maximum payout, which will be made if the average closing stock price in November and December 2024 exceeds $416.32. Actual payouts may vary from 0 to 175 percent of target. Net shares from any payout must be held by executive officers for a minimum of one year. Had the performance period ended December 31, 2022, the payout would have been at 125 percent of target.
2 Shareholder value awards granted for the 2021-2023 performance period will vest on December 31, 2023. The number of shares reported reflects the maximum payout, which will be made if the average closing stock price in November and December 2023 is overexceeds $239.03. Actual payouts may vary from 0 to 175 percent of target. Net shares from any payout must be held by executive officers for a minimum of one year. Had the performance period ended December 31, 2021,2022, the payout would have been at 175 percent of target.
2 Shareholder3 Relative value awards granted for the 2020-20222022-2024 performance period will vest on December 31, 2022.2024. The number of shares reported reflects the maximum payout, which will be madepaid if Lilly’s absolute TSR exceeds the average closing stock price in November and December 2022 is over $187.17. Actual payouts may vary from 0 to 180 percent of target.median peer absolute TSR by 30 percentage points or more. Net shares from any payout must be held by executive officers for a minimum of one year. Had the performance period ended December 31, 2021,2022, the payout would have been 175160 percent of target.
3

73


4 Relative value awards granted for the 2021-2023 performance period will vest on December 31, 2023. The number of shares reported reflects the targetmaximum payout, which will be paid if Lilly'sLilly’s absolute TSR is at or up to 5.9exceeds the median peer absolute TSR by 30 percentage points above the actual peer median TSR.or more. Net shares from any payout must be held by executive officers for a minimum of one year. Had the performance period ended December 31, 2021,2022, the payout would have been 175 percent of target.
4 Relative value awards granted for the 2020-2022 performance period will vest on December 31, 2022. The number of shares reported reflects the target payout, which will be paid if Lilly's absolute TSR is at or up to 5.9 percentage points above the actual peer median TSR. Net shares from any payout must be held by executive officers for a minimum of one year. Had the performance period ended December 31, 2021, the payout would have been 175 percent of target.
5 This number represents the maximum value of performance award shares that could pay out for the 2021-20232022-2024 performance awards, provided performance goals are met. Once the combined cumulative adjusted non-GAAP EPS result and associated payout level are determined at the end of the 2021-20222022-2023 performance period, the associated number of shares will be granted as restricted stock units, vesting in February 2024.2025. Actual payouts may vary from 0 to 175 percent of target. The number of shares recorded in the table reflects the payout if the combined cumulative adjusted non-GAAP EPS for 20212022 and 20222023 is at least $18.08$21.31 under the 2021-20232022-2024 performance award grid (see "CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis—Performance Goals for 20212022 Incentive Programs—2022-2024 Performance Award”).
6 The performance period ended December 31, 2022, for the 2021-2023 Performance Award").performance award, resulting in the issuance of restricted stock units for 140 percent of target shares for Mr. Ricks, Dr. Skovronsky, Ms. AshkenaziHakim and Mr. Van Naarden were not executive officers at the time of grant and, therefore, their 2021-2023 performance awardsJonsson. These restricted stock units will not be subject to the 13-month service vesting period and will payoutvest in February 2023.2024.
67 The performance period ended December 31, 2021 for the 2020-2022 performance award, resulting in the issuance of restricted stock units for 175 percent of target shares for Mr. Ricks, and Dr. Skovronsky. These restricted stock units will vest in February 2023.
59


7 For Mr. Ricks and Dr. Skovronsky, restricted stock unitsMs. Hakim and Mr. Jonsson that vested from the 2019-2021 performance award on February 1, 2022.2023.
8 These grants were made outside of the normal annual cycle in 2020, and 4,600 units will vest on November 1, 2024, and 6,899 units will vest on November 1, 2026.
9 These grants were made outside of the normal annual cycle in 2021, and 5,461 units will vest on February 16, 2022, 2,785 units will vest on February 16, 2023, and 3,618 units will vest on February 1, 2024.
10 This grant was made outside of the normal annual cycle in 2021. A total of 7,560 units will vest on July 1, 2022, 6,300 units will vest on July 1, 2023 and 6,300 units will vest on July 1, 2024.
Options ExercisedOption Exercises and Stock Vested in 20212022
Option AwardsStock AwardsStock Awards
NameNameNumber of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)Value-Realized on Exercise ($)Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)
Value Realized on Vesting ($)1
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)
Value Realized
on Vesting ($)
1
Mr. RicksMr. Ricks0$075,387 2td5,678,234Mr. Ricks56,205 2td3,792,145 
123,088 3td9,943,61859,063 3td0,383,823 
Mr. Ricks42,558 4td4,687,617 
Ms. Ashkenazi2,305 3$795,502 
Ms. Ashkenazi0$05,450 3td,325,8221,824 4$629,499 
Ms. Ashkenazi4,779 4td,162,5877,756 5td,676,751 
Dr. Skovronsky0$041,029 3$9,981,125Dr. Skovronsky18,735 2$4,597,382 
Mr. Van Naarden0$07,929 5td,624,573
Mr. Rau6
0$00$0
Mr. Smiley0$019,266 2$4,006,750
Dr. SkovronskyDr. Skovronsky19,373 3$6,686,010 
13,960 4$4,817,875 
9,450 3$3,261,384 
Ms. HakimMs. Hakim6,809 4td,349,922 
7,929 6td,981,854 
8,2693td,853,797 
Mr. JonssonMr. Jonsson5,9594td,056,570 
1 Amounts reflect the market value of Lilly stock on the day value is realized.
2 Restricted stock units resulting from the 2018-20202019-2021 performance award that vested in February 2021.2022.
3 Payout of the 2019-20212020-2022 shareholder value award at 150175 percent of target, adjusted by Lilly’s three-year cumulative TSR (145.7 percent) relative to its peer companies’ median cumulative TSR of 24.6 percent, resulting in a maximum TSR modifier of 20 percent and a final payout of 180 percent of target. Since Ms. Ashkenazi was not an executive officer when the 2019-2021 shareholder value award was granted, her award was not subject to the TSR modifier. As a result, her payout multiple was 150 percent of target.
4 Payout of the 2020-2022 relative value award at 175 percent of target.
5 Payout of the 2021-2023 performance award at 175%140 percent of target for Ms. Ashkenazi. She was not an executive officer in 20202021 at the time of grant; therefore, no additional 13-month service-vesting period applied.
56 This grant was made outside of the normal annual cycle in 2020 before Mr. Van Naarden became an executive officer.when Ms. Hakim joined Lilly.
6 Mr. Rau joined Lilly in 2021 and had no option exercise or stock awards vest during 2021.
Retirement Benefits
We provide retirement income to eligible U.S. employees, including executive officers, through the following plans:
The 401(k) Plan, a defined contribution plan qualified under Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participants may elect to contribute a portion of their base salary to the plan, and the company provides matching contributions on employees’ contributions up to 6 percent of base salary up to IRS limits. The employee contributions, company contributions, and earnings thereon are paid out in accordance with elections made by the participant and the terms of the plan. See the "AllAll Other Compensation"Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table for information about company contributions under the 401(k) Plan for the named executive officers.
The Retirement Plan, a tax-qualified defined benefit plan that provides monthly benefits to retirees. See the Pension Benefits in 2021 table below for additional information about the value of these pension benefits.

74


Sections 401 and 415 of the Internal Revenue Code generally limit the amount of annual pension that can be paid from a tax-qualified plan ($230,000245,000 in 20212022 and $245,000$265,000 in 2022)2023) as well as the amount of annual earnings that can be used to calculate a pension benefit ($290,000305,000 in 20212022 and $305,000$330,000 in 2022)2023). However, since 1975 the company has maintained a nonqualified pension plan that pays eligible retirees the difference between the amount payable under the Retirement Plan and the amount they would have received without the Internal Revenue Code limits. The nonqualified pension plan is unfunded and subject to forfeiture in the event of bankruptcy. Likewise, the company maintains a nonqualified savings plan that allows participants to contribute up to 6 percent of base salary exceeding the IRS limit. The company matches these contributions in the same manner as described in the 401(k) Plan. For more information, see footnote 2 to the "NonqualifiedNonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2021"2022 table.
60


The following table shows benefits that the named executive officers have accrued under the Retirement Plan and the nonqualified pension plan.
Pension Benefits in 20212022
NameNamePlanNumber of Years of Credited Service
Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit ($)
1
Payments During
Last Fiscal Year ($)
NamePlan NameNumber of Years Credited Service
Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit ($)
1
Payments During
Last Fiscal Year ($)
Mr. RicksMr. Ricksretirement plan (pre-2010)14$827,458Mr. Ricksretirement plan (pre-2010)14$630,082
retirement plan (post-2009)12$455,777retirement plan (post-2009)13$351,957
nonqualified plan (pre-2010)14$11,555,253nonqualified plan (pre-2010)14$9,226,014
nonqualified plan (post-2009)12$6,246,306nonqualified plan (post-2009)13$5,041,161
total$19,084,794$0total$15,249,214$0
Ms. AshkenaziMs. Ashkenaziretirement plan (pre-2010)9$473,739Ms. Ashkenaziretirement plan (pre-2010)9$321,129
retirement plan (post-2009)12$396,301retirement plan (post-2009)13$267,432
retirement plan (post-2009)9$1,015,918retirement plan (post-2009)9$922,919
nonqualified plan (post-2009)12$856,088nonqualified plan (post-2009)13$770,780
total$2,742,046$0total$2,282,260$0
Dr. SkovronskyDr. Skovronskyretirement plan (post-2009)9$294,986Dr. Skovronskyretirement plan (post-2009)10$205,453
nonqualified plan (post-2009)9$1,676,195nonqualified plan (post-2009)10$1,269,986
total$1,971,181$0total$1,475,439$0
Mr. Van Naardenretirement plan (post-2009)0.3$7,555
Ms. HakimMs. Hakimretirement plan (post-2009)3$75,341
nonqualified plan (post-2009)0.3$9,354nonqualified plan (post-2009)3$428,649
total$16,909$0total$503,990$0
Mr. Rauretirement plan (post-2009)1$30,790
Mr. JonssonMr. Jonssonretirement plan (post-2009)3$95,010
nonqualified plan (post-2009)1$13,729nonqualified plan (post-2009)3$255,493
total$44,519$0total$350,503$0
Mr. Smileyretirement plan (pre-2010)14$877,998
retirement plan (post-2009)12$408,343
retirement plan (post-2009)14$4,002,852
nonqualified plan (post-2009)12$1,832,029
total$7,121,222$0
1 The following standard actuarial assumptions were used to calculate the present value of each individual’s accumulated pension benefit:
Discount rate:3.115.28 percent for the qualified plan and 2.915.21 percent for nonqualified plan
Mortality (post-retirement decrement only):Private 2012 white collar table with generational projection using Scale MP-2021
Pre-2010 joint and survivor benefit (% of pension):50 percent until age 62; 25 percent thereafter
Post-2009 benefit payment form:Life annuity
The Retirement Plan benefits shown in the table are net present values. The benefits are not payable as a lump sum; they are generally paid as a monthly annuity for the life of the retiree and, if elected, any qualifying survivor. The annual benefit under the Retirement Plan is calculated using years of service and the average of the annual earnings (salary plus bonus) for the highest five out of the last ten calendar years of service (final average earnings).
Post-2009 Plan Information:Following amendment of our Retirement Plan formulas, employees first hired on or after February 1, 2008, have accrued retirement benefits only under the new plan formula. Employees hired before that date have accrued benefits under both the old and new plan formulas. All eligible employees, including those hired on or after February 1, 2008, can currently retire at age 65 with at least five years of service and receive an unreduced benefit. The annual benefit under the new plan formula is equal to 1.2 percent of final

75


average earnings multiplied by years of service. Early retirement benefits under this plan formula are reduced six percent for each year under age 65. Transition benefits were afforded to employees with 50 points (age plus service) or more as of December 31, 2009. These benefits were intended to ease the transition to the new retirement formula for those employees who were closer to retirement or had been with the company longer at the time the plan was changed. For the transition group, early retirement benefits are reduced three percent for each year from age 65 to age 60 and six percent for each year under age 60. Mr. Ricks and Ms. Ashkenazi and Mr. Smiley are in this transition group.
Pre-2010 Plan Information:Employees hired prior to February 1, 2008 accrued benefits under both plan formulas. For these employees, benefits that accrued before January 1, 2010 were calculated under the old plan formula. The amount of the benefit is calculated using actual years of service through December 31, 2009, while total years of service are used to determine eligibility and early retirement reductions. The benefit amount is increased (but not decreased) proportionately based on final average earnings at termination compared to final average earnings at December 31, 2009. Full retirement benefits are earned by employees with 90 or more points (the sum of his or her age plus years of service). Employees
61


electing early retirement receive reduced benefits as described below:
The benefit for employees with between 80 and 90 points is reduced by three percent for each year before the earlier of 90 points or age 62.
The benefit for employees who have fewer than 80 points, but who reached age 55 and have at least ten years of service, is reduced as described above and is further reduced by six percent for each year before the earlier of 80 points or age 65.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 20212022
NameNamePlan
Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)
1
Registrant
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)
2
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)
Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year End
($)
3
NamePlan
Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)
1
Registrant
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)
2
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)
Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year End
($)
3
Mr. RicksMr. Ricksnonqualified savings$72,600 $72,600 $1,140,638 $0 $3,131,383 Mr. Ricksnonqualified savings$71,700 $71,700 $841,242 $0 $4,116,026 
deferred compensation$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 deferred compensation$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 
total$72,600 $72,600 $1,140,638 $0 $3,131,383 total$71,700 $71,700 $841,242 $0 $4,116,026 
Ms. AshkenaziMs. Ashkenazinonqualified savings$33,626 $33,626 $20,659 $0 $212,556 Ms. Ashkenazinonqualified savings$38,123 $38,123 ($24,643)$0 $264,160 
deferred compensation$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 deferred compensation$871,457 $0 $15,182 $0 $886,639 
total$33,626 $33,626 $20,659 $0 $212,556 total$909,580 $38,123 ($9,460)$0 $1,150,799 
Dr. SkovronskyDr. Skovronskynonqualified savings$42,600 $42,600 $174,864 $0 $920,647 Dr. Skovronskynonqualified savings$53,816 $53,816 ($178,790)$0 $849,488 
deferred compensation$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 deferred compensation$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 
total$42,600 $42,600 $174,864 $0 $920,647 total$53,816 $53,816 ($178,790)$0 $849,488 
Mr. Van Naardennonqualified savings$12,462$12,462$544$0$25,467
Ms. HakimMs. Hakimnonqualified savings$34,258$34,258($26,208)$0$174,143
deferred compensation$0$0$0deferred compensation$0$0$0
total$12,462$12,462$544$0$25,467total$34,258$34,258($26,208)$0$174,143
Mr. Raunonqualified savings$7,339$7,339$229$0$14,906
Mr. JonssonMr. Jonssonnonqualified savings$26,123$26,123($19,191)$0$138,719
deferred compensation$0$0$0deferred compensation$0$0$0
total$7,339$7,339$229$0$14,906total$26,123$26,123($19,191)$0$138,719
Mr. Smileynonqualified savings$0$0$189,951$0$802,988
deferred compensation$0$0$0
total$0$0$189,951$0$802,988
1 The amounts in this column are also included in the Summary Compensation Table in the "Salary"“Salary” column (nonqualified savings) or the "Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation"Compensation” column (deferred compensation).
2 The amounts in this column are also included in the Summary Compensation Table in the "All“All Other Compensation"Compensation” column as a portion of the savings plan match.
3 Of the totals in this column, the following amounts have previously been reported in the Summary Compensation Table for this year and for previous years:
Name2021 ($)Previous Years ($)Total ($)
Mr. Ricks$145,200$547,415$692,615
Ms. Ashkenazi$67,252N/A$67,252
Dr. Skovronsky$85,200$224,777$309,977
Mr. Van Naarden$24,923N/A$24,923
Mr. Rau$14,677N/A$14,677
Mr. Smiley$0$228,777$228,777

76


Name2022 ($)Previous Years ($)Total ($)
Mr. Ricks$143,400$692,615$836,015
Ms. Ashkenazi$947,703$67,252$1,014,955
Dr. Skovronsky$107,631$309,977$417,608
Ms. Hakim$68,516N/A$68,516
Mr. Jonsson$52,246N/A$52,246
The Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 20212022 table above shows information about two company programs: the nonqualified savings plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan. The nonqualified savings plan is designed to allow each employee to contribute up to 6 percent of his or her base salary and receive a company match, beyond the contribution limits prescribed by the IRS with regards to 401(k) plans. This plan is administered in the same manner as the 401(k) Plan, with the same participation and investment elections. Executive officers and other U.S. executives may also defer receipt of all or part of their cash compensation under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred by executives under this plan are credited with interest at 120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate as established the preceding December by the U.S. Treasury Department under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code with monthly compounding, which was 1.6 percent for 2021 and is 2.3 percent for 2022.2022 and is 5.1 percent for 2023. Participants may elect to receive the funds in a lump sum or in up to 10 annual installments following termination of employment but may not make withdrawals while employed by the company, except in the event of hardship as approved by the Talent and Compensation Committee. All deferral elections and associated
62


distribution schedules are irrevocable. Both plans are unfunded and subject to forfeiture in the event of company bankruptcy.
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control (as of December 31, 2021)2022)
The following table describes the potential payments and benefits under the company’s compensation and benefit plans and arrangements to which the named executive officers would be eligible upon qualifying termination of employment. Except for certain terminations following a change in control of the company, as described below, there are no agreements, arrangements, or plans that entitle named executive officers to severance, perquisites, or other enhanced benefits upon termination of their employment. Any agreement to provide such payments or benefits to a terminating executive officer (other than following a change in control) would be at the discretion of the Talent and Compensation Committee.
NameName
Cash Severance Payment 1
Continuation of Medical / Welfare Benefits (present value) 2
Acceleration and Continuation of Equity Awards as of 12/31/2021Total Termination BenefitsName
Cash Severance Payment 1
Continuation of Medical / Welfare Benefits (present value) 2
Acceleration and Continuation of Equity Awards as of 12/31/2021Total Termination Benefits
Mr. RicksMr. RicksMr. Ricks
Involuntary retirement or termination$0$28,724,256$28,724,256Involuntary retirement or termination$0$28,315,065 $28,315,065
Involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control$7,500,000$44,054$83,838,115$91,382,169Involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control$7,500,000$48,219$89,798,117 $97,346,336
Ms. AshkenaziMs. AshkenaziMs. Ashkenazi
Involuntary retirement or termination$0$4,496,378$4,496,378Involuntary retirement or termination$0$0 $7,044,249 $7,044,249
Involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control$3,600,000$52,130$9,766,103$13,418,233Involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control$3,800,000$57,473 $16,443,648 $20,301,121
Dr. SkovronskyDr. SkovronskyDr. Skovronsky
Involuntary retirement or termination$0$9,504,661$9,504,661Involuntary retirement or termination$0$9,371,504$9,371,504
Involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control$4,000,000$44,242$27,791,074$31,835,316Involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control$5,000,000$48,408$30,374,451$35,422,859
Mr. Van Naarden
Ms. HakimMs. Hakim
Involuntary retirement or termination$0$3,277,074$3,277,074Involuntary retirement or termination$0$4,422,347 $4,422,347
Involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control$2,430,000$51,818$5,717,146$8,198,964Involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control$3,600,000$57,638$14,894,755 $18,552,393
Mr. Rau
Mr. JonssonMr. Jonsson
Involuntary retirement or termination$0$5,568,595$5,568,595Involuntary retirement or termination$0$3,956,340$3,956,340
Involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control$2,412,000$39,340$5,568,595$8,019,935Involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control$3,000,000$59,558$12,157,522$15,217,080
1 See "Change-in-ControlChange-in-Control Severance Pay Plan—Cash Severance Payment"Payment below.
2 See "AccruedAccrued Pay and Regular Retirement Benefits"Benefits and "Change-in-ControlChange-in-Control Severance Pay Plan—Continuation of medicalMedical and welfare benefits"Welfare Benefits below.

77


Accrued Pay and Regular Retirement Benefits:The amounts shown in the table above do not include certain payments and benefits to the extent they are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment. These include:
accrued salary, vacation pay, and, if applicable, equity payouts prorated for time worked in the performance period and adjusted for company performanceperformance;
regular pension benefits under the Retirement Plan and the nonqualified pension plan. See "Retirement Benefits" aboveRetirement Benefits” above;
welfare benefits provided to eligible U.S. retirees, including retiree medical and dental insurance. The amounts shown in the table above as "Continuation“Continuation of Medical/Welfare Benefits"Benefits” are explained below; and
distributions of plan balances under the 401(k) Plan, the nonqualified savings plan, and the Deferred Compensation Plan. See the narrative following the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 20202022 table for information about these plans.
Death and Disability:A termination of employment due to death or disability does not entitle named executive officers to any payments or benefits that are not available to U.S. employees generally.
Termination for Cause:Executives terminated for cause receive no severance or enhanced benefits and forfeit any unvested equity grants.
Change-in-Control Severance Pay Plan:As described in the CD&A under "OtherOther Compensation Practices and Information—Severance Benefits",” the company maintains a change-in-control severance pay plan for nearly all employees, including the named executive officers. The change-in-control plan for executive officers defines a change in control specifically, but generally the terms include the occurrence of one of the following: (i) acquisition by any person of 20 percent or more of the company’s stock; (ii) replacement by the shareholders of one-half or more of the board of directors; (iii) consummation of a merger, share exchange, or consolidation of the company (other than a transaction that results in the Lilly shareholders prior to the transaction continuing to hold more than 60 percent of the voting stock of the combined entity); or (iv) complete
63


liquidation of the company or sale or disposition of all or substantially all of its assets. The amounts shown in the table for "involuntary“involuntary or good-reason termination after change in control"control” are based on the following assumptions and plan provisions:
Covered terminations.The table assumes a termination of employment that is eligible for severance under the terms of the plan, based on the named executive officer’s compensation, benefits, age, and service credit at December 31, 2021.2022. Eligible terminations include an involuntary termination for reasons other than "cause"“cause” or a voluntary termination by the executive for "good“good reason," each as defined in the plan, within two years following the change in control.
A termination of an executive officer by the company is for "cause,"“cause,” in general, if it is for any of the following reasons: (i) the employee’s willful refusal to perform, without legal cause, his or her material duties, resulting in demonstrable economic harm to the company or participating employers; (ii) any act of fraud, dishonesty, or gross misconduct resulting in significant economic harm or other significant harm to the company or participating employers or to the business reputation of the company or participating employers; or (iii) conviction by a court of competent jurisdiction of any crime (or the entering of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a charge of any crime) constituting a felony.
A termination by the executive officer is for "good“good reason," in general, if it results from: (i) a material diminution in the nature or status of the executive’s position, title, reporting relationship, duties, responsibilities, or authority, or the assignment to him or her of additional responsibilities that materially increase his or her workload; (ii) any reduction in the executive’s then-current base salary; (iii) a material reduction in the executive’s opportunities to earn incentive bonuses below those in effect for the year prior to the change in control; (iv) a material reduction in the executive’s employee benefits from the benefit levels in effect immediately prior to the change in control; (v) the failure to grant to the executive stock options, stock units, performance shares, or similar incentive rights during each 12-month period following the change in control on the basis of a number of shares or units and all other material terms at least as favorable to the executive as those rights granted to him or her on an annualized average basis for the three-year period immediately prior to the change in control; (vi) relocation of the executive by more than 50 miles from his or her regularly assigned workplace in effect immediately prior to the change in control; or (vii) any failure by a successor entity to the company in connection with a change in control to assume

78


the obligations of the company under the plan, or any attempted amendment, termination or repudiation of the plan by such successor entity.
Cash severance payment.The cash severance payment amounts, in general, to two times the executive officer's annual base salary plus two times the executive officer’s bonus target for that year under the Bonus Plan.Plan, to be paid in a lump sum.
Continuation of medical and welfare benefits.This amount represents the present value of the change-in-control plan’s provision, following a covered termination, of 18 months of continued coverage equivalent to the company’s current active employee medical, dental, group life, company-provided death benefit, and long-term disability insurance. Similar actuarial assumptions to those used to calculate incremental pension benefits apply to the calculation for continuation of medical and welfare benefits, with the addition of actual COBRA rates based on current benefit elections.
Acceleration of equity awards. Upon a covered termination, any unvested equity awards would convert into restricted stock units of the new company, with the number of shares earned under the awards based on accrued performance at the time of the transaction. The restricted stock units will continue to vest and pay out upon the earlier of the completion of the original award period; upon a covered termination; or if the successor entity does not assume, substitute, or otherwise replace the award. The amount in this column represents the value of the acceleration of unvested equity grants had a qualifying termination occurred on December 31, 2021.2022.
Excise taxes.Upon a change in control, employees may be subject to certain excise taxes under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. The company does not reimburse the affected employees for those excise taxes or any income taxes payable by the employee. To reduce the employee'semployee’s exposure to potential excise taxes, the employee’s change-in-control benefit will be decreased to maximize the after-tax benefit to the individual.
Payments upon Change in Control Alone:Alone. The change-in-control plan is a "double trigger"“double trigger” plan, meaning payments are made only if the employee suffers a covered termination of employment within two years following the change in control, or in the case of equity awards, if the successor entity does not assume, substitute, or otherwise replace the awards.
Agreement with Former Chief Financial Officer
In connection with Mr. Smiley’s resignation, he and the Company entered into a Separation Agreement (the Separation Agreement), which provided that Mr. Smiley immediately resign from his position as senior vice president and chief financial officer of the Company, as well as forfeit or forego compensatory arrangements totaling $20,133,375 (using Lilly's closing share price at the time of such forfeiture or the intended grant date value for such awards that had been previously approved but not yet granted prior to Mr. Smiley's resignation, as applicable), including all of his earned 2020 cash bonus (which would have otherwise been $1,102,317 based on company performance), his target 2021 bonus of $1,000,000, 25 percent of his earned 2018-2020 shareholder value award (representing a forfeiture of $3,100,954 in value based on Lilly's closing share price at the time of such forfeiture), and all other outstanding and previously approved but not yet granted equity incentive awards totaling $14,930.104. Mr. Smiley also agreed to remain available to the company’s chief executive officer and his successor as chief financial officer through July 2021 to facilitate the transition of his responsibilities, at reduced cash compensation of $9,000 every two weeks. The Separation Agreement includes customary provisions regarding confidentiality
64


and a release of claims against the company, as well as a 24-month non-solicitation agreement and an 18-month non-competition agreement.
CEO Pay Ratio
Lilly’s compensation and benefits philosophy across the organization is to encourage and reward all employees who contribute to our success. We strive to ensure that the pay of every Lilly employee reflects the level of their job impact and responsibilities and is competitive within our peer group. Lilly’s ongoing commitment to pay equity is critical to our success in supporting a diverse workforce with opportunities for all employees to grow, develop, and contribute.
Below is the 20212022 annual total compensation of our CEO and our median employee and the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to that of our median employee.
CEO Pay Ratio:
CEO Annual Total Compensation*$21,509,98521,398,135
Median Employee Annual Total Compensation$97,130124,103
CEO to Median Employee Pay Ratio221:172:1
*This annual total compensation is the "Summary“Summary Compensation Table"Table” amount.
Methodology:
Measurement Date: We identified the median employee using our employee population (excluding the CEO) on October 31, 2021.2022. On this date, Lilly employed approximately 37,10039,500 people, with approximately 16,10017,900 members of our workforce located in the U.S.United States and approximately 21,00021,600 members of our workforce located outside of the U.S.United States.
Identification of Median Employee: In a manner consistent with SEC rules, we identified the median employee by use of a "consistently“consistently applied compensation measure," or CACM. Specifically, we identified the median employee by looking at annual base pay, bonus opportunity at target, and the grant date fair value for standardannual equity awards. We did not adjust the compensation paid to part-time employees to calculate what they would

79


have been paid on a full-time basis.
De Minimis Exception: Lilly has employees in 7068 countries. In identifying the median employee, we excluded 386466 workers in the following 1011 countries, which represent approximately one percent of our workforce: Bahrain, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Egypt, Greece, Indonesia, Kuwait, Pakistan, Panama, Qatar, Russia and United Arab Emirates. We excluded these employees because they are affiliated with joint ventures, or third-party distributors and Lilly does not set their compensation philosophy.or currently undergoing a change in operating model.
Calculated CEO Pay Ratio: After applying our CACM and excluding the employees listed above, we identified the median employee. Once the median employee was identified, we calculated the median employee’s total annual compensation in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table. 
Pay versus Performance
The Talent and Compensation Committee approves and administers compensation programs that are designed to attract, retain, engage, and incentivize our workforce to deliver medicines that make life better for people around the world. Our program aligns executive pay with shareholder interests and links pay to performance through a blend of short-, mid- and long-term performance measures. In 2022, incentive pay made up 92 percent of our CEO’s target compensation and, on average, 82 percent of our other named executive officers’ target compensation. The high utilization of incentive compensation results in higher total realized pay when leadership exceeds the Talent and Compensation Committee-approved performance targets. Conversely, failure to achieve approved targets results in lower realized pay including the possibility that some awards pay zero at the end of their performance period.
The compensation actually paid (CAP) for the Principal Executive Officer (PEO) and the average non-PEO named executive officers is calculated by taking the Summary Compensation Table values: a) less the grant value of equity granted during the year; b) less the change in pension value for the year; c) plus the year-end fair value of unvested equity awards granted during the year; d) plus, for awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested at the end of the year, the difference between the year-end fair value and the immediately prior year-end fair value; e) plus, for awards granted in prior years that vested during the year, the difference between the fair value as of the vesting date and the immediately prior year-end fair value; f) plus the pension service cost for that year.
Pay versus Performance CAP Table
Value of initial fixed $100 investment based on:
Year
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO1
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs2
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOsTotal Shareholder Return
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return3
Net Income ($ millions)
Company Selected Measure (CSM) –Adjusted Non-GAAP EPS4
2022$21,398,135$64,088,705$5,769,8105$13,893,269 $292.18$133.61$6,245$8.84
2021$21,509,985$75,705,116$4,730,6906$4,563,545 $217.66$121.90$5,582$8.25
2020$23,708,629$51,253,831$6,787,9347$10,732,708 $131.06$102.07$6,194$6.89
1 The PEO Summary Compensation Table to compensation actually paid reconciliation is summarized in the following table:
YearSummary Compensation Table TotalSummary Compensation Table EquitySummary Compensation Table Change in Pension ValueChange in year-end value of prior years’ awards unvested on 31-Dec-2022 plus change in value of prior year’s awards that vested in 2022Pension Service Cost for each calendar yearPEO CAP
abcdea-b-c+d+e
2022$21,398,135$16,981,250$0$59,048,474$623,346$64,088,705
2021$21,509,985$14,966,000$2,442,235$70,922,494$680,872$75,705,116
2020$23,708,629$13,587,500$5,883,924$46,356,324$660,302$51,253,831
2 The average non-PEO NEO Summary Compensation Table to CAP reconciliation is summarized in the following table:

80


YearSummary Compensation Table TotalSummary Compensation Table EquitySummary Compensation Table Change in Pension ValueChange in value of prior year’s awards unvested on 31-Dec-2022 plus change in value of prior year’s awards that vested in FY 2022Pension Service Cost for each calendar yearNon-PEO NEO CAP
abcdea-b-c+d+e
2022$5,769,810$3,553,000$93,171$11,584,337$185,293$13,893,269 
2021$4,730,690$3,115,360$159,911$2,972,681$135,445$4,563,545 
2020$6,787,934$3,665,898$1,448,154$8,871,572$187,254$10,732,708 
3 The peer group used for calculating Peer Group Total Shareholder Return is the same peer group used by the company for benchmarking compensation, setting the growth goals for the performance award and for determining relative total shareholder return performance for the relative value award.
4 For pay versus performance analysis, adjusted non-GAAP EPS aligns with the adjusted non-GAAP EPS values for performance awards in Appendix A, “Summary of Adjustments Related to the Annual Cash Bonus and Performance Award.”
5 The average CAP for 2022 comprised compensation for Ms. Ashkenazi, Dr. Skovronsky, Ms. Hakim and Mr. Jonsson.
6 The average CAP for 2021 comprised compensation for Ms. Ashkenazi, Dr. Skovronsky, Mr. Van Naarden, Mr. Rau, and Mr. Smiley. Ms. Ashkenazi succeeded Mr. Smiley as CFO on February 9, 2021 when Mr. Smiley resigned his position.
7 The average CAP for 2020 comprised compensation for Mr. Smiley, Dr. Skovronsky, Ms. Hakim and Mr. Zulueta.
Pay versus Performance: Most Important Measures
The measures most important in determining pay during 2022 were those most heavily weighted in our long-term incentive and annual bonus programs.
Most Important Performance Measures
Adjusted non-GAAP EPS1
Total Shareholder Return
Revenue
1 For pay versus performance analysis, adjusted non-GAAP EPS aligns with the adjusted non-GAAP EPS values for performance awards in Appendix A, “Summary of Adjustments Related to the Annual Cash Bonus and Performance Award.
Pay versus Performance: Total Shareholder Return
Over the immediately preceding three-year period, the company’s total shareholder return (TSR) significantly exceeded the peer group’s TSR. The company’s chosen peer group is the same as the group used for benchmarking compensation, setting growth goals for the performance award and for determining relative TSR performance for the relative value award, which will pay out for the first time in early 2023.
Lilly’s relative TSR outperformance was likely substantially attributable to strong developments in our product pipeline and was a significant contributor to the PEO and non-PEOs’ compensation over the three-year period. While the PEO CAP grew with each successive year of TSR outperformance, the highest growth occurred during 2021 when Lilly’s TSR was 66 percent compared to 19 percent for the peer group. Non-PEO average CAP was impacted by the shifting of non-PEO membership by at least three members each year and the cancellation of compensation for the company's former CFO, who departed during the 2021 reporting year.


81


lly-20230224_g106.jpg
Pay versus Performance: Net Income
Lilly does not currently utilize GAAP or non-GAAP net income as a metric in any of its incentive programs; however, non-GAAP net income generally moves in a similar direction as our most important company selected measure (CSM), adjusted non-GAAP EPS. Generally, CAP is not heavily correlated with GAAP net income because GAAP net income includes certain items that the Talent and Compensation Committee believes are not reflective of the underlying performance of the business. By excluding the impact of (i) amortization of intangible assets primarily associated with costs of marketed products acquired or licensed from third parties, (ii) net losses or gains on investments in equity securities, and (iii) other specified items that are not reflective of underlying business performance, the Talent and Compensation Committee believes non-GAAP net income better represents the operating performance of the company and is more correlated to CAP. For comparison purposes, the graph below reflects both GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income against PEO and average NEO CAP. For additional information on non-GAAP financial metrics, seeAppendix A, Summary of Adjustments Related to the Annual Cash Bonus and Performance Award.”
lly-20230224_g107.jpg

82


* GAAP Net Income and non-GAAP Net Income are discrete outcomes. Trend lines added to depict alignment with PEO and average non-PEO CAP.
Pay versus Performance: Adjusted Non-GAAP EPS
Lilly has chosen adjusted non-GAAP EPS as its most important CSM. Lilly leverages annual non-GAAP EPS derived from the board-approved business plan to set targets for the Lilly bonus. Additionally, Lilly uses a non-GAAP EPS derived from the median external analyst anticipated two-year non-GAAP EPS growth for our peer group to set our growth goal for our performance award. While these two approaches differ in performance period duration and source of performance comparison, significant sustained profitability growth can contribute to higher total CAP as seen in the graphic below. For additional information on non-GAAP financial metrics, see Appendix A, Summary of Adjustments Related to the Annual Cash Bonus and Performance Award.”
lly-20230224_g108.jpg
* Adjusted non-GAAP EPS data points are discrete outcomes. Trend lines added to depict alignment with PEO and average non-PEO CAP.
Pay versus Performance: Revenue
Lilly strives to make breakthrough medicines available to patients around the globe. Given a growing portfolio of new medicines, we motivate our entire workforce to reach as many patients as possible. The combination of a strong product portfolio and effective patient delivery yields higher sales volume and, generally, higher total revenue. A decline in product portfolio quality or effective launch execution reduces revenue. As such, revenue is one of our most important measures to ensure we are consistently growing the number of patients we serve. Our revenue curve over the preceding three-year period aligns with the growth in PEO and average non-PEO CAP.

83


lly-20230224_g109.jpg
* Revenue data points are discrete outcomes. Trend lines added to depict alignment with PEO and average non-PEO CAP.
Pay versus Performance: Conclusions
The Talent and Compensation Committee believes in pay for performance and has structured the Lilly compensation programs to reward leaders when the company is delivering strong results. Lilly has had strong cumulative TSR and EPS growth over the immediately preceding three-year period. As a result of this strong performance, shareholders have been rewarded with significant total stock returns and leadership has been rewarded with above target payouts from their incentive compensation programs.
Item 3. Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Named Executive Officer Compensation
Federal legislation enables the company’s shareholders to vote, on an advisory or non-binding basis, on how frequently they would like to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. Shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation every one, two or three years. Shareholders may also, if they wish, abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.
We support advisory votes on named executive officer compensation every year, and they are currently occurring annually. We welcome shareholder input and believe that annual advisory votes on named executive officer compensation provide a meaningful way to continue dialogue with shareholders regarding this issue.
The board is not bound by this advisory shareholder vote; however, it will give significant weight to shareholder preferences on this matter.
lly-20230224_g70.jpg
RECOMMENDATION FOR
The board recommends that you vote FOR an annual (1 YEAR)advisory vote on the compensation of the company’s named executive officers as disclosed in its proxy statements.
Audit Matters

84


Item 3.4. Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Auditor
Audit Committee Oversight of the Independent Auditor
The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent auditor and oversees the process for reviewing and evaluating the lead audit partner. Further information regarding the committee'sAudit Committee’s oversight of the independent auditor can be found in the Audit Committee charter, available online at lilly.com/leadership/governance.
Evaluation Process: In connection with the decision regarding whether to reappoint the independent auditor each year (subject to shareholder ratification), the committeeAudit Committee assesses the independent auditor'sauditor’s performance. This assessment examines three primary criteria: (1) includes:
1.the independent auditor'sauditor’s qualifications and experience; (2)
2.the communication and interactions with the auditor over the course of the year; and (3)
3.the auditor'sauditor’s independence, objectivity, and professional skepticism. skepticism; and
4.the independent auditor’s tenure.
These criteria are assessed against an internal and an external scorecard and are discussed with management during a private session as well as in executive session. The committee also periodically considers whether a rotation of the company's independent auditor is advisable.
Ernst & Young LLP (EY) has served as the independent auditor for the company since 1940. Based on the Audit Committee’s assessment of EY'sErnst & Young LLP’s (EY) performance during 2021,2022, the Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of EY to serve as the company's independent auditor is in the best interests of the company and its shareholders and has therefore reappointed EY as the company’s independent auditor for 2022. In addition to this year's favorable assessment2023.
Benefits of EY's performance, we recognize that thereLonger Tenure: EY has served as the independent auditor for the company since 1940. There are several benefits of retaining a longer-tenured independent auditor. EY has gainedauditor, including institutional knowledge and expertise regarding the company'scompany’s global operations, accounting policies and practices, and internal controls over financial reporting. AuditIn addition, audit and other fees are also competitive with peer companies because of EY's
65


familiarity with the company and its operations. In accordance
EY’s Internal Independence Assessment: EY conducts periodic internal reviews of its audit and other work, assesses the adequacy of partners and other personnel working on the Company’s account and rotates the lead assurance engagement partner, the global coordinating partner, and other partners on the engagement consistent with the bylaws, this appointment is being submitted to the shareholders for ratification.independence requirements.
Representatives of EY are expected to participate in the Annual Meeting and will be available to respond to questions. Those representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so.
Board Recommendation on Item 3
The board recommends that you vote FOR ratifying the appointment of EY as the independent auditor for 2022.
lly-20230224_g70.jpg
RECOMMENDATION FOR
The board recommends that you vote FOR ratifying the appointment of EY as the independent auditor for 2023.
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee reviews the company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the board. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls and disclosure controls. In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and the independent auditor. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20212022, were prepared in accordance with GAAP, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements and related disclosures with management and the independent auditor, including a review of the significant management judgments underlying the financial statements and disclosures.
The independent auditor reports directly to the Audit Committee, which has sole authority to appoint and to replace the independent auditor (subject to shareholder ratification).

85


The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committee by the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), the SEC, and the NYSE, including the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of the disclosures in the financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditor required by applicable PCAOB rules regarding communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent auditor the auditor’s independence from the company and its management. In concluding that the auditor is independent, the Audit Committee determined, among other things, that the non-audit services provided by EY (as described below) were compatible with its independence. Consistent with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), the Audit Committee has adopted policies to ensure the independence of the independent auditor, such as prior committee approval of non-audit services and required audit partner rotation.
The Audit Committee discussed with the company’s internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits, including internal control testing under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Audit Committee periodically meets with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, and in private sessions with members of senior management (such as the chief financial officer and the chief accounting officer) to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee also periodically meets in executive session.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the board (and the board subsequently approved the recommendation) that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021,2022, for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee has also appointed EY as the company’s independent auditor, subject to shareholder ratification, for 2022.2023.
Audit Committee
Jamere Jackson, Chair
Ralph Alvarez
Michael L. Eskew
Gabrielle Sulzberger
Jackson P. Tai
Karen Walker
Services Performed by the Independent Auditor
The Audit Committee pre-approves all services performed by the independent auditor, in part to assess whether the provision of such services might impair the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee’s policy and procedures are as follows:
Audit services:The Audit Committee approves the annual audit services engagement and, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions, and fees resulting from changes in audit scope, company structure, or other matters. Audit services include internal controls attestation work under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve other audit services, which are those services that only the independent auditor reasonably can provide.
Audit-related services: Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or reviews of the financial statements, and that are traditionally performed by the independent
66


auditor. The Audit Committee believes that the provision of these services does not impair the independence of the auditor.
Tax services: The Audit Committee believes that, in appropriate cases, the independent auditor can provide tax compliance services, tax planning, and tax advice without impairing the auditor’s independence.
Other services: The Audit Committee may approve other services to be provided by the independent auditor if (i) the services are permissible under SEC and PCAOB rules, (ii) the Audit Committee believes the provision of the services would not impair the independence of the auditor, and (iii) management believes that the auditor is the best choice to provide the services.

86


Approval process: At the beginning of each audit year, management requests pre-approval from the Audit Committee of the annual audit, statutory audits, and quarterly reviews for the upcoming audit year as well as any other services known at that time. Management will also present at that time an estimate of all fees for the upcoming audit year and known services. As specific engagements are identified thereafter that were not initially approved, they are brought forward to the Audit Committee for approval. To the extent approvals are required between regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings, pre-approval authority is delegated to the committee chair.
For each engagement, management provides the Audit Committee with information about the services and fees, sufficiently detailed to allow the committee to make an informed judgment about the nature and scope of the services and the potential for the services to impair the independence of the auditor.
After the end of the audit year, management provides the committee with a summary of the actual fees incurred for the completed audit year.
Independent Auditor Fees
The following table shows the fees incurred for services rendered on a worldwide basis by EY in 20212022 and 2020.2021. All such services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the pre-approval policy.
2021
($ millions)*
2020
($ millions)*
2022
($ millions)*
2021
($ millions)*
Audit FeesAudit FeesAnnual audit of consolidated and subsidiary financial statements, including Sarbanes-Oxley 404 attestationtd3.9td3.7Audit FeesAnnual audit of consolidated and subsidiary financial statements, including Sarbanes-Oxley 404 attestation, reviews of quarterly financial statementstd3.9
Reviews of quarterly financial statements
Audit-Related FeesAudit-Related Fees$0.7$0.9Audit-Related FeesPrimarily related to assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or reviews of the financial statements primarily related to employee benefit plan and other ancillary audits, and due diligence services on potential acquisitions$0.7
Primarily related to assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or reviews of the financial statements primarily related to employee benefit plan and other ancillary audits, and due diligence services on potential acquisitions
Tax FeesTax Fees$2.1$2.7Tax FeesTax compliance services, tax planning, tax advice
Primarily related to consulting and compliance services
$1.6$2.1
Tax compliance services, tax planning, tax advice
Primarily related to consulting and compliance services
TotalTotal$16.7$17.3Total$16.2$16.7
*Numbers may not add due to rounding

* Numbers may not add due to rounding
Management Proposals
Item 4.5. Proposal to Amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to Eliminate the Classified Board Structure
The company’s articles of incorporation provide that the board is divided into three classes, with each class elected every three years. The board, after review by its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, has approved, and recommends that the shareholders approve, amendments to eliminate the classified board structure in order to provide for the annual election of all directors (the Declassification Amendments). From 2010 through 2012 and again from 2018 through 2021,2022, the board submitted this management proposal to shareholders seeking approval to eliminate the company’s classified board structure; however, under the company’s articles of incorporation the proposal requires the vote of 80 percent of the outstanding shares to be approved and on each prior occasion failed to receive the required vote.
If approved, the Declassification Amendments would become effective following the Annual Meeting upon the company making the required filings of the Declassification Amendments with the Secretary of State of Indiana. Directors elected prior to the effectiveness of the Declassification Amendments would serve the remainder of their respective three-year terms and each director elected after the Annual Meeting would serve a one-year term, ending at the next annual meeting of shareholders. Thereafter, the company’s classified board structure would be fully eliminated starting with the 20252026 annual meeting of shareholders. In the case of any vacancy on the board occurring after the Annual Meeting created by an increase
67


in the number of directors, the vacancy would be filled through an appointment by the board, with the new director to serve a term ending at the next annual meeting of shareholders. Vacancies created by resignation, removal or death would be filled by appointment by the board of a new director to serve until the end of the term of the director being replaced. This proposal would not change

87


the present number of directors or the board’s authority to change that number and to fill any vacancies or newly created directorships.
Background of Proposal
As part of its ongoing review of corporate governance matters, the board, taking into account the input of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, considered the advantages and disadvantages of maintaining the classified board structure. The board considered the view of certain shareholders who believe that classified boards have the effect of reducing the accountability of directors to shareholders because shareholders are unable to evaluate and consider all directors for election on an annual basis. The board gave considerable weight to the favorable votes of a strong majority of the outstanding shares for management’s proposals in prior years.
The board also considered the benefits of retaining the classified board structure. A classified structure may promote shareholder value by providing continuity and stability in the management of the business and affairs of the company, as a majority of the board always has prior experience as directors of the company. In addition, under certain circumstances, classified boards may protect shareholder value by forcing an entity seeking control of the company to initiate discussions at arm’s-length with the board of the company, because the entity cannot replace the majority of the board in a single election. The board also considered that even without a classified board (and without the supermajority voting requirements, which the board also recommends eliminating), the company would have appropriate safeguards to protect the interests of all shareholders and discourage a would-be acquirer from proceeding with a proposal that undervalues the company or is opportunistic. These include other provisions of the company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws, as well as certain provisions of Indiana corporation law.
After balancing these interests, the board has decided to resubmit this proposal to eliminate the classified board structure. The affirmative vote of at least 80 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock is needed to approve this proposal. Unless such vote is received, the present classification of the board will continue.
Text of the Amendments
Article 9(b) of the company’s articles of incorporation contains the provisions that will be affected if this proposal is adopted. This article, set forth in Appendix B to this proxy statement, shows the proposed changes, with deletions indicated by strikeouts and additions indicated by underlining. The board has also adopted conforming amendments to the company’s bylaws, to be effective immediately upon, and subject to, the effectiveness of the amendments to the articles of incorporation.
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of at least 80 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock is needed to approve this proposal. Unless such vote is received, the present classification of the board will continue.
Board Recommendation on Item 4
The board recommends that you vote
lly-20230224_g70.jpg
RECOMMENDATION FOR
The board recommends that you vote FOR amending the company’s articles of incorporation to eliminate the classified board structure.

Item 5.6. Proposal to Amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to Eliminate Supermajority Voting Provisions
The company’s articles of incorporation provide that nearly all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders can be adopted by a majority of the votes cast. However, the company’s articles of incorporation require certain fundamental corporate actions to be approved by the holders of 80 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock. Those actions are:
amending certain provisions of the articles of incorporation that relate to the number and terms of office of directors:
the company’s classified board structure (as described under Item 4)
a provision that the number of directors shall be specified solely by resolution of the board
removing directors prior to the end of their elected term
entering into mergers, consolidations, recapitalizations, or certain other business combinations with a “related person”—a party who has acquired at least five percent of the company’s stock (other than the Endowment or a company benefit plan) — without the prior approval of such action or transaction by the directors not affiliated with such shareholder

88


modifying or eliminating any of the above supermajority voting requirements.
68


The board, after review by the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, has approved, and recommends that the shareholders approve, amendments to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements (the Supermajority Voting Amendments). From 2010 through 2012 and again from 2018 through 2021,2022, the board submitted this management proposal to shareholders seeking approval to eliminate these supermajority voting requirements; however, under the company’s articles of incorporation the proposal requires the vote of 80 percent of the outstanding shares to be approved and on each prior occasion failed to receive the required vote.
Background of Proposal
As part of its ongoing review of corporate governance matters, the board, taking into account the input of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, considered the advantages and disadvantages of maintaining the supermajority voting requirements. The board considered the potential adverse consequences of maintaining the supermajority voting requirements. The board believes it is important to maintain shareholder confidence by demonstrating that the board is responsive and accountable to shareholders and committed to strong corporate governance. This requires the board to carefully balance sometimes competing interests. In this regard, the board gave considerable weight to the favorable votes of a strong majority of the outstanding shares for management’s proposal in the previous four years. Many shareholders believe that supermajority voting requirements impede accountability to shareholders and contribute to board and management entrenchment. The board also considered that, even without the supermajority vote (and without the classified board, which the board also recommends eliminating), the company has appropriate safeguards to protect the interests of all shareholders and to discourage a would-be acquirer from proceeding with a proposal that undervalues the company or is opportunistic and to assist the board in responding to such proposals. These include other provisions of the company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws as well as certain provisions of Indiana corporation law.
The board also considered that under certain circumstances, supermajority voting requirements can provide benefits to the company and all its shareholders by making it more difficult for one or a few large shareholders to facilitate a takeover of the company or implement certain significant changes to the company without more widespread shareholder support.
After balancing these interests, the board has decided to resubmit this proposal to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements. The affirmative vote of at least 80 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock is needed to approve this proposal. Unless such vote is received, the supermajority voting requirements will continue to be in effect.
Text of Amendments
Articles 9(c), 9(d), and 13 of the company’s articles of incorporation contain the provisions that will be affected if this proposal is adopted. These articles, set forth in Appendix B to this proxy statement, show the proposed changes with deletions indicated by strikeouts and additions indicated by underlining. The board has also adopted conforming amendments to the company’s bylaws, to be effective immediately upon, and subject to, the effectiveness of the amendments to the articles of incorporation.
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of at least 80 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock is needed to approve this proposal. Unless such vote is received, the supermajority voting requirements will continue to be in effect.
Board Recommendation on Item 5
The board recommends that you vote FOR amending the company's articles of incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.

Item 6. Proposal to Amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to Give Shareholders the Ability to Amend the Company’s Bylaws
The company’s articles of incorporation do not allow shareholders to amend the company’s bylaws. This position reflects the default under Indiana law, which reserves the exclusive authority to amend bylaws to the board. The board, after review by the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, has approved, and recommends that the shareholders approve, amendments to the articles of incorporation to allow shareholders to amend the company’s bylaws. Pursuant to Indiana law, approval of the proposal requires that the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal.
Background of Proposal
As part of its ongoing review of corporate governance matters, the board, taking into account the input of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, considered the advantages and disadvantages of maintaining the Indiana default position that reserves the exclusive right to amend the bylaws to the board. The board considered the potential adverse consequences of maintaining the Indiana default position that does not allow shareholders to amend the bylaws. The board believes it is important to maintain shareholder confidence by demonstrating that the board is responsive and accountable to shareholders and committed to strong corporate governance. This requires the board to carefully balance sometimes competing interests. In this regard, the board gave considerable weight to shareholder feedback supporting the ability of
69


shareholders to amend the bylaws. The board also considered that even if shareholders have the authority to amend the bylaws, the company has appropriate safeguards to protect the interests of all shareholders and discourage a would-be acquirer from proceeding with a proposal that undervalues the company or is opportunistic. These include other provisions of the company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws, as well as certain provisions of Indiana corporation law.
The board also considered that under certain circumstances, allowing the bylaws to be amended by shareholders would not be in the best long-term interests of the company because of the potential risk of abuse by a single shareholder or special interest group of shareholders with no fiduciary duties to other shareholders, and accordingly, the board, which is accountable to all shareholders, may be better positioned to ensure that bylaw amendments are appropriate.
After balancing these interests, the board has decided to submit this proposal to allow shareholders holding a majority of the company’s issued and outstanding common stock to amend the company’s bylaws.
Proposed amendments to the bylaws:
Article 10 of the company’s articles of incorporation contains the provisions that will be affected if this proposal is adopted. This article, set forth in Appendix C to this proxy statement, shows the proposed changes, with deletions indicated by strike-outs and additions indicated by underlining. The board has also adopted conforming amendments to the company’s bylaws, to be effective immediately upon, and subject to, the effectiveness of the amendments to the articles of incorporation.
Vote Required
To approve this proposal, the votes cast in favor of this proposal must exceed the votes cast against this proposal. Unless such vote is received, the present prohibitions against shareholders amending the company’s bylaws will continue.
Board Recommendation on Item 6
The board recommends that you vote FOR amending the company’s articles of incorporation to allow shareholders to amend the company’s bylaws.
lly-20230224_g70.jpg
RECOMMENDATION FOR
The board recommends that you vote FOR amending the company’s articles of incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
Shareholder Proposals
Item 7. Proposal to Amend the Bylaws to Require an Independent Board Chair
Legal & General Investment Management America, Inc. ("LGIM America"), 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60606, beneficial owner of 212,515 shares of our common stock as of November 9, 2021, has submitted the following proposal:
RESOLVED, Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly" or the "Company") shareholders request the Board of Directors adopt as policy (the "Policy"), and amend the bylaws as necessary, to require henceforth that the Chair of the Board of Directors, whenever possible, be an independent member of the board. The Policy shall apply prospectively so as not to violate any contractual obligations. If the board determines that a Chair who was independent when selected is no longer independent, the board shall select a new Chair who satisfies the requirements of the policy within a reasonable amount of time. Compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chair. This policy would be phased in for the next CEO transition.
Supporting Statement
The board is responsible for overseeing the actions of management. They are expected to act as a counter-power and constructively challenge the executive directors. Conflicts of interest may arise when one person holds both the Chair and CEO positions. In our view, shareholders, as well as the company, are best served by an independent board Chair who can provide a balance of power between the CEO and the board.
While the CEO's insights and communication can and should be shared with an independently led board, the difference, should the shareholder proposal be implemented, is that those insights will then be subjected to review and oversight by a board led by an independent chair, rather than by a board led by the same person whose insights are being considered. We believe that Lilly's board should adopt best practice governance policies, including having an independent board chair.
In 2019 PricewaterhouseCoopers surveyed over 700 directors, 57% of directors who sat on a board with a combined Chair/CEO stated that it was difficult to voice dissent - a 37% higher result than on boards with an independent Chair.
Pharmaceutical companies are particularly in need of effective and unconflicted oversight because of the industry's high legal and regulatory risks related to product safety and the industry's commercial practices. Eli Lilly is not immune to litigation and regulatory attention. Only in 2021, the company has been repeatedly cited in a US Senate report on significant insulin price increase; the Mississippi Attorney General launched a lawsuit against Lilly, and others, alleging collusion to keep insulin prices high; and the City of Miami, Florida initiated litigation asserting antitrust and other claims against the company.
70


The risk of lawsuits, sustained public controversy and regulatory intervention, whether ultimately found to be justified or not, are strong arguments for the need for continuous, effective and unconflicted board oversight of corporate management.
In order to ensure that our board can provide rigorous oversight for our Company and management with greater independence and accountability, we urge a vote FOR this shareholder proposal.
Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal to Amend the Bylaws to Require an Independent Board Chair
The board, after review by its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, recommends a vote against this proposal.
If implemented, the proposal would lock in a mandatory board leadership structure that eliminates our board’s flexibility to evaluate and adopt what it believes to be the most effective leadership structure for Lilly under the relevant facts and circumstances at any given point in time. Unlike the proponent, the board believes, whether in the present or after the next CEO transition, that there is no “one-size-fits-all” approach to board leadership and recognizes that two of its key responsibilities are to evaluate and implement the leadership structure best suited to achieve the company’s objectives and to promote the long-term interests of its shareholders with due regard for all our stakeholders. In 2021, the board again undertook an assessment of its leadership structure in the context of our business, long-term strategy and industry environment, and developments in corporate governance, and believes that a combined chair and CEO, coupled with a strong lead independent director position, continues to be in the best interest of the company and our shareholders.
Lilly’s board leadership structure is consistent with market practice and our flexible approach was strongly endorsed by Lilly’s shareholders last year.
There is no singular approach to independent board leadership across S&P 500 companies. Notably, as of December 31, 2021, only 36% of companies in the S&P 500 have independent chairs and, like Lilly, 57% of companies in the S&P 500 instead have lead independent directors,1 and six of the eight U.S.-incorporated companies from our peer group (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Committee’s Processes and Analyses—Competitive Pay Assessment” for a list of our peer group companies)2 have a combined board chair and CEO. In addition, Lilly’s shareholders decidedly rejected similar proposals seeking to mandate an independent board chair at both our 2020 and 2021 annual meetings of shareholders, with nearly two-thirds of the votes cast against the proposal, thus endorsing our flexible approach.
Lilly’s current board leadership structure and corporate governance practices provide effective, independent oversight of management.
Lilly has a strong independent board that operates under sound principles of corporate governance. See “Governance—Highlights of the Company’s Corporate Governance—Leadership Structure; Oversight of Chair, CEO, and Senior Management” for a description of the board’s governance principles. Although the chair and CEO roles are combined, we ensure independent oversight of the company through a counterbalancing governance structure, which we have had since 2006 through either a lead independent director or presiding director. Further bolstering independent oversight, each of our current board members other than the CEO is independent (12 out of 13 directors), and all standing board committees are made up solely of independent directors and led by independent committee chairs.
Lilly’s lead independent director is elected annually by and from among the independent directors of the board.Our strong lead independent director is empowered with clearly defined responsibilities including:
leading the board’s processes for selecting the CEO;
overseeing the independent directors’ annual performance evaluation of the chair and CEO;
serving as a liaison between the chair and the independent directors;
presiding at all meetings of the board at which the chair is not present;
presiding at executive sessions of the independent directors;
calling meetings of the independent directors, as appropriate;
approving meeting agendas and schedules and reviewing information to be provided to the board;
being available for consultation and direct communication with shareholders, as appropriate;

1 Source: EY Center for Board Matters, Corporate Governance by the Numbers. December 31, 2021.
2 Biogen has an independent board chair and Merck’s former CEO and Chair retired as CEO in 2021 and remains on Merck’s board of directors as executive chair.
71


together with the chair and the chair of the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, conducting the annual board assessment process;
together with the Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, leading the director succession planning process; and
retaining advisors for the independent directors, as appropriate.
Furthermore, the board has instituted a number of governance best practices to ensure effective independent oversight, including:
executive sessions of the independent directors held after every regular board meeting that are presided over by our lead independent director;
an annual performance evaluation of the chair and CEO conducted by the independent directors, the results of which are reviewed with the CEO and considered by the Compensation Committee and independent directors in establishing the CEO’s compensation for the next year;
an annual performance evaluation of the lead independent director by the board as part of the annual board assessment process;
independent director access to management whenever deemed necessary by the independent directors; and
the ability of independent directors and all committees to retain their own independent advisors, at the company’s expense, whenever they deem it desirable to do so.
Lilly’s current governance structure provides effective, independent oversight over key matters that are important to our stakeholders, including drug pricing and access.
Our independent directors are deeply engaged in key matters important to Lilly and our stakeholders, including the oversight over the company’s approach to drug pricing and access. Guided by this active oversight, Lilly already has taken numerous steps to promote drug affordability and access. For example, Lilly introduced two additional lower-priced versions of Humalog in January 2020 and added the Lilly Insulin Value Program to Lilly’s comprehensive suite of insulin affordability solutions in September 2020, which now enables customers with commercial insurance or no insurance to purchase their monthly prescription of all Lilly insulins for $35. In addition, in September 2021, Lilly announced that it would lower the list price of all Lilly’s non-branded insulins, including Insulin Lispro Injection, by an additional 40% in the U.S. That price reduction took effect January 1, 2022, effectively reducing the list price to 2008 levels. These examples, among others, demonstrate Lilly’s commitment to providing effective oversight over drug pricing and access.
Our board of directors believes that our shareholders are best served by preserving the flexibility to determine the appropriate leadership structure for the company in light of the circumstances at the relevant time.
We believe the proposal would unnecessarily restrict the board’s ability to exercise its fiduciary duty to determine the board leadership structure most appropriate for the company given the specific circumstances and leadership needs at any particular point in time. The company’s robust governance framework ensures that board leadership is balanced with independent participation given the extensive involvement and approval authority of the lead independent director and his oversight. Our independent directors also collectively bring to the board vast leadership experience, industry expertise, and other critical skills, and individually have demonstrated the willingness to think and act independently on behalf of shareholders. Therefore, adopting a proposal that would limit the board’s ability to exercise decision-making on the appropriate leadership is not in shareholders’ best interests.
We believe independence is essential to strong corporate governance. The combination of a chair who is also the CEO and a lead independent director assigned specific duties and empowered with robust authority achieves the delivery of multiple balanced inputs to the board. Having one individual serve as both chair and CEO provides the board with deep insights to drive long-term strategy and execution and allows consistent communication throughout the company. This is vital to our innovative research and development business with prolonged product development cycles. Further, the lead independent director, currently a sitting CEO, drives an “outside in” analysis of company decisions and performance, maintains frequent contact with our chair and CEO to ensure a productive partnership between our independent directors and management and leads our independent directors in their important oversight function. This leadership structure has served our shareholders well.
Our current governance structure enables us to be responsive to shareholders’ preferences—for example, this year we are submitting a management proposal to allow shareholders to amend the company’s bylaws.
Our current governance structure enables us to be responsive and accountable to shareholders. For example, this year we have submitted a management proposal to amend our articles of incorporation to give shareholders the ability to amend the company’s bylaws (see Item 6) with a majority vote standard. In addition, as we have done each of the past four years, we are also resubmitting management proposals to eliminate the classified board structure and supermajority voting requirements (see Items 4 and 5), which reflects our continued commitment to the interests of our shareholders.
72


Our current governance structure appropriately balances the company’s need for continuity in its leadership with independent and effective oversight.
Lilly’s independent directors have determined that Mr. Ricks is eminently qualified to serve as both chair and CEO, and the board believes that having him fill that combined role, complemented by Mr. Luciano, a strong lead independent director, strikes an appropriate balance between consistent leadership and independent and effective oversight that is optimal for the company and our shareholders. For additional information on the particular qualities of Mr. Ricks and why he is best suited to serve as chair at this time, as well as information on the leadership provided by Mr. Luciano, the lead independent director, please see “Governance—Highlights of the Company’s Corporate Governance—Leadership Structure; Oversight of Chair, CEO, and Senior Management.”
For these reasons, we believe a policy requiring an independent board chair is not necessary and not in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
Board Recommendation on Item 7
The board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.

Item 8.7. Proposal to Publish an Annual Report Disclosing Lobbying Activities
SEIUThe Service Employees International Union Pension Plans Master Trust (SEIU), 1800 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Suite 301, Washington, D.C. 20036-1202, a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock having a market value in excess of $2000,$2,000, has submitted the following proposal:

89


Whereas, we believe in full disclosure of Eli Lilly and Company’s (“Lilly’s”) direct and indirectLilly’s lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether itsLilly’s lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and inshareholder interests.
Resolved, the best interests of shareholders.
Resolved, shareholders of Lilly request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:
1.Company policiespolicy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.
2.Payments by Lilly used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.
3.Lilly’s membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.
4.Description of management’s and the Board’s decision-making process and oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.
For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which Lilly is a member.
Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the territory, local, territorial, state and federal levels.
The report shall be presented to the Public Policy and Compliance Committee and posted on Lilly’s website.
Supporting Statement
Drugmakers spend more to lobby Washington than any other industry.1Lilly spent $88,362,000$95,877,000 from 2010 - 2020– 2021 on federal lobbying. This figure does not include state lobbying, where Lilly lobbies extensively at the state level where disclosure is uneven or absent, withlobbied in at least 144 lobbyists in 4446 states in 2020 (followthemoney.org).2021. Lilly also lobbies abroad, spending between €700,000-799,000€900,000–999,000 on lobbying in Europe.Europe for 2021.
Lilly fails to disclose its third-party payments to trade associations and social welfare organizations,groups (SWGs), or the amounts used for lobbying, to shareholders. Companies can give unlimited amounts to third party groups that spend millions on lobbying and often undisclosed grassroots activity, and theseactivity. These groups may be spending “at least double what’s publicly reported.”21 For example, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) has given millions to controversial “dark money” social welfare groupsSWGs like the American Action Network.32
Lilly chairs the board of PhRMA and belongs to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable, National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and PhRMA, which together have spent over $2.1$2.8 billion on lobbying since 1998, and supports social welfare organizationsSWGs that lobby, like the Alliance for Patient Access (AfPA), “which claims to be pro-consumer but consistently advocates against policies to lower drug prices.”4

1 https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/04/vaccine-access-pharma-lobbying-fight/.3
2 https://theintercept.com/2019/08/06/business-group-spending-on-lobbying-in-washington-is-at-least-double-whats-publicly-reported/.
3 https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/ll/big-phanna-bankrolled-conservative-groups-tax-retums-show/.
4https://prospect.org/power/astroturf-campaign-attacks-discount-drug-program-for-poor/.
5https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/09/phannaceutical-industrv-backs-democratic-holdouts-on-drug-pricing-plan/.
73



We are concernedbelieve Lilly’s lack of disclosure presents reputational risk when its lobbying contradicts company public positions. For example, Lilly states it supports more affordable medicines, yet funds PhRMA’sPhRMA and AfPA’s opposition to lower prescription drug prices.5 And while 4 Lilly opposed Indiana voter restrictions, yet groups have asked Lilly to cut ties with the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) “because of its voter restriction efforts.”65 Lilly is also represented at ALEC by its trade associations, as the Chamber, NAM and PhRMA each sit on its Private Enterprise Advisory Council.
Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal to Publish an Annual Report Disclosing Lobbying Activities
The board, after review by its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, recommends a vote against this proposal.
1https://theintercept.com/2019/08/06/business-group-spending-on-lobbying-in-washington-is-at-least-double-whats-publiclyreported/.
2https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/11/big-pharma-bankrolled-conservative-groups-tax-returns-show/.
3https://prospect.org/power/astroturf-campaign-attacks-discount-drug-program-for-poor/.
4https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/09/pharmaceutical-industry-backs-democratic-holdouts-on-drug-pricing-plan/; https://nonprofitquarterly.org/alliance-for-patient-access-not-even-trying-subtlety/.
5https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/alec-corporations-democracy/.

90


The proposal calls for the board to publish an annual report to shareholders disclosing the company’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether its lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and in the best interest of shareholders.
The report requested by the proposal is unnecessary because Lilly already provides shareholders with extensive disclosures regarding the company’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures, and information necessary to assess the consistency of the company’s lobbying activities with its expressed goals through existing disclosures. Given the focus of our stakeholders on this topic, inIn November 2021, we substantially enhanced our public disclosures with respect to Lilly’s direct and indirect lobbying activities, including for example, disclosures regarding:
our board’s oversight of political expenditures and lobbying activities;
Lilly’s political contributions to candidates for public office (directly from Lilly and through the company’s exclusively employee-led political action committee (the “LillyPAC”)(LillyPAC));
recipients of Lilly’s political contributions;
Lilly’s federal and state lobbying activities; and
Lilly’s trade association membershipsassociations to which Lilly pays annual membership dues of $50,000 or more (including those trade associations whereon which Lilly has a board seat).
These extensive disclosures already enable shareholders to assess whether the company’s lobbying activities are consistent with its expressed goals and in the best interest of shareholders.
In addition, the company already directs its public policy engagement toward offering Lilly’s perspective in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines and advocates for improvements to the U.S. healthcare system and, accordingly, Lilly’s policies and procedures relating to its engagement in political activities already seek to align the company’s lobbying activities with its expressed goals. Moreover, contraryContrary to the proposal’s assertions, Lilly does not fund opposition to lowering prescription drug prices. Lilly does, however, oppose legislative policies that would hinder medical discovery for patients. For example, as explained on our website’s news and stories section, we opposed H.R. 3 because it would not only stifle innovation but there are better policy solutions to help patients with their out of pockets costs such as Medicare Part D modernization and not requiring deductibles for insulin coverage. Similarly, we have opposed the drug pricing aspects of the Build Back BetterInflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the IRA) that would also have negative consequences to drug discovery without directly helping patients—such as Medicare price setting under the guise of negotiation. At the same time, Lilly actively supported portions of the IRA that we believe will benefit patients and innovation, such as the $35 out of pocket cap on insulin costs for Medicare beneficiaries and the elimination of the coverage gap in Medicare Part D plans.
Our political expenditures, however,in fact, cover the political spectrum and reflect our approach to engaging stakeholders on various complex issues to help preserve incentives and ensure an environment conducive to finding new treatments. As explained in further detail below, the company already publicly discloses this information, which provides shareholders with the information necessary to assess the consistency of the company’s lobbying activities with its expressed goals.
Lilly already publicly discloses the information requested by the proposal regarding the company’s policies and procedures governing direct and indirect lobbying activities.
In this proxy statement, the political participation page of Lilly’s website (the “Political(Political Participation Website”)Website), and Lilly’s corporate governance guidelines, the company discloses its extensive policies and procedures governing direct and indirect lobbying activities. For example, the Political Participation Website discloses:
Lilly’s commitment, through public policy engagement, to provide a way for all our locations globally to offer Lilly’s perspective on the political environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines, as well as to look for ways to engage on issues specific to local business environments;
that Lilly employees must comply with our global policies, core values and legal obligations, which are outlined in our written code of business conduct, The Red Book;
that when engaging in lobbying activities, Lilly complies with the laws that govern such activities, and that Lilly’s senior vice president, U.S.global government affairs is responsible for overseeing these activities and the company’s general counsel and chief financial officer, or their designees, also approve all corporate political contributions before they are made; and
that, where permitted, Lilly makes lawful political contributions in the United States to political candidate committees, political parties, political action committees, ballot measure committees, associations and other political organizations operating under section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code.

6 https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/alec-corporations-democracv/.
74
91



Lilly already publicly discloses the information requested by the proposal regarding our direct and indirect lobbying expenditures.
Lilly makes extensive disclosures regarding its direct and indirect lobbying expenditures in its proxy statement, Political Participation Website, proxy materials, the environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) page of its website,report, and through other publicly availablepublic disclosures regarding its political activities. The trade associations through which Lilly conducts its indirect lobbying activities (which are evaluated annually by the Company’scompany’s U.S. government affairs leaders) also publicly disclose their lobbying expenditures. As noted in the bullet points above, in November 2021, Lilly substantially enhanced its disclosures related to its direct and indirect lobbying activities, including lobbying expenditures. Lilly voluntarily discloses its corporate political contributions and expenditures on an annual basis on the Political Participation Website. The proposal also requests we disclose our grassroots lobbying communications, however, Lilly does not engage in grassroots lobbying communications to the general public. The proposal also notes that groups have asked Lilly to cut ties with the American Legislative Exchange Council (“ALEC”)(ALEC). Lilly is no longer a member of ALEC. Additional details regarding the company’s corporate contributions, LillyPAC’s contributions (which are also voluntarily disclosed on an annuala bi-annual basis), contribution data, and the company’s direct lobbying expenses are also already made available to the public from numerous public sources.
Lilly already publicly discloses the information requested by the proposal regarding our membership in, and payments to, any tax-exempt organizationsorganization that writes and endorses model legislation.
As noted above, Lilly’s Political Participation Website also contains information regarding the company’s U.S. trade association memberships for which the company pays annual dues of $50,000 or more and information regarding the percentage of dues collected by such trade associations utilized for federal and state lobbying and political expenditures. In the Political Participation Website, Lilly already discloses Lilly’s memberships in organizations that report lobbying activity to the U.S. federal government, including the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the Business Roundtable.
Lilly already publicly discloses the information requested by the proposal regarding its decision-making process and the board’s oversight over direct and indirect lobbying activities.
In this proxy statement and the Political Participation Website, Lilly already discloses its decision-making process and the board’s oversight over the company’s political expenditures and direct and indirect lobbying activities to ensure the company fulfills its commitment to stewardship of corporate funds and minimizes risk minimization with respect to such activities.
For example, the board receives regular updates from the seniorexecutive vice president, corporate affairs, and communications regarding public policy issues and the company’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and receives semi-annual updates on direct and indirect lobbying activities and trade association memberships. See “Governance—HighlightsGovernanceHow We Operate an Effective BoardKey Areas of Oversight by the Company’s Corporate Governance—Board and Its CommitteesPolitical Activities”, and “Governance PracticesPolitical and Policy Participation”Participation for additional information.
Requiring Lilly to prepare a separate report with this information would place an undue administrative burden on the company and would not provide meaningful additional information to shareholders.
We do not believe that publishing the additional disclosures contemplatedstandalone report requested by the proposal would provide meaningful additional information to shareholders to merit the resources required to provide the requested report. For these reasons, we believe the proposal is not in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
lly-20230224_g110.jpg
RECOMMENDATION AGAINST
The board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.
Item 8. Proposal to Eliminate Supermajority Voting Requirements
John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock having a market value in excess of $2,000, has submitted the following proposal:

92


Proposal 8— Simple Majority Vote
lly-20230224_g111.jpg
Shareholders request that our board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws.
This means the closest standard to a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals consistent with applicable laws. This includes any existing supermajority vote requirement that results from default to state law and can be subject to replacement. This proposal topic is important because it was approved by 84% of Eli Lilly shares that voted in 2021.
This 2023 proposal includes that the Board Recommendationtake all the steps necessary at its discretion to help ensure that the topic of this proposal is approved by the requirement of 80% of all outstanding shares including a commitment to hire a proxy solicitor to conduct an intensive campaign, a commitment to adjourn the annual meeting to obtain the votes required if necessary and to take a 2-year process to adopt this proposal topic if applicable. This proposal does not restrict the Board from using a means to obtain the necessary vote that is not mentioned in this proposal.
For instance PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) adjourned its annual meeting for weeks to obtain the necessary votes on this proposal topic in 2022 and Raytheon Technologies Corporation (RTX) announced a 2-year process to obtain shareholder approval of this proposal topic in its 2022 proxy.
This proposal includes that the Board make an EDGAR filing approximately 10-days before the annual meeting urging shareholder to vote in favor and explaining all the efforts the board has taken or will take to obtain the necessary vote and all the available efforts that the Board has not taken with an explanation for each available effort not taken. This EDGAR filing would also describe any group of Eli Lilly shareholders who are opposed to this topic and Board efforts to reach out to such groups.
It is important to make an all-out effort now to obtain shareholder approval of this proposal topic in preference to the expense of conducting failed votes on this proposal topic every year into the foreseeable future. Extraordinary measures need to be taken to adopt this proposal topic due to the dead hand of our undemocratic governance provisions that require an 80% approval from all Eli Lilly shares outstanding to improve the corporate governance of Eli Lilly — given the reality that only 70% of Eli Lilly shares typically vote at the annual meeting.
Please vote yes:
Simple Majority Vote — Proposal 8
Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal to Eliminate Supermajority Voting Requirements
The board, after review by its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, recommends a vote against this proposal.
The proposal calls for the board to take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws.
The board believes that, in light of management’s proposal set forth in Item 86 of this proxy statement to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements applicable to common shareholders, this non-binding shareholder proposal is redundant, unnecessary, and confusing.
The board has approved, and recommends that the shareholders approve, amendments to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements (the Supermajority Voting Amendments) in the company’s articles of incorporation as described in Item 6 of this proxy statement.
Lilly has repeatedly made efforts to obtain shareholder approval of the Supermajority Voting Amendments proposal over many years. From 2010 through 2012 and again from 2018 through 2022, the board has submitted this management proposal to shareholders seeking approval to eliminate these supermajority voting requirements.

93


For instance, as disclosed in this and prior proxy statements, for every year management has submitted the Supermajority Voting Amendments to shareholders for approval, the company has engaged a proxy solicitor to assist with distribution and solicitation of proxies, and the number of shares represented at the last four meetings (either in person or by proxy) has exceeded 90 percent. However, while over 81 percent of shares outstanding cast votes with respect to management’s Supermajority Voting Amendments proposal in the last three years, on each occasion the proposal has failed to receive the required affirmative vote given the failure of enough shareholders to vote in favor.
Furthermore, as discussed in this proxy statement in the section titled “Shareholder Engagement on Governance IssuesManagement Proposals to Eliminate Classified Board and Supermajority Voting Requirements”, management regularly engages with shareholders on governance topics, including management’s proposal on the Supermajority Voting Amendments.
Because the board is submitting, and is recommending the adoption of, Item 6 to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements at the 2023 Annual Meeting, the board believes that the request in this non-binding and advisory shareholder proposal that the board take action that it believes it has already taken, including through the submission of Item 6, is unnecessary, redundant, and confusing.
The board recommends that the company’s shareholders oppose this proposal and instead adopt management’s proposal to adopt the Supermajority Voting Amendments set out in Item 6.
lly-20230224_g110.jpg
RECOMMENDATION AGAINST
The board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.
Item 9. Proposal to Establish and Report on a Process by which the Impact of Extended Patent Exclusivities on Product Access Would be Considered in Deciding Whether to Apply for Secondary and Tertiary Patents
Trinity Health, as lead filer, with multiple additional cofilers, each a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock having a market value in excess of $2,000, has submitted the following proposal:
RESOLVED, that shareholders of Eli Lilly & Co. (“Lilly”) ask the Board of Directors to establish and report on a process by which the impact of extended patent exclusivities on product access would be considered in deciding whether to apply for secondary and tertiary patents. Secondary and tertiary patents arc patents applied for after the main active ingredient/molecule patent(s) and which relate to the product. The report on the process should be prepared at reasonable cost, omitting confidential and proprietary information, and published on Lilly’s website.
Supporting Statement
Access to medicines, especially costly specialty drugs, is the subject of consistent and widespread public debate in the U.S. A 2021 Rand Corporation analysis concluded that U.S. prices for branded drugs were nearly 3.5 times higher than prices in 32 OECD member countries.6 The Kaiser Family Foundation has “consistently found prescription drug costs to be an important health policy area of public interest and public concern.”7
This high level of concern has driven policy responses. The Inflation Reduction Act empowers the federal government to negotiate some drug prices.8 State measures, including drug price transparency legislation and copay caps, have also been adopted.9 The House Committee on Oversight and Reform (the “Committee”) launched a far-reaching investigation into drug pricing in January 2019.10 The Committee and the Senate Finance Committee also undertook in
6https:/ /www.rand.org/news/press /2021 /01 /28.html
7https://www.kfforg/health-costs/poll-finding/public-opinion-on-prescription-dnigs-and-their-ptices/
8https://www.kfforg/medicare/issue-brief/explaining-the-prescription-drug-provisions-in-the-inflation-reduction-act/
9https://www.americanprogress.org/article/state-policies-to-address-prescription-drug-affordability-across-the-supplychain/
10 https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/DRUG%20PRICING%20REPORT%20WITH%20APPENDIX %20v3.pdf, at i.

94


vestigations into insulin pricing in 2019, which focused on Lilly’s Humalog insulin and two other products.11
Intellectual property protections on branded drugs play an important role in maintaining high prices and impeding access. When patent protection on a drug ends, generic manufacturers can enter the market, reducing prices. But branded drug manufacturers may try to delay generic competition by extending their exclusivity periods.
Such periods can be extended if secondary patents are granted. The Committee’s December 2021 report described construction of a “patent thicket,” which consists of many “secondary patents covering the formulations, dosing, or methods of using, administering, or manufacturing a drug”; they are granted after the drug’s primary patent, covering its main active ingredient or molecule, has been granted.12 In June 2022, citing the impact of patent thickets on drug prices, a bipartisan group of Senators urged the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to “take regulatory steps to. . . eliminate large collections of patents on a single invention.”
Lilly has raised the price of a 10 ml vial of Humalog by 1219% since its launch. Secondary patents on Humalog extended Lilly’s exclusivity period by 17 years.13
In our view, a process that considers the impact of extended exclusivity periods on patient access would ensure that Lilly considers not only whether it can apply for secondary and tertiary patents but also whether it should do so. A more thoughtful process could, we believe, bolster Lilly’s reputation and help avoid regulatory blowback resulting from high drug prices and perceptions regarding abusive patenting practices.
Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal to Establish and Report on a Process by which the Impact of Extended Patent Exclusivities on Product Access Would be Considered in Deciding Whether to Apply for Secondary and Tertiary Patents
The board, after review by its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, recommends a vote AGAINSTagainst this proposal.

We are proud of the work we do to increase access to medicines around the world. At the same time, intellectual property protection through patents is critical to Lilly’s ability to successfully commercialize our innovations and invest in the search for new medicines and indications. Like most companies in our industry, Lilly could not invest or operate to research, discover, develop, test, manufacture or deliver existing and new medicines for patients without an effective patent application strategy. Given the nature of our business, without obtaining patent protections, we could not make the investments necessary to develop new medicines or further develop already-approved products. There is a high rate of failure inherent in new drug discovery. To bring a drug from the discovery phase to market can take over a decade and can often cost in excess of $2 billion. Failure can occur at any point in the process, including in later stages after substantial investment. As a result, most funds invested in research programs will not generate financial returns. The decisions of when to incur technical risk, time, effort, and significant expense to seek to develop a new product or develop new indications or new medicine delivery options (the typical innovation sources for the “secondary” patents), and when to permit copying of an already-approved product are complicated decisions at the core of the Company’s business model. Lilly’s process for patent prosecution is thoughtful and overseen by legal experts focused on compliance with applicable laws. Subjecting this process to additional cumbersome procedures and shareholder oversight would interfere with Lilly’s operations and management’s ability to run the business.
The report requested by this shareholder proposal is unnecessary because the company already provides shareholders with information about the analysis and framework the company uses for intellectual property protection strategies. As discussed in detail under “GovernanceGovernance PracticesEnvironmental, Social, and GovernanceIncrease Access to Medicines” in this proxy statement, Lilly is deeply committed to patient access to our medicines so that our breakthroughs can transform more people’s lives.
Notably, the supporting statement submitted by the proponent includes misleading assertions regarding basic facts and inaccurate data. In fact, there is increasing recognition that narratives such as those being advanced by
11https://www.grassley.senate.gove/news/news-releases/grassley-wyden-launch-bipartisan-investigation-insulin-prices
12https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gove/files/DRUG%20PRICING%20REPORT%20WITH%20APPENDIX %20v3.pdf, at 79.
13https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/DRUG%20PRICING%20REPORT%20WITH%20APPENDIX %20v3.pdf, at 14, 81.

95


proponents are often built on flawed and misleading data.14 For example, contrary to the statement in the proposal’s supporting statement, secondary patents on Humalog did not extend Lilly’s exclusivity period by 17 years. In fact, Lilly’s “primary” Humalog patent expired in 2013 and, just four years later in 2017, the FDA approved Sanofi’s Humalog follow-on biologic (Admelog®). The misleading and factually inaccurate information in the proposal also reveals a misunderstanding of the critical role of patents in sustaining and incentivizing an ecosystem that is fundamental for patient access to innovative drugs and that leads to the reliable entry of lower-cost biosimilar and generic drugs. Such misunderstanding combined with the misleading data presented around patents is in fact ultimately antithetical to patient access to innovative and lower-cost biosimilar and generic drugs. Due to the importance of and complexities involved in patent strategy, Lilly uses a framework (described below) to guide the internal experts who have the factual details to make patent strategy decisions on behalf of the company. In addition, and as explained below, Lilly has already provided public disclosure concerning its patent application process that is responsive to the proposal’s request.
Lilly already provides information on guiding principles related to its intellectual property protection strategies.
Lilly believes that patients benefit most from a biopharmaceutical innovation ecosystem that both (a) incentivizes discovery and development of a sustainable pipeline of innovative drugs and (b) leads to reliable entry of lower-cost biosimilar and generic drugs.
As described in our ESG Report, intellectual property protection improves patient access by incentivizing investment and innovation. Consistent with our commitment to promoting access to our medicines so that our breakthroughs can transform more people’s lives, Lilly supports the removal of regulatory or pricing, reimbursement and access restrictions for generics and biosimilars when intellectual property protections expire. In addition, Lilly has a long-standing practice of not seeking or enforcing patents for medicines in countries designated by the United Nations as the least developed.
In 2021, Lilly publicly announced its participation in the IP Principles for Advancing Cures and Therapies (the IP PACT), which serves as a framework for guiding the company’s commitment to innovation while keeping patients at the heart of its efforts. The IP PACT framework includes the following principles, among others:
Patient and societal benefit will guide Lilly’s approach to IP.
Lilly will support initiatives to ensure patent quality, which help advance biopharmaceutical innovation.
Lilly will use IP rights to facilitate collaboration and enable partnerships that advance global health.
Lilly believes that accessible patent information promotes scientific progress and helps improve the procurement of medicines, and we support voluntary initiatives that advance these goals.
Lilly will act responsibility and professionally in the Company’s patent proceedings, and seek timely resolutions to enhance certainty for all stakeholders.
Lilly believes that generic and biosimilar medicines are important for sustainable health systems, and that certain activities related to seeking regulatory approval should be exempt from patent infringement.
Lilly believes that advancing public health depends on robust IP, rights as well as collaboration among stakeholders, and may call for tailored uses of our IP where these add value for patients.
Lilly will approach IP in the world’s poorest countries in ways that considers their unique socio-economic challenges.
As part of our process for determining whether to apply for patent protection for new innovation, we conduct a fact-specific and complicated analysis in connection with patent applications for potential products or uses, including for secondary and tertiary patents. Once filed, those patent applications are examined by patent offices
14See, e.g., Adam Mossoff, Unreliable Data Have Infected the Policy Debates Over Drug Patents (Jan. 2022); Letter from Sen. Thom Tillis to Dr. Janet Woodcock and Mr. Drew Hirshfeld (Jan. 31, 2022); Letter from Sen. Thom Tillis to Dr. Robert Califf and Mr. Drew Hirshfeld (Apr. 1, 2022); Erika Lietzan & Kristina Acri née Lybecker, Solutions Still Searching for a Problem: A Call for Relevant Data to Support “Evergreening” Allegations, 33 Fordham Intell. Prop., Media & Ent. L.J., at 1 (forthcoming). As noted by Mossoff, the data underlying sources for the proponent’s statement include “reported numbers of issued patents, patent applications, and exclusivity periods for drugs are infected with serious questions of reliability and accuracy…[with]repeated and vast discrepancies” from official, publicly available government sources like the FDA’s Orange Book. This data relied upon “has wrongfully inflated the purported number of patents covering biopharmaceutical products and has extended their predictions of loss of exclusivity dates beyond reality...”

96


around the world to ensure any patent granted meets stringent legal requirements for patentability, including that the invention is appropriately described, new, and not obvious. The statutory text underlying the patent examination standards makes no distinction between the patentability requirements for applications directed to different technologies or for different application types. The IP PACT principles help guide our patent decisions and ensure that we consider product access as part of our evaluation.
Lilly provides information on its goals and approach to access to medicine.
As further discussed in this proxy statement, on our website, in our ESG Report, and in other public materials, Lilly provides extensive disclosure regarding goals and initiatives related to access and affordability of our medicines. For example, our global access program—30x30—is our strategy to invest in pipeline and partnership efforts to increase access to 30 million people in resource limited settings by 2030. A recent example in furtherance of this initiative, in December 2022 Lilly and EVA Pharma announced a collaboration to deliver a sustainable supply of high-quality, affordable human and analogue insulin to at least one million people living with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in low- to middle-income countries, most of which are in Africa.
Requiring Lilly to prepare a separate report with this information would place an undue administrative burden on the company and would not provide meaningful additional information to shareholders.
We do not believe the separate report requested by the proposal would provide meaningful additional information to shareholders to merit the resources required to provide the report. For all of these reasons, we believe the proposal is not in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
lly-20230224_g110.jpg
RECOMMENDATION AGAINST
The board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.
Item 10. Proposal to Report on Risks of Supporting Abortion
National Center for Public Policy Research, 2005 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20036, a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock having a market value in excess of $2,000, has submitted the following proposal:
Report on Risks of Supporting Abortion
Resolved: Shareholders request the Company issue a public report prior to December 31, 2023, omitting confidential and privileged information and at a reasonable expense, detailing the known and reasonably foreseeable risks and costs to the Company caused by opposing or otherwise altering Company policy in response to enacted or proposed state policies regulating abortion, and detailing any strategies beyond litigation and legal compliance that the Company may deploy to minimize or mitigate these risks.
Supporting Statement: In 2022, Eli Lilly made clear its opposition to an Indiana law that restricts abortion in cases other than rape, incest, or where a woman’s life is in danger.15 The Company claimed that as a result of this law, its ability to attract diverse employees would be hindered, and that it would be “forced to plan for more employment growth outside our home state.” 16 The Company also said it expanded its employee health plan coverage to include travel for abortion.17
Ironically, in spite of making these statements and policy changes that demonstrate a clear pro-abortion stance, the Company criticized state officials for taking a stance on such a controversial issue. Indeed, the Company claimed to recognize abortion as a “divisive and deeply personal issue with no clear consensus among the citizens of Indiana,” but then itself went on to take a position through its condemnation. “Despite this lack of agreement, Indiana has opted to quickly adopt one of the most restrictive anti-abortion laws in the United States,”
15https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abortion-indiana-eli-lilly-cummins-roche/;https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/06/eli-lilly-says-indianas-abortion-law-will-lead-the-drugmaker-to-grow-in-other-states.html; https://www.wthr.com/article/news/special-reports/indiana-abortion/eli-lilly-condemns-new-abortion-ban-looks-to-expand-outside-indiana/531-7dedb5c9-0dda-4d9e-acf1-8f18e0b988db
16https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/06/eli-lilly-says-indianas-abortion-law-will-lead-the-drugmaker-to-grow-in-other-states.html
17https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abortion-indiana-eli-lilly-cummins-roche/;https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/06/eli-lilly-says-indianas-abortion-law-will-lead-the-drugmaker-to-grow-in-other-states.html

97


the Company stated.18 We agree with the Company that abortion is a “divisive and deeply personal issue.” Views on the topic are often rooted in an individual’s religious or other core belief system, making taking a position on it a potential reputational, legal, and financial liability for a company—yet Eli Lilly has insisted on doing just that.
By criticizing laws that restrict abortion and implementing a benefit to pay for abortion access, the Company makes clear its opposition to pro-life legislation that limit abortion. This positioning is particularly troubling considering the emphasis the Company has placed on so-called “Diversity & Inclusion.” The Company claims that embracing differences drives its business success,19 but apparently that embrace of diversity ends at diversity of thought, opinion, and religious convictions.
Taking positions on issues the Company admits are “divisive,” “deeply personal,” and on which there is “no clear consensus,” can only serve to alienate consumers, employees, and investors and impact the Company’s bottom-line. The Company should instead focus on its pharmaceutical mission and its fiduciary duty to shareholders, a fiduciary duty that is likely to be violated by engaging in politically divisive rhetoric and actions.
Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal to Report on Risks of Supporting Abortion
The board, after review by its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, recommends a vote against this proposal.
Lilly seeks to attract and retain diverse talent from around the world, and offers competitive compensation, healthcare coverage, and other benefits to its employees. Our board and its applicable committees provide oversight of the company’s global compensation philosophy, human capital management and compliance programs. After careful consideration of this proposal, we believe the preparation of the requested report would not benefit our shareholders, employees, and other stakeholders and, therefore, would be an unnecessary distraction and redirection of resources that otherwise could be focused on running the business and advancing Lilly’s mission.
Lilly offers competitive compensation, healthcare coverage and other benefits to its employees.
As a global company with approximately 39,000 employees, Lilly is dedicated to attracting, developing, engaging and retaining the best talent in order to create medicines that make life better for people around the world. We want our company to be a welcoming place that people want to join, and where they can enjoy meaningful work, build successful careers, and make important contributions to society. We compete for talent with others in our industry and in the geographies in which we operate. In order to attract and retain employees, we offer a competitive total rewards program, including pay, benefits, and learning and development opportunities.
Workforce management is a complicated topic that is core to management’s ability to run the business. Determining health benefits such as employee leave and insurance coverage for a multitude of issues is informed by a number of factors such as local market data, employee input, and financial affordability. The Company must consider our benefit offerings with our global workforce in mind where roughly 55 percent of our full-time workforce works outside of the United States and benefit packages are developed at the individual country level. In the U.S., nearly 40 percent of our workforce lives outside of the state of Indiana, which is also an important consideration for benefits packages being developed for our U.S. employees.
We believe the healthcare coverage options offered to our employees are competitive in the markets in which we operate. We review benefit offerings frequently for compliance with applicable law and to be responsive to the needs of our current employees as well as those we are seeking to recruit. Without the flexibility to react to changes in the markets in which we operate and update our benefits offerings in the manner that management determines is most beneficial to the company, Lilly may face additional recruitment or retention challenges that could ultimately affect the company’s profitability.
Lilly is committed to fairness and nondiscrimination in our employment practices, and we value diverse backgrounds, skills and global perspectives.
Our long-standing values of integrity, excellence and respect for people promote an environment where team members are encouraged to speak up, share ideas and be fully engaged in our work while bringing their full
18https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/06/eli-lilly-says-indianas-abortion-law-will-lead-the-drugmaker-to-grow-in-other-states.html
19https://www.lilly.com.au/operating-responsibly/diversity-inclusion; https://blog.kelley.iupui.edu/2020/10/05/eli-lilly-ceo-to-lead-healthcare-focused-conversation-on-inclusive-leadership/

98


authentic selves to work every day in order to achieve our mission. Leaders at Lilly are expected to lead more inclusively by valuing differences, recognizing and overcoming bias and fostering a speak-up culture where all colleagues feel their ideas and contributions are welcome and valued.
Lilly employees have different experiences, perspectives and traditions, and we are committed to welcoming, respecting and valuing those differences. Our health benefit policies are intended to be responsive to what our employees are seeking and what our competitors are offering to their employees, with the goal of creating a welcoming and diverse workplace where all employees feel supported and valued.
Lilly has a robust governance process in place to oversee risk and compliance.
The board and its committees receive regular updates from management, including related to human resources and compliance, and discuss management’s assessments from the company’s enterprise risk management process. Specifically, the company’s Compensation Committee advises management and the board regarding human capital management, diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts, and employee compensation and benefits matters. We believe these processes are reasonable and appropriate to assess and respond to any purported risks from any specific benefit policy without the need to commission the report requested by the proposal.
The scope of the requested report is framed so broadly and speculatively that we believe it would be extremely difficult for the company to produce a report that would provide value or utility to our shareholders, employees, and other stakeholders.
The requested report would involve a review and report of not only the laws in each of the states in which the company operates, but also all proposed bills, legislation in committee, speculation about the results or outcomes of relevant pending state-level litigation, and any current or proposed administrative policies of state governmental bodies. Moreover, it is not clear how the company could quantify what constitutes “risks and costs” caused by “opposing” or “altering” company policies and procedures “in response to enacted or proposed state policies” of the kind described in the proposal. Producing the requested report would prove to be a diversion of board and management time and other company resources that could be better spent running the business and managing the company’s workforce.
Lilly is committed to complying with any laws that are or may be enacted that apply to our company. We believe the company’s resources are better focused on its day-to-day review and design of our benefits plans and programs in order to remain competitive in our industry and in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements in the jurisdictions where we operate.
lly-20230224_g110.jpg
RECOMMENDATION AGAINST
The board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.
Item 9.11. Proposal to Disclose Lobbying Activities and Alignment with Public Policy Positions and Statements
CommonSpirit Health, 444 West Lake Street, Chicago, IL 60606, as lead filer, along with several cofilers, each a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock having a market value in excess of $2000,$2,000, has submitted the following proposal:
Resolved:Resolved: Shareholders request that the Board of Directors commission and publish a third party review within the next year (at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information) of whetherhow Eli Lilly and Company’sCompany (“Lilly’s”Lilly”) reconciles the strong commitments to both innovation and patient access, reflected in Lilly’s statement that it “strike[s] a balance between access and patient affordability, while sustaining investments to research innovative life-changing treatments for some of today’s most serious diseases”20--when lobbying and engaging in other policy advocacy activities (direct(both direct and through trade associations) align with Lilly’s public policy position and public statements, particularly supporting “making medicines more accessible and affordable to patients” and “fairness and transparency in the biopharma industry.”1 The report should discuss how Lilly addresses the risks presented by any misaligned lobbying and its plans, if any, to mitigate these risks..

1
20https://www.lilly.com/policies-reports/public-policy.

public-policy
75
99



Supporting Statement:
Lilly’s commitmentLilly states that it “is committed to Health Above Allensuring you can afford your Lilly insulin,”21 and says it wants to “help those with diabetes get the medication and care they need.”22 Though Lilly has a patient access program, there is in opposition to its lobbying efforts.not solid evidence that these programs reach the most vulnerable patients, with one study finding “limited evidence … that co-pay assistance was associated with improved treatment persistence/adherence across various diseases…”23 In March 2021, Lilly says, “We’re dedicated to making our medicines more equitable, accessible and affordable,” and clearly states, “no one should have to ration their insulin.”2 Yet, Lilly is among three insulin manufacturers explicitly called outalso made headlines for price collusion in a 2017 class action lawsuit.3
“deceptive trade practice claims” associated with “insulin price-gouging.”24Lilly states, “Now more than ever, it’s vitally important that we demonstrate accountability and trustworthiness so we can continue to earn the confidence of patients, healthcare providers and other customers, as well as society as a whole.”25 However, Lilly has directly lobbied against drug pricing reform that advances affordability,426 hiring three lobbyists in March 2021 to defeat Democratic drug pricing proposals even while Lilly was under intense scrutiny for insulin price hikes.5
27Lilly’s CEO Dave Ricks is now thea recent Board Chair for Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (“PhRMA”), which raised nearly $527 million in 2020 and spent roughly $506 million, including donating millions to numerous other organizations for use in opposing congressional drug pricing reform efforts.628 PhRMA also sits on the boardPrivate Enterprise Advisory Council of the American Legislative Exchange Council, which has actively opposed H.R.bills to lower the costs of pharmaceuticals (H.R. 3 and its moderate counterpart S. 2534 (both 116th Congress) - bills to lower the costs of pharmaceuticals.7).29
Lilly is the fourth largestspent $7.5M lobbying spender ($166.2M)in 2021 and the third highest campaign contributor ($13.3M) between 1999 and 2018. Lilly was among several pharmaceutical companies that gave $1.6M to lawmakers$5.3M in the first half of 2021, targeting legislators who were likely to oppose drug pricing reforms in the Build Back Better Act.8
The positions Lilly adopts should not be undermined by lobbying efforts undertaken by organizations the Company supports financially. A company may not support every position taken by the trade associations to which it belongs, but proper risk management requires that the board be aware of inconsistencies and evaluate salient risks that would require mitigation.
2022 (through October 24).30Given Lilly’s extensive direct and indirect lobbying against measures that would make drugs more affordable, we are concerned thatinvestors need to better understand the misalignmentbalance Lilly is striking between Lilly’s lobbyingits commitments to innovation, on the one hand, and its stated position with regard to equity, access and affordability, creates reputational risk.9
on the other. For these reasons, we urge shareholders to support the proposal.
Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal to Publish an Annual Report DisclosingDisclose Lobbying Activities and Alignment with Public Policy Positions and Statements
The board, after review by its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, recommends a vote against this proposal.
The proposal calls for the board to publish a report to shareholders disclosing whetherhow the company’s lobbying activities align with its public policy positions and statements, particularly regarding Lilly’s goals of promoting access and affordability of medicines, and fairness and transparency inwhile at the biopharmaceutical industry.same time sustaining investments to research innovative life-changing treatments for some of today’s most serious diseases.
The report requested by the proposal is unnecessary because Lilly already provides shareholders with sufficient information to assess the alignment of the company’s lobbying activities with its public positions and statements through existing disclosures. Given the focus of our stakeholders on this topic, in November 2021At Lilly, we substantially enhanced ourprovide public disclosures with respect to Lilly’sour direct and indirect lobbying activities, including without limitation, disclosures regarding:
our board’s oversight of political expenditures and lobbying activities;
Lilly’s political contributions to candidates for public office (directly from Lilly and through the company’s exclusively employee-led political action committee (the “LillyPAC”)(LillyPAC));
recipients of Lilly’s political contributions;
Lilly’s federal and state lobbying activities; and
Lilly’s trade association membershipsassociations to which Lilly pays annual membership dues of $50,000 or more (including those trade associations whereon which Lilly has a board seat).;
21https://www.insulinaffordability.com/
22https://www.insulinaffordability.com/lilly-diabetes-solution-center
23https://www.ajmc.com/view/impact-of-co-pay-assistance-on-patient-clinical-and-economic-outcomes
24https://www.news.bloomberglaw.com/antitrust/sanofi-lilly-novo-must-face-more-insulin-price-gouging-claims
25https://www.lilly.com/impact/operating-ethically-and-responsibly
26https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/novo-faces-new-shareholder-suit-for-alleged-collusive-price-fixing
27https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/04/vaccine-access-pharma-lobbying-fight/
28https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/12/pharma-lobby-poured-millions-into-darkmoney-groups/
29https://www.alecaction.org/update/20-alec-lawmakers-say-no-to-importing-price-controls-and-socialized-medicine-to-america/
30https://www.opensecrets.orgs/orgs/eli-lilly-co/summary?id=d000000166

100


our public policy positions and goals on the promotion of access and affordability of medicines as well as expanded development of innovation, all of which are detailed in our environmental, social and governance report (ESG Report); and
Lilly’s core principles and key areas of public policy effort when advocating for improvements to the U.S. healthcare system.
These extensive disclosures already enable shareholders (i) to understand Lilly’s perspective and approach to increasing access to medicines and innovative research and development, (ii) to assess whether the company’s lobbying activities align with its public policy positions and statements, as well asand (iii) to assess the risks presented by any potential misalignment.

2https://www.lilly.com/who-we-are/health-above-all.
3https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/novo-faces-new-shareholder-suit-for-alleged-collusive-price-fixing.
4https://www.wfyi.org/news/articles/eli-lilly-says-legislation-to-address-drug-prices-would-hurt-its-current-future-operations.
5https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/04/vaccine-access-pharma-lobbying-fight/.
6https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2020/12/pharma-lobby-poured-millions-into-darkmoney-groups/.
7https://www.alecaction.org/update/20-alec-lawmakers-say-no-to-importing-price-controls-and-socialized-medicine-to-america.
8https://www.tampabay.com/news/health/2021/10/27/big-pharma-spends-big-to-block-attempts-to-control-drug-prices/.
9https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/eli-lilly-co/lobbying?id=d000000166
76


In addition, the company already directs its public policy engagement toward offering Lilly’s perspective in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines and advocates for improvements to the U.S. healthcare system and, accordingly, Lilly’s policies and procedures relating to its engagement in political activities already seek to align the company’s lobbying activities with its expressed goals. Moreover, contrary to the proposal’s assertions, Lilly does not fund opposition to lowering prescription drug prices. Lilly does, however, oppose legislative policies that would hinder medical discovery for patients. For example, we opposed H.R. 3 because it would not only stifle innovation but there are better policy solutions to help patients with their out of pockets costs such as Medicare Part D modernization and not requiring deductibles for insulin coverage. Similarly, we have opposed the drug pricing aspects of the Build Back Better Act that would also have negative consequences to drug discovery without directly helping patients—such as Medicare negotiation. Our political expenditures, however, cover the political spectrum and reflect our approach to engaging stakeholders on various complex issues to help preserve incentives and ensure an environment conducive to finding new treatments.
Lilly already publicly discloses the information requested by the proposal regarding the company’s lobbying activities.
Lilly makes extensive disclosures regarding its lobbying activities in the political participation page of its website (the “Political(Political Participation Website”)Website), its proxy materials, the environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) page of its website,ESG Report, and through other publicly available disclosures regarding its political activities. As noted in the bullet points above, in November 2021 Lilly substantially enhanced its disclosures related to its lobbying activities. In addition,For example, Lilly voluntarily discloses its corporate political contributions on an annuala biannual basis. In addition to the public disclosures of lobbying expenditures by trade associations through which Lilly conducts its indirect lobbying activities (which are evaluated annually by the company’s U.S. government affairs leaders), Lilly’s Political Participation Website also contains information regarding the company’s trade association memberships for which the company pays annual dues of $50,000 or more, as well as information regarding the percentage of dues collected by such trade associations that is utilized for federal and state lobbying and political expenditures. Additional details regarding the company’s corporate contributions, LillyPAC’s contributions (which are also voluntarily disclosed on an annual basis), contribution data, and the company’s direct lobbying expenses are also already made available to the public from numerous public sources.
Lilly already publicly discloses the information requested by the proposal regarding its public policy positions and statements with regard to accessibilityaccess and affordability and fairness and transparency.investments in research.
In this proxy statement, the Political Participation Website and Lilly’s public policy website, the company discloses its public policy positions regarding accessibility and affordability as well as fairness and transparency in the biopharmaceutical industry. These disclosures include Lilly’s commitment to advocate for improvements to the U.S.United States health care system that align with the company’s core principles of:of (1) encouraging and protecting innovation;innovation, (2) fairness and transparency in the biopharmaceutical industry and all of health care;care, and (3) lowering costs at the pharmacy counter for patients who use our medicine.medicines. Lilly’s lobbying activities are aligned with these public policy positions and our actions also clearly demonstrate this alignment. For example, Lilly advocates for insurers to pass through its negotiated rebates directly to consumers at the pharmacy counter, and is supportive of efforts to exempt health care services for chronic conditions from a health insurance plan’s deductible. Ondeductible and Lilly passes through estimated rebates directly to its employees at the ESG page ofpharmacy counter under its website, Lillyown healthcare coverage. In our proxy statement and other public disclosures, the company also discloses its support for various transparency initiatives globally, and explains that the company seeks to collaborate with policy makers, industry colleagues and key stakeholders to align on approaches that achieve these objectives. As demonstrations of delivering on its commitment to its public policy positions regarding drug pricing and access, Lilly introduced two additional lower-priced versions of Humalog in January 2020 and added the Lilly Insulin Value Program to Lilly’s comprehensive suite of insulin affordability solutions in September 2020, which now enables customers with commercial insurance or no insurance to purchase their monthly prescription of all Lilly insulins for $35. In addition, in September 2021, Lilly announced that it would lower the list price of all Lilly’s non-branded insulins, including Insulin Lispro Injection, by an additional 40%40 percent in the U.S.United States. That price reduction took effect January 1, 2022, effectively reducing the list price to 2008 levels. These examples, among others, demonstrate Lilly’s commitment to providing effective oversight over drug pricing and access.access as well as the public’s ability to evaluate this information.
Lilly already publicly discloses the information requested by the proposal regarding its oversight and plans to mitigate alleged risks presented by any misaligned lobbying activities.
In this proxy statement and the Political Participation Website, Lilly already discloses its governance and risk mitigation procedures that are in place to avoid and address any potential misalignment between Lilly’s lobbying activities and its public policy positions and statements.

101


For example, the board exercises oversight of Lilly’s political expenditures and lobbying activities to ensure the company fulfills its commitment to stewardship of corporate funds and minimizes risk minimization with respect to such activities. The board receives regular updates from the executive vice president, corporate affairs and communications regarding public policy issues and the company’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and the board also receives semi-annual updates on the company’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and trade association memberships.
Therefore, the board already takes substantial steps to oversee and mitigate the potential risks of misalignment between Lilly’s lobbying activities and public policy positions and statements and the company provides that information to the public.
Requiring Lilly to prepare a separate report with this information would place an undue administrative burden on the company and would not provide meaningful additional information to shareholders.
We believe our existing disclosures regarding out lobbying activities provide meaningful information that allows shareholders to evaluate how our lobbying activities align with our public policy positions and statements. Additionally, we do not believe the standalone report requested by the proposal would provide meaningful additional information to shareholders to merit the resources required to provide the report. For these reasons, we believe the proposal is not in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
lly-20230224_g110.jpg
RECOMMENDATION AGAINST
The board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.
Item 12. Proposal to Report on Effectiveness of the Company’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts
As You Sow, on behalf of Leslie Oelsner Bene IRA of S Berman (S), Sarah B Sonnenfeld Rev Tr (S), Curtis Overway and Marcelina Cravat-Overway, each a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock having a market value in excess of $2,000, has submitted the following proposal:
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Eli Lilly and Co. (“Eli Lilly”) report to shareholders on the effectiveness of the Company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. The report should be done at reasonable expense, exclude proprietary information, and provide transparency on outcomes, using quantitative metrics for hiring, retention, and promotion of employees, including data by gender, race, and ethnicity.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Quantitative data is sought so investors can assess and compare the effectiveness of the Company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.
WHEREAS: Eli Lilly has not shared sufficient quantitative hiring, retention, and promotion data to allow investors to determine the effectiveness of its human capital management programs. Between September 2020 and September 2022, S&P 100 companies increased by 298 percent their release of hiring rate data by gender, race, and ethnicity; retention rate data by 481 percent; and promotion rate data by 300 percent.31 Companies that release, or have committed to release, more inclusion data than Eli Lilly include CVS Health, Gilead Sciences, Illumina, Pfizer, and UnitedHealth Group.
Numerous studies have pointed to the benefits of a diverse workforce. Their findings include:
There is a positive association between diversity in management and cash flow, net profit, revenue, and return on equity.32
Companies in the top quartile for gender diversity are 21 percent more likely to outperform on profitability.33
31https://www.asyousow.org/our-work/social-justice/workplace-equity
32https://www.asyousow.org/report-pages/workplace-diversity-and-financial-performance
33Ibid

102


The 20 most diverse companies had an average annual five year-stock return that was 5.8 percentage points higher than the 20 least diverse companies.34
Similar to how an income statement pairs with a balance sheet, hiring, promotion, and retention rate data show how well a company manages its workforce diversity. Without this data, investors are unable to assess the effectiveness of a company’s human capital management program. Companies should look to hire the best talent. However, Black and Latino applicants face hiring challenges. Results of a meta-analysis of 24 field experiments found that, with identical resumes, White applicants received an average of 36 percent more callbacks than Black applicants and 24 percent more callbacks than Latino applicants.35
Promotion rates show how well diverse talent is nurtured at a company. Unfortunately, women and employees of color experience “a broken rung” in their careers; for every 100 men who are promoted, only 86 women are. Women of color are particularly impacted, comprising 17 percent of the entry-level workforce and only four percent of executives.36
Retention rates show whether employees choose to remain at a company. Morgan Stanley has found that employee retention above industry average can indicate a competitive advantage and higher levels of future profitability.37 Companies with high employee satisfaction have also been linked to annualized outperformance of over two percent.38
Investors have reason to be concerned as Eli Lilly has faced allegations of age, sex, and race discrimination.
Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal to Report on the Effectiveness of the Company’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts
The board, after review by its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, recommends a vote against this proposal.
The proposal calls for the board to report to shareholders on the effectiveness of the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts and provide transparency on outcomes using quantitative metrics hiring, retention, and promotion of employees, including data by gender, race, and ethnicity.
The report requested by the proposal is unnecessary because Lilly already establishes specific DEI goals, discloses progress towards these goals, and has consistently been evaluated and recognized by third parties for our DEI practices, programs and outcomes.
Lilly is committed to DEI.
At Lilly, we believe in the power of DEI to fulfill our purpose of creating medicines that make life better for people around the world. At our core, we believe that by leveraging the varied backgrounds of our more than 39,000 employees—and by driving actionable and measurable strategies to improve DEI, including diversity within our clinical trials—we can better deliver scientific breakthroughs. We take a data-driven approach to DEI so that our business and employee base better reflect the world around us. We recognize that the wide array of races, ethnicities, abilities, ages, religions, sexual orientations, genders and political views in our communities serves as a catalyst for innovation and creativity that contributes to the health and prosperity of society.
The DEI commitment at Lilly includes, among other things, high-level oversight, purposeful corporate culture and ongoing data analyses to inform our approach. Our CEO and Executive Committee (EC) consistently set expectations for inclusive leadership and hold leaders accountable for building diverse and inclusive teams. The EC is dedicated to advising and driving corporate DEI strategy in order to promote diverse talent development, recruitment, and retainment as highlighted in our proxy statement and other public disclosures. The EC regularly reviews progress towards aspirational goals for women and minority group member talent for both recruiting and representation in management along with other DEI metrics, including employee survey data. Lilly is committed to
34https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-business-case-for-more-diversity-11572091200
35https://www.hbr.org/2017/10/hiring-discrimination-against-black-amercians-hasnt-declined-in-25-years
36https://wiw-report.s3amazonaws.com/Women_in_the_Workplace_2021.pdf
37https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_culturequantframework_us.pdf
38https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1tx0zzdhhnf5x/Want-to-Pick-the-Best-Stocks-Pick-the-Happiest-Companies?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The%20Essential20II20100721&utm_content= The20Essential%20II20100721%20CID_eb103a9e15359075f72a85f7ff534c79&utm_source= CampaignMonitorEmail&utm_term=Want%20to%20Pick%20the%20Best%20Stocks%20Pick%20the%20Happiest%20Companies

103


data-driven results, and metrics are used to develop annual DEI plans, track progress and implement Lilly’s strategies, which are reviewed at least annually by the Board.
Our executive leadership team purposefully integrates DEI within our human resources talent management organization. Lilly’s executive vice president for human resources and diversity, a member of the EC, reports directly to our chair and CEO and is ultimately accountable for DEI at Lilly. Our chief DEI officer is a senior vice president reporting to the executive vice president for human resources and diversity and is also responsible for leading our talent management functions. As a result, DEI is integrated into how we recruit, develop, promote and retain talent.
Employee resource groups (ERGs) are another important component of developing talent at Lilly. Our ERGs represent groups including women, minority group members, LGBTQ+ individuals, veterans and people with disabilities. ERGs offer our diverse workforce opportunities to build relationships, engage with senior leaders, advance our caring community, and offer unique insights and perspectives to improve our business.
Lilly already provides extensive information on its DEI efforts and has posted its consolidated EEO-1 reports.
We already disclose Lilly’s DEI efforts, including the information provided above, in our proxy statement and other public disclosures along with quantitative diversity data, including the gender and ethnicity breakdown of both Lilly’s workforce and management. In addition, the company publishes its EEO-1 reports on the company’s website, which provides additional transparency and accountability with respect to Lilly’s workforce diversity data.
Lilly continues to be recognized for its DEI efforts.
Finally, Lilly has been recognized externally several times for its DEI efforts. Lilly is and has been ranked in the Top 5 Companies in effective DEI practices by DiversityInc for the past 4 years and in the Top 50 the past twelve (12) years running. DiversityInc has a systematic, rigorous process that reviews companies’ data across six categories: Leadership Accountability, Talent Programs, Human Capital and Diversity Metrics, Workplace Practices, Supplier Diversity and Philanthropy.
Additionally, Lilly has been recognized in Forbes, America’s Best Large Employers list; Seramount, Top Company for Executive Women and Best Company for Multicultural Women; DisabilityIN, Disability Equality Index Best Places to Work – Perfect Score; Human Rights Campaign Foundation, Corporate Equality Index – Perfect Score to name a few.
Requiring Lilly to prepare a separate report with this information would place an undue administrative burden on the company and would not provide meaningful additional information to shareholders.
We believe our existing DEI practices, and significant disclosures, provide meaningful information that allows shareholders to determine the effectiveness of our policies related to workplace diversity. Additionally, we do not believe the standalone report requested by the proposal would provide meaningful additional information to shareholders to merit the resources required to provide the report. For these reasons, we believe the proposal is not in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
lly-20230224_g110.jpg
RECOMMENDATION AGAINST
The board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.
Item 13. Proposal to Adopt a Policy to Require Certain Third-Party Organizations to Annually Report Expenditures for Political Activities before Lilly Contributes to an Organization
Change Finance, P.B.C., a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock having a market value in excess of $2,000, has submitted the following proposal:

104


Eli Lilly & Company Model Code Proposal
Resolved: The shareholders of Eli Lilly & Company (“Lilly” or “Company”) ask the Company to adopt a policy requiring that, prior to making a donation or expenditure that supports the political activities of any trade association, social welfare organization, or organization organized and operated primarily to engage in political activities, Lilly will require that the organization report, at least annually, the organization’s expenditures for political activities, including the amount spent and the recipient, and that each such report be posted on Lilly’s website. For purposes of this proposal, “political activities” are (i) influencing or attempting to influence the selection, nomination, election, or appointment of any individual to a public office; or (ii) supporting a party, committee, association, fund, or other organization organized and operated primarily for the purpose of directly or indirectly accepting contributions or making expenditures to engage in the activities described in (i). This proposal does not encompass lobbying spending.
Supporting Statement
As long-term Lilly shareholders we support transparency and accountability in corporate electoral spending, including indirect political spending that is the subject of this proposal. Misaligned or non-transparent funding creates reputational risk that can harm shareholder value and place a company in legal jeopardy. Without knowing which candidates and political causes its funds ultimately support, our Company cannot assure shareholders, employees, or other stakeholders that its spending aligns with core values, business objectives, and policy positions. Without this information, none of the board, senior management, or shareowners can assess the risks associated with political spending.
The risks are especially serious when giving to trade associations, Super PACs, 527 committees, and “social welfare” organizations – groups that routinely pass money to or spend on behalf of candidates and political causes that a company might not otherwise wish to support. The Conference Board’s 2021 “Under a Microscope” report details these risks, discusses how to effectively manage them, and recommends the process suggested in this proposal. Media coverage amplifies the risk a company’s spending can pose and contributions to third-party groups can also embroil companies in scandal. Public records show Lilly has contributed at least $8.4 million in corporate funds to third-party groups dating to the 2010 election cycle. Beneficiaries of this spending have been tied to attacks on voting rights, efforts to deny climate change, and efforts to impose extreme restrictions on abortion – associations many companies wish to avoid.
It is unclear whether Lilly and its board received sufficient information from these groups to assess (a) the potential risks for the Company and stockholders, and (b) whether the groups’ expenditures aligned with our Company’s core values, business objectives, and policy positions. Mandating reports from third-party groups receiving Lilly political money would demonstrate our Company’s commitment to robust risk management and responsible civic engagement.
We urge a vote FOR the commonsense risk management measures contained in this proposal.
Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal to Adopt a Policy to Require Certain Third-Party Organizations to Annually Report Expenditures for Political Activities before Lilly Contributes to an Organization
The board, after review by its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, recommends a vote against this proposal.
The proposal calls for the board to adopt a policy requiring that, prior to making a contribution or expenditure that supports the political activities of any trade association, social welfare organization, or organization organized and operated primarily to engage in political activities, Lilly will require that the organization report, at least annually, the organization’s expenditures or political activities, including the amount spent and the recipient, and that each such report be posted on Lilly’s website.
The actions requested by the proposal are unnecessary, impracticable, and could exclude Lilly from important public policy discussions vital to Lilly’s business or restrict Lilly’s ability to further the public policy goals that are important to the company’s objectives.
Lilly already publicly discloses information regarding its lobbying activities and trade association memberships, including the extent of management and board oversight of the Company’s participation.

105


Lilly makes extensive disclosures regarding its lobbying activities in the political participation page of its website (Political Participation Website), its proxy materials, its environmental, social and governance report (ESG Report), and through other publicly available disclosures regarding its political activities. For example, Lilly voluntarily discloses its corporate political contributions on a biannual basis. In addition to the public disclosures of lobbying expenditures by trade associations through which Lilly conducts its indirect activities (which are evaluated annually by the company’s U.S. government affairs leaders), Lilly’s Political Participation Website also contains information regarding the company’s trade association memberships for which the company pays annual dues of $50,000 or more, as well as information regarding the percentage of dues collected by such trade associations that is utilized for federal and state lobbying and political expenditures. Additional details regarding the company’s corporate contributions, LillyPAC’s contributions (which are also voluntarily disclosed on an annual basis), contribution data, and the company’s direct lobbying expenses are also already made available to the public from numerous public sources.
Our contributions to these organizations are evaluated annually by the company’s U.S. Government Affairs leaders based on these organizations’ expertise in healthcare policy and advocacy and support of key issues of importance to Lilly. In addition to their positions on health care and business policy issues, we recognize that these organizations may engage in a broad range of other issues that extend beyond matters of primary importance to Lilly.
If concerns arise about an organization’s activities or involvement, we convey our concerns to them and evaluate whether the organization’s actions align with our core values, business objectives, and policy positions such that Lilly should maintain its relationship with that organization. We contribute to and participate in certain organizations because we believe there is value in ensuring our positions on issues important to Lilly and our industry are communicated and understood within the trade associations to which we belong. Lilly’s membership in these groups comes with the understanding that we may not always agree with the positions of the larger organization and/or other members.
Furthermore, as described in this proxy statement and on our Political Participation Website, Lilly discloses its decision-making process and the board’s oversight over the company’s political expenditures and direct and indirect lobbying activities. The board receives regular updates from the executive vice president, corporate affairs and communications regarding public policy issues and the company’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and receives semi-annual updates on direct and indirect lobbying activities and trade association memberships.
Therefore, This communication enables the board already takes steps to oversee the company’s fulfillment of its commitment to stewardship of corporate funds and mitigateminimizes risk with respect to such activities. See “GovernanceGovernance PracticesHuman Capital ManagementPolitical and Policy Participation” for additional information. This robust internal oversight as well as the potential risks of misalignment between Lilly’s lobbying activities andextensive public policy positions and statements.
77


Requiring Lilly to prepare a separate report with this information would place an undue administrative burden ondisclosure provided by the company allow the board, senior management, and wouldour shareholders to assess the risks associated with political spending.
Lilly does not have the power to control third-party disclosure and it is important for our business that we have flexibility to appropriately evaluate and engage in the public policymaking process.
We believe our membership in, or association with, certain trade associations allow us to work collaboratively and create consensus with organizations with similar interests on key policy issues and advocate in favor of those interests. However, our limited participation does not afford us the influence to require third parties to provide meaningful additional informationthe detailed reports requested by the proposal, and mandating that organizations must produce these reports in order to shareholders.receive contributions from Lilly could severely limit the number and types of organizations in which we could participate. Most of these organizations already provide some level of disclosure regarding their political spending activities, either voluntarily or based on legal obligations to do so. Trade associations, for example, are subject to public disclosure obligations with respect to their lobbying and political contributions and expenditures.
We do not believe that requiring additional disclosure from these groups would be beneficial to our shareholders and believe the additional disclosures contemplateddisadvantage from more limited participation would far exceed any perceived advantage from more disclosure. In addition, even if we were to receive such reports from organizations, we do not have the ability to ensure that such reports are accurate prior to posting on our website. Inaccurate records could undermine the disclosure and subject Lilly to unnecessary risk without benefiting shareholders.
We believe that our current practices, as described above, provide sufficient transparency and accountability with respect to our political spending and the governance and oversight of that spending, and that restricting the organizations that may receive contributions to those that are willing or able to prepare the reports requested by this proposal only harms Lilly by excluding the proposal would provide meaningful additional information company from important public policy discussions that are critical

106


to shareholders to meritour business and restricting the resources required to provide the requested report.furtherance of our public policy agenda. For these reasons, we believe the proposal is not in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
Board Recommendation on Item 9
The board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.

Item 10. Proposal to Report Oversight of Risks Related to Anticompetitive Pricing Strategies
Trinity Health, 766 Brady Avenue, Apt. #635, Bronx, New York 10462, beneficial owner of shares of our common stock having a market value in excess of $2000, has submitted the following proposal:
RESOLVED that shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company (“Eli Lilly”) ask the board of directors to report to shareholders on how it oversees risks related to anticompetitive practices, including whether the full board or board committee has oversight responsibility, whether and how consideration of such risks is incorporated into board deliberations regarding strategy, and the board’s role in Eli Lilly’ s public policy activities related to such risks. The report should be prepared at reasonable expense and should omit confidential or proprietary information, as well as information about existing litigation and claims of which Eli Lilly has notice.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
The anticompetitive practices of companies within the pharmaceutical supply chain, including insulin manufacturers such as Eli Lilly, are receiving increasing scrutiny from the public, regulators, and enforcers. The criticism of Eli Lilly has focused on the company’s insulin pricing strategy, which has resulted in massive price hikes for everyday consumers.1
In response, regulators and legislators have increasingly focused on the pricing strategies of insulin manufacturers. In early 2021, the Senate Finance Committee issued a Staff Report on the rising cost of insulin, noting that Eli Lilly’s Humalog 50-50 Kwikpen had seen a 64% price increase between 2013 and 2017, and that insulin manufacturers had “aggressively raised the [wholesale acquisition cost] of their insulin products absent significant advances in the efficacy of the drugs.”2 Additionally, in response to high insulin prices, eight states (CO, IL, ME, NM, NY, UT, WA, WV) have capped the price of insulin within their jurisdiction and others are considering adopting similar policies.3
Separately, the company is facing a multitude of lawsuits around the pricing of its insulin products, including claims from various state attorney generals, class action lawsuits, and other market participants.4 The allegations include claims that Eli Lilly violated both state and federal RICO statutes, was unjustly enriched, and violated various state level consumer protection laws.5 The number and magnitude of lawsuits continues to mount, with the Mississippi Attorney General recently filing a lawsuit against Eli Lilly, alleging that the company colluded with other insulin manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers to artificially keep insulin prices high:6
Eli Lilly’s pricing strategies and the resulting mounting pressure on the company increase the likelihood of new regulation, increase risk for investors, and have a substantial impact on the public at large. Given the widespread concern and rapidly changing environment the company finds itself in, we believe that robust board oversight would improve Eli Lilly’s management of the risks related to its anticompetitive practices and that shareholders would benefit from more information about the board’s role.
Therefore, we urge Eli Lilly shareholders to vote FOR this proposal.
Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal to Report Oversight of Risks Related to Anticompetitive Pricing Strategies
The board, after review by its Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, recommends a vote against this proposal.
The proposal calls for the board to produce a report on how it oversees risks from alleged anticompetitive practices. The supporting statement makes reference to, among other things, competition-related lawsuits and regulatory investigations that relate to the pricing of insulin from several years ago.

1https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Grassley-Wyden%20lnsulin%20Report%20(FINAL%201).pdf.
2 Id.
3https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/states-are-trying-cap-price-insulin-pharmaceutical-companies-arepushing-n1236766
4See Eli Lilly and Company 2020 Form 10-K, at 108-109 (https://investor.lilly.com/static-files/e724cf2c-3a2e-4180-beaf-944ecd588323).
5Id.
6https://seekingalpha.com/news/3706905-eli-lilly-sanofi-and-novo-nordisk-sued-over-insulin-prices
78



The proposal is unnecessary because Lilly already provides shareholders information that can be used to assess the board’s oversight over risks from alleged anticompetitive practices, including relating to the pricing of its medicines. This proxy statement and the company’s environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) page of its website include extensive disclosures describing how the board actively oversees and approves Lilly’s strategy, approves significant management initiatives, and structures its board and board committee agendas to engage directors in informed reviews of strategic and forward-looking issues, and Lilly’s independent directors are deeply engaged in overseeing Lilly’s approach to drug pricing and access.
These materials disclose that under the active oversight from the board and its committees, Lilly devotes substantial time and resources to implementing industry-leading initiatives in furtherance of insulin affordability. While the proposal attempts to articulate alleged anticompetitive risks by relying on “wholesale acquisition cost” data from 2017, the fact is that through numerous affordability solutions, combined with insurance coverage, Lilly has lowered the average monthly out-of-pocket cost for a prescription of Lilly insulin (regardless of the number of vials or pens) by 42% since 2017, to $22.59. Today, with various affordability options now available, anyone is eligible to purchase their monthly prescription of Lilly insulin for $35, whether they are uninsured, use commercial insurance, or are enrolled in a participating Medicare Part D plan.
In the 2021 10-K, this proxy statement and board committee charters, we already publicly disclose risks regarding regulatory and pricing strategy and the mechanisms by which the board and its committees actively oversee such risks.
In our 2021 10-K, we already disclose that there continues to be considerable public and government scrutiny of pharmaceutical pricing, and that measures to address the perceived high cost of pharmaceuticals are being considered at
various levels of state and federal government. Our risk factors address drug pricing risk, noting that public and private payers continue to take steps to control expenditures for pharmaceuticals by placing restrictions on pricing and reimbursement for, and patient access to, our medications.
We already disclose to shareholders the mechanisms by which the board oversees such risks in this proxy statement and in our committee charters, which we make publicly available on our website. This proxy statement includes extensive information about how our independent directors are deeply engaged in key matters important to Lilly and our stakeholders, including oversight over the company’s approach to drug pricing and access. For example, the full board oversees the state of our compliance program and reviews key enterprise-level risks, and the Audit Committee oversees enterprise risk management processes and procedures.
The Audit Committee charter charges the Audit Committee with monitoring legal and regulatory requirements, Lilly’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and processes and procedures to identify and mitigate enterprise-level risks. The Ethics and Compliance Committee charter charges the Ethics and Compliance Committee with reviewing, identifying and, when appropriate, bringing to the board’s attention legal and regulatory trends and issues. The Ethics and Compliance Committee meets at least four times a year, including semi-annual private sessions with the company’s chief ethics and compliance officer, general auditor, and senior vice president, global quality. On an annual basis, the full board reviews the company’s overall state of compliance and the Ethics and Compliance Committee receives an update on compliance at each meeting. In addition, the Audit Committee and the Ethics and Compliance Committee meet jointly at least annually to review significant legal or regulatory compliance exposure and material reports or inquiries from regulators. Guided by this active oversight and as described in the next section, Lilly provides sufficient information to shareholders to assess that the company has already taken numerous industry-leading initiatives to promote drug affordability and access.
In this proxy statement and on the ESG page of our website, we already disclose how the board incorporates pricing decisions into its strategic considerations designed in furtherance of medicine accessibility.
This proxy statement discloses that the board actively oversees our corporate strategy and provides that each year the board and executive management closely examine the company’s strategy, including key risks and decisions facing the company.
The ESG page of our website describes that Lilly aims to strike a balance between access and affordability for patients while sustaining investments in life-changing treatments for some of today’s most serious diseases. When making pricing decisions, we use a value-based approach, taking into account the following:
Customer perspective – The unmet needs that medicines can fulfill for patients and caregivers and how people can affordably access the treatment;
Company considerations – The costs of research, development, manufacturing and support services for customers; business trends and other economic factors; as well as the medicine’s potential market size, patent life and place within our larger portfolio of medicines;
Competitive landscapeThe benefits of our medicine compared to alternative medicines, where our medicine fits in treating conditions and existing contracts between payers and our competitors;
Other external factors – Such as health system changes and policy guidelines.
As described in this proxy statement, under the active oversight of the board, we have taken substantial actions to address drug pricing and access concerns. For example, Lilly introduced two additional lower-priced versions of Humalog in January
79


2020 and added the Lilly Insulin Value Program to Lilly’s comprehensive suite of insulin affordability solutions in September 2020, which now enables customers with commercial insurance or no insurance to purchase their monthly prescription of all Lilly insulins for $35. In addition, in September 2021, Lilly announced that it would lower the list price of all Lilly’s non-branded insulins, including Insulin Lispro Injection, by an additional 40% in the U.S. That price reduction took effect January 1, 2022, effectively reducing the list price to 2008 levels. These examples, among others, demonstrate Lilly’s commitment to providing effective oversight over drug pricing and access.
In addition, for the last five years Lilly has published on the company’s website U.S. list price increases and net price decreases for certain Lilly products, as well as specific additional data for Humalog and Insulin Lispro. Our board approved this measure five years ago and Lilly was among the first companies to provide this information. In addition to other actions that actually lower the price of our drugs, such as those referenced above, we routinely disclose our drug price changes, in some cases several months in advance, to stakeholders and multiple state and federal agencies.
The board’s role in public policy assessments is disclosed on the Political Participation Website, stating our approach to overseeing current and emerging environmental, social, political, and governance trends and public policy issues that may affect business operations, including overseeing political activities.
As noted in this proxy statement and the Political Participation Website, as a biopharmaceutical company that develops treatments for serious diseases, we believe it is important for our company to be a responsible participant in global political and public policy debates. Our engagement in the political arena helps ensure that patients have access to needed medicines. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all our locations globally to offer Lilly’s perspective on the political environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines and a way to engage on issues specific to local business environments.
The Political Participation Website describes that the board exercises governance oversight of our political expenditures and lobbying activities ensuring our commitment to stewardship of corporate funds and risk minimization with respect to such activities. As discussed in the Political Participation Website, the board receives regular updates from our senior vice president, corporate affairs and communications regarding public policy issues and the company’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and receives semi-annual updates on political engagement, including information on the contributions made by our exclusively employee-led political action committee (LillyPAC) and the company, as well as trade association memberships. Lilly’s vice president, U.S. government affairs reviews and approves all corporate political contributions to ensure these contributions are consistent with the company’s guidelines and in accordance with applicable laws. Our general counsel and our chief financial officer, or their designees, also approve all corporate political contributions before they are made.
Therefore, the board already takes steps to oversee and mitigate the potential risks of public policy issues that may affect our business operations, including overseeing political activities.
Requiring Lilly to prepare a separate report with this information would place an undue administrative burden on the company and would not provide meaningful additional information to shareholders.
We do not believe the additional disclosures contemplated by the proposal would provide meaningful additional information to shareholders to merit the resources required to provide the requested report. For these reasons, we believe the proposal is not in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
Board Recommendation on Item 10
The board recommends that you vote
lly-20230224_g110.jpg
RECOMMENDATION AGAINST
The board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.
Other Information
Meeting and Voting Logistics
Quorum
A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, present or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting. As of February 21, 2023, 950,296,153 shares of company common stock were issued and outstanding.
Who Can Vote
Shareholders as of the close of business on February 21, 2023 (the record date) may vote or have their shares voted at the Annual Meeting. You have one vote for each share of common stock you held on the record date, including shares:
held directly in your name as the shareholder of record;
held for you in an account with a broker, bank, or other nominee; and
attributed to your account in the company’s 401(k) Plan.
Why You May Receive Multiple Notices, Proxy Materials, or Emails
If you received more than one notice, full set of proxy materials, or email related to proxy materials, you hold shares in more than one account. You will need to cast a vote for each notice, full set of proxy materials, or email you receive. If you do not receive a proxy card, you may have elected to receive your proxy statement electronically, in which case you should have received an email with directions on how to access this proxy statement and how to vote your shares. If you wish to request a paper copy of these materials and a proxy card, please call 1-800-579-1639 on or before April 17, 2023, to facilitate timely delivery.

107


Voting Choices
Voting MatterRequired VoteVoting OptionsEffect of AbstentionsBroker Discretionary Voting Allowed?Effect of Broker Non-Votes
Election of directorsMajority of votes castFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN (for each director nominee)No effect - not counted as a “vote cast”NoNo effect
Advisory vote on compensation paid to named executive officersMajority of votes castFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINNo effect - not counted as a “vote cast”NoNo effect
Advisory vote on frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation
Majority of votes cast1
1 YEAR, 2 YEARS, 3YEARS, ABSTAIN
No effect - not counted as a “vote cast”NoNo effect
Ratification of the appointment of the independent auditorMajority of votes castFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINNo effect - not counted as a “vote cast”YesNot applicable
Proposal to amend the company's articles of incorporation to eliminate the classified board structure80% of outstanding sharesFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINTreated as a vote AGAINST the proposalNoTreated as a vote AGAINST the proposal
Proposal to amend the company's articles of incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting provisions80% of outstanding sharesFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINTreated as a vote AGAINST the proposalNoTreated as a vote AGAINST the proposal
Shareholder ProposalsMajority of votes cast
FOR, AGAINST or
ABSTAIN (for each shareholder proposal)
No effect - not counted as a “vote cast”NoNo effect
1    If no frequency receives a majority of votes cast, then we will consider the option that receives the highest number of votes cast to be the frequency recommended by shareholders.
Additional Items of Business
We do not expect any items of business to be submitted to shareholders at the Annual Meeting other than the proposals referred to in this proxy statement. Nonetheless, if necessary, the persons named on the proxy have discretionary authority to vote the shares represented thereby with respect to any other matters that might be brought before the meeting. Those persons intend to vote on any such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
Voting
Vote Tabulation
Votes are tabulated by an independent inspector of election, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
List of Shareholders asof Record
A list of the closenames of business on February 22, 2022 (the record date) mayshareholders entitled to vote or have their shares voted at the Annual Meeting. You have one voteMeeting will be available to shareholders for each share of common stock you held onfive business days prior to the record date, including shares:
held directly in your name as the shareholder of record;
80


heldAnnual Meeting for you in an account with a broker, bank, or other nominee; and
attributedany purpose germane to your account in the company's 401(k) Plan.
We encourage you to vote by mail, by telephone, or online even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Shareholders who hold their shares inPlease contact us at shareholderproposals@lilly.com if you wish to examine the 401(k) Plan must vote by April 27, 2022 so the plan trustee can vote their shares accordingly. See
"—Voting Shares Held in the Company 401(k) Plan" for more information.
Required Vote
Below are the vote requirements for the various proposals:
The three nominees for director will be elected if the votes cast for the nominee exceed the votes cast against the nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as votes cast either for or against a nominee.
The following items of business will be approved if the votes cast for the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal:
an advisory approval of compensation paidlist prior to the named executive officers presented in this proxy statement;
ratification of the appointment of the independent auditor;
the proposal to amend the company’s articles of incorporation to give shareholders the ability to amend the bylaws;and
four shareholder proposals.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast either for or against these proposals. As discussed below in "Meeting and Voting Logistics—Voting Shares Held by a Broker," broker non-votes are not expected in connection with the ratification of the appointment of the independent auditor.
The proposals to amend the articles of incorporation to eliminate the classified board structure and to eliminate supermajority voting provisions require the vote of 80 percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock. For these items, abstentions and broker non-votes have the same effect as a vote against the proposals.
Quorum
A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, present or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting. AsThe shareholder list will also be available during the virtual Annual Meeting for examination by shareholders who access the Annual Meeting using their 16-digit control number at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2023.
The 2024 Annual Meeting
The company’s 2024 annual meeting of February 22, 2022, 952,347,126 shares of company common stock were issued and outstanding.shareholders is currently scheduled for May 6, 2024.
Voting by Shareholders of Record

If you are a shareholder of record, you108


How to Vote
You may vote by any one of the following methods:
Shareholders of RecordShares Held by a BrokerShares Held in the Company 401(k) Plan
laptopblue1a.jpglly-20230224_g35.gif
Online
Online. Vote online at ProxyVote.com.
The broker will ask you how you want your shares to be voted. You may instruct your broker or other nominee to vote your shares by following instructions that the broker or nominee provides to you. Most brokers offer voting by mail, by telephone, and online. You may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker or other nominee or, if your broker provides you with a 16-digit control number found on the voting instruction form for ProxyVote.com, by signing in with your 16-digit control number and voting at the Annual Meeting.
Vote online at ProxyVote.comProxyVote.com. Follow the instructions on your proxy card or notice. If you received these materials electronically, follow the instructions in the email message that notified you of their availability.
mobileblue76.jpglly-20230224_g36.gif
Telephone
By telephone. Call 1-800-690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the instructions provided.
Call 1-800-690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the instructions provided.
bymlblue76.jpglly-20230224_g37.gif
Mail
By mail. If you received or requested paper copies of your proxy materials, sign,Sign, date, and return each proxy card you receivereceived in the prepaid envelope.
Sign, date, and return the voting instruction form you received in the prepaid envelope.
lly-20230224_g38.gif
At the Meeting
Follow the instructions at
virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2023 to vote during the meeting
Plan shares cannot be voted at the meeting. The Trustee must receive your name exactly as it appears. Ifinstructions by one of the methods above by April 26, 2023.
Voting Deadline11:59 p.m. EDT on April 30, 2023, unless you are signing in a representative capacity (for example, as an attorney-in-fact, executor, administrator, guardian, trustee,voting at the meetingPlease refer to the information
provided by your broker, bank
or other nominee
11:59 p.m. EDT on April 26, 2023
We encourage you to vote by mail, by telephone, or online even if you plan to attend the officer or agent of a corporation or partnership), please indicate your name and your title or capacity. If the stock is held in custody for a minor (for example, under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act), the custodian should sign, not the minor. If the stock is held in joint ownership, one owner may sign on behalf of all owners. If you return your signed proxy but do not indicate your voting preferences, the proxy holder will vote on your behalf based upon the board’s recommendations.Annual Meeting.
YouGeneral: Follow the instructions on your proxy card, voting instruction form or notice. If you received these materials electronically, follow the instructions in the email message that notified you of their availability.
Signing your proxy card or voting instruction form: Sign your name exactly as it appears. If you are signing in a representative capacity (for example, as an attorney-in-fact, executor, administrator, guardian, trustee, or the officer or agent of a corporation or partnership), please indicate your name and your title or capacity. If the stock is held in custody for a minor (for example, under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act), the custodian should sign, not the minor. If the stock is held in joint ownership, one owner may sign on behalf of all owners. If you return your signed proxy but do not indicate your voting preferences, the proxy holder will vote on your behalf based upon the board’s recommendations.
Voting Deadlines:
Shareholders of record may vote yourtheir shares prior to the Annual Meeting until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 1, 2022April 30, 2023, by mail, online, or by telephone. If you are voting by mail, your marked, signed, and dated proxy card must be received by May 1, 2022. Shareholders of record may also opt to vote at the Annual Meeting, which will be held online via live webcast at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2022. See "—Attending the Annual Meeting" for more information on attending the Annual Meeting.
April 30, 2023. You have the right to change your vote or revoke your proxy before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by (i) timely notifying the General Counsel and Secretary in writing, (ii) timely delivering a later-dated proxy by mail, or (iii) timely casting a new vote online or by telephone. Shareholders of record may also revoke their proxies bytelephone, or (iv) voting at the Annual Meeting.
81


Shareholders who hold their shares in the 401(k) Plan must vote by 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 26, 2023 (mailed ballots must be received by the trustee by this time), so the plan trustee can vote the shares accordingly.
Voting Shares Held by a Broker
If yourShareholders whose shares are held by a broker should follow the broker will askinstructions and deadlines on your proxy card, voter instruction form or notice. If you howreceived these materials electronically, follow the

109


instructions in the email message that notified you want your shares to be voted. You may instruct your broker or other nominee to vote your shares by following instructions that the broker or nominee provides to you. Most brokers offer voting by mail, by telephone, and online.of their availability. You may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker or other nominee or by voting at the Annual Meeting.
Broker Non-Votes:If your shares are held through a broker and you give the broker instructions, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a "broker“broker non-vote." In these cases, the broker can register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum butand will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under NYSE rules. If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, your broker hasuse their discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of EY as the independent auditor for 2022, even if2023. However, the broker doeswill not receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker does not have discretionary authoritybe able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under NYSE rules, such as to vote on the election of directors, the advisory approval of executive compensation, the advisory approval on frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, or the shareholder or management proposals without instructions from you, in which case a broker non-vote will occur, and your shares will not be voted on these matters.
Additional Voting Shares HeldInformation for shares held in the Companycompany 401(k) Plan
You may instruct the plan trustee on how to vote yourPlan: If you hold shares in the company 401(k) Plan, online, by mail, or by telephone as described above in "Meeting and Voting Logistics—Voting by Shareholders of Record," except that if you vote by mail, the card you use will be a voting instruction form rather than a proxy card.
In addition, unless you decline, your vote will apply to a proportionate number of other shares held by participants in the 401(k) Plan for which voting directions are not received (except for a small number of shares from a prior stock ownership plan, which can be voted only on the directions of the participants to whose accounts the shares are credited).
All participants are named fiduciaries under the terms of the 401(k) Plan and under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) for the limited purpose of voting shares credited to their accounts and the portion of undirected shares to which their vote applies. Under ERISA, fiduciaries are required to act prudently in making voting decisions.
If you do not want to have your vote applied to the undirected shares, you must so indicate when you vote. Otherwise, the trustee will automatically apply your voting preferences to the undirected shares proportionally with all other participants who elected to have their votes applied in this manner.
If you do not vote online or by telephone by 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 27, 2022, or if your mailed ballot is not received by April 27, 2022,the deadline, your shares will be voted in accordance with instructions received from other plan participants who have elected to have their voting preferences applied proportionally to all shares for which voting instructions are not otherwise received. You will not be able to vote your shares personally at the Annual Meeting.
Multiple Notices, Proxy Materials, or Emails
If you received more than one notice, full set of proxy materials, or email related to proxy materials, you hold shares in more than one account. You will need to cast a vote for each notice, full set of proxy materials, or email you receive. If you do not receive a proxy card, you may have elected to receive your proxy statement electronically, in which case you should have received an email with directions on how to access this proxy statement and how to vote your shares. If you wish to request a paper copy of these materials and a proxy card, please call 1-800-579-1639 on or before April 18, 2022 to facilitate timely delivery.
Vote Tabulation
Votes are tabulated by an independent inspector of election, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Attending the Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting will be held on Monday, May 2, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. EDT, and allWho: All shareholders as of close of business on February 22, 202221, 2023 are entitled to participate.
The Annual MeetingWhen: Monday, May 1, 2023, starting at 8:30 a.m. EDT and ending at or before 9:15 a.m. EDT. Following the formal meeting and after agenda items are addressed there will be held virtually via live webcast.an opportunity for shareholder questions.
Although you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting at a physical location, we have designed the Annual Meeting live webcast to provide shareholders the opportunity to participate virtually to facilitate shareholder attendance and provide a consistent experience to all shareholders, regardless of location.
Where: The live webcast of the Annual Meeting can be accessed by shareholders on the day of the meeting at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2022 and will begin promptly at 11:00 a.m. EDT.LLY2023. To attend the Annual Meeting, you will need to log in to virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2022LLY2023 using the 16-digit control number found on the proxy card, voting instruction form, or notice you previously received. This website can be accessed on a computer, tablet, or phone with internet connection. Online access to the webcast will open 15 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting to allow time to log in and test your device’s audio system. We encourage you to access the meeting in advance of the designated start time.
82


Although you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting at a physical location, we have designed the Annual Meeting live webcast to provide shareholders the opportunity to participate virtually to facilitate shareholder attendance and provide a consistent experience to all shareholders, regardless of location.
Asking Questions: To submit questions in advance of the Annual Meeting, visit ProxyVote.com before May 2, 20221, 2023, and enter your 16-digit control number. During the meeting, if you wish to submit a question, log into the virtual meeting website at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2022LLY2023, click on "Q“Q&A," type your question into the "Submit“Submit a Question"Question” field, and click "Submit."“Submit.” In order to provide an opportunity to as many shareholders as possible who wish to ask a question, each shareholder will be limited to one question. Shareholders may ask a second question if all other shareholders have had an opportunity to ask a question and if time allows. The Annual Meeting is scheduled to begin at 11:00 a.m. EDT and end at 11:45 a.m. EDT, and time remaining after agenda items are addressed will be available for shareholder questions. We will endeavor to answer as many questions submitted by shareholders as time permits. We reserve the right to edit

110


profanity or other inappropriate language, to simplify language and to exclude questions regarding topics that are not pertinent to meeting matters or company business. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition. ResponsesAs appropriate, responses to questions relevant to meeting matters that we do not have time to respond to duringby the meeting9:15 a.m. EDT end time will be posted to our website following the meeting. Questions regarding topics that are not pertinent to meeting matters or company business will not be answered.
Technical Assistance: Support staff will be available on the meeting day should you experience any technical difficulties in accessing the virtual meeting. Instructions for requesting technical assistance will be available atvirtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2022.
List of Shareholders of Record
A list of the names of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available to shareholders for five business days prior to the Annual Meeting for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting. Please contact us at shareholderproposals@lilly.com if you wish to examine the list prior to the Annual Meeting. The shareholder list will also be available during the virtual Annual Meeting for examination by shareholders who access the Annual Meeting using their 16-digit control number at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LLY2022.
The 2023 Annual Meeting
The company’s 2023 annual meeting of shareholders is currently scheduled for May 1, 2023.LLY2023.
Other Matters
Notice and Access
We distribute proxy materials to many shareholders via the internet under the SEC’s "Notice“Notice and Access"Access” rules to reduce production and mailing costs and to help preserve environmental resources. Using this method of distribution, on or about March 18, 2022,17, 2023, we mailed the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials that contains basic information about the Annual Meeting and instructions on how to view all proxy materials and vote. If you receive the notice and prefer to receive proxy materials by regular mail or email, follow the instructions in the notice for making this request, and the materials will be sent promptly to you via the preferred method. If you prefer to vote by phone rather than online, the website listed on the notice (ProxyVote.com) has instructions for voting by phone.
Householding
We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called "householding."“householding.” Under the householding procedure, certain shareholders, whether they own registered shares or shares in street name, who have the same address and who receive either notices or paper copies of the proxy materials in the mail will receive only one copy of our proxy materials, or a single notice, for all shareholders at that address, unless one or more of the shareholders at that address has previously notified us that they want to receive separate copies. Each 401(k) Plan participant will continue to receive a copy of all of the proxy materials. Regardless of how you own your shares, if you received a single set of proxy materials as a result of householding, and one or more shareholders at your address would like to have separate copies of these materials with respect to the Annual Meeting or in the future, or if you would like to request that only a single set of proxy materials be sent to the household, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., at 1-866-540-7095 or 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
Other Information Regarding the Company’s Proxy Solicitation
The board is soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. We will pay all expenses in connection with our solicitation of proxies. We will pay brokers, nominees, fiduciaries, or other custodians their reasonable expenses for sending proxy material to and obtaining instructions from persons for whom they hold stock of the company. We expect to solicit proxies primarily by mail and email, but directors, officers, and other employees of the company may also solicit in person or by telephone, fax, or email. We have retained Georgeson LLC to assist in the distribution and solicitation of proxies. Georgeson may solicit proxies by personal interview, telephone, fax, mail, and email. We expect that the fee for those services will not exceed $17,500 plus reimbursement of customary out-of-pocket expenses.
Corporate Governance Materials
The company’s main corporate website address is lilly.com. We also make available through our investor relations website, free of charge, our company filings with the SEC as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with, or furnish them to, the SEC. The reports we make available include annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form
83


10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, registration statements, and any amendments to those documents. The website link to our SEC filings is investor.lilly.com/sec.cfm. This proxy statement and the annual report to shareholders are also available at ProxyVote.com as well as on our website at lilly.com/policies-reports/annual-report, and the articles of incorporation, bylaws, and all committee charters are available online at lilly.com/leadership/governance. Certain documents and information referenced in this proxy statement are available on our website. However, except as otherwise expressly provided in this proxy statement, we are not including the information contained on our website, or any information that may

111


be accessed by links on our website, as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this proxy statement.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Ms. Anat Hakim
SeniorExecutive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
March 18, 202217, 2023






Voluntary Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials
Help us Reduce Environmental WasteHow to Enroll
We encourage shareholders to voluntarily elect to receive future proxy materials and annual reports electronically to help contribute to our sustainability efforts.
The benefits include:
you receive immediate and convenient access to the materials,
you can help reduce our impact on the environment, and
you can help reduce our printing and mailing costs.
Shareholders of Record
Internetwww.proxyvote.com under the “Delivery Settings” tab
Telephone1-800-690-6903 and follow the instructions provided
EmailSend a blank email with your control number in the subject line to: sendmaterial@proxyvote.com
Shares Held by Broker
ContactContact your bank, broker or other nominee

84
112



Appendix A - Summary of Adjustments Related to the Annual Cash Bonus and Performance Award
Consistent with past practice, the Talent and Compensation Committee adjusted the reported financial results on which the 20212022 annual cash bonus and the 2020-20222021-2023 performance awards were determined to eliminate the distorting effect of certain unusual items on incentive compensation performance measures. The adjustments arewere intended to:
align award payments with the underlying performance of the core business
avoid volatile, artificial inflation or deflation of awards due to unusual items during any year in the performance period, and, where relevant, the previous (comparator) year
eliminate certain counterproductive short-term incentives—for example, incentives to refrain from acquiring new technologies, to defer disposing of underutilized assets, or to defer settling legacy legal proceedings to protect current bonus payments
facilitate comparisons with peer companies.
To ensure the integrity of the adjustments, the Talent and Compensation Committee establishesreviews and approves adjustment guidelines in the first 90 days of the performance period.at least annually. These guidelines are generally consistent with the company guidelines for reporting non-GAAP financial measures to the investment community, which are reviewed by the Audit Committee. The adjustments apply equally to income and expense items. The Talent and Compensation Committee reviews all adjustments and retains downward discretion i.e.(i.e., discretion to reduce compensation below the amounts that are yielded by the adjustment guidelines.guidelines).
Adjustments for 20212022 Bonus Plan
For 20212022 bonus calculations, the Talent and Compensation Committee made the following adjustments to reported EPS consistent with our external reporting of non-GAAP financial measures:
Eliminated the impact of the charges recognized for acquired in-process research and development
Eliminated the impact of amortization of intangible assets
Eliminated the impact of a charge related to the repurchase of higher-cost debt
Eliminated the impact of asset impairments, restructuring, and other special charges
Eliminated the impact of COVID-19 antibodies inventory charges that were recognized primarily due to changes in forecasted demand from U.S. and international governments
Eliminated the impact of net gains and losses on investments in equity securities
In addition to the adjustments consistent with our reporting of non-GAAP financial measures, the Talent and Compensation Committee made the following adjustment:adjustments:
Eliminated the impact of acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D) and development milestone charges. When the Talent and Compensation Committee set 20212022 bonus targets, the revenueEarnings Per Share (EPS) target included estimated development milestone charges but did not include estimated acquired IPR&D charges for potential business development transactions. Concurrent with the company’s changes to the presentation of acquired IPR&D and development milestone charges for purposes of non-GAAP EPS measures, the Talent and Compensation Committee subsequently adopted a policy to eliminate acquired IPR&D and development milestone charges from EPS for compensation purposes. To avoid eliminating charges that were included in the EPS target, the eliminated acquired IPR&D and development milestone charges were adjusted by the development milestone charges in the EPS target.
Eliminated the Revenue and EPS goal did not contemplate estimated savings from certain discreteimpacts of foreign exchange rates in excess of a pre-determined tolerable ranges that were approved by the Talent and unplanned performance items. The Compensation Committee reduced revenueat the beginning of the year.
The company’s 2022 financial results include a favorable impact related to implementation of the provision of the 2017 Tax Act that requires capitalization and non-GAAPamortization of research and development expenses for tax purposes. When the Talent and Compensation Committee set 2022 bonus targets, the EPS target included an assumption that this provision of the 2017 Tax Act would be deferred or repealed by Congress effective for 2022. The year ended without a deferral or repeal of the provision by Congress, resulting in lower tax expense for the company. The Talent and Compensation Committee eliminated the beneficial EPS impact associated with this item for the purposes of the bonus calculation to exclude the savings from these items.calculation.

A-1


A reconciliation of adjustments to our reported revenue is below:
20212022
Revenue as reported$28,318.428,541.4
Adjustment for estimated savings from certain discrete and unplanned performance itemsForeign exchange rate impact in excess of pre-determined tolerable range(180.8)240.2 
Adjusted revenue$28,137.628,781.6
85


A reconciliation of adjustments to our reported EPS is below:
20212022
EPS as reported$6.126.90
Acquired in-process research and development charges0.77
Amortization of intangible assets0.530.50
Charge related to repurchase of higher-cost debt0.35
Asset impairments, restructuring, and other special charges0.280.21
COVID-19 antibodies inventory charges0.25
Net gainslosses on investments in equity securities(0.16)0.33
Non-GAAP EPS$8.167.94
Adjustment for estimated savings from certain discreteAcquired IPR&D and unplanned performance itemsdevelopment milestone charges ($0.90), net of development milestone charges in EPS target ($0.13)(0.16)0.77
Foreign exchange rate impact in excess of pre-determined tolerable range0.17
Tax legislation impact(0.33)
Adjusted Non-GAAP EPS for purposes of annual cash bonus$8.008.55
*Numbers may not add due to rounding

Adjustments for 2020-20222021-2023 Performance Award
For the 2020-20222021-2023 performance award payout calculations, the Talent and Compensation Committee made the following adjustments to reported EPS consistent with our reporting of non-GAAP financial measures:
2019: Eliminated Elanco discontinued operations
2022, 2021, 2020, and 2019: Eliminated the impact of charges recognized for acquired in-process research and development
2021, 2020, and 2019:2020: Eliminated the impact of amortization of intangible assets
2022, 2021, and 2019: Eliminated the impact of charges related to the repurchase of debt
2021, 2020, and 2019:2020: Eliminated the impact of asset impairments, restructuring, and other special charges
2022, 2021, and 2020: Eliminated the impact of net gains and losses on investments in equity securities
2021: Eliminated the impact of charge related to the repurchase of debt
2021: Eliminated the impact of COVID-19 antibodies inventory charges that were recognized primarily due to changes in forecasted demand from U.S. and international governments
In addition to the adjustments consistent with our reporting of non-GAAP financial measures, the Talent and Compensation Committee made the following adjustment:
2022, 2021, 2020, and 2019:2020: Eliminated the impact of net gains on investments in equity securities
2019: Eliminated the impact of the gain on sale of the China antibiotics business
2019: Eliminated the impact of Lartruvo charges
2019: Eliminated the impact of reduced shares outstanding from the Elanco exchange offer
2019: Eliminated the impact of certain income tax items recognized for acquired IPR&D and development milestone charges
86A-2



A reconciliation of adjustments to our reported EPS is below:
20212020% Growth
2021 vs. 2020
2019% Growth 2020 vs. 201920222021% Growth
2022 vs. 2021
2020% Growth 2021 vs. 2020
EPS as reportedEPS as reported$6.12$6.79(9.9)%$8.89(23.6)%EPS as reported$6.90$6.1212.7 %$6.79(9.9)%
Elanco discontinued operations(3.93)Amortization of intangible assets0.500.530.36
EPS as reported from continuing operations6.126.794.96Asset impairment, restructuring, and other
special charges
0.210.280.14
Acquired in-process research and development charges0.770.640.21
Net losses (gains) on investments in equity securities(a)
0.33(0.16)(1.15)
Amortization of intangible assets0.530.360.18Charge related to repurchase of debt0.35
Charge related to repurchase of debt0.350.22COVID-19 antibodies inventory charges0.25
Non-GAAP EPSNon-GAAP EPS7.947.396.14
Asset impairment, restructuring, and other
special charges
0.280.140.58
Acquired IPR&D and development milestone charges(b)
0.900.860.75
COVID-19 antibodies inventory charges0.25
Net gains on investments in equity securities(a)
(0.16)(1.15)(0.31)
Gain on sale of China antibiotics business(0.26)
Lartruvo charges0.14
Impact of reduced shares outstanding for non-GAAP reporting(b)
0.07
Impact of certain tax items(c)
(0.05)
Non-GAAP EPS$8.16$6.7820.4 %$5.7318.3 %
Adjusted Non-GAAP EPS for purposes of performance awardsAdjusted Non-GAAP EPS for purposes of performance awards$8.84$8.257.2 %$6.8919.7 %
*Numbers may not add due to rounding

(a) In 2021, the company began excluding gains and losses on investments in equity securities from non-GAAP measures. Prior to 2021, theThe Talent and Compensation Committee made a $0.98 adjustment to 2020 non-GAAP EPS to offset the impact of the net gains on investments in equity securities on EPS results in an amount that significantly exceeded the expected net gains on investments originally included in the EPS plan during 2020. For the 2020-2021 performance award, the Compensation Committee adjusted the 2019 base-year results to which the expected industry growth rates are applied to derive the two-year cumulative EPS goals and recast 2020 non-GAAP EPS to be consistent with the 2021 non-GAAP EPS treatment of gains and losses on investments in equity securities. Those adjusted 2020 and 2019 results are presented in this table for comparability.
(b) In 2022, the company began excluding acquired in process research development milestone charges from Adjusted Non-GAAP EPS assume thatfor purposes of the dispositionperformance awards. For the 2021-2022 performance award, the Talent and Compensation Committee adjusted the 2020 base-year results to which the expected industry growth rates are applied to derive the two-year cumulative EPS goals and recast 2021 Adjusted Non-GAAP EPS to be consistent with the 2022 Adjusted Non-GAAP EPS treatment of Elanco occurred at the beginning of 2019development milestone charges. Those adjusted 2021 and therefore, exclude the approximately 65.0 million shares of Lilly common stock retired2020 results are presented in the Elanco exchange offer.this table for comparability.
(c) Amount relates to a tax benefit from a capital loss on the disposition of subsidiary stock.


87A-3



Appendix B - Proposed Amendments to the Company'sCompany’s Articles of Incorporation
Proposed changes to the company’s articles of incorporation are shown below related to Items 45 and 5, "Items of Business."6. The changes shown to Article 9(b) will be effective if Item 4, "Proposal5, “Proposal to Amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to Eliminate the Classified Board Structure," receives the vote of at least 80 percent of the outstanding shares. The changes to Articles 9(c), 9(d), and 13 will be effective if Item 5, "Proposal6, “Proposal to Amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to Eliminate Supermajority Voting Provisions," receives the vote of at least 80 percent of the outstanding shares. Additions are indicated by underlining and deletions are indicated by strike-outs. The full text of the company’s Articles of Incorporation can be found on our website at lilly.com/leadership/governance.


9. The following provisions are inserted for the management of the business and for the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation, and it is expressly provided that the same are intended to be in furtherance and not in limitation or exclusion of the powers conferred by statute:
(a)    The number of directors of the Corporation, exclusive of directors who may be elected by the holders of any one or more series of Preferred Stock pursuant to Article 7(b) (the “Preferred Stock Directors”), shall not be less than nine, the exact number to be fixed from time to time solely by resolution of the Board of Directors, acting by not less than a majority of the directors then in office.
(b)    Prior to the 2023 annual meeting of directors, Tthe Board of Directors (exclusive of Preferred Stock Directors) shall be divided into three classes, with the term of office of one class expiring each year. At the annual meeting of shareholders in 1985, five directors of the first class shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 1986 annual meeting, five directors of the second class shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 1987 annual meeting, and six directors of the third class shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 1988 annual meeting. Commencing with the annual meeting of shareholders in 19862023, each class of directors whose term shall then expire shall be elected to hold office for a threeone-year term expiring at the next annual meeting of shareholders. In the case of any vacancy on the Board of Directors, including a vacancy created by an increase in the number of Ddirectors, the vacancy shall be filled by election of the Board of Directors with the director so elected to serve for the remainder of the term of the director being replaced or, in the case of an additional director, for the remainder of the term of the class to which the director has been assigned until the next annual meeting of shareholders. All directors shall continue in office until the election and qualification of their respective successors in office. When the number of directors is changed, any newly created directorships or any decrease in directorships shall be so assigned among the classes by a majority of the directors then in office, though less than a quorum, as to make all classes as nearly equal in number as possible. No decrease in the number of directors shall have the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent director. Election of directors need not be by written ballot unless the By-laws so provide.
(c)    Any director or directors (exclusive of Preferred Stock Directors) may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of at least 80%a majority of the votes entitled to be castby holders of all the outstanding shares of Voting Stock (as defined in Article 13 hereof), voting together as a single class.
(d)    Notwithstanding any other provision of these Amended Articles of Incorporation or of law which might otherwise permit a lesser vote or no vote, but in addition to any affirmative vote of the holders of any particular class of Voting Stock required by law or these Amended Articles of Incorporation, the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of all the outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal this Article 9.


13. In addition to all other requirements imposed by law and these Amended Articles and except as otherwise expressly provided in paragraph (c) of this Article 13, none of the actions or transactions listed below shall be effected by the Corporation, or approved by the Corporation as a shareholder of any majority-owned subsidiary of the Corporation if, as of the record date for the determination of the shareholders entitled to vote thereon, any Related Person (as hereinafter defined) exists, unless the applicable requirements of paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) of this Article 13 are satisfied.
B-1


(a)    The actions or transactions within the scope of this Article 13 are as follows:
(i)    any merger or consolidation of the Corporation or any of its the Corporation’s subsidiaries into or with such Related Person;
(ii)    any sale, lease, exchange, or other disposition of all or any substantial part of the assets of the Corporation or any of itsthe Corporation’s majority-owned subsidiaries to or with such Related Person;
(iii)    the issuance or delivery of any Voting Stock (as hereinafter defined) or of voting securities of any of the Corporation’s majority-owned subsidiaries to such Related Person in exchange for cash, other assets or securities, or a combination thereof;
88


(iv)     any voluntary dissolution or liquidation of the Corporation;
(iv)    any reclassification of securities (including any reverse stock split), or recapitalization of the Corporation, or any merger or consolidation of the Corporation with any of its subsidiaries, or any other transaction (whether or not with or otherwise involving a Related Person) that has the effect, directly or indirectly, of increasing the proportionate share of any class or series of capital stock of the Corporation, or any securities convertible into capital stock of the Corporation or into equity securities of any subsidiary, that is beneficially owned by any Related Person; or
(vi)    any agreement, contract, or other arrangement providing for any one or more of the actions specified in the foregoing clauses (i) through (iv).
(b)    The actions and transactions described in paragraph (a) of this Article 13 shall have been authorized by the affirmative vote of at least 80% of all a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of all the outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class.
(c)    Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of this Article 13, the 80% voting special shareholder approval requirement set forth in paragraph (b) shall not be applicable if any action or transaction specified in paragraph (a) is approved by the Corporation’s Board of Directors and by a majority of the Continuing Directors (as hereinafter defined).
(d)    Unless approved by a majority of the Continuing Directors, after becoming a Related Person and prior to consummation of such action or transaction.:
(i)    the Related Person shall not have acquired from the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries any newly issued or treasury shares of capital stock or any newly issued securities convertible into capital stock of the Corporation or any of its majority-owned subsidiaries, directly or indirectly (except upon conversion of convertible securities acquired by it prior to becoming a Related Person or as a result of a pro rata stock dividend or stock split or other distribution of stock to all shareholders pro rata);
(ii)    such Related Person shall not have received the benefit, directly or indirectly (except proportionately as a shareholder), of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges, or other financial assistance or tax credits provided by the Corporation or any of its majority-owned subsidiaries, or made any major changes in the Corporation’s or any of its majority-owned subsidiaries’ businesses or capital structures or reduced the current rate of dividends payable on the Corporation’s capital stock below the rate in effect immediately prior to the time such Related Person became a Related Person; and
(iii)    such Related Person shall have taken all required actions within its power to ensure that the Corporation’s Board of Directors included representation by Continuing Directors at least proportionate to the voting power of the shareholdings of Voting Stock of the Corporation’s Remaining Public Shareholders (as hereinafter defined), with a Continuing Director to occupy an additional Board position if a fractional right to a director results and, in any event, with at least one Continuing Director to serve on the Board so long as there are any Remaining Public Shareholders.
(e)    A proxy statement responsive to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether or not the Corporation is then subject to such requirements, shall be mailed
B-2


to the shareholders of the Corporation for the purpose of soliciting shareholder approval of such action or transaction and shall contain at the front thereof, in a prominent place, any recommendations as to the advisability or inadvisability of the action or transaction which the Continuing Directors may choose to state and, if deemed advisable by a majority of the Continuing Directors, the opinion of an investment banking firm selected by a majority of the Continuing Directors as to the fairness (or not) of the terms of the action or transaction from a financial point of view to the Remaining Public Shareholders, such investment banking firm to be paid a reasonable fee for its services by the Corporation. The requirements of this paragraph (e) shall not apply to any such action or transaction which is approved by a majority of the Continuing Directors.
(f)    For the purpose of this Article 13:
(i)    the term “Related Person” shall mean any other corporation, person, or entity which beneficially owns or controls, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the outstanding shares of Voting Stock, and any Affiliate or Associate (as those terms are defined in the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of a Related Person; provided, however, that the term Related Person shall not include (a) the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, (b) any profit-sharing, employee stock ownership or other employee benefit plan of the Corporation or any subsidiary of the Corporation or any trustee of or fiduciary with respect to any such plan when acting in such capacity, or (c) Lilly Endowment, Inc.; and furtherprovided, that no corporation, person, or entity shall be deemed to be a Related Person solely by reason of being an Affiliate or Associate of Lilly Endowment, Inc.;
(ii)    a Related Person shall be deemed to own or control, directly or indirectly, any outstanding shares of Voting Stock owned by it or any Affiliate or Associate of record or beneficially, including, without limitation, shares
89


a.    which it has the right to acquire pursuant to any agreement, or upon exercise of conversion rights, warrants, or options, or otherwise; or
b.    which are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly (including shares deemed owned through application of clause a. above), by any other corporation, person, or other entity with which it or its Affiliate or Associate has any agreement, arrangement, or understanding for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting, or disposing of Voting Stock, or which is its Affiliate (other than the Corporation) or Associate (other than the Corporation);
(iii)    the term “Voting Stock” shall mean all shares of any class of capital stock of the Corporation which are entitled to vote generally in the election of directors;
(iv)    the term “Continuing Director” shall mean a director who is not an Affiliate or Associate or representative of a Related Person and who was a member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation immediately prior to the time that any Related Person involved in the proposed action or transaction became a Related Person or a director who is not an Affiliate or Associate or representative of a Related Person and who was nominated by a majority of the remaining Continuing Directors; and
(v)    the term “Remaining Public Shareholders” shall mean the holders of the Corporation’s capital stock other than the Related Person.
(g)    A majority of the Continuing Directors of the Corporation shall have the power and duty to determine for the purposes of this Article 13, on the basis of information then known to the Continuing Directors, whether (i) any Related Person exists or is an Affiliate or an Associate of another and (ii) any proposed sale, lease, exchange, or other disposition of part of the assets of the Corporation or any majority-owned subsidiary involves a substantial part of the assets of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries. Any such determination by the Continuing Directors shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes.
(h)    Nothing contained in this Article 13 shall be construed to relieve any Related Person or any Affiliate or Associate of any Related Person from any fiduciary obligation imposed by law.
(i)    The fact that any action or transaction complies with the provisions of this Article 13 shall
B-3


not be construed to waive or satisfy any other requirement of law or these Amended Articles of Incorporation or to impose any fiduciary duty, obligation, or responsibility on the Board of Directors or any member thereof, to approve such action or transaction or recommend its adoption or approval to the shareholders of the Corporation, nor shall such compliance limit, prohibit, or otherwise restrict in any manner the Board of Directors, or any member thereof, with respect to evaluations of or actions and responses taken with respect to such action or transaction. The Board of Directors of the Corporation, when evaluating any actions or transactions described in paragraph (a) of this Article 13, shall, in connection with the exercise of its judgment in determining what is in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders, give due consideration to all relevant factors, including, without limitation, the social and economic effects on the employees, customers, suppliers, and other constituents of the Corporation and its subsidiaries and on the communities in which the Corporation and its subsidiaries operate or are located.
(j)Notwithstanding any other provision of these Amended Articles of Incorporation or of law which might otherwise permit a lesser vote or no vote, but in addition to any affirmative vote of the holders of any particular class of Voting Stock required by law or these Amended Articles of Incorporation, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of all the outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend, or repeal this Article 13.


90B-4



Appendix C - Proposed Amendments to the Company's Articles of Incorporation
Proposed changes to the company’s articles of incorporation are shown below related to Item 6, "Items of Business." The changes shown to Article 10 will be effective if the votes cast in favor of Item 6, "Proposal to Amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to Give Shareholders the Ability to Amend the Company's Bylaws," exceeds the votes cast against this proposal. Additions are indicated by underlining and deletions are indicated by strike-outs. The full text of the company’s Articles of Incorporation can be found on our website at lilly.com/leadership/governance.


10. The Board of Directors Subject to any express provision of the Indiana BusinessCorporation is exclusively authorized (a) to adopt, repeal, alter or amendLaw, the By-laws of the Corporation may be adopted, repealed, altered or amended by either (i) the Board of Directors of the Corporation by the vote of a majority of the entire Board of Directors and, or (bii) toadopt any By-laws which the Board of Directors may deem necessary or desirable for the efficient conduct of the affairs of the Corporation, including, without limitation, provisions governing the conduct of, and the matters which may properly be brought before, meetings of the shareholders and provisions specifying the manner and extent to which prior notice shall be giventhe affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of all the submission of proposals to be submitted at anyoutstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class at a duly called and constituted meeting of shareholders or of nominations of elections of directors to be held at any such meeting.lly-20230224_g112.jpg
91







proxycard1a.jpg
92PC-1



proxycard2a.jpg
lly-20230224_g113.jpg
93PC-2



proxycard3a.jpglly-20230224_g114.jpg
94PC-3



proxycard4a.jpglly-20230224_g115.jpg
95PC-4